FEMA Deceives Nation About Twin Towers Core

[Christophera]

Perhaps you are in the wrong thread.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/consp...ion-psyops-and-infiltration-of-us-gov-66.html

 

[Fizz]

Your false peer groups psyops of agents is obvious as you fail to recognize substancial evidence over and over. Faling to recognize violations of laws related to subverting the Constitution positions you in acts of treason.

Some pages back you failed to recognize the obvious differences of images you've been looking at for months. You have no evidence and obviously are lying over and over in support of something hideous to percieve.

all your bullshit has already been debunked. got anything new you want to make up? its getting kinda boring answering the same shit already proven wrong over and over again.

 

[Fizz]

find any pictures of a concrete core yet?
find any documentation to your claim of "elevator guide rail support" that you pulled out of your ass?
find any documentation to support your claim that the cores were radically different?
find any pictures of the concrete core getting constructed?
find any building plans for a concrete core?

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dB6xdCS9NJU]YouTube - 9/11: Why They Fell pt 2[/ame]


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EqDTEZIdg7g&feature=PlayList&p=A6382FD1025BACE9&index=62]YouTube - WTC 1&2 UNIQUE DESIGN.[/ame]


"For a combination of historical, cultural and economic reasons, tall, concrete-core buildings dedicated to office use are unusual in New York, where builders prefer the wallboard-enclosed cores with steel frames that Mr. Robertson pioneered in the trade center."
New York Timeshere


"Engineers are still debating whether the Twin Towers' unique structure should be credited for surviving the initial crashes, or blamed for collapsing in the subsequent fires, or both. But the point is that it was unique, utilizing closely spaced columns connected to a steel core by relatively lightweight floor trusses. "
Newsweek. Newsweek.com


"Each of the towers, more than 200 ft. wide on each side, contained a central steel core surrounded by open office space. Eighteen-inch steel tubes ran vertically along the outside, providing much of the support for the building"
Time Magazine.TIME.com


"The twin towers were the first supertall buildings designed without any masonry. Worried that the intense air pressure created by the building's high speed elevators might buckle conventional shafts, engineers designed a solution using a drywall system fixed to the reinforced steel core. "
engineering.comENGINEERING.com


"Like many high-rises built in the 1960s, the Twin Towers were constructed with their weight distributed between a hollow steel core (containing services like elevators) and steel columns around the perimeter, maximizing open floor space. Many believe the older high-rise design, in which steel columns are often encased in concrete, is more fire resistant.

“A lot of people have told me, ‘You should have used more concrete in the structure,’” said Robertson. However, his chart plotting the strength of steel vs. concrete at various temperatures showed that at the incendiary levels that raged in the towers, the two materials become similarly weak."
Berkeley 04.17.2002 - World Trade Center remembered


"Yamasaki has switched from concrete, his favorite medium, to steel because of the sheer height of the towers, and instead of having the weight of the structure carried by the frame and the elevator core, the great steel columns of the exterior walls will support it."
Time Magazine article from 1964!! Art: Onward & Upward - TIME

you are officially DEBUNKED for about the millionth time.

 

[Christophera]

BWahaaaaaaaaaaahaaaa,

You article is from 1964, before the towers were built. It was not until 1965 that the concrete core was shown to be the only core that could resist torsion and sway having the footprint and 4 parallel faces as they did.

The WTC 2 concrete core.

 

[Fizz]

It was not until 1965 that the concrete core was shown to be the only core that could resist torsion and sway having the footprint and 4 parallel faces as they did.

another lie made up by a compulsive liar.

proof please.

 

[DiveCon]

Your false peer groups psyops of agents is obvious as you fail to recognize substancial evidence over and over. Faling to recognize violations of laws related to subverting the Constitution positions you in acts of treason.

Some pages back you failed to recognize the obvious differences of images you've been looking at for months. You have no evidence and obviously are lying over and over in support of something hideous to percieve.

there are no "agents" on this forum, dipshit
just normal people that can see past your bullshit and know you are a pathological liar

 

[DiveCon]

BWahaaaaaaaaaaahaaaa,

You article is from 1964, before the towers were built. It was not until 1965 that the concrete core was shown to be the only core that could resist torsion and sway having the footprint and 4 parallel faces as they did.

The WTC 2 concrete core.

more BULLSHIT

 

[Christophera]

As usual, the opposite of what agents say is closer to the truth. How else would this be possible?

Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST contracted analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.

 

[DiveCon]

As usual, the opposite of what agents say is closer to the truth. How else would this be possible?

<bullshit removed>.

you remain a delusional fucktard

 

[Rat in the Hat]

All the steel is gone and the one taken just before it from the other side still has the interior box columns that surrounded the core with its floor beams that match those below the spire on WTC 1.

In that other image you cannot see the top so cannot tell it is not hollow. It surrounds the concrete walls that in turn surround the concrete core.

So you're saying that the DOD supplied & guarded high tensile strength butt-welded 3" rebar has somehow been sucked out of your Invisicrete (accept no substitutes) core?

And another thing. All of the photos & videos from the WTC towers show a wide open core area, with pillars surrounding wide corridors to the elevators, and glass walls for the shops. If we follow your assumption for just one moment a massive concrete core rose to the top of the towers, what supported it from the ground level to the first office floor above the lobby?? The columns shown in the photos would not be sufficient to support the weight of that much concrete, invisible or not.

 

[DiveCon]

All the steel is gone and the one taken just before it from the other side still has the interior box columns that surrounded the core with its floor beams that match those below the spire on WTC 1.

In that other image you cannot see the top so cannot tell it is not hollow. It surrounds the concrete walls that in turn surround the concrete core.

So you're saying that the DOD supplied & guarded high tensile strength butt-welded 3" rebar has somehow been sucked out of your Invisicrete (accept no substitutes) core?

And another thing. All of the photos & videos from the WTC towers show a wide open core area, with pillars surrounding wide corridors to the elevators, and glass walls for the shops. If we follow your assumption for just one moment a massive concrete core rose to the top of the towers, what supported it from the ground level to the first office floor above the lobby?? The columns shown in the photos would not be sufficient to support the weight of that much concrete, invisible or not.

i still dont get where he gets this 3" DOD rebar from


totally fucking delusional, thats what he is

 

[Rat in the Hat]

As usual, the opposite of what agents say is closer to the truth. How else would this be possible?

Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST contracted analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.

Does your repeated posting of debunked bullshit give you comfort in your lonely nights?

 

[DiveCon]

As usual, the opposite of what agents say is closer to the truth. How else would this be possible?

<bullshit deleted>

Does your repeated posting of debunked bullshit give you comfort in your lonely nights?

thats why i remove it when i quote him

 

[Rat in the Hat]

All the steel is gone and the one taken just before it from the other side still has the interior box columns that surrounded the core with its floor beams that match those below the spire on WTC 1.

In that other image you cannot see the top so cannot tell it is not hollow. It surrounds the concrete walls that in turn surround the concrete core.

So you're saying that the DOD supplied & guarded high tensile strength butt-welded 3" rebar has somehow been sucked out of your Invisicrete (accept no substitutes) core?

And another thing. All of the photos & videos from the WTC towers show a wide open core area, with pillars surrounding wide corridors to the elevators, and glass walls for the shops. If we follow your assumption for just one moment a massive concrete core rose to the top of the towers, what supported it from the ground level to the first office floor above the lobby?? The columns shown in the photos would not be sufficient to support the weight of that much concrete, invisible or not.

i still dont get where he gets this 3" DOD rebar from


totally fucking delusional, thats what he is

In Chrissy's world, the Dept. of Defense maintains a warehouse of project ready specialty building materials, and the manpower to guard them on site under lock and key until your overqualified journeymen need them.

 

[DiveCon]

So you're saying that the DOD supplied & guarded high tensile strength butt-welded 3" rebar has somehow been sucked out of your Invisicrete (accept no substitutes) core?

And another thing. All of the photos & videos from the WTC towers show a wide open core area, with pillars surrounding wide corridors to the elevators, and glass walls for the shops. If we follow your assumption for just one moment a massive concrete core rose to the top of the towers, what supported it from the ground level to the first office floor above the lobby?? The columns shown in the photos would not be sufficient to support the weight of that much concrete, invisible or not.

i still dont get where he gets this 3" DOD rebar from


totally fucking delusional, thats what he is

In Chrissy's world, the Dept. of Defense maintains a warehouse of project ready specialty building materials, and the manpower to guard them on site under lock and key until your overqualified journeymen need them.

i've been around steel rolling mills, my dad worked for one
and i've never seen 3" rebar
let alone DOD rebar
of ANY size

 

[Fizz]

Does your repeated posting of debunked bullshit give you comfort in your lonely nights?

he thinks if you click your heels together and keep repeating the same bullshit over and over it might eventually come true.....

there's no place like home....


there's no place like home....

there's no place like home........

(waiting for someone to drop a house on him)

there's no place like home.....

 

[Rat in the Hat]

Hey, where did Tard-El go? I'd like to know how to support a concrete core on top of open space & glass. I have this amazing concept for a 50 story office building on top of a car dealership, and need to know how to hold that much weight over the display floor.

I guess maybe Goof-El shot him into space again.

 

[Christophera]

So you're saying that the DOD supplied & guarded high tensile strength butt-welded 3" rebar has somehow been sucked out of your Invisicrete (accept no substitutes) core?

The opposite of what agents say is more often the truth.

The concrete was removed from the 3" high tensile steel custom made at a DOD steel mill.

And another thing. All of the photos & videos from the WTC towers show a wide open core area, with pillars surrounding wide corridors to the elevators, and glass walls for the shops. If we follow your assumption for just one moment a massive concrete core rose to the top of the towers, what supported it from the ground level to the first office floor above the lobby?? The columns shown in the photos would not be sufficient to support the weight of that much concrete, invisible or not.

It supported itself and up to 50% of the towers weight as the perimeter foundation and steel settled.

Here is the WTC 2 concrete core.

Here is the massive core base wall of WTC 1 at ground zero.

 

[Christophera]

 

[Fizz]

3" high tensile steel custom made at a DOD steel mill.

proof please.