General Question for everyone!

You sound like a high school student.

Your repeating the same set of words over and over again does not make you appear as intelligent as you are hoping they might.
Sure, whatever you say.

You disagreeing with the OP (which is general in nature), shows exactly who you are and intelligence is not even a factor of the OP. It is about morals, ethics, principles and humanity, which evidently dumb people have more of than you do.

You are a perfect example of an intelligent person being a POS.
 
and every single one of those countries are considered to be wrong by others, on a worldwide basis. From a moral, ethical, principled, and humane perspective they are wrong.

Human rights do exist for everyone (as a basic) even though some countries may see it differently. Keep in mind that most of these differences have to do with ignorance that comes from the past. It does not make it right, only among the ignorant.
They are not wrong for them. These cultures belong among their own people. And stay that way.
 
They are not wrong for them. These cultures belong among their own people. And stay that way.
Sure, raping their own women causes no damage, does it? Killing others (like Jews) does not bring repercussions that will mean they own will die, right?

They want to die?

Israel's counterattack into Gaza killed more than 41,000 over subsequent months.
 
Sure, raping their own women causes no damage, does it? Killing others (like Jews) does not bring repercussions that will mean they own will die, right?

They want to die?
They believe they are right and shouldn't recieve any punishment at all.
 
Sure, whatever you say.

You disagreeing with the OP (which is general in nature), shows exactly who you are and intelligence is not even a factor of the OP. It is about morals, ethics, principles and humanity, which evidently dumb people have more of than you do.

You are a perfect example of an intelligent person being a POS.
There are those 4 words again!
 
They believe they are right and shouldn't recieve any punishment at all.
What you are referring to is called normative ethics. The kid doesn't understand the concept, as he is indulging in the same process.

What he is missing is that morality can be argued logically based upon the harm principle.
 
I totally disagree with you given that YOU are judging others based on YOUR beliefs.

How does a man marrying another man affect you personally, to the point that you have a RIGHT to criticize it?

Are you a man that hates others or a man that "minds your own business?

Oh, I need a “right” to criticize now? How fascist of you.

If a fetus is not similarly situated to a newborn, ain’t no way to men in a marriage are similarly situated to a male/female couple.
 
Oh, I need a “right” to criticize now? How fascist of you.

If a fetus is not similarly situated to a newborn, ain’t no way to men in a marriage are similarly situated to a male/female couple.
So you don't mind others telling you what you should do? When they do, do you welcome them or tell them "mind your own business"?
 
Throughout history, dissension between people has always existed and will always exist. That is life. We all have had different lives, different cultures, different opinions and different objective. Nonetheless, when we live with others (not alone), we need to find ways to "get along" and work together (to a certain extent) so that we can go forward in life. If we always fight with each other, there is no advancement for either of us of if there is advancement, it is at the cost of the other.

Do you agree with that simple statement?

There are some things that I call "BASICS" that are needed/required with everything and everyone in order to be able to find some common ground, get along with each other and go forward (instead of going back).

Those basics are called morals, ethics, principles and humanity. If you have all 4 of them, you are a fine person that will always try to do what is right, but even if you only have one, it does prevent you from doing much damage.

Lying, insulting, debasing, hating, fighting, not willing to compromise, and closing ones eyes and ears to what the other has to say is not going to ever solve anything.

Do you agree?

As such, do you think that the intelligent thing to do is talk civilly with each other and be open to communication?

I do believe that someone that does all the negatives above needs to be put aside and not paid attention to, no matter what he/she is saying. If you can't have morals, ethics, principles or humanity, what good can come out of such a relationship. As long as we are to live together in one nation, we all need to get something out of it (as well as give something up).

Do you agree?

I do know it is difficult but we all need to keep in mind that humanity is by nature flawed and that no one is perfect. That means that we will all make mistakes and errors in judgement that will cause problems and pain. Nonetheless, isn't that what we all agree to when we get married to someone? For good or bad, knowing for sure that we will get both............For Sure!

Do you agree with me on the "general basics of this"?
Ok, now spring the trap and tell that MAGAs dont qualify
 
What you are suggesting is a change in human nature. This will only happen supernaturally through God's Holy Spirit indwelling. Sadly, this won't happen until mankind has nearly destroyed itself and Christ returns to put things right.

"Unless those days be shortened no flesh will remain alive, but for the elects' sake those days will be shortened."
The Left completely ignores human nature, which is why they have no problem with collectivism, that is, a highly centralized state that dictates to the entire world so they can impose all their policies on every man, woman, and child who lives on the planet.

Only then can they do such things as "save the planet from climate change" and "end world hunger"

They then take the history of mankind, which has essentially mankind enslaving most people who have ever walked the earth and/or oppressed people and forced others to fight wars for them and taken the pages from their history book to wipe their arse with and flush it down the commode cuz we can trust this next group of collectivists to do it right this time.

Yay
 
You mean morals, ethics, principles and humanity?

Why do you have a problem with morals ethics, principles or humanity. You have no morals, ethics, principles or humanity?
I discussed Kohlberg's stages of moral development and the concept of normative ethics.

Both went far over your head, child.
 
MAGA's are not willing to compromise on what is best for ALL Americans. They just want what is best for them, and screw everyone else.
MAGA tried to protest to make their views known and you shot an unarmed woman in the process and then claimed they tried to take over the government.

And people believe you fascists.
 
MAGA's are not willing to compromise on what is best for ALL Americans. They just want what is best for them, and screw everyone else.
Who decides what is best for everyone?

You?

Kamala Harris?

Some limey from the UK?
 

Forum List

Back
Top