Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, that isn't what happened under Obama.Another crystal ball
That's what happened under Obama. Underperforming market and economy equaled lower standard of living, particularly for poor and middle-class Americans. You didn't care, of course. All that matters for you is that the party is in power.
No, that isn't what happened under Obama.Another crystal ball
That's what happened under Obama. Underperforming market and economy equaled lower standard of living, particularly for poor and middle-class Americans. You didn't care, of course. All that matters for you is that the party is in power.
A 10% correction would be great. 12% to 15% maybe even better. In the long run, that is nothing.Um that isn't what the markets are saying or the analysis---expect a 10% drop minimum.No.
Markets will be fine.
The market climbed 149% under Obama over 8 years. Your post is false.Another crystal ball
That's what happened under Obama. Underperforming market and economy equaled lower standard of living, particularly for poor and middle-class Americans. You didn't care, of course. All that matters for you is that the party is in power.
The market climbed 149% under Obama over 8 years. Your post is false.
Direct experience. Trump kept most of his campaign promises. You just didn’t like his platformYou acknowledged that you’re not a finance expert and don’t have neither the education nor the experience but you question someone who does? OKThe topic is some schmuck predicting that the market will lose 6-10% if Democrats are elected.Not sure what that has to do with the topic
I don’t take his prediction seriously and I don’t take the pearl clutching hyperbole that this correction, if it ever did happen, would crush people.
Just more scare tactics. Seen it a million times.
But is your opinion based on your education and experience, or political desires?
Someone like Romney might be better for business than someone like Elizabeth Warren, but between Biden and Trump it is not that clear. For example, Obama was elected on being anti war, but then doubled down on wars all over the Mideast. The Clintons trashed Glass-Steagall, so were for right wing bankers, not unions or poor people. And likely Biden will be like a cross of Obama and Hillary? About the only thing in Trump's favor is he did not start any wars. So hard to say?
The market climbed 149% under Obama over 8 years. Your post is false.
The market underperformed and so did the economy. Your devotion to the party is commendable.
The market climbed 149% under Obama over 8 years. Your post is false.
The market underperformed and so did the economy. Your devotion to the party is commendable.
The market climbed 149% under Obama over 8 years. Your post is false.
The market underperformed and so did the economy. Your devotion to the party is commendable.
Totally wrong. The D Party is the party of the ultra rich. They will do everything they can to support Wall Street and continue the crony capitalist policies both political crime families love.While Trump due to his polarizing nature seemingly lost the election to a corpse, the Senate remaining red and the House likely going red in 2020 has kept the markets in check. However, if Georgia goes fully blue then the country will go full Leftist/Socialist and markets will crumble.
Georgia runoff results could trigger a 10% stock market selloff: Strategist
A Democratic win of the two contested Senate seats could trigger a selloff in the markets, according to Oppenheimer strategist John Stoltzfus.www.yahoo.com
In the end money talks. Let's see what happens.
I am curious what others think. Do you want one party rule --- or do you prefer as the markets do, a two party checks and balances rule?
You can do the math, can't you?
This is nothing to be proud of. Ears did it with the help of the Fed keeping interest rates at zero and adding on massive debt, while starting five new wars. All this did was enrich the rich and add trillions to the national debt, while doing nothing to help the working class.The market climbed 149% under Obama over 8 years. Your post is false.
The market underperformed and so did the economy. Your devotion to the party is commendable.
The statistics prove I am correct. The DJIA rose 149%.
When he took office: 7,949.09
When he left office: 19,732.40
You can do the math, can't you?
What was the percentage gain under the blob? Do enlighten us please.You can do the math, can't you?
Why can't you comprehend the word "underperform"?
What was the percentage gain under the blob? Do enlighten us please.You can do the math, can't you?
Why can't you comprehend the word "underperform"?
What was the percentage gain under the blob? Do enlighten us please.You can do the math, can't you?
Why can't you comprehend the word "underperform"?
You're dumb and disingenuous. Carry on.
If that were true you would think the market would react negatively to the Biden win.So you are OK with retirement accounts tanking as House and Senate push the corpse left?While Trump due to his polarizing nature seemingly lost the election to a corpse, the Senate remaining red and the House likely going red in 2020 has kept the markets in check. However, if Georgia goes fully blue then the country will go full Leftist/Socialist and markets will crumble.
Georgia runoff results could trigger a 10% stock market selloff: Strategist
A Democratic win of the two contested Senate seats could trigger a selloff in the markets, according to Oppenheimer strategist John Stoltzfus.
In the end money talks. Let's see what happens.
I am curious what others think. Do you want one party rule --- or do you prefer as the markets do, a two party checks and balances rule?
There is a lot to be said for one party rule on the federal level. Sound persons of good character with the Congress behind them can do wonderous things. Medicare Part D for one thing under Bush in 2003. They should have raised taxes to pay for it. One party rule can do terrible things too of course but sound persons of good character can do wonderous things. The ACA is another example.
We didn't have that with your blob. We had a man-child whose character was dead if he ever hand any and a Senate that makes up rules as it goes along and then violates them...see ACB and nominee Garland.
So I have no problem with the Senate turning blue.
WAS. Not is. The old D party is long dead.Totally wrong. The D Party is the party of the ultra rich. They will do everything they can to support Wall Street and continue the crony capitalist policies both political crime families love.While Trump due to his polarizing nature seemingly lost the election to a corpse, the Senate remaining red and the House likely going red in 2020 has kept the markets in check. However, if Georgia goes fully blue then the country will go full Leftist/Socialist and markets will crumble.
Georgia runoff results could trigger a 10% stock market selloff: Strategist
A Democratic win of the two contested Senate seats could trigger a selloff in the markets, according to Oppenheimer strategist John Stoltzfus.
In the end money talks. Let's see what happens.
I am curious what others think. Do you want one party rule --- or do you prefer as the markets do, a two party checks and balances rule?
Do you not know how to read? The market was neutral as the assumption is the Republicans retain control of the Senate and block many of the D whacky policies. SMH....If that were true you would think the market would react negatively to the Biden win.So you are OK with retirement accounts tanking as House and Senate push the corpse left?While Trump due to his polarizing nature seemingly lost the election to a corpse, the Senate remaining red and the House likely going red in 2020 has kept the markets in check. However, if Georgia goes fully blue then the country will go full Leftist/Socialist and markets will crumble.
Georgia runoff results could trigger a 10% stock market selloff: Strategist
A Democratic win of the two contested Senate seats could trigger a selloff in the markets, according to Oppenheimer strategist John Stoltzfus.
In the end money talks. Let's see what happens.
I am curious what others think. Do you want one party rule --- or do you prefer as the markets do, a two party checks and balances rule?
There is a lot to be said for one party rule on the federal level. Sound persons of good character with the Congress behind them can do wonderous things. Medicare Part D for one thing under Bush in 2003. They should have raised taxes to pay for it. One party rule can do terrible things too of course but sound persons of good character can do wonderous things. The ACA is another example.
We didn't have that with your blob. We had a man-child whose character was dead if he ever hand any and a Senate that makes up rules as it goes along and then violates them...see ACB and nominee Garland.
So I have no problem with the Senate turning blue.
Sadly for you and your partisan bullshit the opposite is true
Wall is TBD, he was going to tax remittances. No one was prepared for COVID. Tell me more. You just bought into all the media hatred.Direct experience. Trump kept most of his campaign promises. You just didn’t like his platformYou acknowledged that you’re not a finance expert and don’t have neither the education nor the experience but you question someone who does? OKThe topic is some schmuck predicting that the market will lose 6-10% if Democrats are elected.Not sure what that has to do with the topic
I don’t take his prediction seriously and I don’t take the pearl clutching hyperbole that this correction, if it ever did happen, would crush people.
Just more scare tactics. Seen it a million times.
But is your opinion based on your education and experience, or political desires?
Someone like Romney might be better for business than someone like Elizabeth Warren, but between Biden and Trump it is not that clear. For example, Obama was elected on being anti war, but then doubled down on wars all over the Mideast. The Clintons trashed Glass-Steagall, so were for right wing bankers, not unions or poor people. And likely Biden will be like a cross of Obama and Hillary? About the only thing in Trump's favor is he did not start any wars. So hard to say?
Mexico pay for the building a wall right across the US-Mexico wall...
Actual: US paid for fence repairs (which actually Obama secured the funding for) and a couple hundred miles of more fencing which cut apart with DIY tools...
Trump said he would keep America Safe.
He has failed to anticipate or prepare for COVID... He was given a warning by the Obama Administration but choose to not only ignore it but wilfully destroy there preparations...
Can go all day... Trump poor at keeping his promises, again another Trump failure. Pointed out by a Trumpster...
Cue the complaint about using Poltifact... It is unfair, they use reality and facts and cite there evidence when the do so...
View attachment 437525
View attachment 437524
People with 'real money' AKA those who control the 'market' all know Biden is nothing but a senile fart in the wind.The markets aren't concerned with the puppet on the podium.
Business is business
Iran deal. North Korea deal. China trade deal. Balance budget. 4% economic growth. Troops out of Syria. Health care reform. His tax plan broke many of his promises including the idea that it wouldn’t disproportionately benefit the wealthy and that it’d be revenue neutral. He was going to have a special counsel for Clinton. He was going to declassify everything about Mueller.Wall is TBD, he was going to tax remittances. No one was prepared for COVID. Tell me more. You just bought into all the media hatred.
