Evidence that universe created itself

[alang1216]

My daughter has a hard science degree and thinks you’re an idiot.

My daughter has a hard science degree and thinks I'm smarter than an idiot. And she actually knows me.

 

[Indeependent]

And eschews evolution? Then your daughter is a moron.

Do you have a PhD in Chemistry and Biology?
Didn't think so.
Evolution is a convoluted ball of bullshit designed for atheists.

 

[Indeependent]

My daughter has a hard science degree and thinks I'm smarter than an idiot. And she actually knows me.

She's sucking up to you and is probably an atheist.
I want to know how a 1 in several trillion chance of 2 asexual organisms became one male and one female within the same living time frame.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Do you have a PhD in Chemistry and Biology?
Didn't think so.

How stupid. Hey weirdo...pretty sure the overwhelming majority of PhDs know evolution is a fact, your silly madeup anecdotes notwithstanding.

And if your daughter rejected evolution in a room of science PhDs, they would laugh her out of the room.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I want to know how a 1 in several trillion chance of 2 asexual organisms became one male and one female within the same living time frame.

Oh look, making up numbers to support a fantasy. Wait that sounds about right.

 

[Indeependent]

How stupid. Hey weirdo...pretty sure the overwhelming majority of PhDs know evolution is a fact, your silly madeup anecdotes notwithstanding.

No, they don't, unless they're getting paid to teach it.

 

[Indeependent]

Oh look, making up numbers to support a fantasy. Wait that sounds about right.

Google the odds of the universe existing, schmuck.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

No, they don't, unless they're getting paid to teach it.

Yes they do,and now we have reached the point in the evening where you lie out loud to yourself to soothe yourself.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Google the odds of the universe existing, schmuck.

Why? That would be pretty stupid. Anyone who pretends to know that is lying. Your kind of people.

 

[Indeependent]

Yes they do,and now we have reached the point in the evening where you lie out loud to yourself to soothe yourself.

How many have you met in your slum?
Do you know how they mock their LibBot students?
Anything for a paycheck and benefits.

 

[Indeependent]

Why? That would be pretty stupid. Anyone who pretends to know that is lying. Your kind of people.

Cool..
So when a scientist disagrees with you, they're lying.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

How many have you met

Lots! Haha, listen to yourself... Listen to the desperate, idiotic things you are saying. If your fake daughter with the fake PhD eschews evolution, then she is fake retarded.

 

[alang1216]

She's sucking up to you and is probably an atheist.
I want to know how a 1 in several trillion chance of 2 asexual organisms became one male and one female within the same living time frame.

You're not the first to ask that question so you could do your own homework but, if you really wanted to know:

Evolution of sexual reproduction​

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sexual reproduction is an adaptive feature which is common to almost all multi-cellular organisms (and also some single-cellular organisms) with many being incapable of reproducing asexually. Prior to the advent of sexual reproduction, the adaptation process whereby genes would change from one generation to the next (genetic mutation) happened very slowly and randomly. Sex evolved as an extremely efficient mechanism for producing variation, and this had the major advantage of enabling organisms to adapt to changing environments. Sex did, however, come with a cost. In reproducing asexually, no time nor energy needs to be expended in choosing a mate. And if the environment has not changed, then there may be little reason for variation, as the organism may already be well adapted. Sex, however, has evolved as the most prolific means of species branching into the tree of life. Diversification into the phylogenetic tree happens much more rapidly via sexual reproduction than it does by way of asexual reproduction.
Evolution of sexual reproduction describes how sexually reproducing animals, plants, fungi and protists could have evolved from a common ancestor that was a single-celled eukaryotic species.[1][2][3] Sexual reproduction is widespread in the Eukarya, though a few eukaryotic species have secondarily lost the ability to reproduce sexually, such as Bdelloidea, and some plants and animals routinely reproduce asexually (by apomixis and parthenogenesis) without entirely having lost sex. The evolution of sex contains two related yet distinct themes: its origin and its maintenance.
The origin of sexual reproduction can be traced to early prokaryotes, around two billion years ago (Gya), when bacteria began exchanging genes via conjugation, transformation, and transduction.[4] Though these processes are distinct from true sexual reproduction, they share some basic similarities. In eukaryotes, true sex is thought to have arisen in the Last Eukaryotic Common Ancestor (LECA), possibly via several processes of varying success, and then to have persisted (compare to "LUCA").[5]
Since hypotheses for the origin of sex are difficult to verify experimentally (outside of evolutionary computation), most current work has focused on the persistence of sexual reproduction over evolutionary time. The maintenance of sexual reproduction (specifically, of its dioecious form) by natural selection in a highly competitive world has long been one of the major mysteries of biology, since both other known mechanisms of reproduction – asexual reproduction and hermaphroditism – possess apparent advantages over it. Asexual reproduction can proceed by budding, fission, or spore formation and does not involve the union of gametes, which accordingly results in a much faster rate of reproduction compared to sexual reproduction, where 50% of offspring are males and unable to produce offspring themselves. In hermaphroditic reproduction, each of the two parent organisms required for the formation of a zygote can provide either the male or the female gamete, which leads to advantages in both size and genetic variance of a population.
Sexual reproduction therefore must offer significant fitness advantages because, despite the two-fold cost of sex (see below), it dominates among multicellular forms of life, implying that the fitness of offspring produced by sexual processes outweighs the costs. Sexual reproduction derives from recombination, where parent genotypes are reorganized and shared with the offspring. This stands in contrast to single-parent asexual replication, where the offspring is always identical to the parents (barring mutation). Recombination supplies two fault-tolerance mechanisms at the molecular level: recombinational DNA repair (promoted during meiosis because homologous chromosomes pair at that time) and complementation (also known as heterosis, hybrid vigor or masking of mutations).

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Cool..
So when a scientist disagrees with you, they're lying.

Haha, changing lanes to an idiotic non sequitur because you are all kinds of blubbering angry. Embarrassing to watch.

 

[Indeependent]

Lots! Haha, listen to yourself... Listen to the desperate, idiotic things you are saying. If your fake daughter with the fake PhD eschews evolution, then she is fake retarded.

Cool..
So when a scientist disagrees with you, they're lying.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You're not the first to ask that question so you could do your own homework

BUt mY fAkE dAuGhTer sAyS

 

[Indeependent]

You're not the first to ask that question so you could do your own homework but, if you really wanted to know:

Evolution of sexual reproduction​

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sexual reproduction is an adaptive feature which is common to almost all multi-cellular organisms (and also some single-cellular organisms) with many being incapable of reproducing asexually. Prior to the advent of sexual reproduction, the adaptation process whereby genes would change from one generation to the next (genetic mutation) happened very slowly and randomly. Sex evolved as an extremely efficient mechanism for producing variation, and this had the major advantage of enabling organisms to adapt to changing environments. Sex did, however, come with a cost. In reproducing asexually, no time nor energy needs to be expended in choosing a mate. And if the environment has not changed, then there may be little reason for variation, as the organism may already be well adapted. Sex, however, has evolved as the most prolific means of species branching into the tree of life. Diversification into the phylogenetic tree happens much more rapidly via sexual reproduction than it does by way of asexual reproduction.
Evolution of sexual reproduction describes how sexually reproducing animals, plants, fungi and protists could have evolved from a common ancestor that was a single-celled eukaryotic species.[1][2][3] Sexual reproduction is widespread in the Eukarya, though a few eukaryotic species have secondarily lost the ability to reproduce sexually, such as Bdelloidea, and some plants and animals routinely reproduce asexually (by apomixis and parthenogenesis) without entirely having lost sex. The evolution of sex contains two related yet distinct themes: its origin and its maintenance.
The origin of sexual reproduction can be traced to early prokaryotes, around two billion years ago (Gya), when bacteria began exchanging genes via conjugation, transformation, and transduction.[4] Though these processes are distinct from true sexual reproduction, they share some basic similarities. In eukaryotes, true sex is thought to have arisen in the Last Eukaryotic Common Ancestor (LECA), possibly via several processes of varying success, and then to have persisted (compare to "LUCA").[5]
Since hypotheses for the origin of sex are difficult to verify experimentally (outside of evolutionary computation), most current work has focused on the persistence of sexual reproduction over evolutionary time. The maintenance of sexual reproduction (specifically, of its dioecious form) by natural selection in a highly competitive world has long been one of the major mysteries of biology, since both other known mechanisms of reproduction – asexual reproduction and hermaphroditism – possess apparent advantages over it. Asexual reproduction can proceed by budding, fission, or spore formation and does not involve the union of gametes, which accordingly results in a much faster rate of reproduction compared to sexual reproduction, where 50% of offspring are males and unable to produce offspring themselves. In hermaphroditic reproduction, each of the two parent organisms required for the formation of a zygote can provide either the male or the female gamete, which leads to advantages in both size and genetic variance of a population.
Sexual reproduction therefore must offer significant fitness advantages because, despite the two-fold cost of sex (see below), it dominates among multicellular forms of life, implying that the fitness of offspring produced by sexual processes outweighs the costs. Sexual reproduction derives from recombination, where parent genotypes are reorganized and shared with the offspring. This stands in contrast to single-parent asexual replication, where the offspring is always identical to the parents (barring mutation). Recombination supplies two fault-tolerance mechanisms at the molecular level: recombinational DNA repair (promoted during meiosis because homologous chromosomes pair at that time) and complementation (also known as heterosis, hybrid vigor or masking of mutations).

You can post any bullshit that pleases you but you didn't answer the question.
The spontaneous existence of at least one male and at least one female...

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Cool..
So when a scientist disagrees with you, they're lying.

Whatever you have to tell yourself not to run into traffic.

 

[Indeependent]

Whatever you have to tell yourself not to run into traffic.

You are boring...have fun playing with yourself.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The spontaneous existence of at least one male and at least one female...

Only a fool who doesn't understand evolution would say something so stupid. This is like asking when a monkey gave birth to a human. I would expect this sort of stupid question from a child learning about all of this for the first time. But you have no excuse.