http://wpjljr.com/wp-content/upload...-zimmerman-trial-0704-horizontal-gallery1.jpg
Sorry girls, the jacket was presented without the presence of the jury.
And was never placed in evidence.
B37 says she never saw it.
BTW, can the tea cops spot grass stains? Tears from concrete?
Not easy eh kids?
Idiot. Did you not see the picture? Guess where that was? In front of the jury.
Drivebymedia doesn't produce any sources for what he's saying, I've asked him to produce some source to what he is saying and he just ignores the requests. I think the guy is just a lying ass troll. There WAS blood found on Z's jacket, so it would have been entered as evidence.
Lastly, the jury not only has to figure out why the crime scene evidence collectors in this case neglected to take as many swabs of the gun, holster and victim's fingernails (as they should have), they've got to try an make sense of the A-through-Z stain analysis conducted on each of four pieces of clothing: George Zimmerman's jacket and his shirt, as well as Trayvon Martin's hoodie and his sweatshirt.
Zimmerman trial jury has to be confused about DNA evidence--all attorneys were - Atlanta Top News | Examiner.com
This is why I'm calling drivebymedia a liar
Last edited: