Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In 2008, Nelson Sloan and Ryan Flynn were arrested by the Raleigh Police Department under North Carolina's "crime against nature" statue for engaging in private, consensual, homosexual sex. The charge is considered a Class I felony in the state and carried a punishment of up to two years in prison.
The Raleigh police Captain at the time, T.D. Hardy, explained that, even though the states law against sodomy had been struck down by Lawrence, his department's actions were still valid:
The Assistant District Attorney eventually decided to drop the charges against the two men, citing Lawrence. Sloan responded by noting that he had nonetheless been punished for consensual sex:
After the charges were dropped, Joe Furmick, the veteran Wake County magistrate who booked the two men, explained why he chose to continue enforcing the states unconstitutional "crime against nature" law:
And the DA dropped the charges just like I said because he knew the law was invalid. The fact that a Wake County individual choose to charge someone based on an unconstitutional law is a problem for Wake Country to deal with in there training program.
>>>>
Were they arrested?
BD, should we start an inventory of the things pulled from bigreb's ass? Is there enough bandwidth?The feeling you are getting is you pulling your head out of your ass.
Nice of you to diagnose that for him, based on your own past experience.
And the DA dropped the charges just like I said because he knew the law was invalid. The fact that a Wake County individual choose to charge someone based on an unconstitutional law is a problem for Wake Country to deal with in there training program.
>>>>
Were they arrested?
Still irrelevant. Police can arrest someone for anything or nothing. Conviction shows someone is guilty of a crime.
I guess you slept thru the whole "innocent until proven guilty" part of civics class too? Not surprising.
About that 9th and 10th amendment question you keep dodging.
So you can keep asking him? It seems that you continue to ask, regardless of whether you get an answer or not. He gave you a link. Try looking there. Not everyone is willing to spoonfeed you info like I have.
And I will continue to ask the troll. I don't give a fuck about any god damn link he produces I want his answer in his words.
yet again the republican party stands on the WRONG side of history
Were they arrested?
Still irrelevant. Police can arrest someone for anything or nothing. Conviction shows someone is guilty of a crime.
I guess you slept thru the whole "innocent until proven guilty" part of civics class too? Not surprising.
nope don't think so.
Talk about people not being tolerant yall are just as bad as I am.
In 2008, Nelson Sloan and Ryan Flynn were arrested by the Raleigh Police Department under North Carolina's "crime against nature" statue for engaging in private, consensual, homosexual sex. The charge is considered a Class I felony in the state and carried a punishment of up to two years in prison.
The Raleigh police Captain at the time, T.D. Hardy, explained that, even though the states law against sodomy had been struck down by Lawrence, his department's actions were still valid:
The Assistant District Attorney eventually decided to drop the charges against the two men, citing Lawrence. Sloan responded by noting that he had nonetheless been punished for consensual sex:
After the charges were dropped, Joe Furmick, the veteran Wake County magistrate who booked the two men, explained why he chose to continue enforcing the states unconstitutional "crime against nature" law:
And the DA dropped the charges just like I said because he knew the law was invalid. The fact that a Wake County individual choose to charge someone based on an unconstitutional law is a problem for Wake Country to deal with in there training program.
>>>>
Were they arrested?
I bet he repeatedly tried to arrest someone for being gay.So you can keep asking him? It seems that you continue to ask, regardless of whether you get an answer or not. He gave you a link. Try looking there. Not everyone is willing to spoonfeed you info like I have.
And I will continue to ask the troll. I don't give a fuck about any god damn link he produces I want his answer in his words.
bigreb, no one cares what you think. You got the answer you deserved.
Why were you fired from the police force? Was that in violation of the 9th and 10th Amendments.
No because you think sucking a dick or getting fucked in the ass as a male is ok.Pull my southern pride card? WTF? Because I didn't start having sex as a preschooler and don't approve of lynching you think you are somehow more southern??
What you are is white trash. That has always been the bane and the joke of the south. The true southerner wants nothing to do with what you espouse.
Right. You are pissed because I have schooled you, owned you, and made a fool of you.
Lets see, which would be worse, having sex before kindergarten and approving of lynching, or being gay?
Nope, you lose.
I bet he repeatedly tried to arrest someone for being gay.And I will continue to ask the troll. I don't give a fuck about any god damn link he produces I want his answer in his words.
bigreb, no one cares what you think. You got the answer you deserved.
Why were you fired from the police force? Was that in violation of the 9th and 10th Amendments.
The state can not legally infringe on someones civil rights.
Guess it was that damn racist, bigoted, hateful, homophobic DEMOCRAT president in 1996 that allowed DOMA to be passed...Bill Clinton.
no, he signed it.
it was the asshat republican congress that ginned it up.
try again
The state can not legally infringe on someones civil rights.
Civil rights and Constitutional rights are two different things, one is solid and listed in the constitution and what is not listed in it is left to the states. Civil rights changes depending on how much the goverment wants to be involved in the individuals lives. Gay marriage is not a right unless the people of the state say it is so. No matter how much you wish for that to change, it wont until the people in your state says so, or until an overbearing tyrannical government changes it.
Guess it was that damn racist, bigoted, hateful, homophobic DEMOCRAT president in 1996 that allowed DOMA to be passed...Bill Clinton.
Yes he did. He learned the time was not yet right and he bowed to political necessity. I'm sure he's laughing now and thinking "I knew it wouldn't last."
I bet he repeatedly tried to arrest someone for being gay.bigreb, no one cares what you think. You got the answer you deserved.
Why were you fired from the police force? Was that in violation of the 9th and 10th Amendments.
He claims he did arrest two men for being "queer". That might explain his departure from the force. Police Depts are much less tolerant of bullies on the force now.
I bet he repeatedly tried to arrest someone for being gay.bigreb, no one cares what you think. You got the answer you deserved.
Why were you fired from the police force? Was that in violation of the 9th and 10th Amendments.
He claims he did arrest two men for being "queer". That might explain his departure from the force. Police Depts are much less tolerant of bullies on the force now.
What the controlling rw does not know or understand is the Constitution says is not hat the people can do but rather what the government can.
Interesting documentary being shown on FSTV (Free Speech TV network) called Blood of Patriots. Not something rw's would want to see however.
Get (pubs, rws, tb) government out of our bedrooms, out of our private lives.
Apparently not. Otherwise you wouldn't have been fired over it.I bet he repeatedly tried to arrest someone for being gay.
He claims he did arrest two men for being "queer". That might explain his departure from the force. Police Depts are much less tolerant of bullies on the force now.
Yes I did. The arrest were legal and according to North Carolina law dick sucker.
The state can not legally infringe on someones civil rights.
If we let them, the Rs will pass more and more laws to control our bodies as well as who we are allowed to marry.
While they say they are against Big Government, in fact they are in favor of any and all laws to control us.
The right is what Orwell meant by Big Brother.
