Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If the U.S. government hadn't kept secrets leading up to WWII, we would have never been involved in WWII."Is it legal for anyone to reveal any government secret they like so long as they claim the government is violating the constitution" ?
And if they are wrong.....hang them.
If the government is keeping secrets, it is time to get a new government.
If the government hadn't kept secrets during WW II you would have been guaranteed a new government. A German speaking government.
If the U.S. government hadn't kept secrets leading up to WWII, we would have never been involved in WWII.If the government is keeping secrets, it is time to get a new government.
If the government hadn't kept secrets during WW II you would have been guaranteed a new government. A German speaking government.
I swear, the amount of information and education the average person on this planet have is so little. Love, more love, I think that is what is needed.
(And less secrets.)
Did you know more Americans die every year from household appliance accidents than from terrorists or foreign operatives?
And you'd prefer that not be true?WTF?!?
I think a lot of the problem is, people drink and do recreation drugs, and then decide to try to get household tasks done when they should be relaxing.
Did you know more Americans die every year from household appliance accidents than from terrorists or foreign operatives?
And you'd prefer that not be true?WTF?!?
Of course I prefer that not to be true.
And you'd prefer that not be true?WTF?!?
Of course I prefer that not to be true.
Well why on Earth do you think 9/11 has not happened again?
If the U.S. government hadn't kept secrets leading up to WWII, we would have never been involved in WWII.If the government hadn't kept secrets during WW II you would have been guaranteed a new government. A German speaking government.
I swear, the amount of information and education the average person on this planet have is so little. Love, more love, I think that is what is needed.
(And less secrets.)
We were going to be involved in WW II whether we wanted to or not. Please stop being naive.
And you'd prefer that not be true?WTF?!?
Of course I prefer that not to be true.
Well why on Earth do you think 9/11 has not happened again?
Of course I prefer that not to be true.
Well why on Earth do you think 9/11 has not happened again?
Go search the conspiracy forums for terms like "MOSSAD." There is no reason for another 9/11, your mind is already completely mentally conditioned. If you actually believe those towers were brought down by air planes, it is quite obvious, you don't read books, and you aren't a critical thinker. What more have we to discuss? You ingest propaganda, and then let loose partisan double-speak.
Do you have any idea how difficult it would be to plant explosive in sky scrappers like that again? Or to coordinate such an elaborate deception? To have so many hijackings at the exact time when the military is running a "terror drill" and supposedly can't intercept them? It is obvious you have done so little research into this topic, it warrants very little response.
Did Ed Snowden not take an oath of secrecy?
Did Ed Snowden just happen to stumble across information he felt like the public needed to know?
"My position with Booz Allen Hamilton granted me access to lists of machines all over the world the NSA hacked," he told the Post on June 12. "That is why I accepted that position about three months ago."
Doesn't sound like it to me! Sounds like he sought out the job with the intent all along of violating his security agreement and U.S. law. That's how SPIES behave - not whistle blowers.
Snowden sought Booz Allen job to gather evidence on NSA surveillance | South China Morning Post
Um, no. That lid was blown off in 2006. Snowden just informed us it was still going on after the torch was passed from Right to Left.
I would need you to objectively define what you mean be "regulating to the nth degree"
Thanks.
It doesn't need definition.
Well I don't know what the term "regulating to the nth degree" means, so yes, it does if you'd like me to answer your question.
If you ever bother reading the Constitution you will find out that NO AUTHORITY was ever provided to regulate the economy.
.
What part of the Commerce clause are you confused about?
Um, no. That lid was blown off in 2006. Snowden just informed us it was still going on after the torch was passed from Right to Left.
Oh bullshit.
You want to whack your little partisan pee-pee about BOOOOOOSHHH
You leftist fucknuts were whining that Bush was intercepting cell phone calls on the public airwaves that were flagged to terrorist countries.
That is a HUGE fucking way from what your little tin Messiah® is doing by monitoring ALL phones, cell and land line, as well as email and SMS.
The Bush justifications that the public airwaves dissipate an expectation of privacy has some merit, you can't expect privacy when chatting on a CB - and let's face it, a cell phone goes over the public airwaves, just like a CB. But your god is going WAY beyond the open airwaves and listening in on everything - as is the way of Big Brother.
Um, no. That lid was blown off in 2006. Snowden just informed us it was still going on after the torch was passed from Right to Left.
Oh bullshit.
You want to whack your little partisan pee-pee about BOOOOOOSHHH
You leftist fucknuts were whining that Bush was intercepting cell phone calls on the public airwaves that were flagged to terrorist countries.
That is a HUGE fucking way from what your little tin Messiah® is doing by monitoring ALL phones, cell and land line, as well as email and SMS.
The Bush justifications that the public airwaves dissipate an expectation of privacy has some merit, you can't expect privacy when chatting on a CB - and let's face it, a cell phone goes over the public airwaves, just like a CB. But your god is going WAY beyond the open airwaves and listening in on everything - as is the way of Big Brother.
Anyone that exposes the wrong-doing of the Hussein is considered a traitor to liberals, that's the only reason libs are upset over Snowden. They could care less if he broke the law.
Edward may have broken the law, but he blew the lid off of a major unconstitutional spying ring known as the National Security Administration.
It doesn't need definition.
Well I don't know what the term "regulating to the nth degree" means, so yes, it does if you'd like me to answer your question.
If you ever bother reading the Constitution you will find out that NO AUTHORITY was ever provided to regulate the economy.
.
What part of the Commerce clause are you confused about?
The one that authorizes Congress to disctate to individual entrepreneurs:
Gibbons v. Ogden, 9 Wheat. 1, 195, 196.
In his concurring opinion in that case Mr. Justice Johnson observed that the grant to congress of the power to regulate commerce carried with it the whole subject, leaving nothing for the state to act upon, and that, 'if there was any one object riding over every other in the adoption of the constitution, it was to keep commercial intercourse among the states free from all invidious and partial restraints.' Id. 23
Of course I prefer that not to be true.
Well why on Earth do you think 9/11 has not happened again?
Because there aren't as many terrorist boogeymen as the government would have you believe.
Terrorist attacks on the scale of 9/11 were always very rare.
Attacks on the scale of the Boston Marathon are a lot more common, and no amount of NSA spying was able to prevent it.
