Doctors are coming out in droves saying hydroxychloroquine works

[Ame®icano]

The most efficient way to kill the virus would be to call it to testify against Clintons.

 

[jc456]

If they had better data, they might have a point.

As we can see, anyone can claim whatever they want.

explain better data? what is it you need, I've asked you before you ignored it.

What’s better? Observational retrospective studies or prospective placebo controlled trials?

both have their place,,,

Sure do. But which is better?

that depends on a lot of factors,,,one being time when someone is dying in front of you,,,

"RIGHT TO TRY"

Nope. That is not a factor.

so death is not a factor in your book,,,
"RIGHT TO TRY"

The strength of medical literature does not depend on the condition of your patient.

but the condition of the patient is dependent on available drugs.

 

[progressive hunter]

If they had better data, they might have a point.

As we can see, anyone can claim whatever they want.

explain better data? what is it you need, I've asked you before you ignored it.

What’s better? Observational retrospective studies or prospective placebo controlled trials?

both have their place,,,

Sure do. But which is better?

that depends on a lot of factors,,,one being time when someone is dying in front of you,,,

"RIGHT TO TRY"

Nope. That is not a factor.

so death is not a factor in your book,,,
"RIGHT TO TRY"

The strength of medical literature does not depend on the condition of your patient.

we arent talking about literature,,,thats already proven it safe,,,


"RIGHT TO TRY"

 

[colfax_m]

So what does it suggest is the best study design for a therapeutic question?

I gave you their quote. go ask them.

It’s on the damn table below the quote.

Good lord, you are just a complete idiot.

 

[jc456]

It’s on the damn table below the quote.

Good lord, you are just a complete idiot.

LOL, dude, they presented a disclaimer that I quoted. so, go talk to them.

 

[colfax_m]

If they had better data, they might have a point.

As we can see, anyone can claim whatever they want.

explain better data? what is it you need, I've asked you before you ignored it.

What’s better? Observational retrospective studies or prospective placebo controlled trials?

both have their place,,,

Sure do. But which is better?

that depends on a lot of factors,,,one being time when someone is dying in front of you,,,

"RIGHT TO TRY"

Nope. That is not a factor.

so death is not a factor in your book,,,
"RIGHT TO TRY"

The strength of medical literature does not depend on the condition of your patient.

we arent talking about literature,,,thats already proven it safe,,,


"RIGHT TO TRY"

Yes, we are talking about literature. You can’t follow a conversation.

 

[colfax_m]

It’s on the damn table below the quote.

Good lord, you are just a complete idiot.

LOL, dude, they presented a disclaimer that I quoted. so, go talk to them.

You are without a doubt one of the dumbest people I have ever talked to.

 

[progressive hunter]

If they had better data, they might have a point.

As we can see, anyone can claim whatever they want.

explain better data? what is it you need, I've asked you before you ignored it.

What’s better? Observational retrospective studies or prospective placebo controlled trials?

both have their place,,,

Sure do. But which is better?

that depends on a lot of factors,,,one being time when someone is dying in front of you,,,

"RIGHT TO TRY"

Nope. That is not a factor.

so death is not a factor in your book,,,
"RIGHT TO TRY"

The strength of medical literature does not depend on the condition of your patient.

we arent talking about literature,,,thats already proven it safe,,,


"RIGHT TO TRY"

Yes, we are talking about literature. You can’t follow a conversation.

youre moving the goal post again,,,


"RIGHT TO TRY"

 

[progressive hunter]

It’s on the damn table below the quote.

Good lord, you are just a complete idiot.

LOL, dude, they presented a disclaimer that I quoted. so, go talk to them.

You are without a doubt one of the dumbest people I have ever talked to.

youre projecting again,,,


"RIGHT TO TRY"

 

[Faun]

No, it’s just gibberish because you have no idea what you’re talking about.

Ain’t playing your game alice

Stop pretending like you have the foggiest idea what you’re talking about and you might learn something.

Ain’t playing your game Alice. Refute the data or move on

Refute what data? She has presented no data.

did you call and ask her for it???

I don't have to. Competent doctors who claim to have a cure for a disease present corroborating data to support their claims.

so your just mad they didnt tell you,,,

maybe mommy can give you a cookie to shut you up,,,

LOL

Why would I be mad at some quack who believes our government has reptilians from another planet?

there are more doctors than her making the claim,,,

why are you focusing on a black women to silence her???

Why are you injecting race into this? Are you racist?

Umm democrats are attacking a black woman, and her culture.. do you know your history?

LOL

Dumbfuck racist, which culture practices replacing government officials with reptilian humanoids?

Is that a joe biden quote!? Haha

LOL

No, it's from Dr. Immanuel. I'll take your non-answer as admission there are none and that you were full of shit when you said there were.

 

[colfax_m]

If they had better data, they might have a point.

As we can see, anyone can claim whatever they want.

explain better data? what is it you need, I've asked you before you ignored it.

What’s better? Observational retrospective studies or prospective placebo controlled trials?

both have their place,,,

Sure do. But which is better?

that depends on a lot of factors,,,one being time when someone is dying in front of you,,,

"RIGHT TO TRY"

Nope. That is not a factor.

so death is not a factor in your book,,,
"RIGHT TO TRY"

The strength of medical literature does not depend on the condition of your patient.

we arent talking about literature,,,thats already proven it safe,,,


"RIGHT TO TRY"

Yes, we are talking about literature. You can’t follow a conversation.

youre moving the goal post again,,,


"RIGHT TO TRY"

Nope. You’re just shifting the subject because you are losing.

here’s what we are talking about:

What’s better? Observational retrospective studies or prospective placebo controlled trials?

 

[progressive hunter]

If they had better data, they might have a point.

As we can see, anyone can claim whatever they want.

explain better data? what is it you need, I've asked you before you ignored it.

What’s better? Observational retrospective studies or prospective placebo controlled trials?

both have their place,,,

Sure do. But which is better?

that depends on a lot of factors,,,one being time when someone is dying in front of you,,,

"RIGHT TO TRY"

Nope. That is not a factor.

so death is not a factor in your book,,,
"RIGHT TO TRY"

The strength of medical literature does not depend on the condition of your patient.

we arent talking about literature,,,thats already proven it safe,,,


"RIGHT TO TRY"

Yes, we are talking about literature. You can’t follow a conversation.

youre moving the goal post again,,,


"RIGHT TO TRY"

Nope. You’re just shifting the subject because you are losing.

here’s what we are talking about:

What’s better? Observational retrospective studies or prospective placebo controlled trials?

that just [proved you moved the goal post from the OP,,,

"RIGHT TO TRY"

 

[colfax_m]

If they had better data, they might have a point.

As we can see, anyone can claim whatever they want.

explain better data? what is it you need, I've asked you before you ignored it.

What’s better? Observational retrospective studies or prospective placebo controlled trials?

both have their place,,,

Sure do. But which is better?

that depends on a lot of factors,,,one being time when someone is dying in front of you,,,

"RIGHT TO TRY"

Nope. That is not a factor.

so death is not a factor in your book,,,
"RIGHT TO TRY"

The strength of medical literature does not depend on the condition of your patient.

we arent talking about literature,,,thats already proven it safe,,,


"RIGHT TO TRY"

Yes, we are talking about literature. You can’t follow a conversation.

youre moving the goal post again,,,


"RIGHT TO TRY"

Nope. You’re just shifting the subject because you are losing.

here’s what we are talking about:

What’s better? Observational retrospective studies or prospective placebo controlled trials?

that just [proved you moved the goal post from the OP,,,

"RIGHT TO TRY"

Nope. The topic from the get go in the OP was assessing the strength of evidence for hydroxychloroquine and my comment is precisely on point.

“right to try” is not relevant to this topic.

 

[progressive hunter]

If they had better data, they might have a point.

As we can see, anyone can claim whatever they want.

explain better data? what is it you need, I've asked you before you ignored it.

What’s better? Observational retrospective studies or prospective placebo controlled trials?

both have their place,,,

Sure do. But which is better?

that depends on a lot of factors,,,one being time when someone is dying in front of you,,,

"RIGHT TO TRY"

Nope. That is not a factor.

so death is not a factor in your book,,,
"RIGHT TO TRY"

The strength of medical literature does not depend on the condition of your patient.

we arent talking about literature,,,thats already proven it safe,,,


"RIGHT TO TRY"

Yes, we are talking about literature. You can’t follow a conversation.

youre moving the goal post again,,,


"RIGHT TO TRY"

Nope. You’re just shifting the subject because you are losing.

here’s what we are talking about:

What’s better? Observational retrospective studies or prospective placebo controlled trials?

that just [proved you moved the goal post from the OP,,,

"RIGHT TO TRY"

Nope. The topic from the get go in the OP was assessing the strength of evidence for hydroxychloroquine and my comment is precisely on point.

“right to try” is not relevant to this topic.

how is it not relevant???
its exactly what its intended for,,,

OH I get it,,you just lied again,,,

"RIGHT TO TRY"

 

[colfax_m]

If they had better data, they might have a point.

As we can see, anyone can claim whatever they want.

explain better data? what is it you need, I've asked you before you ignored it.

What’s better? Observational retrospective studies or prospective placebo controlled trials?

both have their place,,,

Sure do. But which is better?

that depends on a lot of factors,,,one being time when someone is dying in front of you,,,

"RIGHT TO TRY"

Nope. That is not a factor.

so death is not a factor in your book,,,
"RIGHT TO TRY"

The strength of medical literature does not depend on the condition of your patient.

we arent talking about literature,,,thats already proven it safe,,,


"RIGHT TO TRY"

Yes, we are talking about literature. You can’t follow a conversation.

youre moving the goal post again,,,


"RIGHT TO TRY"

Nope. You’re just shifting the subject because you are losing.

here’s what we are talking about:

What’s better? Observational retrospective studies or prospective placebo controlled trials?

that just [proved you moved the goal post from the OP,,,

"RIGHT TO TRY"

Nope. The topic from the get go in the OP was assessing the strength of evidence for hydroxychloroquine and my comment is precisely on point.

“right to try” is not relevant to this topic.

how is it not relevant???
its exactly what its intended for,,,

OH I get it,,you just lied again,,,

"RIGHT TO TRY"

Because it has nothing to do with whether the medication works or not.

 

[Billiejeens]

If they had better data, they might have a point.

As we can see, anyone can claim whatever they want.

explain better data? what is it you need, I've asked you before you ignored it.

What’s better? Observational retrospective studies or prospective placebo controlled trials?

both have their place,,,

Sure do. But which is better?

that depends on a lot of factors,,,one being time when someone is dying in front of you,,,

"RIGHT TO TRY"

Nope. That is not a factor.

so death is not a factor in your book,,,
"RIGHT TO TRY"

The strength of medical literature does not depend on the condition of your patient.

we arent talking about literature,,,thats already proven it safe,,,


"RIGHT TO TRY"

Yes, we are talking about literature. You can’t follow a conversation.

youre moving the goal post again,,,


"RIGHT TO TRY"

Nope. You’re just shifting the subject because you are losing.

here’s what we are talking about:

What’s better? Observational retrospective studies or prospective placebo controlled trials?

that just [proved you moved the goal post from the OP,,,

"RIGHT TO TRY"

Nope. The topic from the get go in the OP was assessing the strength of evidence for hydroxychloroquine and my comment is precisely on point.

“right to try” is not relevant to this topic.

how is it not relevant???
its exactly what its intended for,,,

OH I get it,,you just lied again,,,

"RIGHT TO TRY"

You all realize that he is on here propagandizing day and night.
The country supposedly is under a medical emergency.
If he even knew which end of the thermometer went up his ass, his skills would be too valuable to be here day and night.

 

[Jitss617]

No, it’s just gibberish because you have no idea what you’re talking about.

Ain’t playing your game alice

Stop pretending like you have the foggiest idea what you’re talking about and you might learn something.

Ain’t playing your game Alice. Refute the data or move on

Refute what data? She has presented no data.

did you call and ask her for it???

I don't have to. Competent doctors who claim to have a cure for a disease present corroborating data to support their claims.

so your just mad they didnt tell you,,,

maybe mommy can give you a cookie to shut you up,,,

LOL

Why would I be mad at some quack who believes our government has reptilians from another planet?

there are more doctors than her making the claim,,,

why are you focusing on a black women to silence her???

Why are you injecting race into this? Are you racist?

Umm democrats are attacking a black woman, and her culture.. do you know your history?

LOL

Dumbfuck racist, which culture practices replacing government officials with reptilian humanoids?

Is that a joe biden quote!? Haha

LOL

No, it's from Dr. Immanuel. I'll take your non-answer as admission there are none and that you were full of shit when you said there were.

Stick to the topic

 

[progressive hunter]

If they had better data, they might have a point.

As we can see, anyone can claim whatever they want.

explain better data? what is it you need, I've asked you before you ignored it.

What’s better? Observational retrospective studies or prospective placebo controlled trials?

both have their place,,,

Sure do. But which is better?

that depends on a lot of factors,,,one being time when someone is dying in front of you,,,

"RIGHT TO TRY"

Nope. That is not a factor.

so death is not a factor in your book,,,
"RIGHT TO TRY"

The strength of medical literature does not depend on the condition of your patient.

we arent talking about literature,,,thats already proven it safe,,,


"RIGHT TO TRY"

Yes, we are talking about literature. You can’t follow a conversation.

youre moving the goal post again,,,


"RIGHT TO TRY"

Nope. You’re just shifting the subject because you are losing.

here’s what we are talking about:

What’s better? Observational retrospective studies or prospective placebo controlled trials?

that just [proved you moved the goal post from the OP,,,

"RIGHT TO TRY"

Nope. The topic from the get go in the OP was assessing the strength of evidence for hydroxychloroquine and my comment is precisely on point.

“right to try” is not relevant to this topic.

how is it not relevant???
its exactly what its intended for,,,

OH I get it,,you just lied again,,,

"RIGHT TO TRY"

Because it has nothing to do with whether the medication works or not.

so thats how youre twisting it now,,

sorry but there are a lot of docs using it with a high rate of success,,,

sorry that bothers you,,,

 

[Faun]

I don’t have data. I’m going by what’s published.

can't recall, did you post a link to your data? what makes that published data any more credible?

Someone willing to publish their data is more credible than someone who won’t. Is this a serious question?

Not only did she publish it but she went to capitol hill had a press conference told you about it you could ask her any question you wanted.. The media silenced her.. is this the ussr?

Liar. She even admitted she didn't publish any relevant data.

 

[colfax_m]

If they had better data, they might have a point.

As we can see, anyone can claim whatever they want.

explain better data? what is it you need, I've asked you before you ignored it.

What’s better? Observational retrospective studies or prospective placebo controlled trials?

both have their place,,,

Sure do. But which is better?

that depends on a lot of factors,,,one being time when someone is dying in front of you,,,

"RIGHT TO TRY"

Nope. That is not a factor.

so death is not a factor in your book,,,
"RIGHT TO TRY"

The strength of medical literature does not depend on the condition of your patient.

we arent talking about literature,,,thats already proven it safe,,,


"RIGHT TO TRY"

Yes, we are talking about literature. You can’t follow a conversation.

youre moving the goal post again,,,


"RIGHT TO TRY"

Nope. You’re just shifting the subject because you are losing.

here’s what we are talking about:

What’s better? Observational retrospective studies or prospective placebo controlled trials?

that just [proved you moved the goal post from the OP,,,

"RIGHT TO TRY"

Nope. The topic from the get go in the OP was assessing the strength of evidence for hydroxychloroquine and my comment is precisely on point.

“right to try” is not relevant to this topic.

how is it not relevant???
its exactly what its intended for,,,

OH I get it,,you just lied again,,,

"RIGHT TO TRY"

Because it has nothing to do with whether the medication works or not.

so thats how youre twisting it now,,

sorry but there are a lot of docs using it with a high rate of success,,,

sorry that bothers you,,,

How do they know it’s successful?