For Love of The Poor

[Contumacious]

For Love of The Poor

The democrats created a master plan.

They created a class of people who are dependent on - addicted to - federal largesse.

Because they vote they provide demagogue politicians power.

" it is impossible to compete against free stuff. Every businessman knows this; that is why the “loss leader” or the giveaway is such a powerful marketing tool. Obama’s America is one in which free stuff is given away: the adults among the 47,000,000 on food stamps clearly recognized for whom they should vote, and so they did, by the tens of millions; those who – courtesy of Obama – receive two full years of unemployment benefits (which, of course, both disincentivizes looking for work and also motivates people to work off the books while collecting their windfall) surely know for whom to vote; so too those who anticipate “free” health care, who expect the government to pay their mortgages, who look for the government to give them jobs. The lure of free stuff is irresistible."

The Decline and Fall of the American Empire

.

 

[ClosedCaption]

So I don't waste time reading. I'm sure this can be summed up by saying:
Don't help the poor and they will help themselves..

This is very different when you go up the ladder because the other thought is

Help the rich and they will help US

I know its been a decade and that hasn't happened yet but it will....any day now jobs are a commin'...just wait....any second....

If America was interested in jobs, Mitt Romney would be president today. The last thing the "poor" want is a job. They want unlimited EBT cards, not a job.

And that's why Repubs didn't vote for the guy...They want their EBT cards while claiming to be against it ooooor you didn't know that the red states LOVE their welfare, right?

 

[TemplarKormac]

For Love of The Poor

The democrats created a master plan.

They created a class of people who are dependent on - addicted to - federal largesse.

Because they vote they provide demagogue politicians power.

" it is impossible to compete against free stuff. Every businessman knows this; that is why the “loss leader” or the giveaway is such a powerful marketing tool. Obama’s America is one in which free stuff is given away: the adults among the 47,000,000 on food stamps clearly recognized for whom they should vote, and so they did, by the tens of millions; those who – courtesy of Obama – receive two full years of unemployment benefits (which, of course, both disincentivizes looking for work and also motivates people to work off the books while collecting their windfall) surely know for whom to vote; so too those who anticipate “free” health care, who expect the government to pay their mortgages, who look for the government to give them jobs. The lure of free stuff is irresistible."

The Decline and Fall of the American Empire

.

Yeah, I read that in Fox's thread.

 

[NYcarbineer]

If conservatives really believe that giving the poor anything that the poor did not earn themselves

then they should come out for making public education pay-as-you-go where everyone who wants their children to go to school pays the same rate as the next person,

and those who can't afford it, go without.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Yes, poor people never existed before the US Democrat party and poor people were never helped by their govt in the past before these socialist came around in 1970 or 1950 or 1930

In order to help the poor and to calm any unrest, the Roman government provided the poor with grain and oil which supplemented their diets. They also held entertainments for them. These acts were what caused the expression "bread and circuses" in regard to the poor people of Rome.

What did the ancient roman government do to help the poor

 

[TemplarKormac]

If conservatives really believe that giving the poor anything that the poor did not earn themselves, then they should come out for making public education pay-as-you-go where everyone who wants their children to go to school pays the same rate as the next person and those who can't afford it, go without.

I can't make sense of this comment. And you accuse me of not using plain English?

 

[TemplarKormac]

Yes, poor people never existed before the US Democrat party and poor people were never helped by their govt in the past before these socialist came around in 1970 or 1950 or 1930

In order to help the poor and to calm any unrest, the Roman government provided the poor with grain and oil which supplemented their diets. They also held entertainments for them. These acts were what caused the expression "bread and circuses" in regard to the poor people of Rome.

What did the ancient roman government do to help the poor

How ironic you would mention the Roman Empire... because the parallels between American and Rome are strikingly similar.

 

[Edgetho]

If conservatives really believe that giving the poor anything that the poor did not earn themselves

then they should come out for making public education pay-as-you-go where everyone who wants their children to go to school pays the same rate as the next person,

and those who can't afford it, go without.

You give new meaning to the phrase, 'embrace the stupid'

What do you think we're trying to do with "Vouchers".... Idiot?

We give vouchers, paid for by EVERYBODY through Property and other Taxes to parents and they use them on whatever school they choose.

It's a Republican Idea. Called "Freedom".

But dimocrap scum want to FORCE our kids into attending THE WORST SCHOOLS IN THE CIVILIZED WORLD instead.

Know why?

Teachers Unions, that's why.

We're supporting the most useless, the most overpaid, the laziest, the most time off, the lowest, the fewest working hours of any position on the face of the Earth....

All while making $100k a year.

Fuck the kids, right dimocraps?

 

[cutter]

If conservatives really believe that giving the poor anything that the poor did not earn themselves

then they should come out for making public education pay-as-you-go where everyone who wants their children to go to school pays the same rate as the next person,

and those who can't afford it, go without.

Back in the 60s we had the best education in the world. Before the Dept of education. When schools were run by the states and local school boards. Get the Federal Government involved and they fuck it all up. Spend more than ever and get one of the worlds worst educational systems. Now they get health care too.

 

[NYcarbineer]

If conservatives really believe that giving the poor anything that the poor did not earn themselves

then they should come out for making public education pay-as-you-go where everyone who wants their children to go to school pays the same rate as the next person,

and those who can't afford it, go without.

Back in the 60s we had the best education in the world. Before the Dept of education. When schools were run by the states and local school boards. Get the Federal Government involved and they fuck it all up. Spend more than ever and get one of the worlds worst educational systems. Now they get health care too.

That wasn't the point.

Free or nearly free education for poor children is a handout. It is paid for by someone else.

Why don't conservatives oppose that? Why isn't that detrimental to the poor?

 

[Edgetho]

Yes, poor people never existed before the US Democrat party and poor people were never helped by their govt in the past before these socialist came around in 1970 or 1950 or 1930

In order to help the poor and to calm any unrest, the Roman government provided the poor with grain and oil which supplemented their diets. They also held entertainments for them. These acts were what caused the expression "bread and circuses" in regard to the poor people of Rome.

What did the ancient roman government do to help the poor

The problem is -- Stupid, that there are more poor people now than ever before. Ever.

In fact, the percentage of poor people in the Country has not changed....

Not a bit

Poverty in the 50 years since ?The Other America,? in five charts

Now, look at this chart:

As usual, dimocraps would fuck up a one-car funeral. TRILLIONS spent and NOTHING to show for it.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Roughly, 65 million people in America receive some form of Welfare, whether it be general welfare, food stamps, or unemployment insurance. And despite all of this, the poverty rate rose to 15.1% in 2011.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't it you the other day who admitted you were unemployed?

I suppose you're going to tell us you turned down unemployment insurance?

 

[Edgetho]

Roughly, 65 million people in America receive some form of Welfare, whether it be general welfare, food stamps, or unemployment insurance. And despite all of this, the poverty rate rose to 15.1% in 2011.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't it you the other day who admitted you were unemployed?

I suppose you're going to tell us you turned down unemployment insurance?

As a test, look at what you just typed and tell me what's wrong it....

10...

9....

8...

7....

Fuck it. You're too stupid. You'll never figure it out.

It's the word "Insurance".

Insurance is bought. Insurance is paid for. Insurance is not an entitlement or welfare or a gift.

It is INSURANCE.

moron

 

[NYcarbineer]

If conservatives really believe that giving the poor anything that the poor did not earn themselves, then they should come out for making public education pay-as-you-go where everyone who wants their children to go to school pays the same rate as the next person and those who can't afford it, go without.

I can't make sense of this comment. And you accuse me of not using plain English?

Poor kids receive what amounts to free public education. Paid for by other taxpayers. According to your 'logic' that is the kind of handout to the poor that does more harm than good.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Roughly, 65 million people in America receive some form of Welfare, whether it be general welfare, food stamps, or unemployment insurance. And despite all of this, the poverty rate rose to 15.1% in 2011.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't it you the other day who admitted you were unemployed?

I suppose you're going to tell us you turned down unemployment insurance?

As a test, look at what you just typed and tell me what's wrong it....

10...

9....

8...

7....

Fuck it. You're too stupid. You'll never figure it out.

It's the word "Insurance".

Insurance is bought. Insurance is paid for. Insurance is not an entitlement or welfare or a gift.

It is INSURANCE.

moron

Why are you telling me? The author of this thread calls it Welfare. Do one of your mental patient rants at him.

 

[cutter]

If conservatives really believe that giving the poor anything that the poor did not earn themselves

then they should come out for making public education pay-as-you-go where everyone who wants their children to go to school pays the same rate as the next person,

and those who can't afford it, go without.

Back in the 60s we had the best education in the world. Before the Dept of education. When schools were run by the states and local school boards. Get the Federal Government involved and they fuck it all up. Spend more than ever and get one of the worlds worst educational systems. Now they get health care too.

That wasn't the point.

Free or nearly free education for poor children is a handout. It is paid for by someone else.

Why don't conservatives oppose that? Why isn't that detrimental to the poor?

The point is SMALLER Federal government. Nobody ever suggested not funding education, but let state and local school boards run it. The Federal Government needs to be kept as small as possible to preform the functions allowed by the Constitution. The rest of it is the right and responsibility of the States.

 

[Edgetho]

If conservatives really believe that giving the poor anything that the poor did not earn themselves, then they should come out for making public education pay-as-you-go where everyone who wants their children to go to school pays the same rate as the next person and those who can't afford it, go without.

I can't make sense of this comment. And you accuse me of not using plain English?

Poor kids receive what amounts to free public education. Paid for by other taxpayers. According to your 'logic' that is the kind of handout to the poor that does more harm than good.

The families of poor kids don't pay rent?

The families of poor kids don't work sometimes?

Not only does the 'trickle down' effect work in job creation, it works in taxes.

If you own an Apartment Building, part of the cost of figuring rent is the Property Taxes you have to pay on it. Same if you're renting a house to poor people. Or rich people.

If you own a business, you pay Property Taxes that might otherwise go to your employees.

Now..... Do poor people pay their fair share?

No, they don't. But at least they're paying something.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Yes, poor people never existed before the US Democrat party and poor people were never helped by their govt in the past before these socialist came around in 1970 or 1950 or 1930

In order to help the poor and to calm any unrest, the Roman government provided the poor with grain and oil which supplemented their diets. They also held entertainments for them. These acts were what caused the expression "bread and circuses" in regard to the poor people of Rome.

What did the ancient roman government do to help the poor

The problem is -- Stupid, that there are more poor people now than ever before. Ever.

In fact, the percentage of poor people in the Country has not changed....

Not a bit

Poverty in the 50 years since ?The Other America,? in five charts

Now, look at this chart:

As usual, dimocraps would fuck up a one-car funeral. TRILLIONS spent and NOTHING to show for it.

Like I said, poor people have always been here and always will be. If you're looking for some solution that will get rid of the poor that's your problem. Nothing will ever get rid of the poor. Stop being stupid. Its like buying a bug zapper and complaining that bugs still exist after you spent $50

 

[Edgetho]

Yes, poor people never existed before the US Democrat party and poor people were never helped by their govt in the past before these socialist came around in 1970 or 1950 or 1930



What did the ancient roman government do to help the poor

The problem is -- Stupid, that there are more poor people now than ever before. Ever.

In fact, the percentage of poor people in the Country has not changed....

Not a bit

Poverty in the 50 years since ?The Other America,? in five charts

Now, look at this chart:

As usual, dimocraps would fuck up a one-car funeral. TRILLIONS spent and NOTHING to show for it.

Like I said, poor people have always been here and always will be. If you're looking for some solution that will get rid of the poor that's your problem. Nothing will ever get rid of the poor. Stop being stupid. Its like buying a bug zapper and complaining that bugs still exist after you spent $50

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=DTZT8i5e2Rs]Is the Government Shutdown Bush's Fault? - YouTube[/ame]

 

[TemplarKormac]

Roughly, 65 million people in America receive some form of Welfare, whether it be general welfare, food stamps, or unemployment insurance. And despite all of this, the poverty rate rose to 15.1% in 2011.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't it you the other day who admitted you were unemployed?

I suppose you're going to tell us you turned down unemployment insurance?

Excuse me, if you have no argument, just say so. Don't spew ad hominem. Next reference to my personal life gets negged.

I am not dumb enough to accept money from an already indebted and distended government.