George Zimmerman banned from Tinder dating app

[progressive hunter]

so all you have is spelling and grammar...

fuck you!!!

No worries, stay stupid. No skin off my back.

so youre one of those dumb MFers that cant have a verbal conversation because you cant tell if they are using proper spelling and grammar,,,

No, dumbfuck, I understood what you wrote despite your ignorance. I merely highlighted the stark reality that you look even dumber than the person you called a "dumbass" by misspelling a simple 5 letter word (which you screwed up again in your last post).

Oh well, I tried to help you.

I think its more likely you knew you were losing the debate and did what dumb MFers like you always do and resorted to personal attacks

LOL

Oh? What does your feeble mind tell you I was losing?

And if resorting to personal attacks is a sign of losing an argument, is this an admission from you that you lost this argument since you resorted to a personal attack when you called another poster a "dumbass?"

thats whats called an observation based on content

 

[progressive hunter]

Trayvon went out of his way to confront George. Then, Trayvon attacked him.

LOL

You saying that does not actually constitute proof. Just so ya know.

ALL of the evidence and testimony supports my statement.

What happened was unfortunate, but it ultimately came down to Trayvon making the choice to attack George. He could and should have made another choice. George was justified to shoot Trayvon in order to stop the attack. God bless Trayvon.

Prove it. Repeating yourself and citing yourself doesn't actually prove it.

but the fact Z called 911 and TM didnt does prove it

No, that proves no such thing.

yes it does,,,

 

[Faun]

I don't waste time proving things I don't assert.

And the fact that you're even asking me to prove that means you were full of shit when you asserted Trayvon started it.

well Z called 911 because he wasnt there to start a fight,,,so by that logic if TM didnt start it he would have called 911 because he felt threatened,,,

So? Trayvon was walking back to his residence with candy to watch an NBA game with a friend. He wasn't there to start a fight either.

Regardless, you already proved you were full of shit when you claimed Trayvon started the physical altercation.

tha candy and drink were to get high not watch TV

and the fact that Z called 911 proves he wasnt there to fight and TM not calling but confronting Z proves he was

Really, how many folks jump out of their truck and chase someone in pitch black darkness if they aren't there for an altercation.

So? Trayvon was walking back to his residence with candy to watch an NBA game with a friend. He wasn't there to start a fight either.

Regardless, you already proved you were full of shit when you claimed Trayvon started the physical altercation.

Trayvon went out of his way to confront George. Then, Trayvon attacked him.

LOL

You saying that does not actually constitute proof. Just so ya know.

ALL of the evidence and testimony supports my statement.

What happened was unfortunate, but it ultimately came down to Trayvon making the choice to attack George. He could and should have made another choice. George was justified to shoot Trayvon in order to stop the attack. God bless Trayvon.

Prove it. Repeating yourself and citing yourself doesn't actually prove it.

The local DA didn't prosecute and then a jury acquitted George. I sense that you're unfamiliar with the nuances of the case. The only reason it went to trial was because of guys like Al Sharpton.

Anyway, it's ok with me if you believe that George should have been found guilty. But why do you believe that George was guilty?

Great, either you can quote me saying Zimmerman should have been found guilty or you're merely ignorant.

Which is it?

Spoiler

see post #1245

 

[Superbadbrutha]

Don't just say it, prove it...

already did,,,you just keep ignoring it,,,

No actually prove it, don't just keep giving us the right wing, racist lie about the kid.

Try and keep up satchmo...he posted the synonyms of thug....which fits trayvon to a T.

Next....hurry up I aint got all day chumps.

Your punk ass hero Zimmerman is the wanna be thug, but since he isn't black that doesn't fit in right wing, racist Trump World.

trump wasnt POTUS when this happened dumbass,,,your suffering from TDS

Who claimed he was shit for brains, the fucking mindset is the same. You don't wear sheets anymore, but you still have the mindset of th he sheet wearers.

 

[Faun]

No worries, stay stupid. No skin off my back.

so youre one of those dumb MFers that cant have a verbal conversation because you cant tell if they are using proper spelling and grammar,,,

No, dumbfuck, I understood what you wrote despite your ignorance. I merely highlighted the stark reality that you look even dumber than the person you called a "dumbass" by misspelling a simple 5 letter word (which you screwed up again in your last post).

Oh well, I tried to help you.

I think its more likely you knew you were losing the debate and did what dumb MFers like you always do and resorted to personal attacks

LOL

Oh? What does your feeble mind tell you I was losing?

And if resorting to personal attacks is a sign of losing an argument, is this an admission from you that you lost this argument since you resorted to a personal attack when you called another poster a "dumbass?"

thats whats called an observation based on content

No, that's actually called jumping to conclusions. But thanks for trying anyway. Here's your participation trophy...

 

[progressive hunter]

so youre one of those dumb MFers that cant have a verbal conversation because you cant tell if they are using proper spelling and grammar,,,

No, dumbfuck, I understood what you wrote despite your ignorance. I merely highlighted the stark reality that you look even dumber than the person you called a "dumbass" by misspelling a simple 5 letter word (which you screwed up again in your last post).

Oh well, I tried to help you.

I think its more likely you knew you were losing the debate and did what dumb MFers like you always do and resorted to personal attacks

LOL

Oh? What does your feeble mind tell you I was losing?

And if resorting to personal attacks is a sign of losing an argument, is this an admission from you that you lost this argument since you resorted to a personal attack when you called another poster a "dumbass?"

thats whats called an observation based on content

No, that's actually called jumping to conclusions. But thanks for trying anyway. Here's your participation trophy...

the only one jumping to conclusions is you by ignoring all the evidence that proves you wrong,,,

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

This is the result of "pounding".....

Okay.

Let's all do that to you. Then let's see if you call in a pounding.

You have never been in a single fight before have you? You're a fairy little sissy aren't you? You don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

I offered you the chance to try .... you cowered.

You did?

.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

A real man doesn't need to shoot an unarmed, 160lb teenager in a fist fight.

A real man lets his opponent retreat when the threat is subdued. If not, said "man" gets shot.

No fight is ever "over" until someone is dead, incapacitated, or stops the violence.

It's not a competition where points are awarded.

There is NEVER a winner or loser. Only survivors.


.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Your punk ass hero Zimmerman is the wanna be thug, but since he isn't black that doesn't fit in right wing, racist Trump World.

Zimmerman may be a thug. I will not argue that point. He may technically be "white" if that's what you want.

Make no mistake. The MSM made sure to identify him as "white" to push a narrative. He is about as white as Obama is black.

.

 

[Faun]

No, dumbfuck, I understood what you wrote despite your ignorance. I merely highlighted the stark reality that you look even dumber than the person you called a "dumbass" by misspelling a simple 5 letter word (which you screwed up again in your last post).

Oh well, I tried to help you.

I think its more likely you knew you were losing the debate and did what dumb MFers like you always do and resorted to personal attacks

LOL

Oh? What does your feeble mind tell you I was losing?

And if resorting to personal attacks is a sign of losing an argument, is this an admission from you that you lost this argument since you resorted to a personal attack when you called another poster a "dumbass?"

thats whats called an observation based on content

No, that's actually called jumping to conclusions. But thanks for trying anyway. Here's your participation trophy...

the only one jumping to conclusions is you by ignoring all the evidence that proves you wrong,,,

LOL

Jumping to conclusions is not evidence. It's you being led by your overactive imagination. Face reality for once in your miserable existence -- if you actually had any proof that Trayvon started the physical altercation, you would have posted it rather than challenge me to prove he didn't.

 

[Faun]

This is the result of "pounding".....

Okay.

Let's all do that to you. Then let's see if you call in a pounding.

You have never been in a single fight before have you? You're a fairy little sissy aren't you? You don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

I offered you the chance to try .... you cowered.

You did?

.

Sure did.

 

[progressive hunter]

I think its more likely you knew you were losing the debate and did what dumb MFers like you always do and resorted to personal attacks

LOL

Oh? What does your feeble mind tell you I was losing?

And if resorting to personal attacks is a sign of losing an argument, is this an admission from you that you lost this argument since you resorted to a personal attack when you called another poster a "dumbass?"

thats whats called an observation based on content

No, that's actually called jumping to conclusions. But thanks for trying anyway. Here's your participation trophy...

the only one jumping to conclusions is you by ignoring all the evidence that proves you wrong,,,

LOL

Jumping to conclusions is not evidence. It's you being led by your overactive imagination. Face reality for once in your miserable existence -- if you actually had any proof that Trayvon started the physical altercation, you would have posted it rather than challenge me to prove he didn't.

as would you,,,

 

[Faun]

LOL

Oh? What does your feeble mind tell you I was losing?

And if resorting to personal attacks is a sign of losing an argument, is this an admission from you that you lost this argument since you resorted to a personal attack when you called another poster a "dumbass?"

thats whats called an observation based on content

No, that's actually called jumping to conclusions. But thanks for trying anyway. Here's your participation trophy...

the only one jumping to conclusions is you by ignoring all the evidence that proves you wrong,,,

LOL

Jumping to conclusions is not evidence. It's you being led by your overactive imagination. Face reality for once in your miserable existence -- if you actually had any proof that Trayvon started the physical altercation, you would have posted it rather than challenge me to prove he didn't.

as would you,,,

Wrong again, dumbfuck. Unless of course, you can show where I stated Zimmerman started the physical confrontation-- which we both know you can't.

 

[progressive hunter]

thats whats called an observation based on content

No, that's actually called jumping to conclusions. But thanks for trying anyway. Here's your participation trophy...

the only one jumping to conclusions is you by ignoring all the evidence that proves you wrong,,,

LOL

Jumping to conclusions is not evidence. It's you being led by your overactive imagination. Face reality for once in your miserable existence -- if you actually had any proof that Trayvon started the physical altercation, you would have posted it rather than challenge me to prove he didn't.

as would you,,,

Wrong again, dumbfuck. Unless of course, you can show where I stated Zimmerman started the physical confrontation-- which we both know you can't.

then why are you still running your mouth???? sorry ,,keyboard,,,

 

[Faun]

No, that's actually called jumping to conclusions. But thanks for trying anyway. Here's your participation trophy...

the only one jumping to conclusions is you by ignoring all the evidence that proves you wrong,,,

LOL

Jumping to conclusions is not evidence. It's you being led by your overactive imagination. Face reality for once in your miserable existence -- if you actually had any proof that Trayvon started the physical altercation, you would have posted it rather than challenge me to prove he didn't.

as would you,,,

Wrong again, dumbfuck. Unless of course, you can show where I stated Zimmerman started the physical confrontation-- which we both know you can't.

then why are you still running your mouth???? sorry ,,keyboard,,,

Because you persist in posting stupid shit.

 

[progressive hunter]

the only one jumping to conclusions is you by ignoring all the evidence that proves you wrong,,,

LOL

Jumping to conclusions is not evidence. It's you being led by your overactive imagination. Face reality for once in your miserable existence -- if you actually had any proof that Trayvon started the physical altercation, you would have posted it rather than challenge me to prove he didn't.

as would you,,,

Wrong again, dumbfuck. Unless of course, you can show where I stated Zimmerman started the physical confrontation-- which we both know you can't.

then why are you still running your mouth???? sorry ,,keyboard,,,

Because you persist in posting stupid shit.

so youre just another troll,,,,

we already knew that,,,

 

[Faun]

LOL

Jumping to conclusions is not evidence. It's you being led by your overactive imagination. Face reality for once in your miserable existence -- if you actually had any proof that Trayvon started the physical altercation, you would have posted it rather than challenge me to prove he didn't.

as would you,,,

Wrong again, dumbfuck. Unless of course, you can show where I stated Zimmerman started the physical confrontation-- which we both know you can't.

then why are you still running your mouth???? sorry ,,keyboard,,,

Because you persist in posting stupid shit.

so youre just another troll,,,,

we already knew that,,,

LOL

Trying to get you to prove your claims means I'm a troll? Looks like you don't know what a troll is.

 

[progressive hunter]

as would you,,,

Wrong again, dumbfuck. Unless of course, you can show where I stated Zimmerman started the physical confrontation-- which we both know you can't.

then why are you still running your mouth???? sorry ,,keyboard,,,

Because you persist in posting stupid shit.

so youre just another troll,,,,

we already knew that,,,

LOL

Trying to get you to prove your claims means I'm a troll? Looks like you don't know what a troll is.

my opinion is based on the fact Z was found not guilty,

 

[Faun]

Wrong again, dumbfuck. Unless of course, you can show where I stated Zimmerman started the physical confrontation-- which we both know you can't.

then why are you still running your mouth???? sorry ,,keyboard,,,

Because you persist in posting stupid shit.

so youre just another troll,,,,

we already knew that,,,

LOL

Trying to get you to prove your claims means I'm a troll? Looks like you don't know what a troll is.

my opinion is based on the fact Z was found not guilty,

That only proves Zimmerman had a reasonable fear of death or great bodily injury at the moment he pulled the trigger. It offers zero insight as to who initiated the physical confrontation.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Sure did.

You did?

So I have a time, place, etc?

.