Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
When the libs gloat about the unemployment coming down while over 300,000 fall off the books to attain a lower number. And, only 96,000 jobs created in the latest report, there is only one president we can blame for this so called recovery, and that would be Obama.
What I see with the democrats is that it is party over the country, because if a republican would have these kind of numbers after 3+ years in office they would have been all over the president, but they are defending Obama. go figure....
I posted Meister's bullshit that you have been defending several times already, so stop the dumb act.BULLSHIT, the BLS made no such claim that 368,000 people wanted to work but were taken off the books to attain a lower number.
Employment Situation Summary
"368,000 people wanted to work but were taken off the books attain a lower number."
Show not just me but everyone where I said those words or made such a claim.
Exact words...not your spun interpertation of them.
The only BULLSHIT here is you and you're stinking the board up with it.
Hey dumbass, I was replying to Meister not you. You are too stupid to keep track of who I'm replying to.YOU were the one who claimed that 300,000+ people who want jobs were removed from the books to attain a lower number, so the burden of proof is on you. Everyone with a working brain knows that the Boomers are retiring or becoming disabled.He won't do it because he can't Beretta. This is just the Kool-Aid talking, nothing else.
He will make excuses for his messiah at any cost, which just makes himself look like an ignorant partisan hack that has a fetish for Rush.
Again, you will acknowledge retiring Boomers as soon as a Republican is president and the workforce participation rate continues to decline.
I see you couldn't come back with the reply where I said that. Why? Because I didn't say that. You can't even keep track of who you are replying to.
This is my last post to an obtuse jerk like yourself.
Look it up:
Employment Situation Summary
A little advice: Don't put made-up, twisted words in people's mouths because you just may be asked to show proof of where they said it and you'll end up looling pretty stupid.
Hey dumbass, I was replying to Meister not you. You are too stupid to keep track of who I'm replying to.YOU were the one who claimed that 300,000+ people who want jobs were removed from the books to attain a lower number, so the burden of proof is on you. Everyone with a working brain knows that the Boomers are retiring or becoming disabled.
Again, you will acknowledge retiring Boomers as soon as a Republican is president and the workforce participation rate continues to decline.
I see you couldn't come back with the reply where I said that. Why? Because I didn't say that. You can't even keep track of who you are replying to.
This is my last post to an obtuse jerk like yourself.
Look it up:
Employment Situation Summary
A little advice: Don't put made-up, twisted words in people's mouths because you just may be asked to show proof of where they said it and you'll end up looling pretty stupid.
Hey dumbass, I was replying to Meister not you. You are too stupid to keep track of who I'm replying to.YOU were the one who claimed that 300,000+ people who want jobs were removed from the books to attain a lower number, so the burden of proof is on you. Everyone with a working brain knows that the Boomers are retiring or becoming disabled.
Again, you will acknowledge retiring Boomers as soon as a Republican is president and the workforce participation rate continues to decline.
I see you couldn't come back with the reply where I said that. Why? Because I didn't say that. You can't even keep track of who you are replying to.
This is my last post to an obtuse jerk like yourself.
Look it up:
Employment Situation Summary
A little advice: Don't put made-up, twisted words in people's mouths because you just may be asked to show proof of where they said it and you'll end up looling pretty stupid.
Hey dumbass, I was replying to Meister not you. You are too stupid to keep track of who I'm replying to.I see you couldn't come back with the reply where I said that. Why? Because I didn't say that. You can't even keep track of who you are replying to.
This is my last post to an obtuse jerk like yourself.
Look it up:
Employment Situation Summary
A little advice: Don't put made-up, twisted words in people's mouths because you just may be asked to show proof of where they said it and you'll end up looling pretty stupid.
Go back and look, I've already replied to you before your drivel was even posted, WTF?
Have you ever heard of the Economic Tax Recovery Act of 1981?
yes, it increased my taxes, which is why I did not vote for reagan for his second term.
It lowered your taxes, you dumb shit. Your quote even says it lowered taxes.
Are liberals all such profound imbeciles?
That is not even remotely close to what I said, obviously you are desperately trying save face by playing dumb.YOU were the one who claimed that 300,000+ people who want jobs were removed from the books to attain a lower number, so the burden of proof is on you. Everyone with a working brain knows that the Boomers are retiring or becoming disabled.He won't do it because he can't Beretta. This is just the Kool-Aid talking, nothing else.
He will make excuses for his messiah at any cost, which just makes himself look like an ignorant partisan hack that has a fetish for Rush.
Again, you will acknowledge retiring Boomers as soon as a Republican is president and the workforce participation rate continues to decline.
Dude, the baby boomers are retiring from unemployment? That sounds like what you're saying.
Your stupid graphs mean nothing. The fact remains that Obama created more private sector jobs in 4 years than Bush created in 8.
Why don't you try to explain why corporate profits, of American companies, are at record highs, and we still have unemployment over 8%? Is that a failure of the market?
People care more about Wall Street positive results than unemployment, Under Oblama the stock market is doing great.
Hey dumbass, I was replying to Meister not you. You are too stupid to keep track of who I'm replying to.
Go back and look, I've already replied to you before your drivel was even posted, WTF?
He's hopeless and wrong and he's just digging himself in deeper. For the sake of mercy towards him, I'm moving on.
Way to spin it, Dickless...Michelle "Don't Eat That" 0bama is a Republican?
Never knew that...
You certainly pulled that inanity out your ass, didn't you? Do you think Libertarians are too fucking stupid to know the difference between good diet advice and scumbag conservatives trying to control what people do in their bedrooms?Good diet advice... Good one...lol
"Pay for your own abortion" is a vaginal probe? LMAO!!!Way to spin it, Dickless...You certainly pulled that inanity out your ass, didn't you? Do you think Libertarians are too fucking stupid to know the difference between good diet advice and scumbag conservatives trying to control what people do in their bedrooms?
What spin? Michele Obama isn't telling you that you must eat anything. The GOP, otoh, is telling women that they must have an unnecessary vaginal probe if they want to terminate an early pregnancy. That's not very libertarian.
FAIL! 96,000 jobs created. 125,000 expected.
Explain why American corporations have set record profit growth, and we're still being fucked. Make your argument.
No company is going to invest a lot of money in expansion so long as the community organizer is still in the White house. They have no idea what new horrors are coming down the pike.
Explain why American corporations have set record profit growth, and we're still being fucked. Make your argument.
No company is going to invest a lot of money in expansion so long as the community organizer is still in the White house. They have no idea what new horrors are coming down the pike.
You're an idiot. You know nothing about supply and demand.
When the libs gloat about the unemployment coming down while over 300,000 fall off the books to attain a lower number. And, only 96,000 jobs created in the latest report, there is only one president we can blame for this so called recovery, and that would be Obama.
What I see with the democrats is that it is party over the country, because if a republican would have these kind of numbers after 3+ years in office they would have been all over the president, but they are defending Obama. go figure....
I would not be complaining if a Republican POTUS was getting the results we are seeing given the same circumstances. I am interested in trends. The trend is toward the positive. Thus I am able to accept them as positive.
you are the one claiming that 368,000 people who want to work were removed from the workforce to attain a lower number. The burden of proof is on you. Only a moron would contend that Boomers do not retire or become disabled.BULLSHIT, the BLS made no such claim that 368,000 people wanted to work but were taken off the books attain a lower number.
Employment Situation Summary
You're hopeless. Before you try to use an argument pulled from you ass get a handle of what the conversation is about and what the numbers mean and represent.
Twisting what is reported doesn't count as stats.
Young adults drop out of the job market
The drop in the unemployment rate in August isn't particularly good news for the economy -- it's driven mostly by nearly 400,000 people dropping out of the labor force, rather than more people finding jobs.
But those dropping out aren't so much the discouraged 30-, 40- or 50-year olds. In fact, the Labor Department said there was a modest decline in the overall number of discouraged job seekers.
Obama battles job crisis
The U.S. lost 4.3 million jobs in President Obama's first 13 months in office. Track his progress since then.The drop is because so many young adults, aged 16 to 24, are no longer looking for work.
There were 453,000 fewer young adults with jobs in August than in July. But despite that plunge, only 27,000 more young people were looking for new jobs. Most apparently stopped looking and left the labor force. And those numbers take into account seasonal factors such as younger workers returning to school.
As a result, the percentage of young people who are counted in the labor force fell to its lowest level since 1955
YOU were the one who claimed that 300,000+ people who want jobs were removed from the books to attain a lower number, so the burden of proof is on you. Everyone with a working brain knows that the Boomers are retiring or becoming disabled.I hear you. GOD forbid a person should ask him for stats on his claim.
He won't do it because he can't Beretta. This is just the Kool-Aid talking, nothing else.
He will make excuses for his messiah at any cost, which just makes himself look like an ignorant partisan hack that has a fetish for Rush.
Again, you will acknowledge retiring Boomers as soon as a Republican is president and the workforce participation rate continues to decline.
I would not be complaining if a Republican POTUS was getting the results we are seeing given the same circumstances. I am interested in trends. The trend is toward the positive. Thus I am able to accept them as positive.
I would not be complaining if a Republican POTUS was getting the results we are seeing given the same circumstances. I am interested in trends. The trend is toward the positive. Thus I am able to accept them as positive.
The trend is stagnation, LL.
