JoeB131
Diamond Member
Thanks Joe. My avi just may make a return if you and the other jackboot keep requesting it. I have accomodation laws too
Please do, it's like putting a warning label on rat poison.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thanks Joe. My avi just may make a return if you and the other jackboot keep requesting it. I have accomodation laws too
We call it JUSTICE
Again, that's what I've come to expect from guys who use the Confederate Flag as a AVI and don't think they sound a little bit racist.
So do you piss yourself every time a big scary black man comes near you?
So if the protestors in Ferguson were to simply arm themselves and organize into 'militias', then would you RWnuts support them?
No! It's true!
He has access to information the grand jury doesn't!
For reals!
Or I just have enough common sense to realize when you shoot an unarmed kid 6 times, they call that an EXECUTION.
We call it JUSTICE
-Geaux
It's good to wonder. It's good to be curious.
Perhaps if you took the time and made the effort to be curious and think this through, you would determine that, like the rest of us, you really can't know.
But then, that isn't your thing. It's black vs. white, white people are bad and black people are victims, and you have your agenda to push.
No, guy, it's cops who shoot unarmed people six times are bad.
Police forces who beat up reporters and peaceful protestors are bad.
But you probably think Officer Fuhrman never used the N-word.
No! It's true!
He has access to information the grand jury doesn't!
For reals!
Or I just have enough common sense to realize when you shoot an unarmed kid 6 times, they call that an EXECUTION.
We call it JUSTICE
-Geaux
How can you know it was justice when you don't the facts of the case?
No, I just profile and consider them a threat. How they proceed from there will have impact on their life expectancy
And directly to the straw man deflection we go.
Right on cue, always predictable.
Don't ever be curious, Joe. Your head would explode. Look at your side of the story only.
No! It's true!
He has access to information the grand jury doesn't!
For reals!
Or I just have enough common sense to realize when you shoot an unarmed kid 6 times, they call that an EXECUTION.
We call it JUSTICE
-Geaux
How can you know it was justice when you don't the facts of the case?
Then without the facts, why are the thugs protesting in Furgeson?
I can wait.....
-Geaux
No, I just profile and consider them a threat. How they proceed from there will have impact on their life expectancy
Yup, another scared little gun owner fantasizing about shooting people of color.
But your dick is still tiny.
No! It's true!
He has access to information the grand jury doesn't!
For reals!
Or I just have enough common sense to realize when you shoot an unarmed kid 6 times, they call that an EXECUTION.
We call it JUSTICE
-Geaux
How can you know it was justice when you don't the facts of the case?
Then without the facts, why are the thugs protesting in Furgeson?
I can wait.....
-Geaux
That's what you and they share in common.
A sensible person wants justice no matter who or what the outcome favors. People like you want a particular outcome,
and justice be damned.
No, I just profile and consider them a threat. How they proceed from there will have impact on their life expectancy
Yup, another scared little gun owner fantasizing about shooting people of color.
But your dick is still tiny.Or I just have enough common sense to realize when you shoot an unarmed kid 6 times, they call that an EXECUTION.
We call it JUSTICE
-Geaux
How can you know it was justice when you don't the facts of the case?
Then without the facts, why are the thugs protesting in Furgeson?
I can wait.....
-Geaux
That's what you and they share in common.
A sensible person wants justice no matter who or what the outcome favors. People like you want a particular outcome,
and justice be damned.
Oh do tell..
The left has two words.... 'sensible' and 'Boooosh'
Take your sensible clause and well..... The lost all credibility and should refrain from the use of the word 'sensible. I mean, you did elect Obama twice.
Just saying
-Geaux
I mean, I don't want my cops executing people in the street and normally, neither do you.
And directly to the straw man deflection we go.
Right on cue, always predictable.
Don't ever be curious, Joe. Your head would explode. Look at your side of the story only.
There no other side to this story. Brown was unarmed, and he didn't do anything that merited executing him in the middle of the street.
An honest person sees this situation, sees that there is directly conflicting evidence, and admit that it's essentially impossible to know what happened.
That won't stop the ideologues, though. These narcissists know all, and only see their "side" of the story. As usual.
No, I just profile and consider them a threat. How they proceed from there will have impact on their life expectancy
Yup, another scared little gun owner fantasizing about shooting people of color.
But your dick is still tiny.We call it JUSTICE
-Geaux
How can you know it was justice when you don't the facts of the case?
Then without the facts, why are the thugs protesting in Furgeson?
I can wait.....
-Geaux
That's what you and they share in common.
A sensible person wants justice no matter who or what the outcome favors. People like you want a particular outcome,
and justice be damned.
Oh do tell..
The left has two words.... 'sensible' and 'Boooosh'
Take your sensible clause and well..... The lost all credibility and should refrain from the use of the word 'sensible. I mean, you did elect Obama twice.
Just saying
-Geaux
I see, so my being sensible is just one more trait that distinguishes me from the RWnuts.
Okay.
An honest person sees this situation, sees that there is directly conflicting evidence, and admit that it's essentially impossible to know what happened.
That won't stop the ideologues, though. These narcissists know all, and only see their "side" of the story. As usual.
If the evidence could go EITHER WAY, then that's when a grand jury should defer to a trial. It's the job of a trial jury to resolve conflicting evidence.
And that trial should be public and open for everyone to see the evidence presented by both sides.
Agreed.
So if the grand jury decides not to indict, it would be fair to assume that the evidence in the cop's favor outweighed the evidence against him enough that they felt an indictment was not appropriate.
Regardless of the skin color of the subjects, which is irrelevant.
Agreed.
So if the grand jury decides not to indict, it would be fair to assume that the evidence in the cop's favor outweighed the evidence against him enough that they felt an indictment was not appropriate.
Regardless of the skin color of the subjects, which is irrelevant.
No, it would tell me that the prosecutors tried to sweep this under the rug as quickly as possible.
It would tell black folks that they can't count on the justice system. And they'd be right.