DOMA ruled unconstitutional

[bodecea]

Oh noes run for your life here come the gay people


Gay has exsisted since the begining of mankind.

we have survived just fine.

You do realize allowing gays to marry will give more reason for Muslims to attack America?

So lets go with the logic used after the 9/11 attacks. We should let gays marry or the terrorists have won!!

Personally, anyone who bases our national laws or actions on fear of additional terrorist attacks is definitally a coward.

Let them try and come after us. In fact, the more they do the sooner we can slaughter them in the act.

Definitely!

 

[WinterBorn]

What the SCOTUS called "Fundamental to our very Existence and Survival" is a Right that EVERY American of Consenting Age has...

The Right to Marriage.

Because some Choose to Defy their Natural Design and Equipment is not Society's Burden.

Homosexual Coupling and Heterosexual Coupling are Inherently and Naturally Unequal.

One Produces Life and the other does not yet ALL of us are Equipped and Designed for one of them.



peace...

But producing life isn't required for marriage. We let the elderly marry and people who are infertile.

However gay marriage will be putting and end to producing life.

Absolute nonsense. The gays who will marry are gay now.

Unless it is your claim that allowing gays to marry will increase the number of gays in our population from a minor part to the overwhelming majority.

 

[Pho_King]

So bans on same-sex marriage aren't based on sex. Please then, tell me what the criteria being used to deny the license is.

the two bolded statements seem contradictory

That's because the first statement is my statement, while the second is paraphrasing his.

ahhhhh thanks.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

What the SCOTUS called "Fundamental to our very Existence and Survival" is a Right that EVERY American of Consenting Age has...

The Right to Marriage.

Because some Choose to Defy their Natural Design and Equipment is not Society's Burden.

Homosexual Coupling and Heterosexual Coupling are Inherently and Naturally Unequal.

One Produces Life and the other does not yet ALL of us are Equipped and Designed for one of them.



peace...

Yep isn't that just like the left to support more people who do not want to pull their weight and share the burden of helping the human race survive?

LMAO!! Oh, is the survival of the human race threatened??

Actually, gays pay plenty of taxes used for things that only effect families.

I tell you what gays can live together on an island and even marry let's see how long that island remains populated. 30 years maybe.

 

[JakeStarkey]

No burden has been placed on society where universal marriage is legal.

Not one eensy-teensy little burden.

Well jake since the 9th and 10th amendments were written into the Constitution via the bill of rights what are the usage of those amendments surely they have a purpose. How would they be applied?

You are spamming and will not be permitted to continue,.

No burden at all culturally exists because of universal marriage.

Real conservatives and libertarians recognize this fact.

 

[bodecea]

Cool! Cuz once gays have the right to marry, you can pick up the fight on the incest front. My work here will be done.

I'm not the one who's saying that marriage is a right you are. Are you gong to be a hypocrite? Do Family members not have the same rights as gays do to marry each other is they choose?

bigrebnc has problems: incest and bestiality seem to fascinate him.

OH...he's not the only one...... But people go with what they know, don't they?

 

[Polk]

Nope.

Sexual Choices are not the same as Nature's Design and how each of us are Equipped.

You have the Freedom to Defy, but you don't the Right to Burden Society with your Defiance.



peace...

So bans on same-sex marriage aren't based on sex. Please then, tell me what the criteria being used to deny the license is.

Sex and Sexual Choices are not the same.

Every Homosexual is Designed and Equipped by Nature to Couple with the Opposite Sex.

Marriage in Law does not Need to Burden this Defiance for some False Sense of Validation for those who Choose to Defy.

Every Consenting Adult has a Right to Marriage... The Marriage that the Court called "Fundamental to your very Existence and Survival".

Only one Coupling... Our Natural Coupling fits that Conclusion.

Choose to Defy your Natural Design and Equipment... Just don't Expect Society to Embrace it as Equal to what Creates us.

It's not.



peace...

"Sexual choices" (without getting into the fact that it's not a choice) aside, the legal problem is that the restrictions don't say a thing about sexual orientation. They're written on the basis of sex.

 

[Pho_King]

Universal marriage is between the same sex, so the right question is that should sisters and sisters or brothers and brothers be allowed to marry.

Far greater genetic damage would be occur within hetero incest marriage than same sex incest marriage.

Perhaps only same-sex relatives should be allowed to marry. Why haven't the homos been standing up for this oppressed group?

 

[bodecea]

So bans on same-sex marriage aren't based on sex. Please then, tell me what the criteria being used to deny the license is.

the two bolded statements seem contradictory

Nope, it's totally valid. Sex defined as gender. It is banned based on gender.

 

[WinterBorn]

Aids was first found in the gay community when it was first observed in America.

And allowing gays to marry would effect the spread of AIDs how?

For some reason it found it's way into the normal people side of the isle. I wonder how that happened?

You consider IV drug users and those who sleep with the same gender while claiming to be straight as the "normal" side of the aisle? (I am assuming you meant aisle, since the normal side of an island would be silly)

But you didn't answer the question. How would allowing them to marry effect the spread of AIDs?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

No burden has been placed on society where universal marriage is legal.

Not one eensy-teensy little burden.

Well jake since the 9th and 10th amendments were written into the Constitution via the bill of rights what are the usage of those amendments surely they have a purpose. How would they be applied?

You are spamming and will not be permitted to continue,.

No burden at all culturally exists because of universal marriage.

Real conservatives and libertarians recognize this fact.

I am tired of your shit dictating demands to people. You want too play the troll part but when asked to answer a question you run, but when the question is asked enough times you call it spamming.
Answer the fucking question troll.

Well jake since the 9th and 10th amendments were written into the Constitution via the bill of rights what are the usage of those amendments surely they have a purpose. How would they be applied?

 

[bodecea]

Poor straws are being clutched to death.

It's all the die-hards have now. I've watched this argument for a while now....fewer and fewer make such silly claims over the years. But the die hards have dug in and keep rattling off their mantra for their various of reasons.

 

[WorldWatcher]

I tell you what gays can live together on an island and even marry let's see how long that island remains populated. 30 years maybe.

Nah, take the island of Hawaii - turn it over to all the homosexuals and they will do just fine.



>>>>

 

[WinterBorn]

But producing life isn't required for marriage. We let the elderly marry and people who are infertile.

However gay marriage will be putting and end to producing life.

Do you actually believe this or does your intellectual grasp your reach? Do you think that by extending the access to the marriage contract to homosexuals that heterosexuals will no longer marry?

And I'm waiting for an answer: What harm will befall you personally by same sex marriage?

Good luck getting an answer on that one. I haven't seen a rational answer to it yet. Most avoid answering it completely.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Well jake since the 9th and 10th amendments were written into the Constitution via the bill of rights what are the usage of those amendments surely they have a purpose. How would they be applied?

You are spamming and will not be permitted to continue,.

No burden at all culturally exists because of universal marriage.

Real conservatives and libertarians recognize this fact.

I am tired of your shit dictating demands to people. You want too play the troll part but when asked to answer a question you run, but when the question is asked enough times to call it spamming.
Answer the fucking question troll.

The question has been answered and you won't be allowed to spam. Got it? You don't dictate anything to anybody. You are not a conservative.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

And allowing gays to marry would effect the spread of AIDs how?

For some reason it found it's way into the normal people side of the isle. I wonder how that happened?

You consider IV drug users and those who sleep with the same gender while claiming to be straight as the "normal" side of the aisle? (I am assuming you meant aisle, since the normal side of an island would be silly)

But you didn't answer the question. How would allowing them to marry effect the spread of AIDs?

It started with gays that's enough right their.

 

[bodecea]

However gay marriage will be putting and end to producing life.

It is becoming readily apparent that very few on either side of this issue have really thought the implications of gay marriage through. Seriously man, wtf?

Can gay couples create life? If they can't aren't they ending life?

You call that logic?

 

[Polk]

However gay marriage will be putting and end to producing life.

It is becoming readily apparent that very few on either side of this issue have really thought the implications of gay marriage through. Seriously man, wtf?

Can gay couples create life? If they can't aren't they ending life?

I can't create a rock with my bare hands. Does that mean I'm ending rocks?

 

[JakeStarkey]

It is becoming readily apparent that very few on either side of this issue have really thought the implications of gay marriage through. Seriously man, wtf?

Can gay couples create life? If they can't aren't they ending life?

You call that logic?

It's bigreb logic.

 

[bodecea]

Yep isn't that just like the left to support more people who do not want to pull their weight and share the burden of helping the human race survive?

LMAO!! Oh, is the survival of the human race threatened??

Actually, gays pay plenty of taxes used for things that only effect families.

I tell you what gays can live together on an island and even marry let's see how long that island remains populated. 30 years maybe.

It's called Manhattan.