Gee, could it possibly be that black Police officers, the black Police Chief, the black District Attorney and the black Mayor were simply trying to fight crime in a black neighborhood and there was no racism or brutality against blacks intended?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How can a black man be racists against another black man?It was about police brutality, who duped you? The ones making it about race are paid hucksters and provocateurs...No it is not fine. All that are racists should be addressed in the manner that truly depicts their philosophy....So you judge an entire race by the actions of a few of the race..Well then, you must hate every race....
Let me see if I understand how this works, Moon...it's fine for the liberal media to paint whites as racists because of the actions of a few...but it's totally awful if someone judges blacks by the actions of a few?
To me truth is more important than projection......
So explain to me how the riots in Baltimore were a "racist" issue?
So black leaders are claiming "Police Brutality" on blacks took place in Baltimore...when the officers involved were mostly black...the Chief of Police was black...the District Attorney was black...the Mayor was black...the Attorney General was black and the President of the United States was black?
Actually, intelligent folk have no problem whatsoever with the meaning of the post...apparently you do...Your attempt at logic and factual debate...
![]()
So, no chance you would actually say what you are disagreeing with, you know, with words and points that could be responded to?
Guess that is not the way you roll...
GOt it. Insult.
I note you still have not explained what part of my post, or which specific point you disagree with, and of course, no actual attempt to support your disagreement.
Lets try it one point at a time.
DO you think any mention of a racial issue is "playing the race card"?
Stop begging people to answer you bullshit logic and loaded questions. All you do is ask people "what are ya chicken?" to make sense of your non sense
LIar.
YOu said the op was playing the race card.
I disagreed.
Can you support your claim in any way, or is that me asking a "loaded question"?
No, Cause the guy died from injuries from not being restrained properly after arrest....and the questionable stop by the van in a location where the van has no authorization to be parked at.....The driver is the juan being charged with man slaughter....Gee, could it possibly be that black Police officers, the black Police Chief, the black District Attorney and the black Mayor were simply trying to fight crime in a black neighborhood and there was no racism or brutality against blacks intended?
Actually, intelligent folk have no problem whatsoever with the meaning of the post...apparently you do...So, no chance you would actually say what you are disagreeing with, you know, with words and points that could be responded to?
Guess that is not the way you roll...
GOt it. Insult.
I note you still have not explained what part of my post, or which specific point you disagree with, and of course, no actual attempt to support your disagreement.
Lets try it one point at a time.
DO you think any mention of a racial issue is "playing the race card"?
Stop begging people to answer you bullshit logic and loaded questions. All you do is ask people "what are ya chicken?" to make sense of your non sense
LIar.
YOu said the op was playing the race card.
I disagreed.
Can you support your claim in any way, or is that me asking a "loaded question"?
Sure, the OP assumed that the fight had something to do with white lives and not just an act of violence.
Here's where you get all confused by my one sentence reply
Actually, intelligent folk have no problem whatsoever with the meaning of the post...apparently you do...
GOt it. Insult.
I note you still have not explained what part of my post, or which specific point you disagree with, and of course, no actual attempt to support your disagreement.
Lets try it one point at a time.
DO you think any mention of a racial issue is "playing the race card"?
Stop begging people to answer you bullshit logic and loaded questions. All you do is ask people "what are ya chicken?" to make sense of your non sense
LIar.
YOu said the op was playing the race card.
I disagreed.
Can you support your claim in any way, or is that me asking a "loaded question"?
Sure, the OP assumed that the fight had something to do with white lives and not just an act of violence.
Here's where you get all confused by my one sentence reply
A riot that started after a hip hop concern? 40 black guys vs one white guy?
Race seems to be a reasonable assumption for a motive.
GOt it. Insult.
I note you still have not explained what part of my post, or which specific point you disagree with, and of course, no actual attempt to support your disagreement.
Lets try it one point at a time.
DO you think any mention of a racial issue is "playing the race card"?
Stop begging people to answer you bullshit logic and loaded questions. All you do is ask people "what are ya chicken?" to make sense of your non sense
LIar.
YOu said the op was playing the race card.
I disagreed.
Can you support your claim in any way, or is that me asking a "loaded question"?
Sure, the OP assumed that the fight had something to do with white lives and not just an act of violence.
Here's where you get all confused by my one sentence reply
A riot that started after a hip hop concern? 40 black guys vs one white guy?
Race seems to be a reasonable assumption for a motive.
Your assumption means dick tho
The op has 40 blacks guys beating the crap out of a lone white guy and you want to talk about penis size?
Stop begging people to answer you bullshit logic and loaded questions. All you do is ask people "what are ya chicken?" to make sense of your non sense
LIar.
YOu said the op was playing the race card.
I disagreed.
Can you support your claim in any way, or is that me asking a "loaded question"?
Sure, the OP assumed that the fight had something to do with white lives and not just an act of violence.
Here's where you get all confused by my one sentence reply
A riot that started after a hip hop concern? 40 black guys vs one white guy?
Race seems to be a reasonable assumption for a motive.
Your assumption means dick tho
For it to be a race card play, it has to be dishonestly false.
IF the assumption is reasonably likely, than it is not a Race Card play.
As i said, simply discussing race is not Race Card.
You would be factually correct IF there was an absence of violence in the system prior to those Black elected officials.Actually it also has to do with segregation, and the way the blacks were violently treated by whites during the 1960's, which is not 100 years ago...And there continued to be riots when the backlash has built to a climactic level since the 1960's, no hundred year pause....they fail to see how their original acts of violence has fueled today's backlash...So this thread is playing the race card but you're upset that someone pointed out that racial history has been worse in the past and that...just that, ruffled your feathers?
You should, after every post say "Annnnnnd Scene" because everyone else knows you're acting
A backlash with a hundred year pause?!
LOL!!!
That is utterly absurd.
Now we are seeing the violence inherit in the system. the struggle of class against class turns into a political struggle no matter how long it takes....
Dude, I hate to point out an inconvenient truth but when the President of the United States is black...the Attorney General of the United States is black...the Mayor of Baltimore is black...the Chief of Police of Baltimore is black and half of the officers involved in the incident that started a riot were black...it's damn hard for me to see the "violence inherit (sic) in the system" when the system in question is being run predominantly by blacks!
Are you stating that there was an absence of violence???
The op has 40 blacks guys beating the crap out of a lone white guy and you want to talk about penis size?
Yeah...whats the problem
LIar.
YOu said the op was playing the race card.
I disagreed.
Can you support your claim in any way, or is that me asking a "loaded question"?
Sure, the OP assumed that the fight had something to do with white lives and not just an act of violence.
Here's where you get all confused by my one sentence reply
A riot that started after a hip hop concern? 40 black guys vs one white guy?
Race seems to be a reasonable assumption for a motive.
Your assumption means dick tho
For it to be a race card play, it has to be dishonestly false.
IF the assumption is reasonably likely, than it is not a Race Card play.
As i said, simply discussing race is not Race Card.
Dude, I said I dont play by your fucking rules. You want to talk at someone go find a stray dog or build a robot with no mouth
Sure, the OP assumed that the fight had something to do with white lives and not just an act of violence.
Here's where you get all confused by my one sentence reply
A riot that started after a hip hop concern? 40 black guys vs one white guy?
Race seems to be a reasonable assumption for a motive.
Your assumption means dick tho
For it to be a race card play, it has to be dishonestly false.
IF the assumption is reasonably likely, than it is not a Race Card play.
As i said, simply discussing race is not Race Card.
Dude, I said I dont play by your fucking rules. You want to talk at someone go find a stray dog or build a robot with no mouth
Not my rules. THat what the Race Card is.
You libs like to pretend that there is some equivalency between conservatives pointing out real issues, like a real hate crime, and you libs making false accusations of racism in order to slander people you want to destroy.
Which is self serving bullshit.
The op has 40 blacks guys beating the crap out of a lone white guy and you want to talk about penis size?
Yeah...whats the problem
Random violence is a bigger problem than penis size.
THe problem is that you can't wrap your mind around that.
A riot that started after a hip hop concern? 40 black guys vs one white guy?
Race seems to be a reasonable assumption for a motive.
Your assumption means dick tho
For it to be a race card play, it has to be dishonestly false.
IF the assumption is reasonably likely, than it is not a Race Card play.
As i said, simply discussing race is not Race Card.
Dude, I said I dont play by your fucking rules. You want to talk at someone go find a stray dog or build a robot with no mouth
Not my rules. THat what the Race Card is.
You libs like to pretend that there is some equivalency between conservatives pointing out real issues, like a real hate crime, and you libs making false accusations of racism in order to slander people you want to destroy.
Which is self serving bullshit.
The only person pretending here is you. You're pretending the OP didnt play the race card because you're pretending to be the arbiter of the race card.
What you think the race card is or isnt matters as much as a drop of pee in the Atlantic Ocean.