Decepticon
Rookie
- Jan 11, 2012
- 1,138
- 189
- 0
- Banned
- #41
The only nugget in that whole post worth discussing. You're right, so what is the difference? The difference is that DEBT is now ~101% of GDP. Leaving the country with limited options to conquer a massive fiscal crisis that will meet its end long before 2040 if allowed to be pursued.Spending isn't any higher as a percentage of GDP than it was under that dottering old fuck Reagan
let the currency wars commence. (they already have)
Gee, I guess you shouldn't have run up all that debt under REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTS THEN, HUH?
And where was THIS bit of rationality when CONZ where complaining about Obama spending the stimulus money? Oh, no where. Bush and you CONZ hamstrung Obama by the amount of debt you ran up. You did EXACTLY WHAT YOU SAID YOU WOULD DO, try to shrink the government. Only you did it by throwing the country into debt so that the government WOULD HAVE TO SPEND ALL IT'S REVENUE SERVICING THE DEBT CONZ RAN UP and leave NOTHING for it's citizens or a crisis like 9-11 that Bush let happen because he was incompetent.
And the top tax rate was good through 1964 if you were able to read the chart I posted above at a 4th grade comprehension level. Hell it was above 70% until Reagan. Now it's at 35%.
Gee, it appears that you are full of it and have been caught being full of it, haven't you.
Perhaps if you could provide some examples of capital flight when Clinton raised taxes? Or when Reagan did?
I'll wait while you don't provide a SMIDGEN of evidence to back up your contentions and leave the readers to determine who is full of crapola and who has the facts.