Florida's Don't Feel Bad Law.

It is in the OP

An individual, by virtue of his or her race or sex, does not bear responsibility for actions committed in the past by other members of the same race or sex. An individual should not be made to feel discomfort, guilt, anguish, or any other form of psychological distress on account of his or her race,” the bill states.

Again, how can you sue anybody over what the bill authorizes to be taught?
 
We’ve all been taught the history, it’s being taught right now, and it’s Another Liberal Hoax that we don’t want it taught anymore. We do oppose it being CHANGED to an indoctrination of the horrors of the white man. That’s not education, that’s manipulation.
 
The bill says you cannot teach it if it makes someone feel uncomfortable.

It addresses personal content, not curriculum. There is no lawyer in the country that would take such a case unless they wanted to milk you for your money. Even if it did make it to court, the session would be two minutes before it got thrown out.
 
It addresses personal content, not curriculum. There is no lawyer in the country that would take such a case unless they wanted to milk you for your money. Even if it did make it to court, the session would be two minutes before it got thrown out.

If the curriculum makes the child feel uncomfortable the law is being violated
 
No, because what's authorized is the law. You are just making shit up to try and make a point that isn't there. You love the idea of white guilt being part of our children's teachings.

The wording is pretty clear, a child cannot be allowed to feel uncomfortable.
 
If the curriculum makes the child feel uncomfortable the law is being violated
The prevention is for intending to create discomfort. “Look what these white people did” with either a statement or implication that the student needs to be remorseful and even responsible. It’s your typical liberal lie that the ruling intends to be based on how the child feels. The ruling intends to prohibit pre planned shaming as curriculum.
 
Sure…and it’s Republicans who spew the filth of racism.

Sure…and it’s Republicans who spew the filth of racism.




It's the Republicans who spew the filth of racism??


Why did your " boy" BRANDON call Kyle Rittenhouse a WHITE SUPREMACIST BEFORE HE EVEN WENT TO TRIAL THEN HAD THE NERVE TO DISPLAY HIS DISPLEASURE AT THE VERDICT??

You are Totally Insane
 
Last edited:




It's the Republicans who spew the filth of racism??


Why did your " boy" BRANDON call Kyle Rittenhouse a WHITE SUPREMACIST BEFORE HE EVEN WENT TO TRIAL THEN HAD THE NERVE TO DISPLAY HIS DISPLEASURE AT THE VERDICT??

You are Totally Insane

:lol: oh puh-leeze :lmao:

By the didn't your Cheeto-in-Chief do the exact same thing...uttering pronouncements before a trial?

btw...getting photographed hanging out with white supremacists and using their handsigns didn't help Rittenhouse.
 
Actually it is the Republicans claiming that the teaching of history will make a student feel "uncomfortable" and therefore must be banned.
Bullshit and you know it. It’s you assholes who keep trying to rewrite history. Now STFU and stay under the bridge troll.
 
That's awesome.

Explain how they happened despite Dems doing all they could to prevent them.

Um, I just did... never mind.

You can't teach them history without making white kids feel guilty about their race? The teachers I had seemed to pull it off just fine.

Uh, Ray, if you are example of white teachers sparing your feelings, given your ignorance of history, then they didn't pull it off just fine.

The thing is, we give kids a very sanitized, Disney version of history that starts with the Pilgrims (who weren't the first ones here), Goes on to the Founding fathers, then to the Civil War, then to Dr. King if they are lucky enough to get it in before the semester ends.

They don't cover Jim Crow, Miscegenation Laws, Debt Peonage, Poll Taxes, etc.
 
It's the Republicans who spew the filth of racism??


Why did your " boy" BRANDON call Kyle Rittenhouse a WHITE SUPREMACIST BEFORE HE EVEN WENT TO TRIAL THEN HAD THE NERVE TO DISPLAY HIS DISPLEASURE AT THE VERDICT??

Um, Rittenhouse shot and killed two people on tape and walked away because of bad lawyering... we should all be upset about that.
 
:lol: oh puh-leeze :lmao:

By the didn't your Cheeto-in-Chief do the exact same thing...uttering pronouncements before a trial?
“That was an interesting situation,” he said. “You saw the same tape as I saw. And he was trying to get away from them. I guess it looks like he fell and then they very violently attacked him. And it was something that we’re looking at right now, and it’s under investigation. But I guess he was in very big trouble. He would have been — probably would have been killed, but it’s under investigation."

This is what Trump said. So what? Allegedly in this Country you're considered innocent until a jury says otherwise. You're comparing what Trump said to BRANDON stating he was guilty and calling him a WHITE SUPREMACIST?? Anyone hear of JURY TAMPERING??? That;s what he was trying to do. You see NOTHING wrong in him publicly expressing his disappointment that he wasn't convicted ? Typical Left Wing Psychopath
 
No, actually, they don't. Not in any detail.
Yes, they actually do. IN DETAIL. it's required reading for any AP history course.

Can't you stop lying through your teeth?

It's considered a mental illness when you can't stop.
 
Um, Rittenhouse shot and killed two people on tape and walked away because of bad lawyering... we should all be upset about that.
Um... he killed two people on tape that were trying to kill him. The one who survived ( Gaige) admitted he had initially aimed his gun at Rittenhouse. He was found not guilty and we should all be happy for him
 

Forum List

Back
Top