Female Vet Takes Action to Stop Protesters Defacing the Flag,Takes Cops to Arrest Her

[eots]

no law was broken.

Desecration of the U.S. flag is against the law. Stupid libtards.

the first amendment protects even flat burning, brain dead tea tard. and i'll direct your attention to Texas v Johnson.

Funny how you idiot libtards use the constitution to defend stupidity but trash it at other times, especially when obuthole trashes it. Idiots.

Hey numbnuts, if you want to try and find something from the US Constitution that speaks to desecrating a flag, please do so. If you want to just thru out general statements about those arguing against you, find examples of that. I have not trashed the US Constitution. I think it is worth defending whether I like the results or not.

The 1st Amendment is not about cute little children singing. It protects all of us. We don't need laws to protect the speech everyone likes. But those laws are meant to protect the speech we don't like as well.

I didn't say unconstitutional, I said against the law.

Well some needs to tell Marilyn cuz he toured across the country burning flags nightly in front of thousands on the god,guns and government tour

 

[WinterBorn]

no law was broken.

Desecration of the U.S. flag is against the law. Stupid libtards.

the first amendment protects even flat burning, brain dead tea tard. and i'll direct your attention to Texas v Johnson.

Funny how you idiot libtards use the constitution to defend stupidity but trash it at other times, especially when obuthole trashes it. Idiots.

Hey numbnuts, if you want to try and find something from the US Constitution that speaks to desecrating a flag, please do so. If you want to just thru out general statements about those arguing against you, find examples of that. I have not trashed the US Constitution. I think it is worth defending whether I like the results or not.

The 1st Amendment is not about cute little children singing. It protects all of us. We don't need laws to protect the speech everyone likes. But those laws are meant to protect the speech we don't like as well.

I didn't say unconstitutional, I said against the law.

And it is not against the law. And just as an FYI, if there is a law in place and SCOTUS rules it to be unconstitutional, the law is no longer in effect.

But SCOTUS ruled in 1969 that burning the US flag was protected as free speech.

 

[bodecea]

What a crazy bitch

She has more guts than most libtards and she was in the right.

No, she was not. She does not get to decide who gets to protest and who does not. She does not get to decide who does what with the property that they own.

She doesn't get to decide? That is her protest. I hope she does it again. A whole shitload of veterans on Facebook want her to announce the next flag tromping so they can be there in force.

To do what exactly? Threaten someone's 1st amendment rights with violence if they don't conform to YOUR views?

I love how you redneck conservatives bitch about how "Liberals are threatening us!" yet when someone expresses a idea contrary to the Republican narrative, you expressly or imply violence towards that person or group. You're pathetic.

I love how you ignorant racist pukes ignore the law. She should have gotten a medal. What that idiot did is against the law not a protest.

Um...no. However, she took someone else's property. Is that ok in your law book?

 

[WinterBorn]

no law was broken.

Desecration of the U.S. flag is against the law. Stupid libtards.

the first amendment protects even flat burning, brain dead tea tard. and i'll direct your attention to Texas v Johnson.

Funny how you idiot libtards use the constitution to defend stupidity but trash it at other times, especially when obuthole trashes it. Idiots.

Hey numbnuts, if you want to try and find something from the US Constitution that speaks to desecrating a flag, please do so. If you want to just thru out general statements about those arguing against you, find examples of that. I have not trashed the US Constitution. I think it is worth defending whether I like the results or not.

The 1st Amendment is not about cute little children singing. It protects all of us. We don't need laws to protect the speech everyone likes. But those laws are meant to protect the speech we don't like as well.

I didn't say unconstitutional, I said against the law.

"Currently, flag burning is not illegal in the United States. The Supreme Court of the United States in its decision from 1969 has ruled that the burning of the flag is protected by the First Amendment. However, the person who burnt the flag can be found guilty of a misdemeanor for starting a fire without a permit."

from: Is Flag Burning Illegal

 

[bodecea]

To do what exactly? Threaten someone's 1st amendment rights with violence if they don't conform to YOUR views?

I love how you redneck conservatives bitch about how "Liberals are threatening us!" yet when someone expresses a idea contrary to the Republican narrative, you expressly or imply violence towards that person or group. You're pathetic.

Ahhhh, a puking liberal projecting. Again. Liberal pukes think they're mind readers.

And of course, you don't answer the question.

What are they going to do when someone they disagree with is doing a protest that they have a First Amendment right to do? Why do YOU think YOU have the right to tell other people how, why and when to protest?

They can protest all they want, they can not break the law while doing it.

no law was broken.

Desecration of the U.S. flag is against the law. Stupid libtards.

No it isn't. It's considered disrespectful, but it isn't against the law.

 

[bodecea]

And of course, you don't answer the question.

What are they going to do when someone they disagree with is doing a protest that they have a First Amendment right to do? Why do YOU think YOU have the right to tell other people how, why and when to protest?

They can protest all they want, they can not break the law while doing it.

no law was broken.

Desecration of the U.S. flag is against the law. Stupid libtards.

the first amendment protects even flat burning, brain dead tea tard. and i'll direct your attention to Texas v Johnson.

Funny how you idiot libtards use the constitution to defend stupidity but trash it at other times, especially when obuthole trashes it. Idiots.

 

[AmericanFirst]

Ahhhh, a puking liberal projecting. Again. Liberal pukes think they're mind readers.

And of course, you don't answer the question.

What are they going to do when someone they disagree with is doing a protest that they have a First Amendment right to do? Why do YOU think YOU have the right to tell other people how, why and when to protest?

They can protest all they want, they can not break the law while doing it.

no law was broken.

Desecration of the U.S. flag is against the law. Stupid libtards.

No it isn't. It's considered disrespectful, but it isn't against the law.

I do stand corrected. Should be though.

 

[bodecea]

Whatever bitch, your old ass would have lost your balance and broke your back tryin' to grab the flag

​

I might mention that from September 1966 until the Vietnam war was over, whenever I was driving alone I would be on the lookout for flag desecraters. It's lucky I never witnessed any because I would have driven into the crowd, then backed up to get any I missed. I have a personal interest in Old Glory. As for falling down I have a HurryCane and that thing outscores a Louisville Slugger every time. And, I have many friends in Rolling Thunder who ride around looking for these creeps. Did you think they were just showing off their bikes and making noise? Think again.

And if you use your car or your cane to attack peaceful protesters, one of them can legally shoot you.

That you think you can ignore the US Constitution and willfully ignore private property laws, just because you get mad, is a sign of personal issues.

Hell yes. And I'm packin' heat too. Glock 17. You see, that's my flag and I make it personal.

Ah yes....you're one of those who uses a gun as a replacement penis because the original is so sadly flacid.

My dick can get harder than Chinese arithmetic. Guns only when necessary.

Sure....a gun is your Viagra.....

 

[bodecea]

And of course, you don't answer the question.

What are they going to do when someone they disagree with is doing a protest that they have a First Amendment right to do? Why do YOU think YOU have the right to tell other people how, why and when to protest?

They can protest all they want, they can not break the law while doing it.

no law was broken.

Desecration of the U.S. flag is against the law. Stupid libtards.

No it isn't. It's considered disrespectful, but it isn't against the law.

I do stand corrected. Should be though.

So, you find the piece of cloth (bought in China) to be more precious to you than the 1st Amendment?

 

[Hossfly]

I might mention that from September 1966 until the Vietnam war was over, whenever I was driving alone I would be on the lookout for flag desecraters. It's lucky I never witnessed any because I would have driven into the crowd, then backed up to get any I missed. I have a personal interest in Old Glory. As for falling down I have a HurryCane and that thing outscores a Louisville Slugger every time. And, I have many friends in Rolling Thunder who ride around looking for these creeps. Did you think they were just showing off their bikes and making noise? Think again.

And if you use your car or your cane to attack peaceful protesters, one of them can legally shoot you.

That you think you can ignore the US Constitution and willfully ignore private property laws, just because you get mad, is a sign of personal issues.

Hell yes. And I'm packin' heat too. Glock 17. You see, that's my flag and I make it personal.

Ah yes....you're one of those who uses a gun as a replacement penis because the original is so sadly flacid.

My dick can get harder than Chinese arithmetic. Guns only when necessary.

Sure....a gun is your Viagra.....

There ya go! Projecting again. As a Hoss, I'm like a young stallion.

 

[WinterBorn]

And of course, you don't answer the question.

What are they going to do when someone they disagree with is doing a protest that they have a First Amendment right to do? Why do YOU think YOU have the right to tell other people how, why and when to protest?

They can protest all they want, they can not break the law while doing it.

no law was broken.

Desecration of the U.S. flag is against the law. Stupid libtards.

No it isn't. It's considered disrespectful, but it isn't against the law.

I do stand corrected. Should be though.

I disagree. And here is why.

Take two groups, some hate-filled protesters and some fatass conservative teapers.

The protesters stomp on the flag and burn it. They do so because the flag is a symbol of this great nation. So to the protesters, the flag has great value and meaning. They may hate the value and meaning, but they are acknowledging it by their very actions.

Now take the fatass conservative teapers. On teh 4th of July they will be eating mounds of potato salad, barbeque, and baked beans. Then they will wipe their mouths with napkins with flags on them. Do you think those people are showing that the flag has any value or meaning? They may preach that it does, but then they wipe their mouth with it.

 

[WinterBorn]

And if you use your car or your cane to attack peaceful protesters, one of them can legally shoot you.

That you think you can ignore the US Constitution and willfully ignore private property laws, just because you get mad, is a sign of personal issues.

Hell yes. And I'm packin' heat too. Glock 17. You see, that's my flag and I make it personal.

Ah yes....you're one of those who uses a gun as a replacement penis because the original is so sadly flacid.

My dick can get harder than Chinese arithmetic. Guns only when necessary.

Sure....a gun is your Viagra.....

There ya go! Projecting again. As a Hoss, I'm like a young stallion.

With no prostate? That is rare.

 

[eots]

They can protest all they want, they can not break the law while doing it.

no law was broken.

Desecration of the U.S. flag is against the law. Stupid libtards.

No it isn't. It's considered disrespectful, but it isn't against the law.

I do stand corrected. Should be though.

I disagree. And here is why.

Take two groups, some hate-filled protesters and some fatass conservative teapers.

The protesters stomp on the flag and burn it. They do so because the flag is a symbol of this great nation. So to the protesters, the flag has great value and meaning. They may hate the value and meaning, but they are acknowledging it by their very actions.

Now take the fatass conservative teapers. On teh 4th of July they will be eating mounds of potato salad, barbeque, and baked beans. Then they will wipe their mouths with napkins with flags on them. Do you think those people are showing that the flag has any value or meaning? They may preach that it does, but then they wipe their mouth with it.

Just a lil bit o hillbilly heaven

 

[JFK_USA]

And she is a PETA activist!!! Oh the irony. I love Republican outrage backfires!!!!

 

[Hossfly]

Hell yes. And I'm packin' heat too. Glock 17. You see, that's my flag and I make it personal.

Ah yes....you're one of those who uses a gun as a replacement penis because the original is so sadly flacid.

My dick can get harder than Chinese arithmetic. Guns only when necessary.

Sure....a gun is your Viagra.....

There ya go! Projecting again. As a Hoss, I'm like a young stallion.

With no prostate? That is rare.

It is very rare according to my doctor but he keeps me supplied with some little blue pills.

 

[Ga marine]

Maybe some of you need to read the 1st.ammendment and not recite one part or the other. There is no law to protect the flag.and the protesters were breaking the law,1 they did not have permits that are required by Ga. Law.2 they did not have permission from the school.3 they did not cooperate with the police in the preformance of there duty.and if you demand precedence Brown-v-Louisiana feb 23,2012 and Ga. Law April 19 ,2004

 

[Ga marine]

And for ms.manhart she was charge and stood trail for her playboy photos.

 

[Vandalshandle]

To do what exactly? Threaten someone's 1st amendment rights with violence if they don't conform to YOUR views?

I love how you redneck conservatives bitch about how "Liberals are threatening us!" yet when someone expresses a idea contrary to the Republican narrative, you expressly or imply violence towards that person or group. You're pathetic.

Ahhhh, a puking liberal projecting. Again. Liberal pukes think they're mind readers.

And of course, you don't answer the question.

What are they going to do when someone they disagree with is doing a protest that they have a First Amendment right to do? Why do YOU think YOU have the right to tell other people how, why and when to protest?

They can protest all they want, they can not break the law while doing it.

no law was broken.

Desecration of the U.S. flag is against the law. Stupid libtards.

Nope. You, too, have flunked your final exam from law school, AmericaFirst....

 

[bodecea]

And if you use your car or your cane to attack peaceful protesters, one of them can legally shoot you.

That you think you can ignore the US Constitution and willfully ignore private property laws, just because you get mad, is a sign of personal issues.

Hell yes. And I'm packin' heat too. Glock 17. You see, that's my flag and I make it personal.

Ah yes....you're one of those who uses a gun as a replacement penis because the original is so sadly flacid.

My dick can get harder than Chinese arithmetic. Guns only when necessary.

Sure....a gun is your Viagra.....

There ya go! Projecting again. As a Hoss, I'm like a young stallion.

Sure you are....sure you are.

 

[Hossfly]

Hell yes. And I'm packin' heat too. Glock 17. You see, that's my flag and I make it personal.

Ah yes....you're one of those who uses a gun as a replacement penis because the original is so sadly flacid.

My dick can get harder than Chinese arithmetic. Guns only when necessary.

Sure....a gun is your Viagra.....

There ya go! Projecting again. As a Hoss, I'm like a young stallion.

Sure you are....sure you are.

That's why I'm referred to as "Du Hengst."