ClosedCaption
Diamond Member
- Sep 15, 2010
- 53,233
- 6,719
- 1,830
Both are legal. Only one hated by Repubs.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Both are legal. Only one hated by Repubs.
The moochers are those taking advantage when they should be out taking care of themselves.
Both are legal. Only one hated by Repubs.
Stewart once again impressing clueless adolescents with mindless rhetoric....
The moochers are those taking advantage when they should be out taking care of themselves.
Both are. You hate only one
Both are legal. Only one hated by Repubs.
Stewart once again impressing clueless adolescents with mindless rhetoric....
The moochers are those taking advantage when they should be out taking care of themselves.
Both are. You hate only one
One has made the money and uses the law to keep as much of their own earnings as possible. Therefor they can never be classified as a moocher. The other is in line to get their hands on money that was taken from someone else. The very definition of a moocher.
Stewart once again impressing clueless adolescents with mindless rhetoric....
Both are. You hate only one
One has made the money and uses the law to keep as much of their own earnings as possible. Therefor they can never be classified as a moocher. The other is in line to get their hands on money that was taken from someone else. The very definition of a moocher.
Made the money, how exactly?
If a corporation gets a government grant or contract..is that "earning" or mooching?
One has made the money and uses the law to keep as much of their own earnings as possible. Therefor they can never be classified as a moocher. The other is in line to get their hands on money that was taken from someone else. The very definition of a moocher.
Made the money, how exactly?
If a corporation gets a government grant or contract..is that "earning" or mooching?
Made money by providing a product or a service others are willing to pay for.
Government contracts are earned by providing the product or the service the government deemed necessary.
One involves protecting what is yours. The other involves taking from others by force.
Pretty clear why one might be in favor of one and against the other.
One has made the money and uses the law to keep as much of their own earnings as possible. Therefor they can never be classified as a moocher. The other is in line to get their hands on money that was taken from someone else. The very definition of a moocher.
Made the money, how exactly?
If a corporation gets a government grant or contract..is that "earning" or mooching?
Made money by providing a product or a service others are willing to pay for.
Government contracts are earned by providing the product or the service the government deemed necessary.
Stewart once again impressing clueless adolescents with mindless rhetoric....
Jon Stewart is a comedian, he makes jokes, it's not his fault if certain sheeple use said jokes as a basis for their view of reality.
Heck no. Those people go in the moocher column.Made the money, how exactly?
If a corporation gets a government grant or contract..is that "earning" or mooching?
Made money by providing a product or a service others are willing to pay for.
Government contracts are earned by providing the product or the service the government deemed necessary.
Surely you're not referring to government contracts for the U.S. "Patronage and Cronyism Our Us" Government, right?
Stewart once again impressing clueless adolescents with mindless rhetoric....
Jon Stewart is a comedian, he makes jokes, it's not his fault if certain sheeple use said jokes as a basis for their view of reality.
This is a message board, a board where messages are displayed. Still doesn't address the topic. I see a pattern
Both are legal. Only one hated by Repubs.
Stewart once again impressing clueless adolescents with mindless rhetoric....
Stewart once again rendering idiots unable to address the statement