Don't monkey up the election!

[DrLove]

Does the same hang true about all your claims of false news?

what??
huh??
???

You don't want to believe all the racist calls against your racists why believe all the false news reports the moron in the wh spouts?

bullshit
the news is constantly anti-white
......always an anti-white story making sure RACE is in the story---when it has NOTHING to do with the story!!!! ie--WHITE cop shoots BLACK man! hahahahahahah
....hardly ever is there a story in MSM/headlined/headlined for weeks/etc when a black commits a hate crime/is racist/murders/etc a white

...whites are not crying RACISM 24/7
wtf are you talking about??

Consistently anti-white news? .. Interesting you fucking idiot

everyday---do you need links from now on?? because I've put them out before
I've put out threads on this already--

Pass on your StinkBart, DailySmeller, AmRen, Stormfront and such links Trumptard.

 

[airplanemechanic]

If monkey is racist against blacks can you explain this:

 

[harmonica]

what??
huh??
???

You don't want to believe all the racist calls against your racists why believe all the false news reports the moron in the wh spouts?

bullshit
the news is constantly anti-white
......always an anti-white story making sure RACE is in the story---when it has NOTHING to do with the story!!!! ie--WHITE cop shoots BLACK man! hahahahahahah
....hardly ever is there a story in MSM/headlined/headlined for weeks/etc when a black commits a hate crime/is racist/murders/etc a white

...whites are not crying RACISM 24/7
wtf are you talking about??

Consistently anti-white news? .. Interesting you fucking idiot

everyday---do you need links from now on?? because I've put them out before
I've put out threads on this already--

Pass on your StinkBart, DailySmeller, AmRen, Stormfront and such links Trumptard.

.....I linked one time ABC news had 4 out of 7 headlines were anti-white---same day same time
here, ABC has this anti-white monkey crap headlined/front page
ABC News
Yahoo:
Neo-Confederates Rally At Site Of Toppled UNC Monument
A White Supremacist Group Is Making Robocalls About Mollie Tibbetts' Death
NBC:
Chicago activists plan for 'powder keg' trial of police officer
CNN story about poor hispanics
Why passport report strikes a familiar fear in me (Opinion) - CNN
etc etc

 

[DrLove]

If monkey is racist against blacks can you explain this:

Been there done that you assclown .. there is ZERO history of blacks referring to whites as "monkeys"

Comparing Black People to Monkeys has a Long, Dark Simian History | HuffPost

 

[airplanemechanic]

Doesn't matter. If it's racist, it's racist.

Huffpo as a source? Huffington puffington Post? LOL

 

[Pogo]

Interesting. I've just said seven times that it has no meaning for me yet here you are arguing I argued it's "racist".

Do you always think of running strawmen out on the field when you know I eat them for lunch?

Fuck it up doesn't mean sex, but monkey it up means negroes.

If you say so. Actually I think it means "looka me, I just invented a phrase, how you like me now?".

Then you don't think it's racist. Good for you, because it's not.

Everything monkey isn't racist.

Never said it was. Actually ---- you did.

Paint yourself into a lot of corners do ya?

You'll have to link that fauxfense.

Uhhmmm no. You'll have to go back and find it. This just in: I don't work for you.

 

[DrLove]

You don't want to believe all the racist calls against your racists why believe all the false news reports the moron in the wh spouts?

bullshit
the news is constantly anti-white
......always an anti-white story making sure RACE is in the story---when it has NOTHING to do with the story!!!! ie--WHITE cop shoots BLACK man! hahahahahahah
....hardly ever is there a story in MSM/headlined/headlined for weeks/etc when a black commits a hate crime/is racist/murders/etc a white

...whites are not crying RACISM 24/7
wtf are you talking about??

Consistently anti-white news? .. Interesting you fucking idiot

everyday---do you need links from now on?? because I've put them out before
I've put out threads on this already--

Pass on your StinkBart, DailySmeller, AmRen, Stormfront and such links Trumptard.

.....I linked one time ABC news had 4 out of 7 headlines were anti-white---same day same time
here, ABC has this anti-white monkey crap headlined/front page
ABC News
Yahoo:
Neo-Confederates Rally At Site Of Toppled UNC Monument
A White Supremacist Group Is Making Robocalls About Mollie Tibbetts' Death
NBC:
Chicago activists plan for 'powder keg' trial of police officer
CNN story about poor hispanics
Why passport report strikes a familiar fear in me (Opinion) - CNN
etc etc

Link 1. FAIL
Link 2. Irrelevant
Link 3. DOUBLE Fail
Link 4. You're an Idiot

 

[PredFan]

Any of you left wing morons know the difference between a verb and a noun? Apparently not. A verb describes an action, like drive, walk, repair, destroy, and yes in this case "monkey. A noun describes a person, place, or thing. Like Democrat, idiot, car, phone, opponent, wife, etc. When you say "Be sure not to monkey this up" "monkey is a verb, it cannot describe anyone. Got it? I doubt it.


From the Department of Redundancy Department: "Left Wing morons"

 

[DrLove]

Doesn't matter. If it's racist, it's racist.

Huffpo as a source? Huffington puffington Post? LOL

How many more links you need asshole - there are Buttloads on the topic.

history of comparing blacks to monkeys

 

[harmonica]

bullshit
the news is constantly anti-white
......always an anti-white story making sure RACE is in the story---when it has NOTHING to do with the story!!!! ie--WHITE cop shoots BLACK man! hahahahahahah
....hardly ever is there a story in MSM/headlined/headlined for weeks/etc when a black commits a hate crime/is racist/murders/etc a white

...whites are not crying RACISM 24/7
wtf are you talking about??

Consistently anti-white news? .. Interesting you fucking idiot

everyday---do you need links from now on?? because I've put them out before
I've put out threads on this already--

Pass on your StinkBart, DailySmeller, AmRen, Stormfront and such links Trumptard.

.....I linked one time ABC news had 4 out of 7 headlines were anti-white---same day same time
here, ABC has this anti-white monkey crap headlined/front page
ABC News
Yahoo:
Neo-Confederates Rally At Site Of Toppled UNC Monument
A White Supremacist Group Is Making Robocalls About Mollie Tibbetts' Death
NBC:
Chicago activists plan for 'powder keg' trial of police officer
CNN story about poor hispanics
Why passport report strikes a familiar fear in me (Opinion) - CNN
etc etc

Link 1. FAIL
Link 2. Irrelevant
Link 3. DOUBLE Fail
Link 4. You're an Idiot

the leftists/crybabies/etc always say facts are failures-irrelevant
hahahahahah

 

[DrLove]

Consistently anti-white news? .. Interesting you fucking idiot

everyday---do you need links from now on?? because I've put them out before
I've put out threads on this already--

Pass on your StinkBart, DailySmeller, AmRen, Stormfront and such links Trumptard.

.....I linked one time ABC news had 4 out of 7 headlines were anti-white---same day same time
here, ABC has this anti-white monkey crap headlined/front page
ABC News
Yahoo:
Neo-Confederates Rally At Site Of Toppled UNC Monument
A White Supremacist Group Is Making Robocalls About Mollie Tibbetts' Death
NBC:
Chicago activists plan for 'powder keg' trial of police officer
CNN story about poor hispanics
Why passport report strikes a familiar fear in me (Opinion) - CNN
etc etc

Link 1. FAIL
Link 2. Irrelevant
Link 3. DOUBLE Fail
Link 4. You're an Idiot

the leftists/crybabies/etc always say facts are failures-irrelevant
hahahahahah

What a worthless response - hahahaha
Jesus, where to boards like this find such vacuous individuals?

 

[Ame®icano]

Obama In 2008 Warns: Politicians 'Monkeyed Around With Elections

Racist much?

Obama was referring to POLITICIANS - Not one or more BLACK politicians.
Glad I could assist

When Barry says it, somehow has different meaning.
DeSantis was referring to socialists. Regardless of color, they're all the same, lowest of the lowest.

Any white guy who says a black guy will "monkey this up"?
Is either a racist or dog whistling at racists.
You decide

Only thing is, DeSantis did not say black guy will "monkey this up".

So, the guy just learned who his opponent is but he was not talking about him. Nooooooooo. Couldn't be.
QUIT DEFENDING RACIAL SLURS

Nobody is defending racial slurs, because there are none.

You only want it to be a racial slur, because you got nothing else but "race card".

 

[Mac1958]

Sorry, Mac, I made a real point there, and you did not address it.

Actually, I did.

Your post - "If real racism was a real issue, we would not be seeing so much crap like this example ie monkey, because liberals, would have real examples to work with" - says two things: First, that racism is not a real issue, and that you can't come up with any real examples of it.

I have to assume that you believe what you wrote. And I know it to be so tragically, blatantly untrue that I just don't know how to respond. So, I just pointed at it and said, "and there ya go", out of pure exasperation. My thoughts were, "well, this is what we're dealing with. This is how far we have to go."

If you really believe that, there's absolutely nothing I can say. It's beyond my capacity to understand or address this level of denial. If you are truly capable of intellectually isolating yourself from something this obvious, there are no words that are going to engage you.

I'm being dead serious here. I don't know what else to say. I do find it fascinating, but that's as far as it goes.
.

 

[Correll]

Sorry, Mac, I made a real point there, and you did not address it.

Actually, I did.

Your post - "If real racism was a real issue, we would not be seeing so much crap like this example ie monkey, because liberals, would have real examples to work with" - says two things: First, that racism is not a real issue, and that you can't come up with any real examples of it.

I have to assume that you believe what you wrote. And I know it to be so tragically, blatantly untrue that I just don't know how to respond. So, I just pointed at it and said, "and there ya go", out of pure exasperation. My thoughts were, "well, this is what we're dealing with. This is how far we have to go."

If you really believe that, there's absolutely nothing I can say. It's beyond my capacity to understand or address this level of denial. If you are truly capable of intellectually isolating yourself from something this obvious, there are no words that are going to engage you.

I'm being dead serious here. I don't know what else to say. I do find it fascinating, but that's as far as it goes.
.

Why do libs spend so much time addressing bs like this "monkey" issue, if there are real problems with white racism?


Would it not be more productive, not to mention convincing, if they addressed the "Real" racism?


Or do they have a policy of ignoring the "real racism" while addressing bs so as to continue to let people suffer, just for the evul fun, while pissing off white people by calling them names for no reason?



Cause is there is a real problem with real racism, that is what happens when they ignore that, to focus on bs.

 

[Mac1958]

Sorry, Mac, I made a real point there, and you did not address it.

Actually, I did.

Your post - "If real racism was a real issue, we would not be seeing so much crap like this example ie monkey, because liberals, would have real examples to work with" - says two things: First, that racism is not a real issue, and that you can't come up with any real examples of it.

I have to assume that you believe what you wrote. And I know it to be so tragically, blatantly untrue that I just don't know how to respond. So, I just pointed at it and said, "and there ya go", out of pure exasperation. My thoughts were, "well, this is what we're dealing with. This is how far we have to go."

If you really believe that, there's absolutely nothing I can say. It's beyond my capacity to understand or address this level of denial. If you are truly capable of intellectually isolating yourself from something this obvious, there are no words that are going to engage you.

I'm being dead serious here. I don't know what else to say. I do find it fascinating, but that's as far as it goes.
.

Why do libs spend so much time addressing bs like this "monkey" issue, if there are real problems with white racism?


Would it not be more productive, not to mention convincing, if they addressed the "Real" racism?


Or do they have a policy of ignoring the "real racism" while addressing bs so as to continue to let people suffer, just for the evul fun, while pissing off white people by calling them names for no reason?



Cause is there is a real problem with real racism, that is what happens when they ignore that, to focus on bs.

They do it because it works. It keeps minorities on their side.

Plus, they have the Right denying that racism even exists, which minorities know is a flat-out lie, affirming their loyalties.

So it's just a win-win.
.

 

[Correll]

Sorry, Mac, I made a real point there, and you did not address it.

Actually, I did.

Your post - "If real racism was a real issue, we would not be seeing so much crap like this example ie monkey, because liberals, would have real examples to work with" - says two things: First, that racism is not a real issue, and that you can't come up with any real examples of it.

I have to assume that you believe what you wrote. And I know it to be so tragically, blatantly untrue that I just don't know how to respond. So, I just pointed at it and said, "and there ya go", out of pure exasperation. My thoughts were, "well, this is what we're dealing with. This is how far we have to go."

If you really believe that, there's absolutely nothing I can say. It's beyond my capacity to understand or address this level of denial. If you are truly capable of intellectually isolating yourself from something this obvious, there are no words that are going to engage you.

I'm being dead serious here. I don't know what else to say. I do find it fascinating, but that's as far as it goes.
.

Why do libs spend so much time addressing bs like this "monkey" issue, if there are real problems with white racism?


Would it not be more productive, not to mention convincing, if they addressed the "Real" racism?


Or do they have a policy of ignoring the "real racism" while addressing bs so as to continue to let people suffer, just for the evul fun, while pissing off white people by calling them names for no reason?



Cause is there is a real problem with real racism, that is what happens when they ignore that, to focus on bs.

They do it because it works. It keeps minorities on their side.

Plus, they have the Right denying that racism even exists, which minorities know is a flat-out lie, affirming their loyalties.

So it's just a win-win.
.

Name the biggest example of real racism coming from whites today.

 

[Mac1958]

Sorry, Mac, I made a real point there, and you did not address it.

Actually, I did.

Your post - "If real racism was a real issue, we would not be seeing so much crap like this example ie monkey, because liberals, would have real examples to work with" - says two things: First, that racism is not a real issue, and that you can't come up with any real examples of it.

I have to assume that you believe what you wrote. And I know it to be so tragically, blatantly untrue that I just don't know how to respond. So, I just pointed at it and said, "and there ya go", out of pure exasperation. My thoughts were, "well, this is what we're dealing with. This is how far we have to go."

If you really believe that, there's absolutely nothing I can say. It's beyond my capacity to understand or address this level of denial. If you are truly capable of intellectually isolating yourself from something this obvious, there are no words that are going to engage you.

I'm being dead serious here. I don't know what else to say. I do find it fascinating, but that's as far as it goes.
.

Why do libs spend so much time addressing bs like this "monkey" issue, if there are real problems with white racism?


Would it not be more productive, not to mention convincing, if they addressed the "Real" racism?


Or do they have a policy of ignoring the "real racism" while addressing bs so as to continue to let people suffer, just for the evul fun, while pissing off white people by calling them names for no reason?



Cause is there is a real problem with real racism, that is what happens when they ignore that, to focus on bs.

They do it because it works. It keeps minorities on their side.

Plus, they have the Right denying that racism even exists, which minorities know is a flat-out lie, affirming their loyalties.

So it's just a win-win.
.

Name the biggest example of real racism coming from whites today.

No, I'm done with "examples". We both know you're going to downplay it, scoff at it, or deny it.

Think what you will. This game is insulting, and I think I'm insulted enough here.
.

 

[Correll]

Sorry, Mac, I made a real point there, and you did not address it.

Actually, I did.

Your post - "If real racism was a real issue, we would not be seeing so much crap like this example ie monkey, because liberals, would have real examples to work with" - says two things: First, that racism is not a real issue, and that you can't come up with any real examples of it.

I have to assume that you believe what you wrote. And I know it to be so tragically, blatantly untrue that I just don't know how to respond. So, I just pointed at it and said, "and there ya go", out of pure exasperation. My thoughts were, "well, this is what we're dealing with. This is how far we have to go."

If you really believe that, there's absolutely nothing I can say. It's beyond my capacity to understand or address this level of denial. If you are truly capable of intellectually isolating yourself from something this obvious, there are no words that are going to engage you.

I'm being dead serious here. I don't know what else to say. I do find it fascinating, but that's as far as it goes.
.

Why do libs spend so much time addressing bs like this "monkey" issue, if there are real problems with white racism?


Would it not be more productive, not to mention convincing, if they addressed the "Real" racism?


Or do they have a policy of ignoring the "real racism" while addressing bs so as to continue to let people suffer, just for the evul fun, while pissing off white people by calling them names for no reason?



Cause is there is a real problem with real racism, that is what happens when they ignore that, to focus on bs.

They do it because it works. It keeps minorities on their side.

Plus, they have the Right denying that racism even exists, which minorities know is a flat-out lie, affirming their loyalties.

So it's just a win-win.
.

Name the biggest example of real racism coming from whites today.

No, I'm done with "examples". We both know you're going to downplay it, scoff at it, or deny it.

Think what you will. This game is insulting, and I think I'm insulted enough here.
.

Dude.

Seriously.


Obama got more white votes that Kerry, or Hillary.


Polls showed Colin Powell getting more white votes than Dole or Clinton, if he had actually won.


There are no government policies or laws designed to discriminate against blacks, and MANY that actually discriminate in FAVOR of minorities.

 

[eagle1462010]

Sorry, Mac, I made a real point there, and you did not address it.

Actually, I did.

Your post - "If real racism was a real issue, we would not be seeing so much crap like this example ie monkey, because liberals, would have real examples to work with" - says two things: First, that racism is not a real issue, and that you can't come up with any real examples of it.

I have to assume that you believe what you wrote. And I know it to be so tragically, blatantly untrue that I just don't know how to respond. So, I just pointed at it and said, "and there ya go", out of pure exasperation. My thoughts were, "well, this is what we're dealing with. This is how far we have to go."

If you really believe that, there's absolutely nothing I can say. It's beyond my capacity to understand or address this level of denial. If you are truly capable of intellectually isolating yourself from something this obvious, there are no words that are going to engage you.

I'm being dead serious here. I don't know what else to say. I do find it fascinating, but that's as far as it goes.
.

Why do libs spend so much time addressing bs like this "monkey" issue, if there are real problems with white racism?


Would it not be more productive, not to mention convincing, if they addressed the "Real" racism?


Or do they have a policy of ignoring the "real racism" while addressing bs so as to continue to let people suffer, just for the evul fun, while pissing off white people by calling them names for no reason?



Cause is there is a real problem with real racism, that is what happens when they ignore that, to focus on bs.

They do it because it works. It keeps minorities on their side.

Plus, they have the Right denying that racism even exists, which minorities know is a flat-out lie, affirming their loyalties.

So it's just a win-win.
.

Saying a worded phrase isn't racist is denying racism never exists..........Talk about distorted mentality.........

The issue is a fruitcake going off the deep end over the phrase........Anger........and a way to manipulate his base for it..............For votes...........Has nothing to do with Racism.......has to do with votes.............

Leftist standard get out the vote tactic.............Dividing the Nation by beating a dead horse.

 

[eagle1462010]