Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It was an assumed right
Their vision centered around that philosophy.
You said that as a way to justify for Lincolns abuse, THEREFORE, meaning you are not in agreement with their visions. So, NO, I did not put words in your mouth
The gov't was getting to much power, they south was getting taxed heavier and it was their right to secede. So how were they "enemies"?
Do you hear yourself right now? And you never did substantiate these claims with any verifiable fact, like I asked you to. When I suddenly decided to get serious and stop hijacking your thread, you somehow run away from your argument. And yes, you did put words in my mouth, hotshot.
Freeing slaves was not a philosophy, it was an act of mercy, based on the belief of equality amongst all men.
How did I run away from my argument?
I clearly explained how you do not know what YOU say. You have a comprehension problem, so we will move on..
Lincoln did not believe blacks were equal to whites
"I will say then that I am not, nor ever have been in favor of bringing about in anyway the social and political equality of the white and black races - that I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race. I say upon this occasion I do not perceive that because the white man is to have the superior position the negro should be denied everything."
Source:
Fourth Debate with Stephen A. Douglas at Charleston, Illinois, September 18, 1858
Any other fictitious posts?
Oh, and I didn't say slaves had anything to do with the Framers visions. The whole "being able to get rid of their gov't" thinggggy is.
facts facts facts
terrible things they are, ey?
I think its funny this fool Templar says lincolns abuse was justified to do what HE wanted, but probably goes around talking shit about Obama doin what HE wants. LOLOL
facts facts facts
terrible things they are, ey?
I think its funny this fool Templar says lincolns abuse was justified to do what HE wanted, but probably goes around talking shit about Obama doin what HE wants. LOLOL
facts facts facts
terrible things they are, ey?
I think its funny this fool Templar says lincolns abuse was justified to do what HE wanted, but probably goes around talking shit about Obama doin what HE wants. LOLOL
I cut guys like Templar some slack because at least he's on the right side. A lot of conservatives mistakenly venerate Lincoln because they have been brainwashed all their lives to believe he was literally an angel.
I think it is pretty damn close.
I think Lincoln was a greedy, manipulative asshole; Him suspending Habeas Corpus, expanding the Union army,(granted, it did get approved by Congress LATER) arresting anyone that opposed his views etc.
Basically, he just threw away the COTUS to get what HE wanted
I was doing some reading on it a couple of weeks ago, and honestly, I don't think he gave 2 shits about the slaves. More along the lines of industrialization and the countries economic interests!!
AND Obama; obamacare, drone surveillance, suppressing opposition, assault on the BoR etc
So what say you?
Do you think it was Lincoln or Obama?
Do you think lincolns abuse was justified because of the war? Why?
Well the did start the "highly centralized federal gov't" everyone is always talking about
He did? Can you substantiate that with a link or historical fact?
Lincoln's Culture of Death
The Mythical Lincoln
Was Lincoln a Tyrant?
The American Anti-Civil Liberties Union
Lincoln's 'Second American Revolution' by Thomas J. DiLorenzo
He did? Can you substantiate that with a link or historical fact?
Lincoln's Culture of Death
The Mythical Lincoln
Was Lincoln a Tyrant?
The American Anti-Civil Liberties Union
Lincoln's 'Second American Revolution' by Thomas J. DiLorenzo
that is just greatposting links to more Lincoln haters,
I think it is pretty damn close.
I think Lincoln was a greedy, manipulative asshole; Him suspending Habeas Corpus, expanding the Union army,(granted, it did get approved by Congress LATER) arresting anyone that opposed his views etc.
Basically, he just threw away the COTUS to get what HE wanted
I was doing some reading on it a couple of weeks ago, and honestly, I don't think he gave 2 shits about the slaves. More along the lines of industrialization and the countries economic interests!!
AND Obama; obamacare, drone surveillance, suppressing opposition, assault on the BoR etc
So what say you?
Do you think it was Lincoln or Obama?
Do you think lincolns abuse was justified because of the war? Why?
I think it is pretty damn close.
I think Lincoln was a greedy, manipulative asshole; Him suspending Habeas Corpus, expanding the Union army,(granted, it did get approved by Congress LATER) arresting anyone that opposed his views etc.
Basically, he just threw away the COTUS to get what HE wanted
I was doing some reading on it a couple of weeks ago, and honestly, I don't think he gave 2 shits about the slaves. More along the lines of industrialization and the countries economic interests!!
AND Obama; obamacare, drone surveillance, suppressing opposition, assault on the BoR etc
So what say you?
Do you think it was Lincoln or Obama?
Do you think lincolns abuse was justified because of the war? Why?
what say me ? i say you are a dumb fucking liarberal, Lincoln was fighting a WAR in his own country, what he done was what had to be done to save the United States of America, Oshithead is doing what he is doing to destroy America AND .., i believe wanting a war in this country once more. Lincoln did not have the time to debate with congress his actions which had to be done without delay, and yes, i do not believe he cared that much about the "slaves", that was a by product of the war.
I think it is pretty damn close.
I think Lincoln was a greedy, manipulative asshole; Him suspending Habeas Corpus, expanding the Union army,(granted, it did get approved by Congress LATER) arresting anyone that opposed his views etc.
Basically, he just threw away the COTUS to get what HE wanted
I was doing some reading on it a couple of weeks ago, and honestly, I don't think he gave 2 shits about the slaves. More along the lines of industrialization and the countries economic interests!!
AND Obama; obamacare, drone surveillance, suppressing opposition, assault on the BoR etc
So what say you?
Do you think it was Lincoln or Obama?
Do you think lincolns abuse was justified because of the war? Why?
Only the Supreme Court can determine if a given president has abused his powers, or otherwise acted in an un-Constitutional manner.
Consequently the president hasnt abused any of his powers.
Needless to say the partisan right will disagree.
He did? Can you substantiate that with a link or historical fact?
Lincoln's Culture of Death
The Mythical Lincoln
Was Lincoln a Tyrant?
The American Anti-Civil Liberties Union
Lincoln's 'Second American Revolution' by Thomas J. DiLorenzo
that is just greatposting links to more Lincoln haters,
We have learned by sad experience that it is the nature and disposition of almost all men, as soon as they get a little authority, as they suppose, they will immediately begin to exercise unrighteous dominion. (D&C 121:39)
Lincoln is a tyrant for suspending Habeas Corpus and waging a war against rebels?
Why then does the Constitution allo Habeas Corpus to be suspended when fighting a war with rebels if doing so is tyrannical and shouldn't be done?
I'm confident from what Ive studied of Lincoln's life that he would have been one of the few people to return the power back to the people like Washington. Unfortunately, since he was murdered in cold blood, we will never know for sure.
I don't, however, think Obama would give the power back if he obtained it. There is a reason we need to elect trustworthy men of honor to be President. It's precisely because if they need to exercise more power than we would prefer, they would gladly give it back.
Check Comrade Bripat's sources: primarily anti-American sources.
Check to see how many are communist fronts.
You are the least of all to speak on this subject. At least bripat links to his arguments. Take time to learn from his example.
What could be more hilarious than a senile boot-licking old coot like Fakey accusing me of being a communist?
Who do you think taught Woodrow Wilson?
Did Lincoln shit on the COTUS yes or no?
What in heaven's name are you talking about? Lincoln died in 1865! Woodrow Wilson was president from 1913 to 1921, and was only 9 years old when Lincoln was assassinated! Where do you get this shit man?
No shit? HENCE me saying "who do you think TAUGHT WW" not who he taught..GEEEEZ genius..
I cant do this with you. You really are an idiot