Even After Latest Attack, Liberals Refuse to Support Vehicle Control

[mikegriffith1]

The terrorist who used a truck to kill dozens of people in Nice, France, the other day would have been unable to kill so many people without the truck. Furthermore, each year, people use vehicles to deliberately harm or kill other people, and of course tens of thousand of people die each year in traffic accidents. Yet, despite this carnage, and despite the presence of viable alternatives, liberals still refuse to support meaningful vehicle control, much less a ban on personal vehicle ownership. And it's disgraceful.

 

[TheOldSchool]

I demand that all vehicles that exist for the sole purpose of killing things be immediately taken off the road.

 

[Fueri]

One of the automakers should put out a commercial with one of those vehicles that stop automatically upon sensing something in their path, driven by some terrorist doing his damndest to plow down civilians- and getting all frustrated/pissed off.

Too soon? Probably, but don't be surprised if you see it on SNL.....

 

[martybegan]

I demand that all vehicles that exist for the sole purpose of killing things be immediately taken off the road.

A gun is a device that propels a projectile down a tube via the detonation of explosive substances. That is a guns purpose. What you are talking about is application and use, which is different.

 

[SeniorChief_Polock]

A vehicle is a device that propels a projectile via the detonation of an explosive substance (gasoline).

Next?

 

[The Irish Ram]

I demand that all vehicles that exist for the sole purpose of killing things be immediately taken off the road.

Why can't they deliver donuts in their off time?

Then again, Omaba would want to ban donuts, so..

 

[Moonglow]

A vehicle is a device that propels a projectile via the detonation of an explosive substance (gasoline).

Next?

So does a bowel movement, so...

 

[1stRambo]

The terrorist who used a truck to kill dozens of people in Nice, France, the other day would have been unable to kill so many people without the truck. Furthermore, each year, people use vehicles to deliberately harm or kill other people, and of course tens of thousand of people die each year in traffic accidents. Yet, despite this carnage, and despite the presence of viable alternatives, liberals still refuse to support meaningful vehicle control, much less a ban on personal vehicle ownership. And it's disgraceful.

Yo,

"GTP"

 

[mikegriffith1]

I demand that all vehicles that exist for the sole purpose of killing things be immediately taken off the road.

Notice that to make this lame analogy you have to say "things" instead of "people," because you know that if you said "killing people" you would leave out millions of hunting rifles.

 

[ScienceRocks]

WTF? There's a big difference between a vehicle and a gun. Vehicles transports our entire effin economy,,,while a goddamn gun only real focus is to KILL! Don't you understand?

 

[owebo]

I demand that all vehicles that exist for the sole purpose of killing things be immediately taken off the road.

There is no need for military style automatic killing machines....perhaps we can go back to,stick shifts as a good start....

 

[owebo]

WTF? There's a big difference between a vehicle and a gun. Vehicles transports our entire effin economy,,,while a goddamn gun only real focus is to KILL! Don't you understand?

Guns protect our entire fucking economy...don't you understand?

 

[Neotrotsky]

The terrorist who used a truck to kill dozens of people in Nice, France, the other day would have been unable to kill so many people without the truck. Furthermore, each year, people use vehicles to deliberately harm or kill other people, and of course tens of thousand of people die each year in traffic accidents. Yet, despite this carnage, and despite the presence of viable alternatives, liberals still refuse to support meaningful vehicle control, much less a ban on personal vehicle ownership. And it's disgraceful.

No doubt they are in bed with that powerful and corrupt lobby group

AAA


thanks AAA, you have blood on your hands

 

[JakeStarkey]

The terrorist who used a truck to kill dozens of people in Nice, France, the other day would have been unable to kill so many people without the truck. Furthermore, each year, people use vehicles to deliberately harm or kill other people, and of course tens of thousand of people die each year in traffic accidents. Yet, despite this carnage, and despite the presence of viable alternatives, liberals still refuse to support meaningful vehicle control, much less a ban on personal vehicle ownership. And it's disgraceful.

No doubt they are in bed with that powerful and corrupt lobby group

AAA


thanks AAA, you have blood on your hands

Yes, the OP is 100% right. Vehicle ownership and use need to be regulated even more, right along with guns.

 

[owebo]

The terrorist who used a truck to kill dozens of people in Nice, France, the other day would have been unable to kill so many people without the truck. Furthermore, each year, people use vehicles to deliberately harm or kill other people, and of course tens of thousand of people die each year in traffic accidents. Yet, despite this carnage, and despite the presence of viable alternatives, liberals still refuse to support meaningful vehicle control, much less a ban on personal vehicle ownership. And it's disgraceful.

No doubt they are in bed with that powerful and corrupt lobby group

AAA


thanks AAA, you have blood on your hands

Yes, the OP is 100% right. Vehicle ownership and use need to be regulated even more, right along with guns.

As a fascist liberal, do you own stock in buggy whips?

 

[Flash]

It is appalling that these Libtards are against "sensible" vehicle control laws like having universal background checks that would make vehicles unaccessible to potential terrorists and crazy people.

You know that any terrorist or crook can go into any car dealership and buy a vehicle any time they want without government permission? Scary, isn't it? Of course private sales of vehicles is a big loophole that must be stopped.

 

[blastoff]

The obvious choice is to ban all assault vehicles, but those nuts at the National Vehicle Association will come up with some phony excuse based on the Constitution again.

And don't even get me started on the idiocy of large capacity gas tanks!

 

[JakeStarkey]

The terrorist who used a truck to kill dozens of people in Nice, France, the other day would have been unable to kill so many people without the truck. Furthermore, each year, people use vehicles to deliberately harm or kill other people, and of course tens of thousand of people die each year in traffic accidents. Yet, despite this carnage, and despite the presence of viable alternatives, liberals still refuse to support meaningful vehicle control, much less a ban on personal vehicle ownership. And it's disgraceful.

No doubt they are in bed with that powerful and corrupt lobby group

AAA


thanks AAA, you have blood on your hands

Yes, the OP is 100% right. Vehicle ownership and use need to be regulated even more, right along with guns.

As a fascist liberal, do you own stock in buggy whips?

You do sound like a nag. All instruments of such destructive power must needs be regulated.

 

[Flash]

 

[Skull Pilot]

I demand that all vehicles that exist for the sole purpose of killing things be immediately taken off the road.

Notice that to make this lame analogy you have to say "things" instead of "people," because you know that if you said "killing people" you would leave out millions of hunting rifles.

And every one of my weapons
None of my weapons have as a sole purpose the killing of people
Mostly thy "kill" clay pigeons, paper targets and tin cans