Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What corruption was involved in Biden supposedly getting $3 million?
so far ZERO evidence Biden pressing on Ukraine to fire this corrupt investigator had anything to do with his son's employment.
LMFAO!!!!
Hunter Biden had ZERO qualifications to be on the "board."
The only reason why he was put on the board was to get Joe Biden on board for the US to give Ukraine $1 billion, before KICKBACKS.
Biden wasn't the only one getting the kickbacks, either. Those others are the ones screaming the loudest now for impeachment....
Are you reading this thread? Are you really this ignorant ? I don't think so. Watch the video, and don't insult our intelligence.What corruption was involved in Biden supposedly getting $3 million?
In his investigation, Shokin identified Hunter Biden as the recipient of over $3 Million, in corruption involving Burisma Holdings, a natural gas company (which HB knows noting about, nor does he know anything about Ukraine). His position on the board was strictly to get favoritism from the US government (at US taxpayer expense)Nope, you're lying again. We've already established you failed miserably to prove Hunter Biden benefited from Shokin's ouster.
Quid Pro JOE didn't want this corruption exposed so that's why he went into action using US $$$ hostage while demanding Shokin be fired. Don't believe it ? Watch Quid Pro Joey say it himself in the video.
"But Trump never said the money would be held until Ukraine agreed.... Ukraine did not agree.... and the money was given without any investigation into Biden."No, I am not accusing Biden of doing what Trump did.LOLOLNo he didn't, puppy. That money is US taxpayer money. He has no right to toss it around for his own private interests, and Trump was right to call him out on it. Biden is toast.Wrong as always, gramps. Biden had every right to impose reasonable conditions on that money if they wanted it.
Dumbfuck, he was given authority by the president to handle the situation.
Biden: I said we’re not going to give you the billion dollars.
Poroshenko: You have no authority. You’re not the president.
Biden: Call him.
So you are saying that Obama is clearly guilty of what you are accusing Trump of?
If you really want to claim that Obama is the one who created the Quid Pro Quo.... then that's fine.
Biden was threatening to hold money unless the Ukraine president sacked a corrupt prosecutor who several countries and international bodies wanted out. That served the United States.
Trump held money unless the Ukraine president agreed to investigate Trump's political rival. That served Trump.
But Trump never said the money would be held until Ukraine agreed.... Ukraine did not agree.... and the money was given without any investigation into Biden.
Biden DID say the money would be held until a prosecutor was fired, who happen to be investigating a company his corrupt drug addicted son was being paid $50,000 a month, without any credentials to be a board member of.... the money was in fact withheld.... the Prosecutor was fired, and only then was the money given.
GOOD IDEA! Only exception I might have to it, is that >> is there really any need for investigation for what is plainly visible ? - the Biden quid pro quo's.Donald Trump wants the Ukraine and China to investigate a political opponent. He said it on the White House lawn.
You do not conspire with foreign countries to FIRE your political enemies. No need for investigation. Biden did it in front of the cameras. Nobody ever did accuse him of being smart.You do not conspire with foreign countries to investigate your political enemies. There is a procedure for that. Open up a criminal investigation but there have to be some evidence to open one up.
In his investigation, Shokin identified Hunter Biden as the recipient of over $3 Million, in corruption involving Burisma Holdings, a natural gas company (which HB knows noting about, nor does he know anything about Ukraine). His position on the board was strictly to get favoritism from the US government (at US taxpayer expense)Nope, you're lying again. We've already established you failed miserably to prove Hunter Biden benefited from Shokin's ouster.
Quid Pro JOE didn't want this corruption exposed so that's why he went into action using US $$$ hostage while demanding Shokin be fired. Don't believe it ? Watch Quid Pro Joey say it himself in the video.
What is clear is the Trump quid pro quo.GOOD IDEA! Only exception I might have to it, is that >> is there really any need for investigation for what is plainly visible ? - the Biden quid pro quo's.Donald Trump wants the Ukraine and China to investigate a political opponent. He said it on the White House lawn.
I squashed that silly line a week ago.Ukraine Prosecutor Says No Evidence of Wrongdoing by Bidens
Back in March 2016, Biden threatened to withhold $1 billion in loan guarantees if Ukraine failed to address corruption and remove its Prosecutor General, Viktor Shokin, who soon after left office amid widespread calls for his dismissal. Though Shokin had begun a probe into Burisma, it was dormant when he departed, according to a former prosecutor.
What is clear is the Trump quid pro quo.
You're lying. I've already shown you a photo of bin Laden in Saudi Arabia. And it's been pointed out to you the guy in that photo is about 5" shorter than Osama Bin Laden.Stick to Osman hallucinations.
Since we have no "hallicinations" or ACTUAL PHOTOS of "Osama" in Saudi.... and the Saudi King is a buddy of Epstein.....
LOL!!!!
Here are the KGB photos of Col Tim Osman, before he became .... Osama.....
View attachment 283366
Why can't they show us a single photo of Osama in Saudi???
HE WAS NEVER THERE....
What is clear is the Trump quid pro quo.
He held up the money.
I've already shown you a photo of bin Laden in Saudi Arabia.
And it's been pointed out to you the guy in that photo is about 5" shorter than Osama Bin Laden.
You got it and just like with Hillary waving her Russian connection paperwork around the libs refuse to accept Biden’s video admission of guilt and are scurrying around like demented squirrels try to find a buried Trump Ukraine nugget.What is clear is the Trump quid pro quo.
TRANSLATION
It is NO PROBLEM when Dems steal from the US taxpayer....
It is a BIG PROBLEM when anyone tries to investigate Dems stealing from the US taxpayer....
'Mutual Law Enforcement Assistance Treaties'Donald Trump wants the Ukraine and China to investigate a political opponent. He said it on the White House lawn.
Bla bla bla. Typical leftist methodology. Muddy the waters, and get everything mixed up and confused.The fact is that the international community and Ukrainians wanted Shokin fired. Shokin did no such thing. Hunter Biden was never under investigation and the Burisma case had long been ended.
ALL THAT MATTERS is what Quid Pro Joe said, and what his son has been doing.Dumbfuck, before Shokin was fired, there was an investigation into Burisma Holdings .... from events taking place between 2010-2012. Two years before Biden became a board member....
Ukraine agency says allegations against Burisma cover period before Biden joined
The National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU) said an investigation was ongoing into permits granted by officials at the Ministry of Ecology for the use of natural resources to a string of companies managed by Burisma.
But it said the period under investigation was 2010-2012, and noted that this was before the company hired Hunter Biden.
“Changes to the board of Burisma Limited, which are currently the object of international attention, took place only in May 2014, and therefore are not and never were the subject of (the anti-corruption bureau’s) investigation,” the bureau’s statement said.
