Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
.The Democrats have all that Planned Parenthood money. Far more than the NRA contributes to candidates.
Just for other posters.....you're too far gone to understand or educate yourself
In 2016, PP donated about 450 K to ALL candidates........
In 2016, the NRA (and gun lobby) donated $1,085,100.....
99% of which was to republicans ( $1,071,100)
You'd melt down and cry if you ever touched a gun. Why do leftists insist on the idiotic lie that you're all gun owners, that's how you know that guns emanate an aura of evil?
And BLM isn't a terrorist organization, the NRA is. Just more empty, leftist rhetoric.
If the Democrats do a survey about you, have them send it to me and I'll vouch for you that you actually believe what they tell you to believe and immediately parrot it at every opportunity
You will never stop someone from shooting up a place with one of these
or
Just stop making these WMD's
20 rounds? Not necessary except to wipe out a bunch of people at a mall.
Because a 10 round mag takes how long to swap out?
Bad argument. It takes anywhere from a couple seconds to 20 seconds. And that time can make all the difference in the world.
Oh, and since you don't think it makes a difference then you won't mind us making 20 round clips illegal? Because only being allowed a 10 won't slow you down at all you say right? So that's a win win. It'll make us feel better and won't slow you down at all.
How about this? Since there is no difference to you between a 10 and 20 then how about we only allow 5 rounds? That won't slow you down either right?
So now you see why we should make 20 round clips illegal? Of course you do. Because you know you can kill a lot more people with a 20 round clip than you can 2 10's. Fact. And you will prove it by arguing for 20 round clips. You'll claim 20 round clips are somewhere in the constitution.
When the cops give up their high capacity mags, I'll think about it.
No, i want something back in return. Repeal NYC's law that requires a 3-6 month waiting period and $500 or so in fees just to keep a freaking handgun in my own apartment.
No, the fact is morons like you think giving the gun control people something like this will placate them. It's Neville-ism, except at least had the excuse of being Neville Chamberlain and didn't have his own example of how appeasement never works.
I would be willing to let NY residents own a gun without having to wait 6 months.
Because a 10 round mag takes how long to swap out?
Bad argument. It takes anywhere from a couple seconds to 20 seconds. And that time can make all the difference in the world.
Oh, and since you don't think it makes a difference then you won't mind us making 20 round clips illegal? Because only being allowed a 10 won't slow you down at all you say right? So that's a win win. It'll make us feel better and won't slow you down at all.
How about this? Since there is no difference to you between a 10 and 20 then how about we only allow 5 rounds? That won't slow you down either right?
So now you see why we should make 20 round clips illegal? Of course you do. Because you know you can kill a lot more people with a 20 round clip than you can 2 10's. Fact. And you will prove it by arguing for 20 round clips. You'll claim 20 round clips are somewhere in the constitution.
The Virginia Tech shooter only had a couple of handguns.
Trying to make things illegal doesn't work. Have you asked your drug dealer about your theory that if we make things illegal, that means no one can get them? What does he say about that?
No one ever said we could stop every shooter.
Oh, and look what happened at one point during the rampage
........Next, Cho went across the hall and into room 207, where instructor Jamie Bishop was teaching German. Cho shot at a student, then at Bishop, then at the rest of the students, killing Bishop and four students; six students were wounded.
If he had more powerful guns he probably would have killed more.
And if you hadn't disarmed everyone, he may have been shot before he could kill any of them.
You have no plan at all other than disarm honest citizens, let's pretend shooters can't buy illegal guns. Just wait for the cops who sat outside and waited for the shooting to stop so they could direct traffic and draw lines around the victims.
Great plan. Wow, we could have used you in WWII in Europe
We see when we introduce more guns we have
more accidents
more shootings that otherwise would have just been fists or words
more people snapping and shooting.
Study: Road rage incidents involving guns are increasing
Go ahead and arm more people
Seventy-eight percent of Americans favor banning the sale of AR-15 style weapons to people under the age of 21, according to a recent SurveyMonkey poll.
Let's call it 80%
Hillary getting $145 million and Russians getting 20% of our uranium is the definition of quid pro quo.
Track down if even ONE ounce of US uranium has gone to Russia, nitwit...............LOL
Where did I say it went to Russia? You need to address what I said, not what you want me to have said
lets see....you first write "Hillary getting $145 million and Russians getting 20% of our uranium is the definition of quid pro quo."
AND, then you write the above???.....lol
You know what sucks? If a Democrat takes even 1 dime from the NRA the Republicans trash them but meanwhile it's ok the NRA owns the GOP???
The NRA spent $144.3 million on outside spending, such as independent expenditures, during that period. In addition, the NRA since 1998 has reported spending a cumulative $45.9 million on federal lobbying, both for its in-house operations and the outside consultants it has retained.
The Democrats have all that Planned Parenthood money. Far more than the NRA contributes to candidates.
Just for other posters.....you're too far gone to understand or educate yourself
In 2016, PP donated about 450 K to ALL candidates........
In 2016, the NRA (and gun lobby) donated $1,085,100.....
99% of which was to republicans ( $1,071,100)
It could have come from my real gig. Who knows. It’s all part of sealybobo inc.How did I buy this $25,600 boat straight up cash? Don’t hate papaIt's a lot easier now that it's legal here in Michigan. Ask your Pharamcutical rep.
That didn't address my point. And I believe only medial pot is legal in Michigan
I have a medical card.
That card does not allow you to sell pot, that allows you to buy pot at a dispensary.
With ill gotten gains. I don't hate, not in my nature.
How about a reasonable amendment limiting things like assault rifles?Not only that, but they are also not pushing for the right to own functional artillery weapons, although the 2nd amendment does not specify what kind of arms.The Virginia Tech shooter only had a couple of handguns.
Trying to make things illegal doesn't work. Have you asked your drug dealer about your theory that if we make things illegal, that means no one can get them? What does he say about that?
No one ever said we could stop every shooter.
Oh, and look what happened at one point during the rampage
........Next, Cho went across the hall and into room 207, where instructor Jamie Bishop was teaching German. Cho shot at a student, then at Bishop, then at the rest of the students, killing Bishop and four students; six students were wounded.
If he had more powerful guns he probably would have killed more.
And if you hadn't disarmed everyone, he may have been shot before he could kill any of them.
You have no plan at all other than disarm honest citizens, let's pretend shooters can't buy illegal guns. Just wait for the cops who sat outside and waited for the shooting to stop so they could direct traffic and draw lines around the victims.
Great plan. Wow, we could have used you in WWII in Europe
Your solution is to give everyone a death ray gun and you feel safe because you are carrying one? Stupid.
Now I see why North Korea wants a nuke. How can you argue with them? You would have to be a hypocrite.
Exactly that the 2nd amendment does not specify what kind of arms. We have every right to specify it. The process is 2/3, 2/3 and 3/4.
I'd have no problem with a reasonable amendment limiting things like nuclear weapons and that sort of thing. But that would need to come with a reasonable end to the unreasonable 2nd amendment restrictions government is doing now
I’m not at my computer sorry. I just googled itHillary getting $145 million and Russians getting 20% of our uranium is the definition of quid pro quo.
Track down if even ONE ounce of US uranium has gone to Russia, nitwit...............LOL
Where did I say it went to Russia? You need to address what I said, not what you want me to have said
lets see....you first write "Hillary getting $145 million and Russians getting 20% of our uranium is the definition of quid pro quo."
AND, then you write the above???.....lol
You know what sucks? If a Democrat takes even 1 dime from the NRA the Republicans trash them but meanwhile it's ok the NRA owns the GOP???
The NRA spent $144.3 million on outside spending, such as independent expenditures, during that period. In addition, the NRA since 1998 has reported spending a cumulative $45.9 million on federal lobbying, both for its in-house operations and the outside consultants it has retained.
Can you link this please.
I don’t want to discourage voting do you?Seventy-eight percent of Americans favor banning the sale of AR-15 style weapons to people under the age of 21, according to a recent SurveyMonkey poll.
Let's call it 80%
I think we can make a deal.
Since (according to the left) constitutional rights can have age restrictions, why not also make 21 years old the minimum voting age? It think it's a fair trade if you ask me.
Bad argument. It takes anywhere from a couple seconds to 20 seconds. And that time can make all the difference in the world.
Oh, and since you don't think it makes a difference then you won't mind us making 20 round clips illegal? Because only being allowed a 10 won't slow you down at all you say right? So that's a win win. It'll make us feel better and won't slow you down at all.
How about this? Since there is no difference to you between a 10 and 20 then how about we only allow 5 rounds? That won't slow you down either right?
So now you see why we should make 20 round clips illegal? Of course you do. Because you know you can kill a lot more people with a 20 round clip than you can 2 10's. Fact. And you will prove it by arguing for 20 round clips. You'll claim 20 round clips are somewhere in the constitution.
The Virginia Tech shooter only had a couple of handguns.
Trying to make things illegal doesn't work. Have you asked your drug dealer about your theory that if we make things illegal, that means no one can get them? What does he say about that?
No one ever said we could stop every shooter.
Oh, and look what happened at one point during the rampage
........Next, Cho went across the hall and into room 207, where instructor Jamie Bishop was teaching German. Cho shot at a student, then at Bishop, then at the rest of the students, killing Bishop and four students; six students were wounded.
If he had more powerful guns he probably would have killed more.
And if you hadn't disarmed everyone, he may have been shot before he could kill any of them.
You have no plan at all other than disarm honest citizens, let's pretend shooters can't buy illegal guns. Just wait for the cops who sat outside and waited for the shooting to stop so they could direct traffic and draw lines around the victims.
Great plan. Wow, we could have used you in WWII in Europe
We see when we introduce more guns we have
more accidents
more shootings that otherwise would have just been fists or words
more people snapping and shooting.
Study: Road rage incidents involving guns are increasing
Go ahead and arm more people
View attachment 182187
View attachment 182188
How about a reasonable amendment limiting things like assault rifles?Not only that, but they are also not pushing for the right to own functional artillery weapons, although the 2nd amendment does not specify what kind of arms.No one ever said we could stop every shooter.
Oh, and look what happened at one point during the rampage
........Next, Cho went across the hall and into room 207, where instructor Jamie Bishop was teaching German. Cho shot at a student, then at Bishop, then at the rest of the students, killing Bishop and four students; six students were wounded.
If he had more powerful guns he probably would have killed more.
And if you hadn't disarmed everyone, he may have been shot before he could kill any of them.
You have no plan at all other than disarm honest citizens, let's pretend shooters can't buy illegal guns. Just wait for the cops who sat outside and waited for the shooting to stop so they could direct traffic and draw lines around the victims.
Great plan. Wow, we could have used you in WWII in Europe
Your solution is to give everyone a death ray gun and you feel safe because you are carrying one? Stupid.
Now I see why North Korea wants a nuke. How can you argue with them? You would have to be a hypocrite.
Exactly that the 2nd amendment does not specify what kind of arms. We have every right to specify it. The process is 2/3, 2/3 and 3/4.
I'd have no problem with a reasonable amendment limiting things like nuclear weapons and that sort of thing. But that would need to come with a reasonable end to the unreasonable 2nd amendment restrictions government is doing now
Think about how valuable your assault rifle will be when they don’t make them anymore. Then crazy random lunitic kids won’t get their hands on them anymore
How about a reasonable amendment limiting things like assault rifles?Not only that, but they are also not pushing for the right to own functional artillery weapons, although the 2nd amendment does not specify what kind of arms.No one ever said we could stop every shooter.
Oh, and look what happened at one point during the rampage
........Next, Cho went across the hall and into room 207, where instructor Jamie Bishop was teaching German. Cho shot at a student, then at Bishop, then at the rest of the students, killing Bishop and four students; six students were wounded.
If he had more powerful guns he probably would have killed more.
And if you hadn't disarmed everyone, he may have been shot before he could kill any of them.
You have no plan at all other than disarm honest citizens, let's pretend shooters can't buy illegal guns. Just wait for the cops who sat outside and waited for the shooting to stop so they could direct traffic and draw lines around the victims.
Great plan. Wow, we could have used you in WWII in Europe
Your solution is to give everyone a death ray gun and you feel safe because you are carrying one? Stupid.
Now I see why North Korea wants a nuke. How can you argue with them? You would have to be a hypocrite.
Exactly that the 2nd amendment does not specify what kind of arms. We have every right to specify it. The process is 2/3, 2/3 and 3/4.
I'd have no problem with a reasonable amendment limiting things like nuclear weapons and that sort of thing. But that would need to come with a reasonable end to the unreasonable 2nd amendment restrictions government is doing now
Think about how valuable your assault rifle will be when they don’t make them anymore. Then crazy random lunitic kids won’t get their hands on them anymore
When it comes down to it I’m probably voting democratic but I’ll be ok even if republicans win. If voters agree with you and the nra I’ll live with it. Will you live if gun legislation wins?The Virginia Tech shooter only had a couple of handguns.
Trying to make things illegal doesn't work. Have you asked your drug dealer about your theory that if we make things illegal, that means no one can get them? What does he say about that?
No one ever said we could stop every shooter.
Oh, and look what happened at one point during the rampage
........Next, Cho went across the hall and into room 207, where instructor Jamie Bishop was teaching German. Cho shot at a student, then at Bishop, then at the rest of the students, killing Bishop and four students; six students were wounded.
If he had more powerful guns he probably would have killed more.
And if you hadn't disarmed everyone, he may have been shot before he could kill any of them.
You have no plan at all other than disarm honest citizens, let's pretend shooters can't buy illegal guns. Just wait for the cops who sat outside and waited for the shooting to stop so they could direct traffic and draw lines around the victims.
Great plan. Wow, we could have used you in WWII in Europe
We see when we introduce more guns we have
more accidents
more shootings that otherwise would have just been fists or words
more people snapping and shooting.
Study: Road rage incidents involving guns are increasing
Go ahead and arm more people
View attachment 182187
View attachment 182188
Booboo doesn't like facts. They confuse him
I don’t want to discourage voting do you?Seventy-eight percent of Americans favor banning the sale of AR-15 style weapons to people under the age of 21, according to a recent SurveyMonkey poll.
Let's call it 80%
I think we can make a deal.
Since (according to the left) constitutional rights can have age restrictions, why not also make 21 years old the minimum voting age? It think it's a fair trade if you ask me.
The NRA consists only of four to five million "legal" gun owners, most of which are voters. The NRA gun owners are only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to private citizens who own guns. The total number of private gun owners in the US is between 85 to 100 "million" individuals, most of whom are "voters." While that majority of us are not card-carrying NRA members, we see where the left has made it a mandate to, over time, get rid of our 2nd Amendment and disarm us and because of this, more and more of us are beginning to side with the NRA, member or not.In the same way that many right wing politicians "accuse" Obama of not wanting to you certain terms when linking terrorism to Islam, these same politicians are afraid of the ire from the NRA in openly stating that any individual who is suspected of terrorist plotting should NOT be allowed to buy automatic weapons or explosive materials.
Whereas Obama does not (rightfully) want us to offend the 1.8 billion Muslims on this planet by tacitly stating that terrorists acts are inspired just by religiosity, GOP candidates are reluctant to "offend" the insanity posed by the powerful NRA lobby in denying ANYONE the right to buy weapons whose only purpose is to kill other human beings..........Go figure.
When it comes down to it I’m probably voting democratic but I’ll be ok even if republicans win. If voters agree with you and the nra I’ll live with it. Will you live if gun legislation wins?No one ever said we could stop every shooter.
Oh, and look what happened at one point during the rampage
........Next, Cho went across the hall and into room 207, where instructor Jamie Bishop was teaching German. Cho shot at a student, then at Bishop, then at the rest of the students, killing Bishop and four students; six students were wounded.
If he had more powerful guns he probably would have killed more.
And if you hadn't disarmed everyone, he may have been shot before he could kill any of them.
You have no plan at all other than disarm honest citizens, let's pretend shooters can't buy illegal guns. Just wait for the cops who sat outside and waited for the shooting to stop so they could direct traffic and draw lines around the victims.
Great plan. Wow, we could have used you in WWII in Europe
We see when we introduce more guns we have
more accidents
more shootings that otherwise would have just been fists or words
more people snapping and shooting.
Study: Road rage incidents involving guns are increasing
Go ahead and arm more people
View attachment 182187
View attachment 182188
Booboo doesn't like facts. They confuse him
Someone earlier mentioned Virginia tech shooter. Then there’s this kid in Florida.How about a reasonable amendment limiting things like assault rifles?Not only that, but they are also not pushing for the right to own functional artillery weapons, although the 2nd amendment does not specify what kind of arms.And if you hadn't disarmed everyone, he may have been shot before he could kill any of them.
You have no plan at all other than disarm honest citizens, let's pretend shooters can't buy illegal guns. Just wait for the cops who sat outside and waited for the shooting to stop so they could direct traffic and draw lines around the victims.
Great plan. Wow, we could have used you in WWII in Europe
Your solution is to give everyone a death ray gun and you feel safe because you are carrying one? Stupid.
Now I see why North Korea wants a nuke. How can you argue with them? You would have to be a hypocrite.
Exactly that the 2nd amendment does not specify what kind of arms. We have every right to specify it. The process is 2/3, 2/3 and 3/4.
I'd have no problem with a reasonable amendment limiting things like nuclear weapons and that sort of thing. But that would need to come with a reasonable end to the unreasonable 2nd amendment restrictions government is doing now
Think about how valuable your assault rifle will be when they don’t make them anymore. Then crazy random lunitic kids won’t get their hands on them anymore
You mean because if you make "assault rifles" illegal, no one can get them?
BTW, you claimed you're a gun owner. That would mean to any reasonable person that you're not a stick up your ass idiot who doesn't grasp what "assault rifles" are. Didn't think that one through, did you. As if you ever do
How about a reasonable amendment limiting things like assault rifles?Not only that, but they are also not pushing for the right to own functional artillery weapons, although the 2nd amendment does not specify what kind of arms.And if you hadn't disarmed everyone, he may have been shot before he could kill any of them.
You have no plan at all other than disarm honest citizens, let's pretend shooters can't buy illegal guns. Just wait for the cops who sat outside and waited for the shooting to stop so they could direct traffic and draw lines around the victims.
Great plan. Wow, we could have used you in WWII in Europe
Your solution is to give everyone a death ray gun and you feel safe because you are carrying one? Stupid.
Now I see why North Korea wants a nuke. How can you argue with them? You would have to be a hypocrite.
Exactly that the 2nd amendment does not specify what kind of arms. We have every right to specify it. The process is 2/3, 2/3 and 3/4.
I'd have no problem with a reasonable amendment limiting things like nuclear weapons and that sort of thing. But that would need to come with a reasonable end to the unreasonable 2nd amendment restrictions government is doing now
Think about how valuable your assault rifle will be when they don’t make them anymore. Then crazy random lunitic kids won’t get their hands on them anymore
We did get rid of assault rifles, for ten years. The conclusion was it didn't make a difference.
You probably know nothing about guns, so let me explain:
An AR is a semi-automatic weapon.
Most handguns are semi-automatic weapons.
Both shoot rounds as fast as you can squeeze the trigger.
That being said, can you tell me what a "assault" rifle ban would do?
No 20 clipsHow about a reasonable amendment limiting things like assault rifles?Not only that, but they are also not pushing for the right to own functional artillery weapons, although the 2nd amendment does not specify what kind of arms.And if you hadn't disarmed everyone, he may have been shot before he could kill any of them.
You have no plan at all other than disarm honest citizens, let's pretend shooters can't buy illegal guns. Just wait for the cops who sat outside and waited for the shooting to stop so they could direct traffic and draw lines around the victims.
Great plan. Wow, we could have used you in WWII in Europe
Your solution is to give everyone a death ray gun and you feel safe because you are carrying one? Stupid.
Now I see why North Korea wants a nuke. How can you argue with them? You would have to be a hypocrite.
Exactly that the 2nd amendment does not specify what kind of arms. We have every right to specify it. The process is 2/3, 2/3 and 3/4.
I'd have no problem with a reasonable amendment limiting things like nuclear weapons and that sort of thing. But that would need to come with a reasonable end to the unreasonable 2nd amendment restrictions government is doing now
Think about how valuable your assault rifle will be when they don’t make them anymore. Then crazy random lunitic kids won’t get their hands on them anymore
We did get rid of assault rifles, for ten years. The conclusion was it didn't make a difference.
You probably know nothing about guns, so let me explain:
An AR is a semi-automatic weapon.
Most handguns are semi-automatic weapons.
Both shoot rounds as fast as you can squeeze the trigger.
That being said, can you tell me what a "assault" rifle ban would do?
