Expert reveals tampering in JFK assassination photos

[gipper]

LMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

As predicted you prove that I an right by your impotent inability to refute me with evidence

provide evidence to the contrary i

Hey CIA Dupe....let's keep the comedy rolling...now, was Ruby a great admirer of JFK and this was his motive to killing Oswald?

Please answer....I love your comedy act.

Are there any guilty men in prison?

Cite one passage from the Warren Commission which is a lie and provide evidence it is a lie.

Stop being the same coward you are known to be in real life and answer

LMFAO...you are amazingly FUNNY....CIA Dupe.

I love it. You need to consider doing stand up.

Oswald as a commie and Ruby love JFK....LMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Since you can provide no evidence to the contrary you have admitted those are true facts.

Now stop laughing at your reflection in the mirror and answer the questions

I bet you think LBJ putting Dulles on the Warren Commission, was a good move and entirely innocent.

Am I right???

Come on keep the comedy rolling CIA Dupe!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Soupnazi630]

As predicted you prove that I an right by your impotent inability to refute me with evidence

provide evidence to the contrary i

Hey CIA Dupe....let's keep the comedy rolling...now, was Ruby a great admirer of JFK and this was his motive to killing Oswald?

Please answer....I love your comedy act.

Are there any guilty men in prison?

Cite one passage from the Warren Commission which is a lie and provide evidence it is a lie.

Stop being the same coward you are known to be in real life and answer

LMFAO...you are amazingly FUNNY....CIA Dupe.

I love it. You need to consider doing stand up.

Oswald as a commie and Ruby love JFK....LMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Since you can provide no evidence to the contrary you have admitted those are true facts.

Now stop laughing at your reflection in the mirror and answer the questions

I bet you think LBJ putting Dulles on the Warren Commission, was a good move and entirely innocent.

Am I right???

Come on keep the comedy rolling CIA Dupe!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Are their any guilty people in prison?

Cite one passage from the Warren Commission which you claim is a lie and provide evidence that it is a lie

Everyone can see how I answer, while you run and are a coward who refuses to do the same.

You know it most of all.

Now answer

 

[gipper]

provide evidence to the contrary i

Hey CIA Dupe....let's keep the comedy rolling...now, was Ruby a great admirer of JFK and this was his motive to killing Oswald?

Please answer....I love your comedy act.

Are there any guilty men in prison?

Cite one passage from the Warren Commission which is a lie and provide evidence it is a lie.

Stop being the same coward you are known to be in real life and answer

LMFAO...you are amazingly FUNNY....CIA Dupe.

I love it. You need to consider doing stand up.

Oswald as a commie and Ruby love JFK....LMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Since you can provide no evidence to the contrary you have admitted those are true facts.

Now stop laughing at your reflection in the mirror and answer the questions

I bet you think LBJ putting Dulles on the Warren Commission, was a good move and entirely innocent.

Am I right???

Come on keep the comedy rolling CIA Dupe!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Are their any guilty people in prison?

Cite one passage from the Warren Commission which you claim is a lie and provide evidence that it is a lie

Everyone can see how I answer, while you run and are a coward who refuses to do the same.

You know it most of all.

Now answer

I bet you believe the Secret Service and Dallas PD did everything right that day in Dallas.

Am I right? Am I?

 

[Soupnazi630]

Are there any guilty men in prison?

Cite one passage from the Warren Commission which is a lie and provide evidence it is a lie.

Stop being the same coward you are known to be in real life and answer

LMFAO...you are amazingly FUNNY....CIA Dupe.

I love it. You need to consider doing stand up.

Oswald as a commie and Ruby love JFK....LMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Since you can provide no evidence to the contrary you have admitted those are true facts.

Now stop laughing at your reflection in the mirror and answer the questions

I bet you think LBJ putting Dulles on the Warren Commission, was a good move and entirely innocent.

Am I right???

Come on keep the comedy rolling CIA Dupe!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Are their any guilty people in prison?

Cite one passage from the Warren Commission which you claim is a lie and provide evidence that it is a lie

Everyone can see how I answer, while you run and are a coward who refuses to do the same.

You know it most of all.

Now answer

I bet you believe the Secret Service and Dallas PD did everything right that day in Dallas.

Am I right? Am I?

You believe all incarcerated inmates are innocent and none committed the crime they were convicted of.

You cannot quote any passage from the warren commission report

 

[gipper]

LMFAO...you are amazingly FUNNY....CIA Dupe.

I love it. You need to consider doing stand up.

Oswald as a commie and Ruby love JFK....LMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Since you can provide no evidence to the contrary you have admitted those are true facts.

Now stop laughing at your reflection in the mirror and answer the questions

I bet you think LBJ putting Dulles on the Warren Commission, was a good move and entirely innocent.

Am I right???

Come on keep the comedy rolling CIA Dupe!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Are their any guilty people in prison?

Cite one passage from the Warren Commission which you claim is a lie and provide evidence that it is a lie

Everyone can see how I answer, while you run and are a coward who refuses to do the same.

You know it most of all.

Now answer

I bet you believe the Secret Service and Dallas PD did everything right that day in Dallas.

Am I right? Am I?

You believe all incarcerated inmates are innocent and none committed the crime they were convicted of.

You cannot quote any passage from the warren commission report

Do you believe Oswald was an 'expert marksman' in the Marines?

Do you?

 

[Soupnazi630]

Since you can provide no evidence to the contrary you have admitted those are true facts.

Now stop laughing at your reflection in the mirror and answer the questions

I bet you think LBJ putting Dulles on the Warren Commission, was a good move and entirely innocent.

Am I right???

Come on keep the comedy rolling CIA Dupe!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Are their any guilty people in prison?

Cite one passage from the Warren Commission which you claim is a lie and provide evidence that it is a lie

Everyone can see how I answer, while you run and are a coward who refuses to do the same.

You know it most of all.

Now answer

I bet you believe the Secret Service and Dallas PD did everything right that day in Dallas.

Am I right? Am I?

You believe all incarcerated inmates are innocent and none committed the crime they were convicted of.

You cannot quote any passage from the warren commission report

Do you believe Oswald was an 'expert marksman' in the Marines?

Do you?

Are there any guilty men in prison?

Can you quote a specific passage from the Warren Commission which is a lie and provide evidence that it is a lie?

 

[LA RAM FAN]

You keep posting long winded ignorant posts. Please continue.

Again...did the CIA train you to do this?

you keep posting blanket statements with no evidence or support of any kind whatsoever.

Answer the questions.

Are the any guilty men in prison?

Cite one passage from the Warren Commission report which is a lie and provide evidence that it is a lie.

No the CIA did not train me.

Now I answered you so go ahead and man up.

The evidence is EVERYWHERE...but to the stupid easily duped Statist, it can't be comprehended.

Stop being a pussy and accept the truth.

you keep making blanket statements like " the evidence is everywhere " but you cannot cite any such evidence.

There is no such evidence to cite sonny boy.

Go ahead and present some which has not been massively shredded and debunked.

BTW BOY a pussy is one who runs away from defending their positions you aksed a stupid question about the CIA and I answered.

I asked you two simple question and you ran proving your self a coward and the only real pussy so answer now.

Stop lying stop evading and dodging and answer the to questions i asked you or you admit to being outclassed and to being a cheap coward who has been pwned.

Are there any guilty men in prison?

Cite one specific quote from the Warren Commission which is a lie and present evidence that it is a lie

Did you get your training at Langley or was it overseas?

Gipper, you have more than busted this poseur and exposed him for being a fraud. I salute you and anyone else that takes the path of least resistance and refuses to be intimidated into falling for the "groupspeak" tactic.

Yeah Gipper I dont even know WHY you play his game.the worst thing you can do is reply to him and give him the attention he seeks.Let the moron show off to the whole world what a dumbfuck he is talking to himself in the first degree as he does with me all the time even though i have him on ignore and he KNOWS that.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Oswald was guilty as hell, but did not shoot Kennedy. He was the lookout man for the hit and he did kill Tippit

Well at least you are not anywhere near the stupidity level as agent soupnazi the fact you at least got ONE thing right in your rambling there that he did not shoot kennedy.

Now that unlike the nazi shill you have accepted it that there is no evidence whatsoever that he shot kennedy and no proof of that,try and provide proof that he shot tiippet,you cant,nobody has ever been able to.they end up with shit on their faces each time same as they do when they try to prove he shot kennedy.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Anyone who claims that believing in something which is based on evidence is a willfully ignorant fool. Especially when they have never read what they claim to not believe in.

You have never read the Warren commission report and have no idea what it says and have never challenged or discredited or refuted it,Beliefs are fine but they prove nothing you can believe the earth is flat all day and ignore the evidence to the contrary and the same is true here. The evidence proves wrong and you willfully ignore it.

You do this , by your own admission, based on a faulty and delusional belief which is that the government lies 24/7

One need not be a statist to grasp the fact that often the government leis AND often tells the truth. Sometimes they are right and sometimes they are wrong. In this case they were right and presented the evidence to prove it which once again you cannot even challenge since you have no idea what they said or what the evidence is. Instead you trust a few videos and movies to tell you what to think and blithely obey your masters.

Simple test to prove this fact answer this question: are there ANY guilty people in prison or are they all innocent?

If your insane belief that the government lies 24/7 is true then it follows there can be no guilty convicts and every incarcerated person is actually innocent.

So answer the question just remember you cannot have it both ways.

The preponderance of the evidence proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that not only was Oswald a patsy that had no involvement in the shooting and that the crime scene was secured by Deep State operatives even to the point of removing his body at gunpoint. Your contention that the bullet that fell out of the thigh of Connally wasn't in great shape if not in pristine condition is also a like because I have seen exhibit 399 and outside of the markings caused by the barrel (which all fired bullets will have) it's in nearly pristine condition. Whom was selected to do the autopsy of the most important person in America at the time? One that had never done an autopsy of which a gunshot was the cause. Sorry, dude, you repeat talking points of the very ones involved in the cover-up and touting their point of view. Thus far I remain unimpressed.

That is not even opinion it is an outright lie.

You have presented no evidence of any kind ergo there is no such preponderance. The evidence in fact proves the opposite as i have laid out and shown that Oswald acted alone and your entire claims is based on innuendo, grasping at straws, and speculation sorry but none of those things are evidence.

If there were a preponderance of evidence as you wrongfully claim you could easily cite some BUT YOU CANNOT.

The bullet was never in pristine condition or near pristine condition it was caved in damaged and missing mass just as one would expect from a bullet performing as it did you are proven wrong on that by the exhibit itself.

You are also dead wrong about the expert and experienced Pathologists who performed the autopsies they had in fact done many autopsies on bodies of victims of violent events and crimes including gunshot victims. Commander James Thornton Boswell was the man in charge of the autopsy whom you could not even name and he was not selected he was in fact the chief pathologist on duty at Bethesda which was the site for the autopsy chosen by Jackie Kennedy. Boswell and his colleagues did indeed have great experience at examining gun shot victims which is WHY they were chief pathologists.

I am repeating facts you are repeating falsehoods you never bothered to research and are naively falling for because you saw it in a movie


So far every attempt you have made to produce evidence has failed and been debunked so there is no preponderance of evidence as you Claim as you claim of a conspiracy or that Oswald was a patsy.

"That is not even opinion it is an outright lie"

Nope, it is a fact......one or two anomalies or coincidences do not conspiracy make but when there are literally dozens of things that do not add up nor can be refuted? Yeah, the preponderance of the evidence shows that there was without a doubt a conspiracy by this corporate entity that you lovingly refer to as "gubermint".

"The evidence in fact proves the opposite as i have laid out and shown that Oswald acted alone and your entire claims is based on innuendo, grasping at straws, and speculation sorry but none of those things are evidence"

A spare to fair marksman like Oswald did not get off 3 shots with a bolt action rifle in the amount of time claimed....PERIOD. The radio station KLIF that was covering his trip down Elm proves that there were two shots fired within a second of each other and the shots didn't hit anything. It was a pathetic attempt at a cover-up given what we know now and for you to lamely claim otherwise is the last refuge of someone that is incredibly blinded or simply a disinfo agent......either way? It has been amusing watching you flail away.

"The bullet was never in pristine condition or near pristine condition it was caved in damaged and missing mass just as one would expect from a bullet performing as it did you are proven wrong on that by the exhibit itself"

This is the funniest part of your argument ........the magic bullet that zig zagged around causing multiple injuries and then working it's way onto the gurney of Connally. Don't you realize how fucking stupid that comes across????

The Magic Bullet: Even More Magical than We Knew

This bullet busted ribs and the wrist of Connally.......looks pretty intact to me.

You can't explain how the right side of Kennedy's head pushes to the left when the bullshit story that he was shot in the back of the head would push his head to the front with perhaps a "snap back reflex" and as doctored as the Zapruder film was (which it was) even they couldn't spin that one. His brain didn't leak out from the back of the head, it was the right hand side of the skull was blown to shit.


"You are also dead wrong about the expert and experienced Pathologists who performed the autopsies they had in fact done many autopsies on bodies of victims of violent events and crimes including gunshot victims. Commander James Thornton Boswell was the man in charge of the autopsy whom you could not even name and he was not selected he was in fact the chief pathologist on duty at Bethesda which was the site for the autopsy chosen by Jackie Kennedy. Boswell and his colleagues did indeed have great experience at examining gun shot victims which is WHY they were chief pathologists"

Nope, you are "dead wrong" and it is revisionist history after the fact. Boswell burned his notes? Gee, I wonder why. I will give you credit for one thing, you definitely toe the "corporate line" but you lose and lose badly.

\There are not literally dozens of things which do not add up.

There simply is no evidence to support your assertion.

Once again there is no preponderance of evidence because to have a preponderance you need some evidence to begin with and all the evidence shows Oswald acted alone.

Spare to fair is a weird comment without meaning. Oswald was a well trained marksman as all Marines are. The Marines have the BEST basic rifle marksmanship training program in the military and he was rated a Sharpshooter which by definition makes him better skilled than most people with a rifle.

You are long since proven wrong about the time He had 6 to 8 seconds which is ample time for ANYONE to fire 5 aimed shots with a bolt action rifle as anyone who has fired and operated such a rifle knows.

Your PERIOD is simply false and long since proven so by anyone who knows anything about rifles.

No radio station ever proved any such thing as there is no audio recording of the event which would be required for such proof.


I have not flailed away I have systematically proven each of your assertions wrong and debunked them which id why you have no evidence preponderance or otherwise.

Nothing I said comes across as stupid the bullet was damaged and no where near pristine which is fact.

Yes it was damaged the way one would expect as every test done on similar bullets has shown.

The Zapruder film was never doctored and yes it is very easy to explain why his head moved the way it did. It was a combination of jet effect andneurological reflex.

Your assumption is based on watching TV and movies where people always move or jerk away from the gun when fired but in reality they do not always do so.

Here are tests demonstrating how you are wrong on both the time for the three shots and the jet effect.



Plain and simple your claims debunked.

Yes He did burn his notes which does not constitutes making him inexperienced as you claimed and were wrong about he did have great experience performing autopsies on gun shot victims that is precisely what pathologists DO in the military which sees a high percentage of people shot to death and he had served in that capacity since WWII.

You simply have no evidence

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!


Hey, dumb ass, you can't hit rock bottom until you are done digging a hole. You keep claiming "This was debunked" and THAT was debunk " with no links....I believe it's called the "UH-uh" defense used by little kids with snot running down their noses when they are told that Santa Claus is a myth by the older kids.

Seriously, congrats for exposing yourself for an idiot........it's been slightly entertaining. The best part was you defending the single bullet theory and how the bullet was "damaged" (which it wasn't) and how it's plausible that it could be found on the gurney after having been lodged in Connally's hip. How you are silent on how the right side of the head of Kennedy was actually a shot to the back of the head and those that see the shot that causes Kennedy's head to go up and to the left are just (snicker) "Wacky".

You really can't be THAT fucking stupid to buy that load of bullshit so it's obvious to me that you are simply here to yank some chains and waste time. Mission accomplished, dipshit....are ya proud? (snicker)

Dale,Gipper i can only state this so many times-don not reply to this shill.that is the worst thing you can do because you are not only giving him the attention he so desperately seeks but you guys are both helping him do what his boss has sent him here to do, to do,which is to troll the thread to get you guys to go back and forth and argue with him to try and derail this thread.

I have this many times regarding these shills that have penetrated this site-

 

[LA RAM FAN]

The preponderance of the evidence proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that not only was Oswald a patsy that had no involvement in the shooting and that the crime scene was secured by Deep State operatives even to the point of removing his body at gunpoint. Your contention that the bullet that fell out of the thigh of Connally wasn't in great shape if not in pristine condition is also a like because I have seen exhibit 399 and outside of the markings caused by the barrel (which all fired bullets will have) it's in nearly pristine condition. Whom was selected to do the autopsy of the most important person in America at the time? One that had never done an autopsy of which a gunshot was the cause. Sorry, dude, you repeat talking points of the very ones involved in the cover-up and touting their point of view. Thus far I remain unimpressed.

That is not even opinion it is an outright lie.

You have presented no evidence of any kind ergo there is no such preponderance. The evidence in fact proves the opposite as i have laid out and shown that Oswald acted alone and your entire claims is based on innuendo, grasping at straws, and speculation sorry but none of those things are evidence.

If there were a preponderance of evidence as you wrongfully claim you could easily cite some BUT YOU CANNOT.

The bullet was never in pristine condition or near pristine condition it was caved in damaged and missing mass just as one would expect from a bullet performing as it did you are proven wrong on that by the exhibit itself.

You are also dead wrong about the expert and experienced Pathologists who performed the autopsies they had in fact done many autopsies on bodies of victims of violent events and crimes including gunshot victims. Commander James Thornton Boswell was the man in charge of the autopsy whom you could not even name and he was not selected he was in fact the chief pathologist on duty at Bethesda which was the site for the autopsy chosen by Jackie Kennedy. Boswell and his colleagues did indeed have great experience at examining gun shot victims which is WHY they were chief pathologists.

I am repeating facts you are repeating falsehoods you never bothered to research and are naively falling for because you saw it in a movie


So far every attempt you have made to produce evidence has failed and been debunked so there is no preponderance of evidence as you Claim as you claim of a conspiracy or that Oswald was a patsy.

Are ya new here?? These loons don't need evidence. They're perfectly blissful with their delusions.

Faun? You are easily one of the most disgusting excuses for a human being here....whom else would use that as an avatar knowing what it stands for? Were you spawned before Roe V Wade?

He is quite correct you ignore evidence and offer none whatsoever for your claims which are false and derived from a fictional film.

to quote the ass clown LARAM you got an ass beating of epic proportions and everyone knows it even LARAM who will merely come on to lie and post emojis because he lacks the intellect to do anything else.

With the mountain of evidence proving conspiracy, anyone who thinks Oswald responsible and acted alone has to be FUCKING CRAZY or a CIA plant.

you should know by NOW that Faun and Soupnazi are are shills that have penetrated this site -the nazi especially.He is such a stupid fuck he advertises it with his USER name and doesnt even realise it that he gives it away how evil he is with his user name yet you STILL argue back and forth with thise disgusting monsters who particpate in this coverup? WHY?

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Anyone who claims that believing in something which is based on evidence is a willfully ignorant fool. Especially when they have never read what they claim to not believe in.

You have never read the Warren commission report and have no idea what it says and have never challenged or discredited or refuted it,Beliefs are fine but they prove nothing you can believe the earth is flat all day and ignore the evidence to the contrary and the same is true here. The evidence proves wrong and you willfully ignore it.

You do this , by your own admission, based on a faulty and delusional belief which is that the government lies 24/7

One need not be a statist to grasp the fact that often the government leis AND often tells the truth. Sometimes they are right and sometimes they are wrong. In this case they were right and presented the evidence to prove it which once again you cannot even challenge since you have no idea what they said or what the evidence is. Instead you trust a few videos and movies to tell you what to think and blithely obey your masters.

Simple test to prove this fact answer this question: are there ANY guilty people in prison or are they all innocent?

If your insane belief that the government lies 24/7 is true then it follows there can be no guilty convicts and every incarcerated person is actually innocent.

So answer the question just remember you cannot have it both ways.

The preponderance of the evidence proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that not only was Oswald a patsy that had no involvement in the shooting and that the crime scene was secured by Deep State operatives even to the point of removing his body at gunpoint. Your contention that the bullet that fell out of the thigh of Connally wasn't in great shape if not in pristine condition is also a like because I have seen exhibit 399 and outside of the markings caused by the barrel (which all fired bullets will have) it's in nearly pristine condition. Whom was selected to do the autopsy of the most important person in America at the time? One that had never done an autopsy of which a gunshot was the cause. Sorry, dude, you repeat talking points of the very ones involved in the cover-up and touting their point of view. Thus far I remain unimpressed.

That is not even opinion it is an outright lie.

You have presented no evidence of any kind ergo there is no such preponderance. The evidence in fact proves the opposite as i have laid out and shown that Oswald acted alone and your entire claims is based on innuendo, grasping at straws, and speculation sorry but none of those things are evidence.

If there were a preponderance of evidence as you wrongfully claim you could easily cite some BUT YOU CANNOT.

The bullet was never in pristine condition or near pristine condition it was caved in damaged and missing mass just as one would expect from a bullet performing as it did you are proven wrong on that by the exhibit itself.

You are also dead wrong about the expert and experienced Pathologists who performed the autopsies they had in fact done many autopsies on bodies of victims of violent events and crimes including gunshot victims. Commander James Thornton Boswell was the man in charge of the autopsy whom you could not even name and he was not selected he was in fact the chief pathologist on duty at Bethesda which was the site for the autopsy chosen by Jackie Kennedy. Boswell and his colleagues did indeed have great experience at examining gun shot victims which is WHY they were chief pathologists.

I am repeating facts you are repeating falsehoods you never bothered to research and are naively falling for because you saw it in a movie


So far every attempt you have made to produce evidence has failed and been debunked so there is no preponderance of evidence as you Claim as you claim of a conspiracy or that Oswald was a patsy.

"That is not even opinion it is an outright lie"

Nope, it is a fact......one or two anomalies or coincidences do not conspiracy make but when there are literally dozens of things that do not add up nor can be refuted? Yeah, the preponderance of the evidence shows that there was without a doubt a conspiracy by this corporate entity that you lovingly refer to as "gubermint".

"The evidence in fact proves the opposite as i have laid out and shown that Oswald acted alone and your entire claims is based on innuendo, grasping at straws, and speculation sorry but none of those things are evidence"

A spare to fair marksman like Oswald did not get off 3 shots with a bolt action rifle in the amount of time claimed....PERIOD. The radio station KLIF that was covering his trip down Elm proves that there were two shots fired within a second of each other and the shots didn't hit anything. It was a pathetic attempt at a cover-up given what we know now and for you to lamely claim otherwise is the last refuge of someone that is incredibly blinded or simply a disinfo agent......either way? It has been amusing watching you flail away.

"The bullet was never in pristine condition or near pristine condition it was caved in damaged and missing mass just as one would expect from a bullet performing as it did you are proven wrong on that by the exhibit itself"

This is the funniest part of your argument ........the magic bullet that zig zagged around causing multiple injuries and then working it's way onto the gurney of Connally. Don't you realize how fucking stupid that comes across????

The Magic Bullet: Even More Magical than We Knew

This bullet busted ribs and the wrist of Connally.......looks pretty intact to me.

You can't explain how the right side of Kennedy's head pushes to the left when the bullshit story that he was shot in the back of the head would push his head to the front with perhaps a "snap back reflex" and as doctored as the Zapruder film was (which it was) even they couldn't spin that one. His brain didn't leak out from the back of the head, it was the right hand side of the skull was blown to shit.


"You are also dead wrong about the expert and experienced Pathologists who performed the autopsies they had in fact done many autopsies on bodies of victims of violent events and crimes including gunshot victims. Commander James Thornton Boswell was the man in charge of the autopsy whom you could not even name and he was not selected he was in fact the chief pathologist on duty at Bethesda which was the site for the autopsy chosen by Jackie Kennedy. Boswell and his colleagues did indeed have great experience at examining gun shot victims which is WHY they were chief pathologists"

Nope, you are "dead wrong" and it is revisionist history after the fact. Boswell burned his notes? Gee, I wonder why. I will give you credit for one thing, you definitely toe the "corporate line" but you lose and lose badly.

\There are not literally dozens of things which do not add up.

There simply is no evidence to support your assertion.

Once again there is no preponderance of evidence because to have a preponderance you need some evidence to begin with and all the evidence shows Oswald acted alone.

Spare to fair is a weird comment without meaning. Oswald was a well trained marksman as all Marines are. The Marines have the BEST basic rifle marksmanship training program in the military and he was rated a Sharpshooter which by definition makes him better skilled than most people with a rifle.

You are long since proven wrong about the time He had 6 to 8 seconds which is ample time for ANYONE to fire 5 aimed shots with a bolt action rifle as anyone who has fired and operated such a rifle knows.

Your PERIOD is simply false and long since proven so by anyone who knows anything about rifles.

No radio station ever proved any such thing as there is no audio recording of the event which would be required for such proof.


I have not flailed away I have systematically proven each of your assertions wrong and debunked them which id why you have no evidence preponderance or otherwise.

Nothing I said comes across as stupid the bullet was damaged and no where near pristine which is fact.

Yes it was damaged the way one would expect as every test done on similar bullets has shown.

The Zapruder film was never doctored and yes it is very easy to explain why his head moved the way it did. It was a combination of jet effect andneurological reflex.

Your assumption is based on watching TV and movies where people always move or jerk away from the gun when fired but in reality they do not always do so.

Here are tests demonstrating how you are wrong on both the time for the three shots and the jet effect.



Plain and simple your claims debunked.

Yes He did burn his notes which does not constitutes making him inexperienced as you claimed and were wrong about he did have great experience performing autopsies on gun shot victims that is precisely what pathologists DO in the military which sees a high percentage of people shot to death and he had served in that capacity since WWII.

You simply have no evidence

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!


Hey, dumb ass, you can't hit rock bottom until you are done digging a hole. You keep claiming "This was debunked" and THAT was debunk " with no links....I believe it's called the "UH-uh" defense used by little kids with snot running down their noses when they are told that Santa Claus is a myth by the older kids.

Seriously, congrats for exposing yourself for an idiot........it's been slightly entertaining. The best part was you defending the single bullet theory and how the bullet was "damaged" (which it wasn't) and how it's plausible that it could be found on the gurney after having been lodged in Connally's hip. How you are silent on how the right side of the head of Kennedy was actually a shot to the back of the head and those that see the shot that causes Kennedy's head to go up and to the left are just (snicker) "Wacky".

You really can't be THAT fucking stupid to buy that load of bullshit so it's obvious to me that you are simply here to yank some chains and waste time. Mission accomplished, dipshit....are ya proud? (snicker)

thats how this shill operates all the time he always claims such and such has been debunked and never replies with any links to prove so.that is obviously what his boss instructs him to do everytime he sends him here.

 

[Soupnazi630]

you keep posting blanket statements with no evidence or support of any kind whatsoever.

Answer the questions.

Are the any guilty men in prison?

Cite one passage from the Warren Commission report which is a lie and provide evidence that it is a lie.

No the CIA did not train me.

Now I answered you so go ahead and man up.

The evidence is EVERYWHERE...but to the stupid easily duped Statist, it can't be comprehended.

Stop being a pussy and accept the truth.

you keep making blanket statements like " the evidence is everywhere " but you cannot cite any such evidence.

There is no such evidence to cite sonny boy.

Go ahead and present some which has not been massively shredded and debunked.

BTW BOY a pussy is one who runs away from defending their positions you aksed a stupid question about the CIA and I answered.

I asked you two simple question and you ran proving your self a coward and the only real pussy so answer now.

Stop lying stop evading and dodging and answer the to questions i asked you or you admit to being outclassed and to being a cheap coward who has been pwned.

Are there any guilty men in prison?

Cite one specific quote from the Warren Commission which is a lie and present evidence that it is a lie

Did you get your training at Langley or was it overseas?

Gipper, you have more than busted this poseur and exposed him for being a fraud. I salute you and anyone else that takes the path of least resistance and refuses to be intimidated into falling for the "groupspeak" tactic.

Yeah Gipper I dont even know WHY you play his game.the worst thing you can do is reply to him and give him the attention he seeks.Let the moron show off to the whole world what a dumbfuck he is talking to himself in the first degree as he does with me all the time even though i have him on ignore and he KNOWS that.

The worst thing he can do is answer and expose his ignorance and lack of education.

So yes he should just run along and ignore had badly he was defeated as you have done.

He can always lie as you do as well and claim to have me on ignore as you have never done which is why you always respond even indirectly.

You are reading my posts and know how badly you have been debunked and humiliated

 

[Soupnazi630]

The preponderance of the evidence proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that not only was Oswald a patsy that had no involvement in the shooting and that the crime scene was secured by Deep State operatives even to the point of removing his body at gunpoint. Your contention that the bullet that fell out of the thigh of Connally wasn't in great shape if not in pristine condition is also a like because I have seen exhibit 399 and outside of the markings caused by the barrel (which all fired bullets will have) it's in nearly pristine condition. Whom was selected to do the autopsy of the most important person in America at the time? One that had never done an autopsy of which a gunshot was the cause. Sorry, dude, you repeat talking points of the very ones involved in the cover-up and touting their point of view. Thus far I remain unimpressed.

That is not even opinion it is an outright lie.

You have presented no evidence of any kind ergo there is no such preponderance. The evidence in fact proves the opposite as i have laid out and shown that Oswald acted alone and your entire claims is based on innuendo, grasping at straws, and speculation sorry but none of those things are evidence.

If there were a preponderance of evidence as you wrongfully claim you could easily cite some BUT YOU CANNOT.

The bullet was never in pristine condition or near pristine condition it was caved in damaged and missing mass just as one would expect from a bullet performing as it did you are proven wrong on that by the exhibit itself.

You are also dead wrong about the expert and experienced Pathologists who performed the autopsies they had in fact done many autopsies on bodies of victims of violent events and crimes including gunshot victims. Commander James Thornton Boswell was the man in charge of the autopsy whom you could not even name and he was not selected he was in fact the chief pathologist on duty at Bethesda which was the site for the autopsy chosen by Jackie Kennedy. Boswell and his colleagues did indeed have great experience at examining gun shot victims which is WHY they were chief pathologists.

I am repeating facts you are repeating falsehoods you never bothered to research and are naively falling for because you saw it in a movie


So far every attempt you have made to produce evidence has failed and been debunked so there is no preponderance of evidence as you Claim as you claim of a conspiracy or that Oswald was a patsy.

"That is not even opinion it is an outright lie"

Nope, it is a fact......one or two anomalies or coincidences do not conspiracy make but when there are literally dozens of things that do not add up nor can be refuted? Yeah, the preponderance of the evidence shows that there was without a doubt a conspiracy by this corporate entity that you lovingly refer to as "gubermint".

"The evidence in fact proves the opposite as i have laid out and shown that Oswald acted alone and your entire claims is based on innuendo, grasping at straws, and speculation sorry but none of those things are evidence"

A spare to fair marksman like Oswald did not get off 3 shots with a bolt action rifle in the amount of time claimed....PERIOD. The radio station KLIF that was covering his trip down Elm proves that there were two shots fired within a second of each other and the shots didn't hit anything. It was a pathetic attempt at a cover-up given what we know now and for you to lamely claim otherwise is the last refuge of someone that is incredibly blinded or simply a disinfo agent......either way? It has been amusing watching you flail away.

"The bullet was never in pristine condition or near pristine condition it was caved in damaged and missing mass just as one would expect from a bullet performing as it did you are proven wrong on that by the exhibit itself"

This is the funniest part of your argument ........the magic bullet that zig zagged around causing multiple injuries and then working it's way onto the gurney of Connally. Don't you realize how fucking stupid that comes across????

The Magic Bullet: Even More Magical than We Knew

This bullet busted ribs and the wrist of Connally.......looks pretty intact to me.

You can't explain how the right side of Kennedy's head pushes to the left when the bullshit story that he was shot in the back of the head would push his head to the front with perhaps a "snap back reflex" and as doctored as the Zapruder film was (which it was) even they couldn't spin that one. His brain didn't leak out from the back of the head, it was the right hand side of the skull was blown to shit.


"You are also dead wrong about the expert and experienced Pathologists who performed the autopsies they had in fact done many autopsies on bodies of victims of violent events and crimes including gunshot victims. Commander James Thornton Boswell was the man in charge of the autopsy whom you could not even name and he was not selected he was in fact the chief pathologist on duty at Bethesda which was the site for the autopsy chosen by Jackie Kennedy. Boswell and his colleagues did indeed have great experience at examining gun shot victims which is WHY they were chief pathologists"

Nope, you are "dead wrong" and it is revisionist history after the fact. Boswell burned his notes? Gee, I wonder why. I will give you credit for one thing, you definitely toe the "corporate line" but you lose and lose badly.

\There are not literally dozens of things which do not add up.

There simply is no evidence to support your assertion.

Once again there is no preponderance of evidence because to have a preponderance you need some evidence to begin with and all the evidence shows Oswald acted alone.

Spare to fair is a weird comment without meaning. Oswald was a well trained marksman as all Marines are. The Marines have the BEST basic rifle marksmanship training program in the military and he was rated a Sharpshooter which by definition makes him better skilled than most people with a rifle.

You are long since proven wrong about the time He had 6 to 8 seconds which is ample time for ANYONE to fire 5 aimed shots with a bolt action rifle as anyone who has fired and operated such a rifle knows.

Your PERIOD is simply false and long since proven so by anyone who knows anything about rifles.

No radio station ever proved any such thing as there is no audio recording of the event which would be required for such proof.


I have not flailed away I have systematically proven each of your assertions wrong and debunked them which id why you have no evidence preponderance or otherwise.

Nothing I said comes across as stupid the bullet was damaged and no where near pristine which is fact.

Yes it was damaged the way one would expect as every test done on similar bullets has shown.

The Zapruder film was never doctored and yes it is very easy to explain why his head moved the way it did. It was a combination of jet effect andneurological reflex.

Your assumption is based on watching TV and movies where people always move or jerk away from the gun when fired but in reality they do not always do so.

Here are tests demonstrating how you are wrong on both the time for the three shots and the jet effect.



Plain and simple your claims debunked.

Yes He did burn his notes which does not constitutes making him inexperienced as you claimed and were wrong about he did have great experience performing autopsies on gun shot victims that is precisely what pathologists DO in the military which sees a high percentage of people shot to death and he had served in that capacity since WWII.

You simply have no evidence

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!


Hey, dumb ass, you can't hit rock bottom until you are done digging a hole. You keep claiming "This was debunked" and THAT was debunk " with no links....I believe it's called the "UH-uh" defense used by little kids with snot running down their noses when they are told that Santa Claus is a myth by the older kids.

Seriously, congrats for exposing yourself for an idiot........it's been slightly entertaining. The best part was you defending the single bullet theory and how the bullet was "damaged" (which it wasn't) and how it's plausible that it could be found on the gurney after having been lodged in Connally's hip. How you are silent on how the right side of the head of Kennedy was actually a shot to the back of the head and those that see the shot that causes Kennedy's head to go up and to the left are just (snicker) "Wacky".

You really can't be THAT fucking stupid to buy that load of bullshit so it's obvious to me that you are simply here to yank some chains and waste time. Mission accomplished, dipshit....are ya proud? (snicker)

thats how this shill operates all the time he always claims such and such has been debunked and never replies with any links to prove so.that is obviously what his boss instructs him to do everytime he sends him here.

You are projecting as i have handed your ass to you with every post and proven you uneducated and wrong.

That is why you always answer with a cry baby statement that you ignore those who prove you an uninformed intellectual weakling.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

The preponderance of the evidence proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that not only was Oswald a patsy that had no involvement in the shooting and that the crime scene was secured by Deep State operatives even to the point of removing his body at gunpoint. Your contention that the bullet that fell out of the thigh of Connally wasn't in great shape if not in pristine condition is also a like because I have seen exhibit 399 and outside of the markings caused by the barrel (which all fired bullets will have) it's in nearly pristine condition. Whom was selected to do the autopsy of the most important person in America at the time? One that had never done an autopsy of which a gunshot was the cause. Sorry, dude, you repeat talking points of the very ones involved in the cover-up and touting their point of view. Thus far I remain unimpressed.

That is not even opinion it is an outright lie.

You have presented no evidence of any kind ergo there is no such preponderance. The evidence in fact proves the opposite as i have laid out and shown that Oswald acted alone and your entire claims is based on innuendo, grasping at straws, and speculation sorry but none of those things are evidence.

If there were a preponderance of evidence as you wrongfully claim you could easily cite some BUT YOU CANNOT.

The bullet was never in pristine condition or near pristine condition it was caved in damaged and missing mass just as one would expect from a bullet performing as it did you are proven wrong on that by the exhibit itself.

You are also dead wrong about the expert and experienced Pathologists who performed the autopsies they had in fact done many autopsies on bodies of victims of violent events and crimes including gunshot victims. Commander James Thornton Boswell was the man in charge of the autopsy whom you could not even name and he was not selected he was in fact the chief pathologist on duty at Bethesda which was the site for the autopsy chosen by Jackie Kennedy. Boswell and his colleagues did indeed have great experience at examining gun shot victims which is WHY they were chief pathologists.

I am repeating facts you are repeating falsehoods you never bothered to research and are naively falling for because you saw it in a movie


So far every attempt you have made to produce evidence has failed and been debunked so there is no preponderance of evidence as you Claim as you claim of a conspiracy or that Oswald was a patsy.

Are ya new here?? These loons don't need evidence. They're perfectly blissful with their delusions.

Faun? You are easily one of the most disgusting excuses for a human being here....whom else would use that as an avatar knowing what it stands for? Were you spawned before Roe V Wade?

He is quite correct you ignore evidence and offer none whatsoever for your claims which are false and derived from a fictional film.

to quote the ass clown LARAM you got an ass beating of epic proportions and everyone knows it even LARAM who will merely come on to lie and post emojis because he lacks the intellect to do anything else.

With the mountain of evidence proving conspiracy, anyone who thinks Oswald responsible and acted alone has to be FUCKING CRAZY or a CIA plant.

as is the case with this NAZI shill. He gives it away that he works at Langley with his user name he uses the fact the CIA brought Nazis over to work for them after the war was over.

 

[Soupnazi630]

That is not even opinion it is an outright lie.

You have presented no evidence of any kind ergo there is no such preponderance. The evidence in fact proves the opposite as i have laid out and shown that Oswald acted alone and your entire claims is based on innuendo, grasping at straws, and speculation sorry but none of those things are evidence.

If there were a preponderance of evidence as you wrongfully claim you could easily cite some BUT YOU CANNOT.

The bullet was never in pristine condition or near pristine condition it was caved in damaged and missing mass just as one would expect from a bullet performing as it did you are proven wrong on that by the exhibit itself.

You are also dead wrong about the expert and experienced Pathologists who performed the autopsies they had in fact done many autopsies on bodies of victims of violent events and crimes including gunshot victims. Commander James Thornton Boswell was the man in charge of the autopsy whom you could not even name and he was not selected he was in fact the chief pathologist on duty at Bethesda which was the site for the autopsy chosen by Jackie Kennedy. Boswell and his colleagues did indeed have great experience at examining gun shot victims which is WHY they were chief pathologists.

I am repeating facts you are repeating falsehoods you never bothered to research and are naively falling for because you saw it in a movie


So far every attempt you have made to produce evidence has failed and been debunked so there is no preponderance of evidence as you Claim as you claim of a conspiracy or that Oswald was a patsy.

Are ya new here?? These loons don't need evidence. They're perfectly blissful with their delusions.

Faun? You are easily one of the most disgusting excuses for a human being here....whom else would use that as an avatar knowing what it stands for? Were you spawned before Roe V Wade?

He is quite correct you ignore evidence and offer none whatsoever for your claims which are false and derived from a fictional film.

to quote the ass clown LARAM you got an ass beating of epic proportions and everyone knows it even LARAM who will merely come on to lie and post emojis because he lacks the intellect to do anything else.

With the mountain of evidence proving conspiracy, anyone who thinks Oswald responsible and acted alone has to be FUCKING CRAZY or a CIA plant.

you should know by NOW that Faun and Soupnazi are are shills that have penetrated this site -the nazi especially.He is such a stupid fuck he advertises it with his USER name and doesnt even realise it that he gives it away how evil he is with his user name yet you STILL argue back and forth with thise disgusting monsters who particpate in this coverup? WHY?

For the same reason you still argue indirectly with those who are better than you.

you hate that you have been defeated and merely act like a spoiled brat to deny fact because you believe it will save face.

You do know however that I used your face to mop the floor

 

[LA RAM FAN]

He is quite correct you ignore evidence and offer none whatsoever for your claims which are false and derived from a fictional film.

to quote the ass clown LARAM you got an ass beating of epic proportions and everyone knows it even LARAM who will merely come on to lie and post emojis because he lacks the intellect to do anything else.

With the mountain of evidence proving conspiracy, anyone who thinks Oswald responsible and acted alone has to be FUCKING CRAZY or a CIA plant.

Wrong,.

There is no such evidence or you could cite some which you cannot.

You have admitted as much as well and are merely being dishonest because you are too childish to admit when you are beaten in an argument

The evidence is so overwhelming only a fool wouldn't see it.

You are lying.

there is no evidence to support your claim much less a mountain of it or overwhelming amount.

Your arguments exist in the ABSENCE of evidence and are more akin to faith based arguments of religion. Much like flat earthers or fundamentalists you ignore any fact or evidence disputing you and make great claims of evidence which you can never produce or cite.

This is because you have no evidence and you know it and are merely arguing based on a dogmatic belie system which you will not allow to be questioned in any way.

This is why you make absurdly stupid claims such as CIA plants or shills. Because you KNOW you are lying about such evidence.

The evidence proves you wrong and you are too immature to accept that fact but it is a fact in your face.

You like to look at one little piece of the coup d'etat and tear it apart, without looking at the entire event. I am guessing you were trained in this tactic at Langley.

 

[Soupnazi630]

That is not even opinion it is an outright lie.

You have presented no evidence of any kind ergo there is no such preponderance. The evidence in fact proves the opposite as i have laid out and shown that Oswald acted alone and your entire claims is based on innuendo, grasping at straws, and speculation sorry but none of those things are evidence.

If there were a preponderance of evidence as you wrongfully claim you could easily cite some BUT YOU CANNOT.

The bullet was never in pristine condition or near pristine condition it was caved in damaged and missing mass just as one would expect from a bullet performing as it did you are proven wrong on that by the exhibit itself.

You are also dead wrong about the expert and experienced Pathologists who performed the autopsies they had in fact done many autopsies on bodies of victims of violent events and crimes including gunshot victims. Commander James Thornton Boswell was the man in charge of the autopsy whom you could not even name and he was not selected he was in fact the chief pathologist on duty at Bethesda which was the site for the autopsy chosen by Jackie Kennedy. Boswell and his colleagues did indeed have great experience at examining gun shot victims which is WHY they were chief pathologists.

I am repeating facts you are repeating falsehoods you never bothered to research and are naively falling for because you saw it in a movie


So far every attempt you have made to produce evidence has failed and been debunked so there is no preponderance of evidence as you Claim as you claim of a conspiracy or that Oswald was a patsy.

Are ya new here?? These loons don't need evidence. They're perfectly blissful with their delusions.

Faun? You are easily one of the most disgusting excuses for a human being here....whom else would use that as an avatar knowing what it stands for? Were you spawned before Roe V Wade?

He is quite correct you ignore evidence and offer none whatsoever for your claims which are false and derived from a fictional film.

to quote the ass clown LARAM you got an ass beating of epic proportions and everyone knows it even LARAM who will merely come on to lie and post emojis because he lacks the intellect to do anything else.

With the mountain of evidence proving conspiracy, anyone who thinks Oswald responsible and acted alone has to be FUCKING CRAZY or a CIA plant.

as is the case with this NAZI shill. He gives it away that he works at Langley with his user name he uses the fact the CIA brought Nazis over to work for them after the war was over.

Yes because user names taken from a tv sitcom proves one work for the CIA. No wonder you lose every argument.

What a dunce.

 

[gipper]

The preponderance of the evidence proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that not only was Oswald a patsy that had no involvement in the shooting and that the crime scene was secured by Deep State operatives even to the point of removing his body at gunpoint. Your contention that the bullet that fell out of the thigh of Connally wasn't in great shape if not in pristine condition is also a like because I have seen exhibit 399 and outside of the markings caused by the barrel (which all fired bullets will have) it's in nearly pristine condition. Whom was selected to do the autopsy of the most important person in America at the time? One that had never done an autopsy of which a gunshot was the cause. Sorry, dude, you repeat talking points of the very ones involved in the cover-up and touting their point of view. Thus far I remain unimpressed.

That is not even opinion it is an outright lie.

You have presented no evidence of any kind ergo there is no such preponderance. The evidence in fact proves the opposite as i have laid out and shown that Oswald acted alone and your entire claims is based on innuendo, grasping at straws, and speculation sorry but none of those things are evidence.

If there were a preponderance of evidence as you wrongfully claim you could easily cite some BUT YOU CANNOT.

The bullet was never in pristine condition or near pristine condition it was caved in damaged and missing mass just as one would expect from a bullet performing as it did you are proven wrong on that by the exhibit itself.

You are also dead wrong about the expert and experienced Pathologists who performed the autopsies they had in fact done many autopsies on bodies of victims of violent events and crimes including gunshot victims. Commander James Thornton Boswell was the man in charge of the autopsy whom you could not even name and he was not selected he was in fact the chief pathologist on duty at Bethesda which was the site for the autopsy chosen by Jackie Kennedy. Boswell and his colleagues did indeed have great experience at examining gun shot victims which is WHY they were chief pathologists.

I am repeating facts you are repeating falsehoods you never bothered to research and are naively falling for because you saw it in a movie


So far every attempt you have made to produce evidence has failed and been debunked so there is no preponderance of evidence as you Claim as you claim of a conspiracy or that Oswald was a patsy.

"That is not even opinion it is an outright lie"

Nope, it is a fact......one or two anomalies or coincidences do not conspiracy make but when there are literally dozens of things that do not add up nor can be refuted? Yeah, the preponderance of the evidence shows that there was without a doubt a conspiracy by this corporate entity that you lovingly refer to as "gubermint".

"The evidence in fact proves the opposite as i have laid out and shown that Oswald acted alone and your entire claims is based on innuendo, grasping at straws, and speculation sorry but none of those things are evidence"

A spare to fair marksman like Oswald did not get off 3 shots with a bolt action rifle in the amount of time claimed....PERIOD. The radio station KLIF that was covering his trip down Elm proves that there were two shots fired within a second of each other and the shots didn't hit anything. It was a pathetic attempt at a cover-up given what we know now and for you to lamely claim otherwise is the last refuge of someone that is incredibly blinded or simply a disinfo agent......either way? It has been amusing watching you flail away.

"The bullet was never in pristine condition or near pristine condition it was caved in damaged and missing mass just as one would expect from a bullet performing as it did you are proven wrong on that by the exhibit itself"

This is the funniest part of your argument ........the magic bullet that zig zagged around causing multiple injuries and then working it's way onto the gurney of Connally. Don't you realize how fucking stupid that comes across????

The Magic Bullet: Even More Magical than We Knew

This bullet busted ribs and the wrist of Connally.......looks pretty intact to me.

You can't explain how the right side of Kennedy's head pushes to the left when the bullshit story that he was shot in the back of the head would push his head to the front with perhaps a "snap back reflex" and as doctored as the Zapruder film was (which it was) even they couldn't spin that one. His brain didn't leak out from the back of the head, it was the right hand side of the skull was blown to shit.


"You are also dead wrong about the expert and experienced Pathologists who performed the autopsies they had in fact done many autopsies on bodies of victims of violent events and crimes including gunshot victims. Commander James Thornton Boswell was the man in charge of the autopsy whom you could not even name and he was not selected he was in fact the chief pathologist on duty at Bethesda which was the site for the autopsy chosen by Jackie Kennedy. Boswell and his colleagues did indeed have great experience at examining gun shot victims which is WHY they were chief pathologists"

Nope, you are "dead wrong" and it is revisionist history after the fact. Boswell burned his notes? Gee, I wonder why. I will give you credit for one thing, you definitely toe the "corporate line" but you lose and lose badly.

\There are not literally dozens of things which do not add up.

There simply is no evidence to support your assertion.

Once again there is no preponderance of evidence because to have a preponderance you need some evidence to begin with and all the evidence shows Oswald acted alone.

Spare to fair is a weird comment without meaning. Oswald was a well trained marksman as all Marines are. The Marines have the BEST basic rifle marksmanship training program in the military and he was rated a Sharpshooter which by definition makes him better skilled than most people with a rifle.

You are long since proven wrong about the time He had 6 to 8 seconds which is ample time for ANYONE to fire 5 aimed shots with a bolt action rifle as anyone who has fired and operated such a rifle knows.

Your PERIOD is simply false and long since proven so by anyone who knows anything about rifles.

No radio station ever proved any such thing as there is no audio recording of the event which would be required for such proof.


I have not flailed away I have systematically proven each of your assertions wrong and debunked them which id why you have no evidence preponderance or otherwise.

Nothing I said comes across as stupid the bullet was damaged and no where near pristine which is fact.

Yes it was damaged the way one would expect as every test done on similar bullets has shown.

The Zapruder film was never doctored and yes it is very easy to explain why his head moved the way it did. It was a combination of jet effect andneurological reflex.

Your assumption is based on watching TV and movies where people always move or jerk away from the gun when fired but in reality they do not always do so.

Here are tests demonstrating how you are wrong on both the time for the three shots and the jet effect.



Plain and simple your claims debunked.

Yes He did burn his notes which does not constitutes making him inexperienced as you claimed and were wrong about he did have great experience performing autopsies on gun shot victims that is precisely what pathologists DO in the military which sees a high percentage of people shot to death and he had served in that capacity since WWII.

You simply have no evidence

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!


Hey, dumb ass, you can't hit rock bottom until you are done digging a hole. You keep claiming "This was debunked" and THAT was debunk " with no links....I believe it's called the "UH-uh" defense used by little kids with snot running down their noses when they are told that Santa Claus is a myth by the older kids.

Seriously, congrats for exposing yourself for an idiot........it's been slightly entertaining. The best part was you defending the single bullet theory and how the bullet was "damaged" (which it wasn't) and how it's plausible that it could be found on the gurney after having been lodged in Connally's hip. How you are silent on how the right side of the head of Kennedy was actually a shot to the back of the head and those that see the shot that causes Kennedy's head to go up and to the left are just (snicker) "Wacky".

You really can't be THAT fucking stupid to buy that load of bullshit so it's obvious to me that you are simply here to yank some chains and waste time. Mission accomplished, dipshit....are ya proud? (snicker)

Dale,Gipper i can only state this so many times-don not reply to this shill.that is the worst thing you can do because you are not only giving him the attention he so desperately seeks but you guys are both helping him do what his boss has sent him here to do, to do,which is to troll the thread to get you guys to go back and forth and argue with him to try and derail this thread.

I have this many times regarding these shills that have penetrated this site-

But I so like making him look foolish. It is a lot fun.

 

[Soupnazi630]

With the mountain of evidence proving conspiracy, anyone who thinks Oswald responsible and acted alone has to be FUCKING CRAZY or a CIA plant.

Wrong,.

There is no such evidence or you could cite some which you cannot.

You have admitted as much as well and are merely being dishonest because you are too childish to admit when you are beaten in an argument

The evidence is so overwhelming only a fool wouldn't see it.

You are lying.

there is no evidence to support your claim much less a mountain of it or overwhelming amount.

Your arguments exist in the ABSENCE of evidence and are more akin to faith based arguments of religion. Much like flat earthers or fundamentalists you ignore any fact or evidence disputing you and make great claims of evidence which you can never produce or cite.

This is because you have no evidence and you know it and are merely arguing based on a dogmatic belie system which you will not allow to be questioned in any way.

This is why you make absurdly stupid claims such as CIA plants or shills. Because you KNOW you are lying about such evidence.

The evidence proves you wrong and you are too immature to accept that fact but it is a fact in your face.

You like to look at one little piece of the coup d'etat and tear it apart, without looking at the entire event. I am guessing you were trained in this tactic at Langley.

LARAM------

 

[Soupnazi630]

That is not even opinion it is an outright lie.

You have presented no evidence of any kind ergo there is no such preponderance. The evidence in fact proves the opposite as i have laid out and shown that Oswald acted alone and your entire claims is based on innuendo, grasping at straws, and speculation sorry but none of those things are evidence.

If there were a preponderance of evidence as you wrongfully claim you could easily cite some BUT YOU CANNOT.

The bullet was never in pristine condition or near pristine condition it was caved in damaged and missing mass just as one would expect from a bullet performing as it did you are proven wrong on that by the exhibit itself.

You are also dead wrong about the expert and experienced Pathologists who performed the autopsies they had in fact done many autopsies on bodies of victims of violent events and crimes including gunshot victims. Commander James Thornton Boswell was the man in charge of the autopsy whom you could not even name and he was not selected he was in fact the chief pathologist on duty at Bethesda which was the site for the autopsy chosen by Jackie Kennedy. Boswell and his colleagues did indeed have great experience at examining gun shot victims which is WHY they were chief pathologists.

I am repeating facts you are repeating falsehoods you never bothered to research and are naively falling for because you saw it in a movie


So far every attempt you have made to produce evidence has failed and been debunked so there is no preponderance of evidence as you Claim as you claim of a conspiracy or that Oswald was a patsy.

"That is not even opinion it is an outright lie"

Nope, it is a fact......one or two anomalies or coincidences do not conspiracy make but when there are literally dozens of things that do not add up nor can be refuted? Yeah, the preponderance of the evidence shows that there was without a doubt a conspiracy by this corporate entity that you lovingly refer to as "gubermint".

"The evidence in fact proves the opposite as i have laid out and shown that Oswald acted alone and your entire claims is based on innuendo, grasping at straws, and speculation sorry but none of those things are evidence"

A spare to fair marksman like Oswald did not get off 3 shots with a bolt action rifle in the amount of time claimed....PERIOD. The radio station KLIF that was covering his trip down Elm proves that there were two shots fired within a second of each other and the shots didn't hit anything. It was a pathetic attempt at a cover-up given what we know now and for you to lamely claim otherwise is the last refuge of someone that is incredibly blinded or simply a disinfo agent......either way? It has been amusing watching you flail away.

"The bullet was never in pristine condition or near pristine condition it was caved in damaged and missing mass just as one would expect from a bullet performing as it did you are proven wrong on that by the exhibit itself"

This is the funniest part of your argument ........the magic bullet that zig zagged around causing multiple injuries and then working it's way onto the gurney of Connally. Don't you realize how fucking stupid that comes across????

The Magic Bullet: Even More Magical than We Knew

This bullet busted ribs and the wrist of Connally.......looks pretty intact to me.

You can't explain how the right side of Kennedy's head pushes to the left when the bullshit story that he was shot in the back of the head would push his head to the front with perhaps a "snap back reflex" and as doctored as the Zapruder film was (which it was) even they couldn't spin that one. His brain didn't leak out from the back of the head, it was the right hand side of the skull was blown to shit.


"You are also dead wrong about the expert and experienced Pathologists who performed the autopsies they had in fact done many autopsies on bodies of victims of violent events and crimes including gunshot victims. Commander James Thornton Boswell was the man in charge of the autopsy whom you could not even name and he was not selected he was in fact the chief pathologist on duty at Bethesda which was the site for the autopsy chosen by Jackie Kennedy. Boswell and his colleagues did indeed have great experience at examining gun shot victims which is WHY they were chief pathologists"

Nope, you are "dead wrong" and it is revisionist history after the fact. Boswell burned his notes? Gee, I wonder why. I will give you credit for one thing, you definitely toe the "corporate line" but you lose and lose badly.

\There are not literally dozens of things which do not add up.

There simply is no evidence to support your assertion.

Once again there is no preponderance of evidence because to have a preponderance you need some evidence to begin with and all the evidence shows Oswald acted alone.

Spare to fair is a weird comment without meaning. Oswald was a well trained marksman as all Marines are. The Marines have the BEST basic rifle marksmanship training program in the military and he was rated a Sharpshooter which by definition makes him better skilled than most people with a rifle.

You are long since proven wrong about the time He had 6 to 8 seconds which is ample time for ANYONE to fire 5 aimed shots with a bolt action rifle as anyone who has fired and operated such a rifle knows.

Your PERIOD is simply false and long since proven so by anyone who knows anything about rifles.

No radio station ever proved any such thing as there is no audio recording of the event which would be required for such proof.


I have not flailed away I have systematically proven each of your assertions wrong and debunked them which id why you have no evidence preponderance or otherwise.

Nothing I said comes across as stupid the bullet was damaged and no where near pristine which is fact.

Yes it was damaged the way one would expect as every test done on similar bullets has shown.

The Zapruder film was never doctored and yes it is very easy to explain why his head moved the way it did. It was a combination of jet effect andneurological reflex.

Your assumption is based on watching TV and movies where people always move or jerk away from the gun when fired but in reality they do not always do so.

Here are tests demonstrating how you are wrong on both the time for the three shots and the jet effect.



Plain and simple your claims debunked.

Yes He did burn his notes which does not constitutes making him inexperienced as you claimed and were wrong about he did have great experience performing autopsies on gun shot victims that is precisely what pathologists DO in the military which sees a high percentage of people shot to death and he had served in that capacity since WWII.

You simply have no evidence

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!


Hey, dumb ass, you can't hit rock bottom until you are done digging a hole. You keep claiming "This was debunked" and THAT was debunk " with no links....I believe it's called the "UH-uh" defense used by little kids with snot running down their noses when they are told that Santa Claus is a myth by the older kids.

Seriously, congrats for exposing yourself for an idiot........it's been slightly entertaining. The best part was you defending the single bullet theory and how the bullet was "damaged" (which it wasn't) and how it's plausible that it could be found on the gurney after having been lodged in Connally's hip. How you are silent on how the right side of the head of Kennedy was actually a shot to the back of the head and those that see the shot that causes Kennedy's head to go up and to the left are just (snicker) "Wacky".

You really can't be THAT fucking stupid to buy that load of bullshit so it's obvious to me that you are simply here to yank some chains and waste time. Mission accomplished, dipshit....are ya proud? (snicker)

Dale,Gipper i can only state this so many times-don not reply to this shill.that is the worst thing you can do because you are not only giving him the attention he so desperately seeks but you guys are both helping him do what his boss has sent him here to do, to do,which is to troll the thread to get you guys to go back and forth and argue with him to try and derail this thread.

I have this many times regarding these shills that have penetrated this site-

But I so like making him look foolish. It is a lot fun.

You never did, I owned your uneducated ass and you know it