FEMA Deceives Nation About Twin Towers Core

[DiveCon]

How did you know?

because i was into that type of documentary
still am
it was also a main selling point for the type of construction
your concrete core would have had to have been MASSIVE at the base to support the weight of it above
that was why they were such a revolutionary design
the steel core made for a smaller core and as such more floor space on each floor

 

[Gamolon]

That structure is outside the core and was part of the inner wall of the outer steel.

This is the concrete core wih no steel exterior.

You're a damn liar.
Here is a closeup of that "spire" that you just admitted had steel INSIDE the core wall. You admitted that the column on the right was inside your core.

So there's a column, inside the core, on 9/11, still standing. That makes it a core column as I also don't see any buttplates in it.

 

[Christophera]

The problem with alignment of the elevator guide rail support steel occurred nearer the center of the core as PANEL 5 shows. That is why the butt plates are seen there.

You are supposed to be showing "core columns" clearly in the core, like near the center so it is easy to tell they are core columns.

 

[Gamolon]

The problem with alignment of the elevator guide rail support steel occurred nearer the center of the core as PANEL 5 shows. That is why the butt plates are seen there.

You are supposed to be showing "core columns" clearly in the core, like near the center so it is easy to tell they are core columns.

I did. You admitted it was a column inside your supposed concrete core. Done deal.

You wanted proof of a core column, inside the core, on 9/11.

There it is in the photos above. There are no buttplates visible meaning it's a core column.

 

[Christophera]

Not a "core column" agent.

The first row of elevator guide rail support. And the fact the butt plates shown in PANEL 5 are near the center logically shows they were needed for alignment.

The inner concrete form had slots to hold the elevator guide rail support steel that were agains the concrete core wall, so no alignment was needed for them.

You have failed to clearly show a core column structure clearly inside the core area.

You have failed to show there was a core of steel core columns.

The core was concrete just as the engineer of record identified to Newsweek in the days following 9-11.

The Oxford Illustrated Encyclopedia of Invention and Technology, of 1992 identifies a concrete core as well.

 

[Gamolon]

The problem with alignment of the elevator guide rail support steel occurred nearer the center of the core as PANEL 5 shows. That is why the butt plates are seen there.

Not buttplates as has been proven before. They were metal "lugs".

I love how you claim the furthest column in this next photo to have a buttplate when the first two columns clearly show lugs.

Proven wrong again.

 

[Christophera]

Not all elevator guide rail support steel need re alignment, but all do need lifting lugs.

The concrete core is the only core structure that can be proven with independently verified evidence.

Independently verified evidence.


Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.

 

[Gamolon]

Not all elevator guide rail support steel need re alignment, but all do need lifting lugs.

How did they "re-align" the "elevator guide rail support" columns right inside your concrete core walls?

You know. The ones that were, according to you, connected to the concrete core wall itself. The very same ones that were also connected to the core columns on the OUTSIDE of your core wall via horizontal steel members that were EMBEDDED in the concrete core wall pour.

How did they accomplish this "re-alignment" with buttplates when the columns were already attached together? Were the buttplates prefabbed onto the top of the columns or did they add them when they needed to be "realigned"?

Please explain.

 

[Gamolon]

Hey Chris.

Let's discuss the construction sequence of your supposed concrete core and outer ring of core columns OUTSIDE the core, and the inner "elevator guide rail support" columns inside the core. Here's a couple of photos of the lower level's structural steel.

So we see the outer ring of core columns and the inner "elevator guide rail support" columns are already erected and no concrete core yet. There are horizontal members connecting the core columns and "elevator guide rail support steel". Those columns HAVE to be plumb already right? I mean they ARE attached to the other columns via horizontal members right? They HAVE to be plumb already because once they pour the concrete for the core walls and it dries, they can no longer plumb them right????

So after a certain height is reached with the structural steel columns, they erect the concrete forms and pour the concrete, which flows AROUND the horizontal members connecting the columns.

Answer me this. How were the next column members erected? One column piece at a time?

You saw the documentary that showed this, so please explain.

 

[Christophera]

No discussion with manipulating photoshopping agents working to protect secret methods of mass murder. Not today.

Show an image from 9-11 of this core,

not one of elevator guide rail support stuck to pieces of the core wall as the bottom image shows.

Another angle at the same moment as the image from Aman Zafar that you misrepresent as showing "core columns".

 

[DiveCon]

No discussion with manipulating photoshopping agents

right, if YOU are the agent
dipshit

 

[Christophera]

Just provide your proof in the form of an image of this core when the towers were coming apart before cameras on 9-11.

 

[DiveCon]

Just provide your proof in the form of an image of this core when the towers were coming apart before cameras on 9-11.

you have had SEVERAL posted
you have even posted some
but in your delusions you call them something else

 

[Fizz]

Not all elevator guide rail support steel need re alignment, but all do need lifting lugs.

i'm still waiting for your documentation for your "elevator guide rail support steel" claim. i only started ask LAST FUCKING YEAR for it. so where is it?

 

[Christophera]

You haven't come up with the official plans which show them and I've explained why we don't have them but you cannot go there because you serve the perpetrators and their secret methods of mass murder.

 

[DiveCon]

You haven't come up with the official plans which show them and

you haven't come up with plans that support your fucking delusional concrete core hoax
you do that

 

[Christophera]

Equally valid the engineer of record identified a concrete core to Newsweek magazine in the days after 9-11. Another global authority, Oxford Illustrated Encyclopedia of Invention and Technology, of 1992 also identifies a concrete.

Images from 9-11 show a concrete core.

The FEMA deception is exposed.

 

[Christophera]

Hey Chris.

Let's discuss

Why would I discuss anything with an agent working to manipulate and decieve?

You have not even stated which tower and face you are showing and your image does not show the core. It shows the area between the interior box columns and guide rail supports where the concrete core was cast, before it was cast.

Your selectivity in photos is enabled by the ex NYC mayor taking the WTC documents from city offices and locking them in his own warehouse. There were 6,000 photo files in that information.

 

[DiveCon]

repetitive delusional rantings removed.

reposting the same delusional rant over and over wont make it any more true

 

[Christophera]

Correct, and a false socialgroup in a psyops cannot make truth either.

Evidence that is verified makes it so it does not matter what text you post.

Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.