Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Are you aware that 30 million was spent to uncover no crimes. Babbling about Nixon is meaninglessThere is another angle which is that if everyone hated Trump they still need evidence of impeachable crimes of which there are none. This should end up in the supreme court to decide if a vote is in fact legalthis is political not just legal. they would have impeached already if they knew the votes were there to convict in the Senate.The Senate means nothing as the house will never take a voteI am not a Dem but I do support Impeachment. But I know as long as we have the criminal element Republicans in the Senate it won't happen successfully. So we have the House go through the motions, do the investigations, level the charges and call it something else. Then present it to the voters and let them decide. The Senate should be worried, real worried at this point. Their cushy jobs may be in jepordy and some may even be caught up in the obstruction charges themselves later on.
Trump is more guilty than Nixon. Are you aware that Nixon was guilty of a coverup but really didn't commit any crimes himself other than obstruction? He didn't have prior knowledge of the breakin. He did try to show loyalty to his people to a fault though. Something Trump can never have the character to do.
A two-thirds vote is needed to remove silly boy. Currently the Senate is 53 Rs 45 Ds and 2 independents. How is it that the senate is in his pocket?It would be a waste of time. The Senate is in his pocket. They will lie, cheat, and steal at his direction. Better to push the investigations. Bring every dirty little secret out into the sun for all to see. The court of public opinion will remove him even though the toadies in the Senate will not.But before the Muller report even came out Pelosi said no impeachment. How is this fair to the American people? Is Pelosi working for Trump?
Nancy Pelosi's refusal to impeach Donald Trump is "insane" and "pathetic," Bush ethics chief
Wrong the house can only impeach on the grounds that impeachable high crimes were uncovered.The vote itself is only legal if a threshold is met. The Muller report did not meet the threshold Pelosi knows this and is respecting the constitution by blocking the illegal voteI know they have the votes which is why they should do it. You have to face up to the fact that you have been lied tooThe Senate means nothing as the house will never take a vote
Actually, they have the votes right now. They are not through the evidence gathering and discussions yet. And as long as they don't call it Impeachment, they can call it something like "Admonishment" and make it public at the right time. You actually believe that ALL Republicans support Trump blindly? More and more are starting to wise up.
They have the votes in the House. But the Criminal in Charge of the Senate won't allow it to be brought to the floor even if there is enough votes in the Senate to pass it. Nancy is right on this one. Better to take it to the Voters and let them decide AFTER the formal House admonishment.
The Mueller report has no qualifications to show a threshold of any kind. Anymore than it has the authority to level charges against a sitting President. The House can vote any way it feels obligated to with or without your permission. And it can be done with a simple majority as well. Now, tell me again what would be illegal about a vote of admonishment from the House to the President? Some may even call it Censoring.
A two-thirds vote is needed to remove silly boy. Currently the Senate is 53 Rs 45 Ds and 2 independents. How is it that the senate is in his pocket?It would be a waste of time. The Senate is in his pocket. They will lie, cheat, and steal at his direction. Better to push the investigations. Bring every dirty little secret out into the sun for all to see. The court of public opinion will remove him even though the toadies in the Senate will not.But before the Muller report even came out Pelosi said no impeachment. How is this fair to the American people? Is Pelosi working for Trump?
Nancy Pelosi's refusal to impeach Donald Trump is "insane" and "pathetic," Bush ethics chief
Are you aware that 30 million was spent to uncover no crimes. Babbling about Nixon is meaninglessThere is another angle which is that if everyone hated Trump they still need evidence of impeachable crimes of which there are none. This should end up in the supreme court to decide if a vote is in fact legalthis is political not just legal. they would have impeached already if they knew the votes were there to convict in the Senate.The Senate means nothing as the house will never take a vote
Trump is more guilty than Nixon. Are you aware that Nixon was guilty of a coverup but really didn't commit any crimes himself other than obstruction? He didn't have prior knowledge of the breakin. He did try to show loyalty to his people to a fault though. Something Trump can never have the character to do.
Are you aware that the Mueller investigation netted how many Grand Juries, How many Arrests, How many convictions, and found how many areas that Trump attempted to obstruct the Mueller investigation? But, as Mueller says, the Justice Department cannot charge a sitting President. Only Congress can do that. Are you trying to change the Constitution of the United States for your Orange Individual One?
Wrong the house can only impeach on the grounds that impeachable high crimes were uncovered.The vote itself is only legal if a threshold is met. The Muller report did not meet the threshold Pelosi knows this and is respecting the constitution by blocking the illegal voteI know they have the votes which is why they should do it. You have to face up to the fact that you have been lied tooActually, they have the votes right now. They are not through the evidence gathering and discussions yet. And as long as they don't call it Impeachment, they can call it something like "Admonishment" and make it public at the right time. You actually believe that ALL Republicans support Trump blindly? More and more are starting to wise up.
They have the votes in the House. But the Criminal in Charge of the Senate won't allow it to be brought to the floor even if there is enough votes in the Senate to pass it. Nancy is right on this one. Better to take it to the Voters and let them decide AFTER the formal House admonishment.
The Mueller report has no qualifications to show a threshold of any kind. Anymore than it has the authority to level charges against a sitting President. The House can vote any way it feels obligated to with or without your permission. And it can be done with a simple majority as well. Now, tell me again what would be illegal about a vote of admonishment from the House to the President? Some may even call it Censoring.
This was not found so the vote would be illegal and be overturned in the Senate anyway
They should be helping America,
Pelosi has no power to do anything except send stuff to the SenateA two-thirds vote is needed to remove silly boy. Currently the Senate is 53 Rs 45 Ds and 2 independents. How is it that the senate is in his pocket?It would be a waste of time. The Senate is in his pocket. They will lie, cheat, and steal at his direction. Better to push the investigations. Bring every dirty little secret out into the sun for all to see. The court of public opinion will remove him even though the toadies in the Senate will not.But before the Muller report even came out Pelosi said no impeachment. How is this fair to the American people? Is Pelosi working for Trump?
Nancy Pelosi's refusal to impeach Donald Trump is "insane" and "pathetic," Bush ethics chief
Nancy only needs a simple majority to Censor the President. You want to bet she can get a 2/3s for censoring from the House? They don't need to send that to the Senate. It amounts to the same thing as Impeachment but it's not sent to the Senate. It's sent to the Voters instead for them to vote on. Don't know about you but you scum suckers should be shaking in your diapers on this one.
So you have admitted that impeachment is impossibleWrong the house can only impeach on the grounds that impeachable high crimes were uncovered.The vote itself is only legal if a threshold is met. The Muller report did not meet the threshold Pelosi knows this and is respecting the constitution by blocking the illegal voteI know they have the votes which is why they should do it. You have to face up to the fact that you have been lied too
They have the votes in the House. But the Criminal in Charge of the Senate won't allow it to be brought to the floor even if there is enough votes in the Senate to pass it. Nancy is right on this one. Better to take it to the Voters and let them decide AFTER the formal House admonishment.
The Mueller report has no qualifications to show a threshold of any kind. Anymore than it has the authority to level charges against a sitting President. The House can vote any way it feels obligated to with or without your permission. And it can be done with a simple majority as well. Now, tell me again what would be illegal about a vote of admonishment from the House to the President? Some may even call it Censoring.
This was not found so the vote would be illegal and be overturned in the Senate anyway
They should be helping America,
Who said anything about Impeachment. I am talking about Censoring. You really need to keep up, cupcake. And change those diapers.
WTF is wrong with you? You haters are the problem.A two-thirds vote is needed to remove silly boy. Currently the Senate is 53 Rs 45 Ds and 2 independents. How is it that the senate is in his pocket?It would be a waste of time. The Senate is in his pocket. They will lie, cheat, and steal at his direction. Better to push the investigations. Bring every dirty little secret out into the sun for all to see. The court of public opinion will remove him even though the toadies in the Senate will not.But before the Muller report even came out Pelosi said no impeachment. How is this fair to the American people? Is Pelosi working for Trump?
Nancy Pelosi's refusal to impeach Donald Trump is "insane" and "pathetic," Bush ethics chief
Nancy only needs a simple majority to Censor the President. You want to bet she can get a 2/3s for censoring from the House? They don't need to send that to the Senate. It amounts to the same thing as Impeachment but it's not sent to the Senate. It's sent to the Voters instead for them to vote on. Don't know about you but you scum suckers should be shaking in your diapers on this one.
Just because a wing of the party has the horrible idea of impeachment doesn’t mean all Dems support it. The title of your OP is misleadingBut before the Muller report even came out Pelosi said no impeachment. How is this fair to the American people? Is Pelosi working for Trump?
Nancy Pelosi's refusal to impeach Donald Trump is "insane" and "pathetic," Bush ethics chief
It's a matter of taking the necessary steps. Most Democrats know he deserves impeachment, but it would be a waste to do it before the voters are convinced of Trump's unlawful behavior
The Mueller report weakened that effort.
Yeah … and none of that can be your delusional self speaking? The opinion that we have "criminal element Republicans in the Senate" is simply one of your delusions but the Hysterical House Dems will indeed impeach and the Senate - including some rational Dems - will laugh it off the floor with an admonition that House Dems GTF up. In the end 2020 will be a repudiation not only of socialism but of silly Dems who let both their bitter, petulant loons and their true natures out of the can and now can't get them back in.Because it can't possibly be that you and our Hysterical House Dems are unhinged and their words and actions strictly political and lacking in "true witness bearing morals, eh?The Senate won't convict, regardless; this is political, not "legal". There are simply not enough true witness bearing morals to go around on the right wing even with a "McCarthy era phrase in our pledge".But before the Muller report even came out Pelosi said no impeachment. How is this fair to the American people? Is Pelosi working for Trump?
Nancy Pelosi's refusal to impeach Donald Trump is "insane" and "pathetic," Bush ethics chief
Poll: Majority oppose Trump impeachment, but most Democrats support it
A majority of polled voters oppose impeaching and removing President Trump but a strong majority of Democrats are in favor of doing so, according to the latest Harvard CAPS/Harris Poll survey.
I am not a Dem but I do support Impeachment. But I know as long as we have the criminal element Republicans in the Senate it won't happen successfully. So we have the House go through the motions, do the investigations, level the charges and call it something else. Then present it to the voters and let them decide. The Senate should be worried, real worried at this point. Their cushy jobs may be in jepordy and some may even be caught up in the obstruction charges themselves later on.
Barr never lied Muller said so twiceJust because a wing of the party has the horrible idea of impeachment doesn’t mean all Dems support it. The title of your OP is misleadingBut before the Muller report even came out Pelosi said no impeachment. How is this fair to the American people? Is Pelosi working for Trump?
Nancy Pelosi's refusal to impeach Donald Trump is "insane" and "pathetic," Bush ethics chief
It's a matter of taking the necessary steps. Most Democrats know he deserves impeachment, but it would be a waste to do it before the voters are convinced of Trump's unlawful behavior
The Mueller report weakened that effort.
No, The Barr lies are a problem though. Getting the information from the Mueller report out there is the goal..
Are you aware that 30 million was spent to uncover no crimes. Babbling about Nixon is meaninglessThere is another angle which is that if everyone hated Trump they still need evidence of impeachable crimes of which there are none. This should end up in the supreme court to decide if a vote is in fact legalthis is political not just legal. they would have impeached already if they knew the votes were there to convict in the Senate.
Trump is more guilty than Nixon. Are you aware that Nixon was guilty of a coverup but really didn't commit any crimes himself other than obstruction? He didn't have prior knowledge of the breakin. He did try to show loyalty to his people to a fault though. Something Trump can never have the character to do.
Are you aware that the Mueller investigation netted how many Grand Juries, How many Arrests, How many convictions, and found how many areas that Trump attempted to obstruct the Mueller investigation? But, as Mueller says, the Justice Department cannot charge a sitting President. Only Congress can do that. Are you trying to change the Constitution of the United States for your Orange Individual One?
Zippo on Trump, if I find out you cheated on your taxes does Trump get impeached
Grow up kid
Words are not a crime, so get back to us when Trump murders someone on 5th aveAre you aware that 30 million was spent to uncover no crimes. Babbling about Nixon is meaninglessThere is another angle which is that if everyone hated Trump they still need evidence of impeachable crimes of which there are none. This should end up in the supreme court to decide if a vote is in fact legal
Trump is more guilty than Nixon. Are you aware that Nixon was guilty of a coverup but really didn't commit any crimes himself other than obstruction? He didn't have prior knowledge of the breakin. He did try to show loyalty to his people to a fault though. Something Trump can never have the character to do.
Are you aware that the Mueller investigation netted how many Grand Juries, How many Arrests, How many convictions, and found how many areas that Trump attempted to obstruct the Mueller investigation? But, as Mueller says, the Justice Department cannot charge a sitting President. Only Congress can do that. Are you trying to change the Constitution of the United States for your Orange Individual One?
Zippo on Trump, if I find out you cheated on your taxes does Trump get impeached
Grow up kid
Nope. Trump was right. He could murder someone on 5th Avenue and get away with it. So we do the censor and let the voters decide.
So you have admitted that impeachment is impossibleWrong the house can only impeach on the grounds that impeachable high crimes were uncovered.The vote itself is only legal if a threshold is met. The Muller report did not meet the threshold Pelosi knows this and is respecting the constitution by blocking the illegal voteThey have the votes in the House. But the Criminal in Charge of the Senate won't allow it to be brought to the floor even if there is enough votes in the Senate to pass it. Nancy is right on this one. Better to take it to the Voters and let them decide AFTER the formal House admonishment.
The Mueller report has no qualifications to show a threshold of any kind. Anymore than it has the authority to level charges against a sitting President. The House can vote any way it feels obligated to with or without your permission. And it can be done with a simple majority as well. Now, tell me again what would be illegal about a vote of admonishment from the House to the President? Some may even call it Censoring.
This was not found so the vote would be illegal and be overturned in the Senate anyway
They should be helping America,
Who said anything about Impeachment. I am talking about Censoring. You really need to keep up, cupcake. And change those diapers.
See you can learn
WTF is wrong with you? You haters are the problem.A two-thirds vote is needed to remove silly boy. Currently the Senate is 53 Rs 45 Ds and 2 independents. How is it that the senate is in his pocket?It would be a waste of time. The Senate is in his pocket. They will lie, cheat, and steal at his direction. Better to push the investigations. Bring every dirty little secret out into the sun for all to see. The court of public opinion will remove him even though the toadies in the Senate will not.But before the Muller report even came out Pelosi said no impeachment. How is this fair to the American people? Is Pelosi working for Trump?
Nancy Pelosi's refusal to impeach Donald Trump is "insane" and "pathetic," Bush ethics chief
Nancy only needs a simple majority to Censor the President. You want to bet she can get a 2/3s for censoring from the House? They don't need to send that to the Senate. It amounts to the same thing as Impeachment but it's not sent to the Senate. It's sent to the Voters instead for them to vote on. Don't know about you but you scum suckers should be shaking in your diapers on this one.
Pelosi is not in the senate and the House can’t remove.
Most will call it what it would be … a small, petty, meaningless act of bitter House Dems.The vote itself is only legal if a threshold is met. The Muller report did not meet the threshold Pelosi knows this and is respecting the constitution by blocking the illegal voteI know they have the votes which is why they should do it. You have to face up to the fact that you have been lied tooThe Senate means nothing as the house will never take a vote
Actually, they have the votes right now. They are not through the evidence gathering and discussions yet. And as long as they don't call it Impeachment, they can call it something like "Admonishment" and make it public at the right time. You actually believe that ALL Republicans support Trump blindly? More and more are starting to wise up.
They have the votes in the House. But the Criminal in Charge of the Senate won't allow it to be brought to the floor even if there is enough votes in the Senate to pass it. Nancy is right on this one. Better to take it to the Voters and let them decide AFTER the formal House admonishment.
The Mueller report has no qualifications to show a threshold of any kind. Anymore than it has the authority to level charges against a sitting President. The House can vote any way it feels obligated to with or without your permission. And it can be done with a simple majority as well. Now, tell me again what would be illegal about a vote of admonishment from the House to the President? Some may even call it Censoring.
Do it, trumps approval rating will rise.....So you have admitted that impeachment is impossibleWrong the house can only impeach on the grounds that impeachable high crimes were uncovered.The vote itself is only legal if a threshold is met. The Muller report did not meet the threshold Pelosi knows this and is respecting the constitution by blocking the illegal vote
The Mueller report has no qualifications to show a threshold of any kind. Anymore than it has the authority to level charges against a sitting President. The House can vote any way it feels obligated to with or without your permission. And it can be done with a simple majority as well. Now, tell me again what would be illegal about a vote of admonishment from the House to the President? Some may even call it Censoring.
This was not found so the vote would be illegal and be overturned in the Senate anyway
They should be helping America,
Who said anything about Impeachment. I am talking about Censoring. You really need to keep up, cupcake. And change those diapers.
See you can learn
You are the one that keeps preaching Impeach, Impeach, Impeach. I go with Nancy's line and go for Censor. It completely bypasses the Criminals in the Senate and takes it directly to the voters. The fun part is, Nancy gets to time it JJJUUUSSSSTTTT right on when to release it.
Damn you’re stupid.WTF is wrong with you? You haters are the problem.A two-thirds vote is needed to remove silly boy. Currently the Senate is 53 Rs 45 Ds and 2 independents. How is it that the senate is in his pocket?It would be a waste of time. The Senate is in his pocket. They will lie, cheat, and steal at his direction. Better to push the investigations. Bring every dirty little secret out into the sun for all to see. The court of public opinion will remove him even though the toadies in the Senate will not.But before the Muller report even came out Pelosi said no impeachment. How is this fair to the American people? Is Pelosi working for Trump?
Nancy Pelosi's refusal to impeach Donald Trump is "insane" and "pathetic," Bush ethics chief
Nancy only needs a simple majority to Censor the President. You want to bet she can get a 2/3s for censoring from the House? They don't need to send that to the Senate. It amounts to the same thing as Impeachment but it's not sent to the Senate. It's sent to the Voters instead for them to vote on. Don't know about you but you scum suckers should be shaking in your diapers on this one.
Pelosi is not in the senate and the House can’t remove.
I know exactly what I am saying. You seem to be having a reality problem. Good. Stay that way. It'll make your head explode.
Censoring means less than nothing, and trump wants this so be my guestWTF is wrong with you? You haters are the problem.A two-thirds vote is needed to remove silly boy. Currently the Senate is 53 Rs 45 Ds and 2 independents. How is it that the senate is in his pocket?It would be a waste of time. The Senate is in his pocket. They will lie, cheat, and steal at his direction. Better to push the investigations. Bring every dirty little secret out into the sun for all to see. The court of public opinion will remove him even though the toadies in the Senate will not.But before the Muller report even came out Pelosi said no impeachment. How is this fair to the American people? Is Pelosi working for Trump?
Nancy Pelosi's refusal to impeach Donald Trump is "insane" and "pathetic," Bush ethics chief
Nancy only needs a simple majority to Censor the President. You want to bet she can get a 2/3s for censoring from the House? They don't need to send that to the Senate. It amounts to the same thing as Impeachment but it's not sent to the Senate. It's sent to the Voters instead for them to vote on. Don't know about you but you scum suckers should be shaking in your diapers on this one.
Pelosi is not in the senate and the House can’t remove.
I know exactly what I am saying. You seem to be having a reality problem. Good. Stay that way. It'll make your head explode.
