Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think thats a modern definition and is not valid on this point,,,1. The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms,Shall not be infringed"
2. "The little known tax code provision employed by the Democrats in demanding Mr. Trump’s returns says only that the Internal Revenue Service “shall furnish” the information, giving it and its parent agency, the Treasury Department, little leeway in deciding how to respond.
Link to above:
Trump Lawyer Asserts President’s Right to Keep Tax Returns Private
The Republican Party, the NRA and the Congress must decide if shall means mandatory, or not. The consequences are clear. Give Congress the president's taxes, or give the NRA and it's shall not be infringed a kick in the ass.
Interesting. I always thought "shall" to mean "mandatory". What did I know:
shall
v. 1) an imperative command as in "you shall not kill."
2) in some statutes, "shall" is a direction but does not mean mandatory, depending on the context.
It's a pity, really, for if "shall" changes its meaning contingent on the "context", whatever that's supposed to mean, our righty friends are still not required to interpret your examples the same way. Still, watching them tying themselves in knots finding some "context" to justify different interpretations shall be fun.
It's a matter of Murican case law, Eurotrash fuckwit.1. The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms,Shall not be infringed"
2. "The little known tax code provision employed by the Democrats in demanding Mr. Trump’s returns says only that the Internal Revenue Service “shall furnish” the information, giving it and its parent agency, the Treasury Department, little leeway in deciding how to respond.
Link to above:
Trump Lawyer Asserts President’s Right to Keep Tax Returns Private
The Republican Party, the NRA and the Congress must decide if shall means mandatory, or not. The consequences are clear. Give Congress the president's taxes, or give the NRA and it's shall not be infringed a kick in the ass.
Interesting. I always thought "shall" to mean "mandatory". What did I know:
shall
v. 1) an imperative command as in "you shall not kill."
2) in some statutes, "shall" is a direction but does not mean mandatory, depending on the context.
It's a pity, really, for if "shall" changes its meaning contingent on the "context", whatever that's supposed to mean, our righty friends are still not required to interpret your examples the same way. Still, watching them tying themselves in knots finding some "context" to justify different interpretations shall be fun.
they prosecute, they put together a grand jury. the congress can't do that. no matter how fking much you want that to be so, it just isn't slim. just like trump is president. hitlery is a joke.well actually the DOJ does. but why would you care, facts ain't your thing.Congress has no judicial authority. they can bark all night, and all it will be is annoying.from plainlanguage.gov
"Must" is the only word that imposes a legal obligation that something is mandatory. the Supreme Court ruled that when the word "shall" appears in statutes, it means "may."....must and shall are not supposed to be used together in the same regulation....
So...is "shall not be infringed not mandatory, and can the Sect. of the Treasury able to keep the tax records of Trump secret? It can't be one or the other though I'm sure trump supporters will try.
Neither does the executive. Only the Supreme Court has that authority:
“The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.”
Keep in mind, the Executive does not have legislative power, and EO's are not laws, they are only policies and can be overruled by The Congress.
Why do the supporters of Trump believe he is above the law. Keep in mind John Mitchell, and AG Barr ought to too.
John Mitchell | attorney general of United States
BULLSHIT ^^^
They investigate and prosecute, the trier of fact is under the control of the Judge, and the decision rendered by the judge or the jury.
BTW, the Judiciary Committee just now voted 24 -16 to hold Barr in Contempt.
1. The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms,Shall not be infringed"
2. "The little known tax code provision employed by the Democrats in demanding Mr. Trump’s returns says only that the Internal Revenue Service “shall furnish” the information, giving it and its parent agency, the Treasury Department, little leeway in deciding how to respond.
Link to above:
Trump Lawyer Asserts President’s Right to Keep Tax Returns Private
The Republican Party, the NRA and the Congress must decide if shall means mandatory, or not. The consequences are clear. Give Congress the president's taxes, or give the NRA and it's shall not be infringed a kick in the ass.
we want Trump's tax returns
from plainlanguage.gov1. The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms,Shall not be infringed"
2. "The little known tax code provision employed by the Democrats in demanding Mr. Trump’s returns says only that the Internal Revenue Service “shall furnish” the information, giving it and its parent agency, the Treasury Department, little leeway in deciding how to respond.
Link to above:
Trump Lawyer Asserts President’s Right to Keep Tax Returns Private
The Republican Party, the NRA and the Congress must decide if shall means mandatory, or not. The consequences are clear. Give Congress the president's taxes, or give the NRA and it's shall not be infringed a kick in the ass.
"Must" is the only word that imposes a legal obligation that something is mandatory. the Supreme Court ruled that when the word "shall" appears in statutes, it means "may."....must and shall are not supposed to be used together in the same regulation....
THANK YOU, Wry........I made the same exact argument at a local town hall meeting, and one of the "deplorables" threatened my life.....just for bringing up the fact that his ilk WAS deplorable .....and clearly ignorant.........LOL
1. The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms,Shall not be infringed"
2. "The little known tax code provision employed by the Democrats in demanding Mr. Trump’s returns says only that the Internal Revenue Service “shall furnish” the information, giving it and its parent agency, the Treasury Department, little leeway in deciding how to respond.
Link to above:
Trump Lawyer Asserts President’s Right to Keep Tax Returns Private
The Republican Party, the NRA and the Congress must decide if shall means mandatory, or not. The consequences are clear. Give Congress the president's taxes, or give the NRA and it's shall not be infringed a kick in the ass.
It's the legal definition...It's just like when the court decided that corporations, trusts, and other various legal straw men are "persons".I think thats a modern definition and is not valid on this point,,,1. The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms,Shall not be infringed"
2. "The little known tax code provision employed by the Democrats in demanding Mr. Trump’s returns says only that the Internal Revenue Service “shall furnish” the information, giving it and its parent agency, the Treasury Department, little leeway in deciding how to respond.
Link to above:
Trump Lawyer Asserts President’s Right to Keep Tax Returns Private
The Republican Party, the NRA and the Congress must decide if shall means mandatory, or not. The consequences are clear. Give Congress the president's taxes, or give the NRA and it's shall not be infringed a kick in the ass.
Interesting. I always thought "shall" to mean "mandatory". What did I know:
shall
v. 1) an imperative command as in "you shall not kill."
2) in some statutes, "shall" is a direction but does not mean mandatory, depending on the context.
It's a pity, really, for if "shall" changes its meaning contingent on the "context", whatever that's supposed to mean, our righty friends are still not required to interpret your examples the same way. Still, watching them tying themselves in knots finding some "context" to justify different interpretations shall be fun.
the lefty have been changing the meanings of words for decades,,, so if you get a chance to buy an older edition of the dictionary I would do so,,,
so you insulted the guy and almost got your ass kicked....i bet you almost pissed your underpants....1. The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms,Shall not be infringed"
2. "The little known tax code provision employed by the Democrats in demanding Mr. Trump’s returns says only that the Internal Revenue Service “shall furnish” the information, giving it and its parent agency, the Treasury Department, little leeway in deciding how to respond.
Link to above:
Trump Lawyer Asserts President’s Right to Keep Tax Returns Private
The Republican Party, the NRA and the Congress must decide if shall means mandatory, or not. The consequences are clear. Give Congress the president's taxes, or give the NRA and it's shall not be infringed a kick in the ass.
THANK YOU, Wry........I made the same exact argument at a local town hall meeting, and one of the "deplorables" threatened my life.....just for bringing up the fact that his ilk WAS deplorable .....and clearly ignorant.........LOL
1. The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms,Shall not be infringed"
2. "The little known tax code provision employed by the Democrats in demanding Mr. Trump’s returns says only that the Internal Revenue Service “shall furnish” the information, giving it and its parent agency, the Treasury Department, little leeway in deciding how to respond.
Link to above:
Trump Lawyer Asserts President’s Right to Keep Tax Returns Private
The Republican Party, the NRA and the Congress must decide if shall means mandatory, or not. The consequences are clear. Give Congress the president's taxes, or give the NRA and it's shall not be infringed a kick in the ass.
Interesting. I always thought "shall" to mean "mandatory". What did I know:
shall
v. 1) an imperative command as in "you shall not kill."
2) in some statutes, "shall" is a direction but does not mean mandatory, depending on the context.
It's a pity, really, for if "shall" changes its meaning contingent on the "context", whatever that's supposed to mean, our righty friends are still not required to interpret your examples the same way. Still, watching them tying themselves in knots finding some "context" to justify different interpretations shall be fun.
It's a matter of Murican case law, Eurotrash fuckwit.
Now get the hell back into your own lane.
If you made this point in an open town hall meeting, you publicly made a fool of yourself by flaunting your sheer ignorance....Exactly like you do every day here.1. The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms,Shall not be infringed"
2. "The little known tax code provision employed by the Democrats in demanding Mr. Trump’s returns says only that the Internal Revenue Service “shall furnish” the information, giving it and its parent agency, the Treasury Department, little leeway in deciding how to respond.
Link to above:
Trump Lawyer Asserts President’s Right to Keep Tax Returns Private
The Republican Party, the NRA and the Congress must decide if shall means mandatory, or not. The consequences are clear. Give Congress the president's taxes, or give the NRA and it's shall not be infringed a kick in the ass.
THANK YOU, Wry........I made the same exact argument at a local town hall meeting, and one of the "deplorables" threatened my life.....just for bringing up the fact that his ilk WAS deplorable .....and clearly ignorant.........LOL
no its not mandatory,apparently only must is....shall is the same as may....so the gun rights may OR may not be infringed....and trumps taxes may or may not be furnished...
whats an NRA meeting?...from plainlanguage.gov1. The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms,Shall not be infringed"
2. "The little known tax code provision employed by the Democrats in demanding Mr. Trump’s returns says only that the Internal Revenue Service “shall furnish” the information, giving it and its parent agency, the Treasury Department, little leeway in deciding how to respond.
Link to above:
Trump Lawyer Asserts President’s Right to Keep Tax Returns Private
The Republican Party, the NRA and the Congress must decide if shall means mandatory, or not. The consequences are clear. Give Congress the president's taxes, or give the NRA and it's shall not be infringed a kick in the ass.
"Must" is the only word that imposes a legal obligation that something is mandatory. the Supreme Court ruled that when the word "shall" appears in statutes, it means "may."....must and shall are not supposed to be used together in the same regulation....
Sooooooo, tell THAT at the next NRA meeting and run for your life.
Ad hominem smears of me don't change the fact that you're a total ignoramus about this topic.1. The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms,Shall not be infringed"
2. "The little known tax code provision employed by the Democrats in demanding Mr. Trump’s returns says only that the Internal Revenue Service “shall furnish” the information, giving it and its parent agency, the Treasury Department, little leeway in deciding how to respond.
Link to above:
Trump Lawyer Asserts President’s Right to Keep Tax Returns Private
The Republican Party, the NRA and the Congress must decide if shall means mandatory, or not. The consequences are clear. Give Congress the president's taxes, or give the NRA and it's shall not be infringed a kick in the ass.
Interesting. I always thought "shall" to mean "mandatory". What did I know:
shall
v. 1) an imperative command as in "you shall not kill."
2) in some statutes, "shall" is a direction but does not mean mandatory, depending on the context.
It's a pity, really, for if "shall" changes its meaning contingent on the "context", whatever that's supposed to mean, our righty friends are still not required to interpret your examples the same way. Still, watching them tying themselves in knots finding some "context" to justify different interpretations shall be fun.
It's a matter of Murican case law, Eurotrash fuckwit.
Now get the hell back into your own lane.
Please excuse Oddball, he seeks to be seen as a noble, but those who know his works recognized how ignoble he truly is.
can a moron like you prove that citation wrong?...no its not mandatory,apparently only must is....shall is the same as may....so the gun rights may OR may not be infringed....and trumps taxes may or may not be furnished...
Do morons......like you.....realize that your citation from..... plainlanguage.gov ......is a citation from the "deep state" folks????..............LOL
1. The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms,Shall not be infringed"
2. "The little known tax code provision employed by the Democrats in demanding Mr. Trump’s returns says only that the Internal Revenue Service “shall furnish” the information, giving it and its parent agency, the Treasury Department, little leeway in deciding how to respond.
Link to above:
Trump Lawyer Asserts President’s Right to Keep Tax Returns Private
The Republican Party, the NRA and the Congress must decide if shall means mandatory, or not. The consequences are clear. Give Congress the president's taxes, or give the NRA and it's shall not be infringed a kick in the ass.
nat laughs at everything....the guy must get paid by bad comedians to sit in the audience...no its like saying may......must is like saying will....It's like saying "will"..1. The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms,Shall not be infringed"
2. "The little known tax code provision employed by the Democrats in demanding Mr. Trump’s returns says only that the Internal Revenue Service “shall furnish” the information, giving it and its parent agency, the Treasury Department, little leeway in deciding how to respond.
Link to above:
Trump Lawyer Asserts President’s Right to Keep Tax Returns Private
The Republican Party, the NRA and the Congress must decide if shall means mandatory, or not. The consequences are clear. Give Congress the president's taxes, or give the NRA and it's shall not be infringed a kick in the ass.
so you insulted the guy and almost got your ass kicked....i bet you almost pissed your underpants....
Ad hominem smears of me don't change the fact that you're a total ignoramus about this topic.1. The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms,Shall not be infringed"
2. "The little known tax code provision employed by the Democrats in demanding Mr. Trump’s returns says only that the Internal Revenue Service “shall furnish” the information, giving it and its parent agency, the Treasury Department, little leeway in deciding how to respond.
Link to above:
Trump Lawyer Asserts President’s Right to Keep Tax Returns Private
The Republican Party, the NRA and the Congress must decide if shall means mandatory, or not. The consequences are clear. Give Congress the president's taxes, or give the NRA and it's shall not be infringed a kick in the ass.
Interesting. I always thought "shall" to mean "mandatory". What did I know:
shall
v. 1) an imperative command as in "you shall not kill."
2) in some statutes, "shall" is a direction but does not mean mandatory, depending on the context.
It's a pity, really, for if "shall" changes its meaning contingent on the "context", whatever that's supposed to mean, our righty friends are still not required to interpret your examples the same way. Still, watching them tying themselves in knots finding some "context" to justify different interpretations shall be fun.
It's a matter of Murican case law, Eurotrash fuckwit.
Now get the hell back into your own lane.
Please excuse Oddball, he seeks to be seen as a noble, but those who know his works recognized how ignoble he truly is.
