slackjawed
Self deported
The information of the site is legit, so the site is legit.
It is quite obvious you are jealous.
Yes agent, he is so jealous he can't stand it.
what is there to be jealous of by the way?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The information of the site is legit, so the site is legit.
It is quite obvious you are jealous.
ROFLMAOThe information of the site is legit, so the site is legit.
It is quite obvious you are jealous.
Poor agent has no evidence ond no purpose except keeping the methods of mass murder secret. Can't even share its websites.
How did the top of the WTC 2 concrete core end up falling west onto WTC 3 when a plane hit the SE corner?
The brownish object behind and ontop of a perimeter wall about to crash into WTC 3 is a portion of the WTC 2 core.
thats NOT concrete core, dipshitPoor agent has no evidence ond no purpose except keeping the methods of mass murder secret. Can't even share its websites.
How did the top of the WTC 2 concrete core end up falling west onto WTC 3 when a plane hit the SE corner?
The brownish object behind and ontop of a perimeter wall about to crash into WTC 3 is a portion of the WTC 2 core.
this is truewhy do you persist in lying
because if he stopped lying he would need to realize how fucking insane he has been the last few years while pushing his concrete core hoax.
you've posted some yourself, dipshitI'm really pushing the <BULLSHIT>
Where is the site with the images of the steel core columns in the core area on 9-11? Got link?
I'm really pushing the evidence, rather a large amount of it. All of it consistent and verifying from independent sources. Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST contracted analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.
Where is the site with the images of the steel core columns in the core area on 9-11? Got link?
I'm really pushing the evidence, rather a large amount of it. All of it consistent and verifying from independent sources. Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST contracted analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.
Where is the site with the images of the steel core columns in the core area on 9-11? Got link?
ditz said:you've posted some yourself, dipshitChristophera said:I'm really pushing the <BULLSHIT>
Where is the site with the images of the steel core columns in the core area on 9-11? Got link?
ditz said:you've posted some yourself, dipshitChristophera said:I'm really pushing the <BULLSHIT>
Where is the site with the images of the steel core columns in the core area on 9-11? Got link?
That serves the perpetrators of secret methods of mass murder.
I've posted ONLY images of structural steel surrounding the core.
Show an image of the supposed steel core columns in the core area on 9-11.
Where are the official plans? Why havn't you posted a link to where they can be found?
ditz said:you've posted some yourself, dipshitChristophera said:I'm really pushing the <BULLSHIT>
Where is the site with the images of the steel core columns in the core area on 9-11? Got link?
That serves the perpetrators of secret methods of mass murder.
I've posted ONLY images of structural steel surrounding the core.
Show an image of the supposed steel core columns in the core area on 9-11.
Where are the official plans? Why havn't you posted a link to where they can be found?
OH MY GAWD you are fucking stupidditz said:you've posted some yourself, dipshitChristophera said:I'm really pushing the <BULLSHIT>
Where is the site with the images of the steel core columns in the core area on 9-11? Got link?
That serves the perpetrators of secret methods of mass murder.
I've posted ONLY images of structural steel surrounding the core.
Show an image of the supposed steel core columns in the core area on 9-11.
Where are the official plans? Why havn't you posted a link to where they can be found?
slacker said:Copyrighted material must be purchased.
What part of "PUBLIC BUILDING, public plans" don't you understand agent?
Pretending to not understand that is like failing to recognize that the ex mayor took the buildings plans.
Poor agent has no evidence ond no purpose
How did the top of the WTC 2 concrete core end up falling west onto WTC 3 when a plane hit the SE corner?
...verified by the image of WTC 2 core,
verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3,
the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then,
consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST contracted analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.