First they came for the billionaires...

Anybody here ever get hired by a poor man? :umno:
Bundesarchiv_Bild_183-T0709-429%2C_VEB_Carl_Zeiss_Jena%2C_Geb%C3%A4udeansicht%2C_Parkplatz.jpg


Wow, you really don't realize how good you have it, do you? :dunno:
Here have this healthy food.

last-february-apple.jpg


See, how nice we play? It even smiles!
 
Anybody here ever get hired by a poor man? :umno:

Yep.

One place I worked, I'd take the paycheck to the bank and the bank would go, "umm.... they don't have enough money to cover this --- we'll front it for now". We did that several times before I quit.
 
It is a good thing to take their money. Otherwise those nice sucgreen bills only rot as each fat shot wants to be the fattest shot on the deathbed. They are the true parasites that avoided any public service during their entire lives.
Whether the back-taken money is invested good or not, is another issue.
A. Point to the Communist or strict Socialist nation which has eliminated the existence of the poor and homeless.
The US pulled more people out of poverty than any other nation, but there will always be poor.
B. As for those who become rich through their own initiative and ideas, they take all the risk to achieve their goals and have thus earned whatever
money they can amass. The "worker" just sits on the assembly line and sticks parts on a passing item, or answers a phone, or sells the product.
Little investment there. You get paid what your contribution is worth, whether it's $17.50 per hour, or $200.00 per hour.
Just because someone spits out a little human being does not mean the government is responsible for that individual. The person or persons that
were responsible for your coming in the world are responsible for your existence until adulthood, after that, you the individual are responsible for
your success or failure in life, but the things you get should come out of your own pocket/bank account, not some third-parties labors.
You are suggesting that it is easy to become rich but all the hard working people are just too lazy. So you know, you are telling bs here. The "little investment" dominates the entire day.
There are people who were successful with their ideas, inventions, ect, but the regular rich guy descends from the feudal era.
The regular "rich" guy who descended from the original one who created the wealth, is just as entitled to the riches as the one who first earned it. Such individuals are "heirs." I'm not rich or even close (low middle-class), but if I were, I would want my son/daughter to receive every dime I have earned, not some clown that has no relation to me and I'm sure that they would want the same for their children or grandchildren.
 
...Economic indicators are way up. Black unemployment is usually 12-20% .....currently 5.4%. Nancy Pelosi wants her Scraps back tho. We can't be having all of this prosperity and success. We need a socialist in the WH to put a stop to all of this happy horse shit.
No. We need a sane, stable, experienced, effective leadership that can simultaneously promote a strong economy and ethical government.

To this observer, none of those presently on the national stage meet those criteria. None. And, the present White House? Not even close.
 
...The regular "rich" guy who descended from the original one who created the wealth, is just as entitled to the riches as the one who first earned it. Such individuals are "heirs." I'm not rich or even close (low middle-class), but if I were, I would want my son/daughter to receive every dime I have earned, not some clown that has no relation to me and I'm sure that they would want the same for their children or grandchildren.
Trouble is, after a couple of generations, that creates a Privileged Class, and that is on the wrong side of History. So, The People remedy it.

And, of course, higher taxation is far better than legions of Plebs wearing armbands swarming over the walls and slitting throats, don't you think?
 
It is a good thing to take their money. Otherwise those nice sucgreen bills only rot as each fat shot wants to be the fattest shot on the deathbed. They are the true parasites that avoided any public service during their entire lives.
Whether the back-taken money is invested good or not, is another issue.
A. Point to the Communist or strict Socialist nation which has eliminated the existence of the poor and homeless.
The US pulled more people out of poverty than any other nation, but there will always be poor.
B. As for those who become rich through their own initiative and ideas, they take all the risk to achieve their goals and have thus earned whatever
money they can amass. The "worker" just sits on the assembly line and sticks parts on a passing item, or answers a phone, or sells the product.
Little investment there. You get paid what your contribution is worth, whether it's $17.50 per hour, or $200.00 per hour.
Just because someone spits out a little human being does not mean the government is responsible for that individual. The person or persons that
were responsible for your coming in the world are responsible for your existence until adulthood, after that, you the individual are responsible for
your success or failure in life, but the things you get should come out of your own pocket/bank account, not some third-parties labors.
You are suggesting that it is easy to become rich but all the hard working people are just too lazy. So you know, you are telling bs here. The "little investment" dominates the entire day.
There are people who were successful with their ideas, inventions, ect, but the regular rich guy descends from the feudal era.
The regular "rich" guy who descended from the original one who created the wealth, is just as entitled to the riches as the one who first earned it. Such individuals are "heirs." I'm not rich or even close (low middle-class), but if I were, I would want my son/daughter to receive every dime I have earned, not some clown that has no relation to me and I'm sure that they would want the same for their children or grandchildren.
Sure, why not. But that´s not the point. See all the Richie Rich lapdogs who want to impose all the burdens on the working population because only the rich have a right to their property and can´t be bothered with taxes.
 
...Economic indicators are way up. Black unemployment is usually 12-20% .....currently 5.4%. Nancy Pelosi wants her Scraps back tho. We can't be having all of this prosperity and success. We need a socialist in the WH to put a stop to all of this happy horse shit.
No. We need a sane, stable, experienced, effective leadership that can simultaneously promote a strong economy and ethical government.

To this observer, none of those presently on the national stage meet those criteria. None. And, the present White House? Not even close.
Trumps not the best person for the job but he is the best person for the job right now.
 
It is a good thing to take their money. Otherwise those nice sucgreen bills only rot as each fat shot wants to be the fattest shot on the deathbed. They are the true parasites that avoided any public service during their entire lives.
Whether the back-taken money is invested good or not, is another issue.
A. Point to the Communist or strict Socialist nation which has eliminated the existence of the poor and homeless.
The US pulled more people out of poverty than any other nation, but there will always be poor.
B. As for those who become rich through their own initiative and ideas, they take all the risk to achieve their goals and have thus earned whatever
money they can amass. The "worker" just sits on the assembly line and sticks parts on a passing item, or answers a phone, or sells the product.
Little investment there. You get paid what your contribution is worth, whether it's $17.50 per hour, or $200.00 per hour.
Just because someone spits out a little human being does not mean the government is responsible for that individual. The person or persons that
were responsible for your coming in the world are responsible for your existence until adulthood, after that, you the individual are responsible for
your success or failure in life, but the things you get should come out of your own pocket/bank account, not some third-parties labors.
You are suggesting that it is easy to become rich but all the hard working people are just too lazy. So you know, you are telling bs here. The "little investment" dominates the entire day.
There are people who were successful with their ideas, inventions, ect, but the regular rich guy descends from the feudal era.
The regular "rich" guy who descended from the original one who created the wealth, is just as entitled to the riches as the one who first earned it. Such individuals are "heirs." I'm not rich or even close (low middle-class), but if I were, I would want my son/daughter to receive every dime I have earned, not some clown that has no relation to me and I'm sure that they would want the same for their children or grandchildren.
Sure, why not. But that´s not the point. See all the Richie Rich lapdogs who want to impose all the burdens on the working population because only the rich have a right to their property and can´t be bothered with taxes.
so says the guy who claimed people like Bill Gates Soros go to the food pantry.
 
It is a good thing to take their money. Otherwise those nice sucgreen bills only rot as each fat shot wants to be the fattest shot on the deathbed. They are the true parasites that avoided any public service during their entire lives.
Whether the back-taken money is invested good or not, is another issue.
A. Point to the Communist or strict Socialist nation which has eliminated the existence of the poor and homeless.
The US pulled more people out of poverty than any other nation, but there will always be poor.
B. As for those who become rich through their own initiative and ideas, they take all the risk to achieve their goals and have thus earned whatever
money they can amass. The "worker" just sits on the assembly line and sticks parts on a passing item, or answers a phone, or sells the product.
Little investment there. You get paid what your contribution is worth, whether it's $17.50 per hour, or $200.00 per hour.
Just because someone spits out a little human being does not mean the government is responsible for that individual. The person or persons that
were responsible for your coming in the world are responsible for your existence until adulthood, after that, you the individual are responsible for
your success or failure in life, but the things you get should come out of your own pocket/bank account, not some third-parties labors.
You are suggesting that it is easy to become rich but all the hard working people are just too lazy. So you know, you are telling bs here. The "little investment" dominates the entire day.
There are people who were successful with their ideas, inventions, ect, but the regular rich guy descends from the feudal era.
The regular "rich" guy who descended from the original one who created the wealth, is just as entitled to the riches as the one who first earned it. Such individuals are "heirs." I'm not rich or even close (low middle-class), but if I were, I would want my son/daughter to receive every dime I have earned, not some clown that has no relation to me and I'm sure that they would want the same for their children or grandchildren.
Sure, why not. But that´s not the point. See all the Richie Rich lapdogs who want to impose all the burdens on the working population because only the rich have a right to their property and can´t be bothered with taxes.
so says the guy who claimed people like Bill Gates Soros go to the food pantry.
I guess that Gates has done more for the poor than all other combined.
 
A. Point to the Communist or strict Socialist nation which has eliminated the existence of the poor and homeless.
The US pulled more people out of poverty than any other nation, but there will always be poor.
B. As for those who become rich through their own initiative and ideas, they take all the risk to achieve their goals and have thus earned whatever
money they can amass. The "worker" just sits on the assembly line and sticks parts on a passing item, or answers a phone, or sells the product.
Little investment there. You get paid what your contribution is worth, whether it's $17.50 per hour, or $200.00 per hour.
Just because someone spits out a little human being does not mean the government is responsible for that individual. The person or persons that
were responsible for your coming in the world are responsible for your existence until adulthood, after that, you the individual are responsible for
your success or failure in life, but the things you get should come out of your own pocket/bank account, not some third-parties labors.
You are suggesting that it is easy to become rich but all the hard working people are just too lazy. So you know, you are telling bs here. The "little investment" dominates the entire day.
There are people who were successful with their ideas, inventions, ect, but the regular rich guy descends from the feudal era.
The regular "rich" guy who descended from the original one who created the wealth, is just as entitled to the riches as the one who first earned it. Such individuals are "heirs." I'm not rich or even close (low middle-class), but if I were, I would want my son/daughter to receive every dime I have earned, not some clown that has no relation to me and I'm sure that they would want the same for their children or grandchildren.
Sure, why not. But that´s not the point. See all the Richie Rich lapdogs who want to impose all the burdens on the working population because only the rich have a right to their property and can´t be bothered with taxes.
so says the guy who claimed people like Bill Gates Soros go to the food pantry.
I guess that Gates has done more for the poor than all other combined.
Dodge boy stop dodging from your first assertion
BTW you wanted to take all his money
 
You are suggesting that it is easy to become rich but all the hard working people are just too lazy. So you know, you are telling bs here. The "little investment" dominates the entire day.
There are people who were successful with their ideas, inventions, ect, but the regular rich guy descends from the feudal era.
The regular "rich" guy who descended from the original one who created the wealth, is just as entitled to the riches as the one who first earned it. Such individuals are "heirs." I'm not rich or even close (low middle-class), but if I were, I would want my son/daughter to receive every dime I have earned, not some clown that has no relation to me and I'm sure that they would want the same for their children or grandchildren.
Sure, why not. But that´s not the point. See all the Richie Rich lapdogs who want to impose all the burdens on the working population because only the rich have a right to their property and can´t be bothered with taxes.
so says the guy who claimed people like Bill Gates Soros go to the food pantry.
I guess that Gates has done more for the poor than all other combined.
Dodge boy stop dodging from your first assertion
BTW you wanted to take all his money
No, I just would impose fair taxes on rich people and companies.
 
Communist Lizzy Cheekbones is coming after US wealth, starting with the billionaires on the theory that it will only take a few billionaires to fund both her $52 Trillion Mediscam for All and $90 Trillion Green New Deal.

She, being a complete fucking psychopath and fraud, has no respect for the notion of Private Property.

Can't wait to toss the Stalinist democrats on the ash heap of current events
Are you triggered, Frank?
 

Forum List

Back
Top