Do you support equal rights for all?

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Pure Socialism doesn't work, however a mixed economy works the best.

Kind of odd how the mixed always ends up with liberals demanding something from the government.

40% of the Americans make incomes of $20,000 a year or less, is that a livable wage, really?

Typical anti-American Nazi lie.

First, you make wild claims without supplying facts because you know you'll be proven to be a liar and/or deceiver.

Second, the claim, while wrong, doesn't differentiate between persons and households.

Lastly, and most importantly, it doesn't take into account age. A very important factor except for Socialists, Nazi or otherwise, who think High School graduates should be making $50K/year.

Example:

The latest figures from the Social Security Administration (SSA) reveal that nearly half of the country now makes less than $28,031 annually, while nearly 40 percent of the population makes less than $20,000 per year, which is well below the middle-class threshold.

To give you a better idea of what this means: An individual working a full-time job at $10 per hour makes roughly $20,000 a year. Most $10-per-hour jobs are in sectors like retail or fast food, which means that nearly half of all working-age individuals in America today are flipping burgers or selling clothes at the mall just to make a living.

Third World Plunge: Nearly 40 percent of Americans now make less than $20,000 a year

A blog isn't fact. I could produce a blog stating all Nazis high on their own farts, but that doesn't make it true.

Your source, "Natural News" is a conspiracy theory website with gems like those below. It has no more veracity than any other website full of half (or less) truths:
Geoengineering (chemtrails) shredding ozone layer daily, putting all life on earth at risk

BOMBSHELL: Leading climate scientist admits geoengineering 'experiment' is going on right now

Boston Herald calls for government-run execution squads to MASS MURDER naturopaths, scientists and journalists who oppose mercury in immunizations

Barter will become the new economy after the global financial collapse, so make sure you have plenty of these items

Here's raw data from 2010, and it indeed put 41% of Americans making less than $20,000 a year.

Wage Statistics for 2010

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

...I don't agree with Nazis on war, genocide, forced sterilizations, taking away voting rights, that Dolichocephalic people are superior, that Slavs are non-Aryan, that Germanic's are the Aryan master-race, I don't agree with Lebensraum, the Holocaust, Generalplan Ost, the Nazi slave laborers, or the Nazi government anti-Tobacco campaign.

You posts against Jews, Blacks, Westerners and others are in conflict with your denials.

Just because someone is against something doesn't mean they want to kill them.

I'm sure there's many decent Jews, Blacks, Westerners, Americans, Muslims, Hispanics etc.

It's just they tend to be a collective burden, something which I certainly don't support.

 

[Divine Wind]

Kind of odd how the mixed always ends up with liberals demanding something from the government.

40% of the Americans make incomes of $20,000 a year or less, is that a livable wage, really?

Typical anti-American Nazi lie.

First, you make wild claims without supplying facts because you know you'll be proven to be a liar and/or deceiver.

Second, the claim, while wrong, doesn't differentiate between persons and households.

Lastly, and most importantly, it doesn't take into account age. A very important factor except for Socialists, Nazi or otherwise, who think High School graduates should be making $50K/year.

Example:

The latest figures from the Social Security Administration (SSA) reveal that nearly half of the country now makes less than $28,031 annually, while nearly 40 percent of the population makes less than $20,000 per year, which is well below the middle-class threshold.

To give you a better idea of what this means: An individual working a full-time job at $10 per hour makes roughly $20,000 a year. Most $10-per-hour jobs are in sectors like retail or fast food, which means that nearly half of all working-age individuals in America today are flipping burgers or selling clothes at the mall just to make a living.

Third World Plunge: Nearly 40 percent of Americans now make less than $20,000 a year

A blog isn't fact. I could produce a blog stating all Nazis high on their own farts, but that doesn't make it true.

Your source, "Natural News" is a conspiracy theory website with gems like those below. It has no more veracity than any other website full of half (or less) truths:
Geoengineering (chemtrails) shredding ozone layer daily, putting all life on earth at risk

BOMBSHELL: Leading climate scientist admits geoengineering 'experiment' is going on right now

Boston Herald calls for government-run execution squads to MASS MURDER naturopaths, scientists and journalists who oppose mercury in immunizations

Barter will become the new economy after the global financial collapse, so make sure you have plenty of these items

Here's raw data from 2010, and it indeed put 41% of Americans making less than $20,000 a year.

Wage Statistics for 2010

1) Unsurprising you went for the data 7 years ago instead of the latest data available.

2) Also unsurprising you continue to deceive by ignoring the age factor of wage owners.

So what is your solution? Nationalization of industry and Socialization of wages? Call it National Socialism for short? LOL

 

[Divine Wind]

.....I'm sure there's many decent Jews, Blacks, Westerners, Americans, Muslims, Hispanics etc.

It's just they tend to be a collective burden, something which I certainly don't support.

Is that where the Death Camps come into play?

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

40% of the Americans make incomes of $20,000 a year or less, is that a livable wage, really?

Typical anti-American Nazi lie.

First, you make wild claims without supplying facts because you know you'll be proven to be a liar and/or deceiver.

Second, the claim, while wrong, doesn't differentiate between persons and households.

Lastly, and most importantly, it doesn't take into account age. A very important factor except for Socialists, Nazi or otherwise, who think High School graduates should be making $50K/year.

Example:

The latest figures from the Social Security Administration (SSA) reveal that nearly half of the country now makes less than $28,031 annually, while nearly 40 percent of the population makes less than $20,000 per year, which is well below the middle-class threshold.

To give you a better idea of what this means: An individual working a full-time job at $10 per hour makes roughly $20,000 a year. Most $10-per-hour jobs are in sectors like retail or fast food, which means that nearly half of all working-age individuals in America today are flipping burgers or selling clothes at the mall just to make a living.

Third World Plunge: Nearly 40 percent of Americans now make less than $20,000 a year

A blog isn't fact. I could produce a blog stating all Nazis high on their own farts, but that doesn't make it true.

Your source, "Natural News" is a conspiracy theory website with gems like those below. It has no more veracity than any other website full of half (or less) truths:
Geoengineering (chemtrails) shredding ozone layer daily, putting all life on earth at risk

BOMBSHELL: Leading climate scientist admits geoengineering 'experiment' is going on right now

Boston Herald calls for government-run execution squads to MASS MURDER naturopaths, scientists and journalists who oppose mercury in immunizations

Barter will become the new economy after the global financial collapse, so make sure you have plenty of these items

Here's raw data from 2010, and it indeed put 41% of Americans making less than $20,000 a year.

Wage Statistics for 2010

1) Unsurprising you went for the data 7 years ago instead of the latest data available.

2) Also unsurprising you continue to deceive by ignoring the age factor of wage owners.

So what is your solution? Nationalization of industry and Socialization of wages? Call it National Socialism for short? LOL

Your statistics only includes full time workers, and not part time workers.

I don't support Nationalization of industry, or Socialization of wages.

I do however support the micromanage of industry, which is Fascist.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

.....I'm sure there's many decent Jews, Blacks, Westerners, Americans, Muslims, Hispanics etc.

It's just they tend to be a collective burden, something which I certainly don't support.

Is that where the Death Camps come into play?

I don't have a problem with others existing, so long as they aren't a problem for me.

No, I support cutting off jobs, and welfare for non-Whites.... They'll leave if they can't get their own income.

 

[Markle]

Pure Socialism doesn't work, however a mixed economy works the best.

Europe, as you know, does not have a mixed economy. Europe has chosen a welfare society. A society where the majority of their income is handed over to the state for redistribution.

In my opinion, this desperation to surrender their freedom and opt for the total womb to tomb security stems from the massive suffering they encountered by WW-I which was relatively quickly followed by WW-II.

Socialism is, as you all know, is ownership or total control of all means of production. Examples of Socialism are Venezuela, Cuba, North Korea, China, and Vietnam. China has been allowing some forms of Capitalism allowing their economy to grow.

 

[Markle]

40% of the Americans make incomes of $20,000 a year or less, is that a livable wage, really?

What is their household income?

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Pure Socialism doesn't work, however a mixed economy works the best.

Europe, as you know, does not have a mixed economy. Europe has chosen a welfare society. A society where the majority of their income is handed over to the state for redistribution.

In my opinion, this desperation to surrender their freedom and opt for the total womb to tomb security stems from the massive suffering they encountered by WW-I which was relatively quickly followed by WW-II.

Socialism is, as you all know, is ownership or total control of all means of production. Examples of Socialism are Venezuela, Cuba, North Korea, China, and Vietnam. China has been allowing some forms of Capitalism allowing their economy to grow.

In most of Europe they pay similar on government spending for healthcare, but not a single European country spends even nearly as much the U.S.A does when you account for both out of pocket + government spending.

Yet, on the whole Europeans live longer.

So, what's the American healthcare plan? To pay more, and live less?

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

40% of the Americans make incomes of $20,000 a year or less, is that a livable wage, really?

What is their household income?

So, you want the person who makes $20,000 a year, to pay about 1/4th of their money on healthcare, 1/2 of their money on rent, 1/4th on car, car insurance, food etc.
Where does that leave them?

 

[Markle]

Social programs are actually good for the economy, most of that money is spent back into the economy, anyways.

I do however have an issue with low income families having kids though.

You contradict yourself. First, you say government handouts are good for the economy. Then you say but not for kids. Make up your mind.

What you ignore is that for those handouts to go back into the economy, the money must be taken by force from someone who worked to EARN the money. Then when that $1.00 taken from the worker, is filtered through the government bureaucracy, and only $0.40 - $0.50 comes out the other end going to the welfare victim.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Social programs are actually good for the economy, most of that money is spent back into the economy, anyways.

I do however have an issue with low income families having kids though.

You contradict yourself. First, you say government handouts are good for the economy. Then you say but not for kids. Make up your mind.

What you ignore is that for those handouts to go back into the economy, the money must be taken by force from someone who worked to EARN the money. Then when that $1.00 taken from the worker, is filtered through the government bureaucracy, and only $0.40 - $0.50 comes out the other end going to the welfare victim.

Because poor people having kids is a general detriment to both our gene pool, and society.

However, it's good to help poor people, it's the morally acceptable thing to do, and does indeed help the economy by boosting consumerism.

 

[Markle]

So, you want the person who makes $20,000 a year, to pay about 1/4th of their money on healthcare, 1/2 of their money on rent, 1/4th on car, car insurance, food etc.
Where does that leave them?

What is their household income?

Please show us your source stating that 40% of workers earn $20,000. per year or less. Please show us their household annual income.

 

[Divine Wind]

.....I don't support Nationalization of industry, or Socialization of wages.

I do however support the micromanage of industry, which is Fascist.

To paraphrase Shakespeare, "A turd by any other name still stinks".

 

[skye]

not for all

not for sheeple.

 

[Markle]

Because poor people having kids is a general detriment to both our gene pool, and society.

However, it's good to help poor people, it's the morally acceptable thing to do, and does indeed help the economy by boosting consumerism.

So in your opinion, someone is poor because they are from a bad gene pool. So they should not be encouraged, no forced out of poverty and into earning a productive living. Interesting.

This is the morally correct thing to do.

 

[Markle]

Here's raw data from 2010, and it indeed put 41% of Americans making less than $20,000 a year.

Wage Statistics for 2010

Surely figures are available from a far more recent year, 2016 should be available by now.

Also, still waiting for the household income information. You hate REAL facts, don't you? You prefer to cherry pick, wich you did above.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Because poor people having kids is a general detriment to both our gene pool, and society.

However, it's good to help poor people, it's the morally acceptable thing to do, and does indeed help the economy by boosting consumerism.

So in your opinion, someone is poor because they are from a bad gene pool. So they should not be encouraged, no forced out of poverty and into earning a productive living. Interesting.

This is the morally correct thing to do.

Not all poor people are genetic detriments... Just a lot of them are..

 

[Markle]

Because poor people having kids is a general detriment to both our gene pool, and society.

However, it's good to help poor people, it's the morally acceptable thing to do, and does indeed help the economy by boosting consumerism.

So in your opinion, someone is poor because they are from a bad gene pool. So they should not be encouraged, no forced out of poverty and into earning a productive living. Interesting.

This is the morally correct thing to do.

Not all poor people are genetic detriments... Just a lot of them are..

So in addition to refusing to provide current information to support your opinion, you are a bigot as well.

Impressive!

 

[Divine Wind]

Because poor people having kids is a general detriment to both our gene pool, and society.

However, it's good to help poor people, it's the morally acceptable thing to do, and does indeed help the economy by boosting consumerism.

So in your opinion, someone is poor because they are from a bad gene pool. So they should not be encouraged, no forced out of poverty and into earning a productive living. Interesting.

This is the morally correct thing to do.

Not all poor people are genetic detriments... Just a lot of them are..

Which explains why Polish Death Camps had a triage system.....including the entertainment value for Nazi's to play "Sophie's Choice".