Failed black state again: now S.Sudan

Baron

Platinum Member
Sep 19, 2008
14,103
6,649
If white Christians established states in Africa, anything was fine and well. Just remember former Rhodesia and South Africa. If blacks try to do the same, except sh... coming nothing, only murders, wars, corruption and epidemics.

Blacks have received entirely states, now they are sh...holes ( Liberia, S. Africa, S.Sudan )



But if white Christians go to failed black states, they transform they to little paradises.

A small example:Even in failed South Africa




Sorry guys, nut 1000000 and more proofs are clearly evidences superiority of the White Christian Race.
 
Blacks cannot build a first world country, In fact they can't even maintain one after they steal it from whites as happened in rhodesia and South Africa. Blacks are mentally inferior and the evidence is overwhelming.
 
Blacks didn't receive anything. The people native to those regions decided to reclaim what is theirs. Success and failure has little to do with black or white, but rather a whole lot of complicated factors.
 
Sudan was divided. Muslims on the North Christians on the South. The battles are agitated by those who want control over the oil. Now where do you think the problem lies?
 
Blacks didn't receive anything. The people native to those regions decided to reclaim what is theirs. Success and failure has little to do with black or white, but rather a whole lot of complicated factors.
So, after taking over thriving countries it was just too complicated to maintain the status quo. Got it.
 
Blacks didn't receive anything. The people native to those regions decided to reclaim what is theirs. Success and failure has little to do with black or white, but rather a whole lot of complicated factors.
So, after taking over thriving countries it was just too complicated to maintain the status quo. Got it.

No. You didn't get it.
 
Blacks didn't receive anything. The people native to those regions decided to reclaim what is theirs. Success and failure has little to do with black or white, but rather a whole lot of complicated factors.
Would you kindly explain some of those complicated factors for those of us who would genuinely appreciate being educated on the topic.

Thanks.
 
Blacks didn't receive anything. The people native to those regions decided to reclaim what is theirs. Success and failure has little to do with black or white, but rather a whole lot of complicated factors.
Would you kindly explain some of those complicated factors for those of us who would genuinely appreciate being educated on the topic.

Thanks.

I doubt there is any "genuine" interest....

For one example - a number of former colonies were set up as a means to provide raw resources to Europe, who then created the value added product: cloth, steel, furniture etc. None of that was reinvested into the country's infrastructure, institutions or people. Doing so also broke down traditional economies creating a mono-economy based on say, coffee or cotton. So when some of these countries gained independence they lacked the educational systems, infrastructure, democratic institutions for sucessful democratic transitions. People think it's all about the vote, but it really isn't. The vote means nothing if corruption is rife, transition of power is done with violence, etc. If a country can't protect it's citizens and treat - all of it's citizens, equally, then often tribal, ethnic and religious identifications become more important than national ones and you end up with sectarian conflicts. So in some cases when you talk about a failed state, on the surface you see corruption, dictatorships, sectarian violence - but beneath the surface is a lot more. That applies to some states and it doesn't help that many of these states have artificially imposed boundaries that force different people's together that didn't ordinarily get along. Other factors include extreme poverty and famine, few resources and climate.

This has nothing to do with race because failed states occur through out the world and there are many successful states as well in Africa.

I'm not sure why people think South Africa was so successful under Apartheid since sucess was limited to only one race. Mugabwe destroyed Zimbabwe in a way that did not occur in South Africa, but the transition was also very different.

There is an interesting list of failed states along with explanations:
The 25 Most Failed States On Earth
 
Blacks didn't receive anything. The people native to those regions decided to reclaim what is theirs. Success and failure has little to do with black or white, but rather a whole lot of complicated factors.

The native blacks didn't build the cities and highways and farms that used to exist in rhodesia and south africa and the congo. It was all built by whites and then the blacks took these things. And to make it worse they then destroyed what they stole.
 
Blacks didn't receive anything. The people native to those regions decided to reclaim what is theirs. Success and failure has little to do with black or white, but rather a whole lot of complicated factors.

The native blacks didn't build the cities and highways and farms that used to exist in rhodesia and south africa and the congo. It was all built by whites and then the blacks took these things. And to make it worse they then destroyed what they stole.

They didn't? I wonder who's labor they used.

I do agree though, Mugabwe's extremist faction made a wreck of what was a great agricultural region, but that was Mugabwe.
 
Blacks cannot build a first world country, In fact they can't even maintain one after they steal it from whites as happened in rhodesia and South Africa. Blacks are mentally inferior and the evidence is overwhelming.

Therefore the Race Theory is true.
 
Blacks didn't receive anything. The people native to those regions decided to reclaim what is theirs. Success and failure has little to do with black or white, but rather a whole lot of complicated factors.

The native blacks didn't build the cities and highways and farms that used to exist in rhodesia and south africa and the congo. It was all built by whites and then the blacks took these things. And to make it worse they then destroyed what they stole.
Blacks didn't receive anything. The people native to those regions decided to reclaim what is theirs. Success and failure has little to do with black or white, but rather a whole lot of complicated factors.

The native blacks didn't build the cities and highways and farms that used to exist in rhodesia and south africa and the congo. It was all built by whites and then the blacks took these things. And to make it worse they then destroyed what they stole.

Just look how blacks ruined Detroit.Everywhere where blacks rule is murder, robbery, poverty and criminality.
 
Blacks as a whole are a failed race. An antiquated vestige of humanitys primitive past. Even they know this. That's why they are always looking for any chance to up-breed their bloodline.
 
Blacks didn't receive anything. The people native to those regions decided to reclaim what is theirs. Success and failure has little to do with black or white, but rather a whole lot of complicated factors.
what are those complicated factors that seem to follow failed black leadership around the world.
 
If you were superior you'd support maintaining our country with funding for educating our children, paving our highways and investing in science. Right? The fact that most African nations don't do this is why they're shit holes.
 
If you were superior you'd support maintaining our country with funding for educating our children, paving our highways and investing in science. Right? The fact that most African nations don't do this is why they're shit holes.
Which we do. They don't. We inherently strive for it. They don't. We instinctively pursue it. They don't...
 
If white Christians established states in Africa, anything was fine and well. Just remember former Rhodesia and South Africa. If blacks try to do the same, except sh... coming nothing, only murders, wars, corruption and epidemics.

Blacks have received entirely states, now they are sh...holes ( Liberia, S. Africa, S.Sudan )



But if white Christians go to failed black states, they transform they to little paradises.

A small example:Even in failed South Africa




Sorry guys, nut 1000000 and more proofs are clearly evidences superiority of the White Christian Race.

Liberals want the United States to be like South Sudan.
 
Blacks didn't receive anything. The people native to those regions decided to reclaim what is theirs. Success and failure has little to do with black or white, but rather a whole lot of complicated factors.
what are those complicated factors that seem to follow failed black leadership around the world.

Make that failed LEADERSHIP around the world.
 
If white Christians established states in Africa, anything was fine and well. Just remember former Rhodesia and South Africa. If blacks try to do the same, except sh... coming nothing, only murders, wars, corruption and epidemics.

Blacks have received entirely states, now they are sh...holes ( Liberia, S. Africa, S.Sudan )



But if white Christians go to failed black states, they transform they to little paradises.

A small example:Even in failed South Africa




Sorry guys, nut 1000000 and more proofs are clearly evidences superiority of the White Christian Race.

Liberals want the United States to be like South Sudan.



How cute. Thank you for your contribution.
 

Forum List

Back
Top