Because children aren’t responsible for their parents’ actions, minor children are subject to the care and control of their parents. And clearly a child who hasn’t been born yet can’t be held responsible because his undocumented mother gave birth to that child in the United States.This fails as a false comparison fallacy.If parent(s) can't financially support their own kids, the taxpayers have to do it. Being that I'm a taxpayer, any money taken from me is money I can't provide to my kids. Why should my children do with less for the situations of those adults?
Yet another selfish greed obsessed post from someone which zero compassion or empathy for children.
If children aren't supposed to pay for the choices of their parents, why should my children do with less and pay for the choices of some other kid's parents?
It's not greedy to want to keep what I've earned but it is to expect to get a portion of mine if you didn't earn it.
That the Constitution prohibits punitive measures against children for the bad acts of a parent has nothing whatsoever to do with your subjective and errant perception that the prohibition manifests as a ‘disadvantage’ to your children.
You’re ignorant of the law and have an unwarranted fear of immigrants, rendering your ‘arguments’ devoid of merit.
How is it punishment for children of illegal aliens to gain the citizenship of their parent's country? "Immigrants"? These illegal aliens aren't immigrants in the true sense of the law. We have nothing against "immigrants" that come here legally. So stuff you sheet.
That’s why all persons born in the Unite States are citizens of the United States, in accordance with the 14th Amendment, to safeguard citizens’ civil liberties from the partisan whims of those hostile to immigrants.
Opposition to citizenship at birth is completely devoid of Constitutional and legal merit, motivated by bigotry toward Hispanics and other ethnic minorities, as it’s incorrectly perceived to be an ‘incentive’ to further immigration.
That this even has to be explained at all is sad and telling.
Wrong! "and " subject to the jurisdiction is your clue and qualifier. If anyone born on our soil were automatically a citizen the world "and" would not have been used in that phrase as a qualifier.
WTH does bigotry have to do with it? The same thing would apply if an illegal alien were white and from Ireland and there are many of them here also. So stick your race card where the sun don't shine!
It is an incentive to come here illegally because they can tap into our welfare coffers for years thru their U.S. born kids and it anchors the parents unto our country. That was proven just recently with Obama giving a stay of deportation to parents with kids born on our soil.
This whole thing has nothing to do with punishing a child for their parent's lawbreaking because it isn't punishment to inherit the ctizenshhip of one's parents.