Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes he was. He stole people's money. Exxon isn't a predator. It sells a product people want to buy. The same goes for banks that provide you with a mortgage.
That's obvious horseshit. Wealth grows. Who did Intel take wealth from when it created the Intel series of CPUs that are the heart of most of the PCs in the world? The answer is "no one." It created new wealth.
The idea that wealth is a fixed pie is endorsed mainly by the stupid, but also by the dishonest who are trying to fleece you.
Democracy is a form of government in which all citizens take part. It is government of the people, by the people, and for the people.
Socialism is where we all put our resources together and work for the common good of us all and not just for our own benefit. In this sense, we are sharing the wealth within society.
Here's what stupid fucking dimocrap filth fail to ask --
"Who's in charge of distributing the money?"
dimocraps are the stupidest motherfuckers to ever walk the surface of the planet.
A waste of skin
Yes he was. He stole people's money. Exxon isn't a predator. It sells a product people want to buy. The same goes for banks that provide you with a mortgage.
The same (your example of Exxon) could be said about a heroin supplier.....Exxon and other fuel suppliers have successfully nixed attempts to utilize other viable fuel sources for....especially....autos.
So, you judge about that "predator" label.
That's obvious horseshit. Wealth grows. Who did Intel take wealth from when it created the Intel series of CPUs that are the heart of most of the PCs in the world? The answer is "no one." It created new wealth.
The idea that wealth is a fixed pie is endorsed mainly by the stupid, but also by the dishonest who are trying to fleece you.
You're missing the point......I'm not saying that progress is "bad".....but when Intel ushered in PCs......did you ever wondered what happened to all the typewriters manufacturers?......and isn't the personal computer revolution killing movie-house owners?
Obama and the cost of government is destroying the Middle Class in America. That is why families are losing income. Our little movement towards more distribution of wealth and the enormous cost of government is killing our economy on several different levels.
I don't car how much anybody else makes. I am not poorer because somebody else is richer. I don't have that envy of the rich that the Moon Bats have.
I just want the government to get off my back so I can succeed in a free market.
The best way not to be poor in the US is to not help elect Liberals who screw up the economy so much.
What's destroying the middle class is income/cost disparity.
Distribution of wealth is having the rich pay the same effective tax rates. BTW; we don't need your help to get wealthier, we have Republicans.
You ARE poorer because somebody else is richer.
Liberals? Really? The worst years for the middle class were during Reagan and Bush. Bush was so bad that it will still take years to fix it.
Yes he was. He stole people's money. Exxon isn't a predator. It sells a product people want to buy. The same goes for banks that provide you with a mortgage.
The same (your example of Exxon) could be said about a heroin supplier.....Exxon and other fuel suppliers have successfully nixed attempts to utilize other viable fuel sources for....especially....autos.
So, you judge about that "predator" label.
Herion dealers aren't predators. They supply a product people want. Tax collectors, on the other hand, are predators. They take your money at gun point.
Says he who believes that people who do nothing are entitled to the wealth of those that do something.I find it a rather amazing sociological phenomenon how many people (especially on the right...or perhaps its just Obama-hatred) succumb to a belief that a small percentage of the population are ENTITLED to be "royalty."
Economic Darwinism..You're missing the point......I'm not saying that progress is "bad".....but when Intel ushered in PCs......did you ever wondered what happened to all the typewriters manufacturers?......and isn't the personal computer revolution killing movie-house owners?
Unsuprisingly, you completely ignored the response put to you.Actually I leave "creationism" up to your ilk....Economic Darwinsim.
You do believe in Darwinism, don't you?
Says he who believes that people who do nothing are entitled to the wealth of those that do something.
You obviously do not understand what I said.So, dingbat, in all those socialistic countries in northern Europe, you're stating here that NO ONE in the citizenry does nothing?Says he who believes that people who do nothing are entitled to the wealth of those that do something.
Unsuprisingly, you completely ignored the response put to you.
What do you suppose SHOULD happen to companies that produce obsolete products/services, should they fail to keep up with progress?
And so you stated the obvious. Is there a point attached?No, I fully understood how completely moronic the responses have been....I NEVER stated that progress was not good and that "survival of the fittest" was a bad thing....I was responding to the real fact that when a company does amazingly well, some other company who could not compete, folded.Unsuprisingly, you completely ignored the response put to you.
What do you suppose SHOULD happen to companies that produce obsolete products/services, should they fail to keep up with progress?
Unsuprisingly, you completely ignored the response put to you.
What do you suppose SHOULD happen to companies that produce obsolete products/services, should they fail to keep up with progress?
No, I fully understood how completely moronic the responses have been....I NEVER stated that progress was not good and that "survival of the fittest" was a bad thing....I was responding to the real fact that when a company does amazingly well, some other company who could not compete, folded.
When about two dozen or so families in this country own HALF of the wealth generated, something is wrong.....Look up the causes of the French Revolution.
Yes he was. He stole people's money. Exxon isn't a predator. It sells a product people want to buy. The same goes for banks that provide you with a mortgage.
The same (your example of Exxon) could be said about a heroin supplier.....Exxon and other fuel suppliers have successfully nixed attempts to utilize other viable fuel sources for....especially....autos.
So, you judge about that "predator" label.
Herion dealers aren't predators. They supply a product people want. Tax collectors, on the other hand, are predators. They take your money at gun point.
So, how to run a country without taxes, let everyone voluntarily send in contributions? You know, the inability of the government to tax was one of the drawbacks of the Articles of Confederation.
Why are you leftist wealth re-distribution types so greedy? Shouldn't wealth be redistributed globally? Okay so you would only earn $3 an hour and probably have to live in a tent and poop in the woods but at least the wealth would be fairly re-distributed...right?
Only if you redefine the term to suit your rhetorical need.Any, ANY form of taxation is "wealth distribution"...Why are you leftist wealth re-distribution types so greedy? Shouldn't wealth be redistributed globally? Okay so you would only earn $3 an hour and probably have to live in a tent and poop in the woods but at least the wealth would be fairly re-distributed...right?
