OohPooPahDoo
Gold Member
- May 11, 2011
- 15,347
- 985
Two Judges were asked to approve the warrant, but they refused because Rosen wasn't given notice, as required. A third Judge approved the warrant.
The 'third judge' was an appeals court judge whose opinion overturns those of lower court judges. Are you familiar with the appeals process? Is the DOJ not allowed to appeal decisions by lower court judges?
This isn't an "appeal" you moron.
So appealing to an appeals court judge isn't an appeal. Got it.
So when a judge does something you disagree with, they have no business being there?When someone refers to "Judge shopping" what they mean is going to various judges trying to find one who will go along with what you're proposing. In this case Holder went to two Federal judges who looked at what he wanted to do with Rosen and they refused to go along with it. So he went to yet another Federal judge and finally found one that would. My guess is they upped the ante by accusing Rosen of being a "co-conspirator" and sold it to this third idiot as a matter of "national security". Which goes to show how many judges we have sitting on benches that have no business being there.
I'm just trying to figure out what the standards are. They seem to change every minute, its hard to keep up sometimes!