Gen. Flynn case about to blow up in Dimwinger's faces.

This is the very latest on this ...

'Mr. Flynn will ask this Court to dismiss the entire prosecution based on the outrageous and un-American conduct of law enforcement officials and the subsequent failure of the prosecution to disclose this evidence.'

Sydney Powell is such an amazing lady! Bravo!:clap: you go girl!


Powell Drops Bombshell Showing How The FBI Trapped Michael Flynn

too bad he pled guilty.

A coerced guilty plea can be thrown out.

Wow

who knew it was so easy to coerce a confession out of a 3 star general? And then they can get him to flip on his buddies too? All with supposedly made up evidence.

you sure you want to paint that picture?


so wow, ok?

you don't like how the Legal Books have been written through the centuries? no?

lol.....go change them to your liking then....:cuckoo:

legal books are fine

apparently generals are pussies nowadays...they take after your blob
 
This is the very latest on this ...

'Mr. Flynn will ask this Court to dismiss the entire prosecution based on the outrageous and un-American conduct of law enforcement officials and the subsequent failure of the prosecution to disclose this evidence.'

Sydney Powell is such an amazing lady! Bravo!:clap: you go girl!


Powell Drops Bombshell Showing How The FBI Trapped Michael Flynn

too bad he pled guilty.

A coerced guilty plea can be thrown out.

Wow

who knew it was so easy to coerce a confession out of a 3 star general? And then they can get him to flip on his buddies too? All with supposedly made up evidence.

you sure you want to paint that picture?


so wow, ok?

you don't like how the Legal Books have been written through the centuries? no?

lol.....go change them to your liking then....:cuckoo:

legal books are fine

apparently generals are pussies nowadays...they take after your blob

Someone is a pussy because their lawyer looks at the ALTERED evidence and suggests pleaing guilty to avoid years in prison? Pleaing guilty doesn't mean you are admitting you did it, you're admitting that the evidence against you in front of a jury would probably get you found guilty with a much harsher sentence.

But since that guilty plea was possibly based on illegally altered evidence, the plea of guilty is invalid.
 
General Flynn was setup, and charged with a crime he did not commit.
.
New evidence reveals that Flynn’s 302 form was edited by Lisa Page and Peter Strzok of the FBI. The agents who interviewed Flynn were in full belief that he did not lie to them.
.
General Flynn should have all charges dropped against him, and be repaid the MILLIONS he had to spend defending himself.
you don’t really expect people to believe that load of crap do you?
i do
wow, that’s amazing. How can you logically make sense of it? Aside from the partisan BS. How do you think all that happens and Flynn doesn’t just go public or call his buddy Trump and blow up the feds for indicting an innocent man?
The narrative just doesn’t make sense if you really dig into it.
 
General Flynn was setup, and charged with a crime he did not commit.
.
New evidence reveals that Flynn’s 302 form was edited by Lisa Page and Peter Strzok of the FBI. The agents who interviewed Flynn were in full belief that he did not lie to them.
.
General Flynn should have all charges dropped against him, and be repaid the MILLIONS he had to spend defending himself.
you don’t really expect people to believe that load of crap do you?

People will believe anything. Just look at the whole Mueller investigation.
What about it?
 
General Flynn was setup, and charged with a crime he did not commit.
.
New evidence reveals that Flynn’s 302 form was edited by Lisa Page and Peter Strzok of the FBI. The agents who interviewed Flynn were in full belief that he did not lie to them.
.
General Flynn should have all charges dropped against him, and be repaid the MILLIONS he had to spend defending himself.
you don’t really expect people to believe that load of crap do you?

People will believe anything. Just look at the whole Mueller investigation.
What about it?

It was based on bullshit evidence and morons believed it too. With the likes of Peter and Lisa admitting they hated Trump and they were the center of that investigation and people actually took it seriously, yea people will believe anything.
 
This is so out of hand it is in another galaxy.

A multifaceted “criminal conspiracy” to destroy former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn was launched by persons across the national security state apparatus to prevent audits of intelligence agencies’ operations, said Lee Smith, author of The Plot Against the President: The True Story of How Congressman Devin Nunes Uncovered the Biggest Political Scandal in U.S. History, in a Friday interview on SiriusXM’s Breitbart News Tonight with host Rebecca Mansour and special guest host Rick Manning.
“General Flynn’s lawyer, Sydney Powell, has done a fantastic job of unearthing a whole bunch of new information which clarifies what we’ve known — what we’ve suspected — for quite a long time, that large parts of the intelligence community targeted General Flynn,” Smith stated.

Smith added, “Sydney Powell has brought forth a whole bunch of important information … about how they tinkered with the FBI’s interviews. They also ambushed General Flynn in the White House for an interview, and we know how that went down. It was James Comey who asked his deputy director Andy McCabe to send agents down there to go after General Flynn.”
Lee Smith: Deep State Destroyed Flynn to Stop Audit of Its Operations

Yes. It is. You believe it. Say hi to Alf and Mork for us. You total and complete dupe.


What is it about the corruption that you think people have wrong?

All of it. Nobody in the DOJ or the intelligence tried to stop Trump from being elected. Asshole.
 
This is the very latest on this ...

'Mr. Flynn will ask this Court to dismiss the entire prosecution based on the outrageous and un-American conduct of law enforcement officials and the subsequent failure of the prosecution to disclose this evidence.'

Sydney Powell is such an amazing lady! Bravo!:clap: you go girl!


Powell Drops Bombshell Showing How The FBI Trapped Michael Flynn
I dunno why Trump hasn't already pardoned him.


wait until all the legal things are over and done with.
 
too bad he pled guilty.

A coerced guilty plea can be thrown out.

Wow

who knew it was so easy to coerce a confession out of a 3 star general? And then they can get him to flip on his buddies too? All with supposedly made up evidence.

you sure you want to paint that picture?


so wow, ok?

you don't like how the Legal Books have been written through the centuries? no?

lol.....go change them to your liking then....:cuckoo:

legal books are fine

apparently generals are pussies nowadays...they take after your blob

Someone is a pussy because their lawyer looks at the ALTERED evidence and suggests pleaing guilty to avoid years in prison? Pleaing guilty doesn't mean you are admitting you did it, you're admitting that the evidence against you in front of a jury would probably get you found guilty with a much harsher sentence.

But since that guilty plea was possibly based on illegally altered evidence, the plea of guilty is invalid.
Do you recall the statement he made in his own words before he confessed to his crimes?
 
Barr and Durham are on it.


Light a few candles..........THAT should help your cause.......LOL
Joseph Mifsud, British Intel Asset, Not Russia's Boy

joseph-mifsud.jpg

Joseph Mifsud, the Maltese Diplomat who reportedly told George Papadopoulos that Russia had Hillary's emails, was a British intelligence asset. But the Brits did not keep Mifsud for themselves. They offered him to the CIA and the FBI, and those two US agencies, in a coordinated effort, relied on Mifsud to entrap Papadopoulos and to manufacture a Russian collusion case against the Trump Campaign.

Mifsud's job was simple - dangle the possibility of getting Hillary's emails from the Russians, offer up meetings with Russian Government officials and introduce Papadopoulos to another Western intelligence operative who pretended to be the niece of Vladimir Putin (Putin does not have a niece). These communications were recorded and then used against Papadopoulos.

The FBI falsely claims that they learned of the Papadopoulos "meeting" with Mifsud two months after it happened from an Australian diplomat, Alexander Downer, who also was tied closely to British intelligence and the Clintons. But this story does not hold water. Take a look at the criminal complaint filed against Papadopoulos (see here).

The complaint recounts meetings, emails and conversations that George Papadopoulos had with Professor Mifsud and people Mifsud introduced to Papadopoulos.Where the hell did the FBI get that information? Remember, they charged George with lying to the FBI because of discrepancies between what he told Agents and what Agents claimed was actually said and written.

The meaning of this leaves only two possibilities - the FBI secured a FISA warrant against Papadopoulos sometime in March or April of 2016 or the Brits and American intelligence intercepted the communications between Papadopoulos and the Mifsud crew.

We already know that there is a recording - an exculpatory recording - of Papadopoulos rebuffing the offer to collaborate with the Russians. There was no legal reason to get a FISA warrant against Papadopoulos. And anything collected by British intelligence and passed to the CIA or NSA could not be used as evidence. There is much more to this story to unravel.

What should shock all civil libertarians and Americans of good will is that the public has been bamboozled into believing that Joseph Mifsud was a Russian intelligence operative. But there is no evidence whatsoever for that claim. Please look at the Mueller Report (I have copied key sections and inserted below, at the end of this article). Mueller only claims that, "Joseph Mifsud, a London-based professor who had connections to Russia and traveled to Moscow in April 2016." If that is the standard, then Bill Clinton is a Russian intelligence asset--Clinton has connections to Russia (he got paid a lot of money by the Russians) and he traveled to Moscow.

If you want to get the full picture of Mifsud's ties to British intelligence, the CIA and the FBI, I encourage you to read, The Death of Russiagate?, Mueller team tied to Mifsud network, a tangled web. This article provides actual evidence about the intelligence pedigree of Joseph Mifsud. Robert Mueller, by contrast, provides not one single piece of actual evidence. Mueller and his team of clown lawyers relied on innuendo and guilt by association.

If this had been a genuine counter-intelligence investigation, then the FBI should have asked one fundamental question - "Who is Joseph Mifsud working for?" They did not need to ask The FBI knew the answer. Joseph Mifsud was working for the CIA and the FBI with the permission of the British MI-6.

I hope the full dimensions of this hoax will be exposed. George Papadopoulos was nothing more than a naive, eager patsy. A young guy who wanted to be important to the Trump campaign got played.

Here are salient sections of the Mueller Report. Read them for yourself and you will see that Mifsud was never fingered as a Russian intelligence asset. You were just asked to believe this nonsense. Sadly, many seemingly smart people have bought into this lie.
 
A coerced guilty plea can be thrown out.

Wow

who knew it was so easy to coerce a confession out of a 3 star general? And then they can get him to flip on his buddies too? All with supposedly made up evidence.

you sure you want to paint that picture?


so wow, ok?

you don't like how the Legal Books have been written through the centuries? no?

lol.....go change them to your liking then....:cuckoo:

legal books are fine

apparently generals are pussies nowadays...they take after your blob

Someone is a pussy because their lawyer looks at the ALTERED evidence and suggests pleaing guilty to avoid years in prison? Pleaing guilty doesn't mean you are admitting you did it, you're admitting that the evidence against you in front of a jury would probably get you found guilty with a much harsher sentence.

But since that guilty plea was possibly based on illegally altered evidence, the plea of guilty is invalid.
Do you recall the statement he made in his own words before he confessed to his crimes?

Doesn't matter. Murderers who have pled guilty to murder and said I did it have later been found to have been lying.

Statements, pleas its all GARBAGE if based on altered evidence. THAT IS ILLEGAL TO DO AND TAINTS THE ENTIRE LEGAL PROCESS. The ENTIRE CASE is based on evidence presented either to a jury in a jury trial or to the defendants lawyer via discovery. ALL ENSUING DECISIONS ARE BASED ON THIS EVIDENCE. So if this evidence is found to have been falsified then EVERYTHING AFTER THAT POINT IS NO LONGER VALID. No plea can be valid when the crime of tampering with the evidence has been found.

Tampering With Evidence

A guilty plea does not mean that if evidence is found to be altered in the case the defendant is still fucked.
 
Last edited:
Wow

who knew it was so easy to coerce a confession out of a 3 star general? And then they can get him to flip on his buddies too? All with supposedly made up evidence.

you sure you want to paint that picture?


so wow, ok?

you don't like how the Legal Books have been written through the centuries? no?

lol.....go change them to your liking then....:cuckoo:

legal books are fine

apparently generals are pussies nowadays...they take after your blob

Someone is a pussy because their lawyer looks at the ALTERED evidence and suggests pleaing guilty to avoid years in prison? Pleaing guilty doesn't mean you are admitting you did it, you're admitting that the evidence against you in front of a jury would probably get you found guilty with a much harsher sentence.

But since that guilty plea was possibly based on illegally altered evidence, the plea of guilty is invalid.
Do you recall the statement he made in his own words before he confessed to his crimes?

Doesn't matter. Murderers who have pled guilty to murder and said I did it have later been found to have been lying.

Statements, pleas its all GARBAGE if based on altered evidence. THAT IS ILLEGAL TO DO AND TAINTS THE ENTIRE LEGAL PROCESS. The ENTIRE CASE is based on evidence presented either to a jury in a jury trial or to the defendants lawyer via discovery. ALL ENSUING DECISIONS ARE BASED ON THIS EVIDENCE. So if this evidence is found to have been falsified then EVERYTHING AFTER THAT POINT IS NO LONGER VALID. No plea can be valid when the crime of tampering with the evidence has been found.

Tampering With Evidence

A guilty plea does not mean that if evidence is found to be altered in the case the defendant is still fucked.

comparing your blob’s boy to a murderer is not appropriate.

confessing to a crime is pretty much proof you did it.

or is this your new standard? If you support someone’s politics you dismiss the confession that was made in court?
 
Flynn will walk...I've been saying this for two and a half years...and when he is cleared I will send him thousands of dollars to sue the pants off of the swamp....

You don't have thousands of dollars unless you count what is in that Monopoly game in the closet.
 

Forum List

Back
Top