jtpr312
Senior Member
- Sep 29, 2012
- 2,100
- 253
Bring it up to date. I blame the us, the American people not just the Republican party for allowing that Amendment to remain an archaic part of the constitution, and all for votes and money. We will never stop violence nor the nuts in America but that does not mean we should stop trying. And for America to make it so easy for the nuts to get the means to kill children wholesale is unbelievable.
The Court is not the answer they are just robed politicians with a great job. If one reads the second amendment it sounds like something from the dark ages. That period has long passed. Our militias are now part of the nut groups.
Funny enough, it's been in nations that had the most stringent gun contol laws in modern history that had the highest rates of murdered children in modern history. China, the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany to pick three. Untold millions of children murdered by the very people that enacted and enforced those stringent gun control laws. I don't know about you slick, but I don't trust the leaders in this nation that much. I don't see them being any different or any less capable of committing mass atrocities than the men who led in China, the Soviet Union or Nazi Germany, and I for one will not submit to alowing them to be the only ones armed. Our Founders put the 2nd Amerndment in the Constituion not to protect us from the occasional car jacker, rapist or armed robber, but to protect us from leaders like they have/had in Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union and China.
Once the government starts manufacturing ways to kill the children, they can use that to persuade the people to agree to almost anything. What's the deaths of 20 children compared to the number of dead children China, the Soviet Union, Nazi Germany, Iran, or any other totalitarian nation created? It's nothing. If liberals could use 20 children to disarm the people that's a pittance. They are prepared to murder millions if necessary to create the liberal utopia they intend to create.
They already condone and support the murder of over a 1,000,000 innocent lives a year in the womb for nothing but the sake of convienance. Their hypocrisy never ceases to amaze me. They wail and cry over 20, yet vociferiously spew that woman should have the right to kill over 1,000,000 a year because they're inconvienant. Stalin said 1 death is a tragedy, 1,000,000 a statistic, seems like the American socialist thinks up to 20 can be a tragedy.