DONE - GOING TO JAIL! -- Official: Some Clinton emails 'too damaging' to release'

[bravoactual]

Hillary is above the law.

Laws are not meant for democrats, only for commoners and Republicans.

Do you have proof....

All you need is proof.

Where is your proof.

 

[leftwinger]

does this mean anything?

US Officials: Hillary's Emails Contain Names of Undercover CIA Spies

U.S. intelligence officials say "top-secret" emails Hillary Clinton kept on her private email server when she headed the State Department include the real names of CIA spies serving undercover overseas — a violation of federal law that has put the agents in harm's way, The Observer reports. And, The Observer's John Schindler writes, those emails also include the names of foreigners on the CIA payroll, possibly endangering their lives. "At a minimum, valuable covers have been blown, careers have been ruined, and lives have been put at serious risk. Our spies' greatest concern now is what's still in Hillary's emails that investigators have yet to find," Schindler, a former National Security Agency ...

 

[daws101]

I know you live in the make it up reality world is where you live ... you say we know some of her emails were classified ... you haven't any proof saying they were, just you know this... must be very satisfy to know that you can read minds predict what a person did or didn't do HUH ... yet you can't say that for shure ... its just and opinion of yours... kind of like sarah palin shrill ... I hope you get to hear that shrilll for the next 8 years .. oh lucky you... but you stay in your make it up world, you'll be happy there...
P. S.
you still have shown us one stick of evidence here that she had classified emails ... just your rants ... were still waiting for the evidence

It's been discussed, I'm not going to tutor you unless you pay me.

I would pick a illiterate tutor like you to teach any thing ...in other words we get it you're haven't a leg ti stand on ... just a bunch of unsubstantiated allegations ... Iv'e been following this thread from the get go... not one of you right wing nut jobs have been able to post one bit of factual proof or evidence just bunch of bull shit with a lot of might be or mat or a dozen could be's when confronted with the question you dodge it like you did here... we get it you're a liar

Jesus, talk about illiterate. What grade did you make it to? We know she broke the law because it's been quoted many times already. she wasn't allowed to do what she did. Period. Obviously she got classified information as SoS and she had it all on her personal homebrew setup, duh. Then deleting it, or so she thought.

At least 22 emails will never be seen in any form since they were so sensitive.

whats been quoted in the news by all media says this hillary clinton may have so22 emails that are considered to be classified ... then nut jobs like you turn that around salon hillary had 22 emails that arte classified ... then you claim they got here ... the fact that you're the illiterate one who just can'y seem to comprehend what you read is your fault ... I guess you were to busy being lead around by your nose by your handlers

in the second paragraph:
The State Department said it is investigating whether the content of the unreleased emails was classified at the time it was sent or received

then they said:
But because she used a private server, it wasn’t protected by government technology personnel. Clinton’s campaign has said her private server had robust security protections, but neither she nor the campaign has gone into much detail about those practices.

I could go on and on but nut jobs like you won't accept what they say

That's a dodge. How did she get her classified emails?

Golly Homer, people sent them to her?

 

[bravoactual]

It all comes down to one thing and one thing only.

Hillary Goddamn Clinton.

Hillary Goddamn Clinton Must Be Goddamn Guilty of Goddamn Something Because She is Hillary Goddamn Clinton and Hillary Goddamn Clinton Is GODDAMN Guilty For No Other Reason Than She Is HILLARY GODDAMN CLINTON!!!!!

It does not matter if there is no evidence supporting what the RWJ's have been saying, GODDAMNIT HILARY GODDAMN IS GUILTY...NOTHING ELSE MATTERS EXCEPT HILLARY GODDAMN CLINTON IS GUILTY.

There does not have to proof, HILLARY GODDAMN CLINTON IS GODDAMN GUILTY.

There does not have to evidence, HILLARY GODDAMN CLINTON IS GODDAMN GUILTY.

Nothing else matters to the Cons except that HILLARY GODDAMN CLINTON IS GODDAMN GUILTY BECAUSE SHE IS HILLARY GODDAMN CLINTON.

 

[PredFan]

"The intelligence community has now deemed some of Hillary Clinton’s emails “too damaging" to national security to release under any circumstances, according to a U.S. government official close to the ongoing review. A second source, who was not authorized to speak on the record, backed up the finding. "

"Na na na na
Na na na na
Hey, Hey, Hey
GOOD-BYE!"

Go to jail. Go DIRECTLY to Jail. Do NOT pass 'Go'. Do NOT collect $200. Do NOT Win the DNC Nomination. Do NOT continue Campaigning. Do NOT get put on the ballot. DO go down as the 1st 1st Lady to Go to Jail for NUMEROUS Felonies - crimes under the ESPIONAGE Act and for CORRUPTION Charges!

------

Selling Russia 1/5th of the US uranium Stockpile.

Caught and stopped TRYING to sell the Russians several of the Aleutian Islands & their mineral rights.

Caught taking contributions from foreign millionaire whose company she protected from legal punishment for violating Iranian Sanctions - running illegal goods to Iran - WHILE she served as Secretary of State ('Corruption'/'Influence Peddling)

Taking millions from Islamic nations that finance and support terrorism.

Taking millions from Islamic nations that oppress women, engage in female genital mutilation, and who murder homosexuals.

Hiring an AL QAEIDA-associated Militia to protect a US Ambassador.

Abandoning a US Ambassador in a hostile environment amidst terrorist threats that forced EVERY other nation with people in Benghazi to pull them out.

REJECTING OVER 600 pleas for additional security from the on-site US Ambassador AND TAKING AWAY 14 members of the Ambassador's security detail in the midst of these threats, a call for his assassination, AND after 2 previous terror attacks on his compound, the last of which before his murder left a 4-foot hole in his compound wall.

Denying UNDER OATH she knew what happened that night, ONLY to have HER OWN E-MAILS expose she told the Turkish Ambassador after the 13-hour attack that resulted in 4 Americans dead that she KNEW the video had nothing to do with the attack, that this was a terrorist attack; revealed that she told her own daughter that this was a terrorist attack; then told the world and the grieving families it was all about a video...thern ended up calling the grieving families 'Liars'!

Broke the law by not signing the required legal document, upon getting her security clearance required to do the job as Secretary of State, stating she had received her classification training.

Violated Administration rules and the law by not providing copies of ALL State Dept-related documents and e-mails to the State Dept for required recording/holding. The State Dept made it clear Hillary did NOT turn over all documents AS SHE CLAIMED UNDER OATH TO HAVE DONE.

Lied under oath about not using a legal private server, using MULTIPLE electronic devices (not just 'one'), and about NOT sending / receiving classified information. She later changed her statement to cover ass by saying she had not sent/received an e-mails / documents MARKED classified.
-- Since then the FBI has evidence that Hillary ordered subordinates to strip the classification markings off documents and to send them vis UNCLASS means for the sake of 'ease' and 'expedience'. These workers have stated this was not a 1-time thing but was almost 'SOP'! Thatm btw, is a CRIME.

Illegal handling, storage, and attempted destruction of Classified / EXTREMELY classified information capable of seriously damaging our national security.
- The company handling her server, which illegally had different / multiple classifications of information on 1 server (illegal) - did not have the appropriate legal clearance to hold/store/handle the classified information.
- Her lawyer was walking around with a USB drive that contained highly classified information without a security clearance, violating laws regarding handling, transporting, and storage of classified information.

Hillary broke the law by not signing the Federal Document stating she had released / returned all security documents and that she was keeping none of them (according to one report), which is a crime. If she DID sign the document, in light of all the classified State Dept-related information found in her position, she broke the law for keeping all this classified information.
-- Once you quit/step down/leave a job/program dealing with COMPARTMENTALIZED Highly Classified information the business/organization 'READS YOU OUT' of the program. From that point on it is ILLEGAL for you to have access to the information let alone have any of it in your possession!!!! The FBI just confirmed Hillary has / had compartmentalized Highly Classified info in her possession...ILLEGALLY.

(If they wanted to press it and make the case, considering her dealings with Russia and taking money from Islamic countries and others - such as the guy she 'helped' violate US Sanctions on Iran, a case of possible TREASON / REAL 'ESPIONAGE' could me made. (Not that it would stick, but it could be made...)

NOW the FBI is reporting that the information Hillary has / had in her possession was / is SO HIGHLY CLASSIFIED AND DANGEROUS TO OUR NATIONAL SECURITY that they CAN'T even REDACT it enough to release ANY of it!

HOLY CR@P! Stick a fork in her. SHE IS DONE! There is NO WAY the DOJ and / or Obama could possibly refuse to call for a Grand Jury / agree to indict her! Doing so to protect Ex-Atty General Eric Holder for multiple counts of Felony Perjury while attempting to keep Obama's 'Fast and Furious' scandal buried was easy to pull off because his criminal acts did not rise to the level of being capable of 'seriously causing damage to our national security'! Hillary, though? She'll be lucky if ALL they charge her with is 'NEGLIGENCE' under the Esionage Act!

She isn't going to jail unless the Obama Administration indicts her. Not going to happen.

she wont be indicted unless they believe they can WIN the case...and find her or anyone, guilty.... that's how it works... otherwise it's a waste of tax payer's money.

That is the excuse they will use. They won't indict her, she has a "D" after her name.

 

[easyt65]

Bravo gas finally SNAPPED...

Unable to face the truth, he has finally snapped. (& don't yse God's name that way. Try saying 'Allahdamnit')

 

[Vigilante]

Lovers in jail...together!

 

[easyt65]

does this mean anything?

US Officials: Hillary's Emails Contain Names of Undercover CIA Spies

U.S. intelligence officials say "top-secret" emails Hillary Clinton kept on her private email server when she headed the State Department include the real names of CIA spies serving undercover overseas — a violation of federal law that has put the agents in harm's way, The Observer reports. And, The Observer's John Schindler writes, those emails also include the names of foreigners on the CIA payroll, possibly endangering their lives. "At a minimum, valuable covers have been blown, careers have been ruined, and lives have been put at serious risk. Our spies' greatest concern now is what's still in Hillary's emails that investigators have yet to find," Schindler, a former National Security Agency ...

What's more dead Americans added to her credit? What difference does it make? As long as Hillary's ass and political career are saved it's all worth it, right Libs?!

 

[daws101]

Bravo gas finally SNAPPED...

Unable to face the truth, he has finally snapped. (& don't yse God's name that way. Try saying 'Allahdamnit')

God damn and fuck you .
You mean like that?

 

[easyt65]

Classy...just like Hillary.
What a clown...

 

[leftwinger]

pretty quiet in here? proof?

The Observer calls the breach a clear violation of federal law, citing the Intelligence Identities Protection Act of 1982, voted into law following the murder of the CIA spy in Greece after his identity was disclosed in the media.

CIA brass believe some or all or Clinton's emails, which were kept on her home server and were apparently unencrypted, were intercepted by foreign powers.

Clinton insists she never sent or received e-mails that were marked classified from the home server and blames Republicans for stoking the controversy. She has also asked that the 22 emails being withheld by the State Department be released.

Breaking News at Newsmax.com US Officials: Hillary's Emails Contain Names of Undercover CIA Spies

 

[Care4all]

WRONG!!!!! WRONG!!!!! WRONG!!!!!

Unless or until such as material is marked, it remains unclassified.

No.....REPEAT....NO Classified Material "Passed Through" the private server(s) used by Ms. Clinton.

There is no means or no mechanism by which classified material, held on a Secure Government Server can pass along or allowed to be passed along Classified Material to Non-Secure Non-Governmental Private Server.
The material in question was NOT classified at the time it was held on the server(s) used by Ms. Clinton and was classified after the fact, five years after the fact and at a time when said classified material was no longer being held or accessible by the server(s) being used by Ms. Clinton.

You do not have facts, you have assumptions, conjecture, contention, hearsay, and innuendo.

You have a claim by Ms. Clinton's attorney, but such claims have not been supported by any body of evidence that supports that claim. Ms. Clinton's attorney cannot and has not cited specific instances of wrong doing. l He knows that should he do so, he would be sued for malpractice, face criminal charges and disbarment for violation of Attorney/Client Privilege.

The attorney has made no specific claim and has provided no evidence to support his claims of wrong doing on the part of Ms. Clinton

No evidence has been brought forward to prove classified material was held, passed through, or passed along by Ms. Clinton.

The U.S. State Department, the U.S. State Departent's Diplomatic Security Service and the U.S. State Departments Intelligence Service have gone on the record saying no classified information was passed along to the server(s) used by Ms. Clinton.

You can continue to deny the facts, but you cannot change those facts.

Epic Fail.

Epic fail indeed. Apart from the fact that you're full of shit, explain how she got her classified emails since she wasn't using the government's system.

You do understand that even if she was using the .gov email system for her email, that the .gov email system was an UNCLASSIFIED gvt. email system...and not a system that was to have top secret info, on it.... so anything that came to her from the .gov email system, she would have automatically assumed what was being sent to her from it, would have been information that was not classified information....

the Top Secret system the govt keeps, has no internet capabilities..... the Top Secret system is on a separate system from the .gov email system and again, has no internet to email anyone....it is an internal system only.

So you believe she never got classified intel via the computer? Why does the FBI not agree? And where did she get it then, you left that out.

I believe whatever is NOW classified top secret, due to additional things and information gathered that have taken place since the email and documents were sent, has NOW made them top secret....and they are now being removed from the .gov email system.... which govt officials have stated is common.... very common to classify things that never were classified, due to addition information, sometimes years after the initial doc or email.

You can believe whatever you want.

You can believe the sky is green.

You can believe the sea orange.

You can believe the moon purple.

That does not make it so.

Your opinion is your own.

The facts as stated DO NOT SUPPORT WHAT YOU BELIEVE AND DO NOT SUPPORT YOUR OPINION.

There is no proof to support what you believe, there is no proof to support your opinion.

The State Department has gone on record. "No Classified Information Was Passed Through" to Ms.Clinton's Server(s). That is a fact....the truth.

There is no mechanism, no means by which a Classified Government Server, held at a secure site could pass on, or pass through Classified Information to an Unsecure, Privately held Server. That is a fact. That is the truth.

You continue to ignore the simple fact that the time the material in question was held on Ms. Clinton 's private server(s), said material was not classified. The material in question was classified after the fact and was in fact no longer stored or held on Ms. Clinton's server(s).

There is no body of proof to support allegations, conjectures, contentions, innuendos or suppositions that Ms. Clinton either by act or by intention did knowingly and willing pass on or have reason to pass on classified material. No proof...No evidence supports such a claim.

Your opinion is your own.

The facts DO NOT in any way, shape and/or form support your opinion.

You are entitled to your own opinion.

You ARE NOT entitled to your own facts.

There is no evidence to support your opinion.

There is no proof to support your opinion.

Might be time to change the tin foil in your hat.

uhhhhhh, who the heck are you commenting to? My post is agreeing with all that you have stated....

 

[easyt65]

Silly Liberals....melting down and 'eating their own'...

 

[JoeB131]

don't need another congressional investigation, the FBI is doing it. They only question is whether the AG will bring indictments when the FBI releases its findings. You can poo poo this as much as you like, but these are very serious findings. Patreaus was convicted of much less.

Not really.

Petreaus removed classified documents and showed them to Broadwell. The point is, Broadwell, even though her creepy stalking behavior is what blew the lid off the whole thing, was never charged with a crime for merely SEEING the documents.

So you might have a good argument whoever copy and pasted classified data and put it in an e-mail that eventually ended up in the inbox of Mrs. Clinton MIGHT have some legal jeopardy, but Mrs. Clinton really doesn't.

 

[Care4all]

pretty quiet in here? proof?

The Observer calls the breach a clear violation of federal law, citing the Intelligence Identities Protection Act of 1982, voted into law following the murder of the CIA spy in Greece after his identity was disclosed in the media.

CIA brass believe some or all or Clinton's emails, which were kept on her home server and were apparently unencrypted, were intercepted by foreign powers.

Clinton insists she never sent or received e-mails that were marked classified from the home server and blames Republicans for stoking the controversy. She has also asked that the 22 emails being withheld by the State Department be released.

Breaking News at Newsmax.com US Officials: Hillary's Emails Contain Names of Undercover CIA Spies

Do you trust The Observer as the source of this revelation given to them by a supposed intelligence community worker, that signed a nondisclosure agreement not to say anything regarding this...?

leak leak leak leak leak, drip drip drip....

I don't trust it, what so ever.... just 4 days ago, with the official release about these 7 email chains, it was said that we could be told NOTHING about what was in these emails and now this supposed 'official' is leaking some of the details to the Observer right wing rag....? I don't think so.... and if it's true, the intelligence officer or senate member leaking this, should be brought up on ETHICS charges...

 

[leftwinger]

Do you trust The Observer as the source of this revelation given to them by a supposed intelligence community worker, that signed a nondisclosure agreement not to say anything regarding this...?

leak leak leak leak leak, drip drip drip....

I don't trust it, what so ever.... just 4 days ago, with the official release about these 7 email chains, it was said that we could be told NOTHING about what was in these emails and now this supposed 'official' is leaking some of the details to the Observer right wing rag....? I don't think so.... and if it's true, the intelligence officer or senate member leaking this, should be brought up on ETHICS charges...

yeah. I don't know. I saw the headline about US officials........and thought it worth a look. Never heard of any Observer.

U.S. intelligence officials say "top-secret" emails Hillary Clinton kept on her private email server when she headed the State Department include the real names of CIA spies serving undercover overseas — a violation of federal law that has put the agents in harm's way, The Observer reports.

Breaking News at Newsmax.com US Officials: Hillary's Emails Contain Names of Undercover CIA Spies

 

[Arianrhod]

I predict we will see dozens more Hillary threads between now and the NH primary, started primarily by Trumpsters trying to avoid any mention of Iowa.

 

[Care4all]

Do you trust The Observer as the source of this revelation given to them by a supposed intelligence community worker, that signed a nondisclosure agreement not to say anything regarding this...?

leak leak leak leak leak, drip drip drip....

I don't trust it, what so ever.... just 4 days ago, with the official release about these 7 email chains, it was said that we could be told NOTHING about what was in these emails and now this supposed 'official' is leaking some of the details to the Observer right wing rag....? I don't think so.... and if it's true, the intelligence officer or senate member leaking this, should be brought up on ETHICS charges...

yeah. I don't know. I saw the headline about US officials........and thought it worth a look. Never heard of any Observer.

U.S. intelligence officials say "top-secret" emails Hillary Clinton kept on her private email server when she headed the State Department include the real names of CIA spies serving undercover overseas — a violation of federal law that has put the agents in harm's way, The Observer reports.

Breaking News at Newsmax.com US Officials: Hillary's Emails Contain Names of Undercover CIA Spies

NEWSMAX was reporting they got this information from The Observer, right in the first paragraph of your link provided, so I went to the Observer link newsmax provided to read the Original sourced article newsmax used to write their article..

 

[MarcATL]

You idiot. The second link I posted was to folks no longer collecting unemployment benefits. Even if you add those taking part time jobs for economic reasons, there are still fewer than when Obama became president. And that's still not even factoring in population growth.

After Five Years Of Obamanomics, A Record 100 Million Americans Not Working

What part of record do you not understand?
After Five Years Of Obamanomics, A Record 100 Million Americans Not Working

he Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) jobs report for December counted 74,000 jobs created last month. That was less than half the 200,000 new jobs expected.
Nevertheless, the BLS reported those 74,000 new jobs as reducing at least what it calls the U3 unemployment rate by three tenths of a percentage point, from 7.0% to 6.7%. That was because 347,000 workers fled the work force altogether last month, and so were no longer counted as unemployed.
Those 347,000 workers leaving the workforce altogether were almost 5 times (4.689) the 74,000 new jobs created. But the BLS, and the New York Times, still count that as headline unemployment plummeting on net to 6.7% from 7.0%. In fact, all of the decline in the U3 headline unemployment rate since President Obama entered office has been due to workers leavingthe work force, and therefore no longer counted as unemployed, rather than to new jobs created.
Those 347,000 for December, 2013, however, are still out there not working, and suffering. Indeed, they joined a near record of more than 102 million Americans not working in December, all still out there and suffering without jobs. Those 102 million Americans are the human face of an employment-population ratio stuck at a pitiful 58.6%. In fact, more than 100 million Americans were not working in Obama’s workers’ paradise for all of 2013 and 2012.

You do understand that there is a difference between number of Americans working and number of people, including illegal aliens, working in our country right? 80% of our job growth went to illegal aliens.
Seal the border.
No more immigrants until every American who wants a job has a job that pays a living wage.

Great, another idiot. The vast majority of those 100,000 don't want to work. They include retirees, stay-at-home spouses, students, folks collecting government checks, etc...

Currently, there are about 7.9 million people unemployed and another 5.9 who have stopped looking but want a job.

You must think those who read your posts are idiots if you keep using stats that include working illegal aliens.
I'm one of those 100,000 and I WANT TO WORK!!! So your statement is mere fiction. And it's more than 100,000.
Seal the border.
No new immigrants, unless they bring money or jobs, until every American who wants a job has a job that pays a living wage.

I'm eeking out contractual work because everybody wants to hire pt or seasonable employees only because of Obamacare.

What happened to "picking up yourself by your own bootstraps" that you righties love touting so much?

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

I don't really think that has anything to do with American jobs going to immigrants, while 35% of our population is collecting social services in order to pay the bills!!! Why do you want to destroy our country and our economy?

What jobs specifically?

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

 

[MarcATL]

[Q

You mentioned holding Brian Williams accountable by not watching his shows. Is that the same standard you are applying to Bill O'Reilly?

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

I think when I said I didn't give a shit about O'Reilly and sure as hell would not vote for him as President I answered your question. You are barking up the wrong tree if you are excusing The Bitch's stolen valor by suggesting that I am hypocritical with O'Reilly.

When are you going to dump the The Bitch because of her stolen valor or do you even care?

So you're saying that you DO hold O'Reilly to the same standard as you hold Brian Williams. Yes?

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk