GOP exposing U.S. as weak emboldens Putin

[Meister]

I'll answer but Are you asking because what Dana Rohrabacher said is just like what Harry Reid said? Are you saying the two statements are comparable? Both being wrong?

I am asking you to answer the question. If you then wish to ask a question, I will answer it.

But my question is very simple...

what did YOU think when Harry Reid announced to the World that the Iraq War was lost while we still had men and women in harms way fighting the "lost war"?

Yep. Still NO ONE will answer my question.

Hangover decided to leave than have to apologize for his nuclear war insinuation. I just knew he wasn't man enough to apologize.

What is this cut and run stuff?

 

[natstew]

Is this a freaking joke or are lefties serious? The freaking anti-war nutcases lynched the president in effigy and democrats undermined the Military any way they could when Bush was president and he took it like a man. Now we have a whiny administration that lashes out at everyone else for their failures and the low information left laps it up like pablum.

 

[ClosedCaption]

We're talking politics, CC. Try and keep up.

I know which is why I'm wondering why the repubs are bringing up internet posters and girl singing groups.

Are you saying bashing our politicians overseas by a leftwing nut group isn't political?
It's every bit as political as if a gov, senator or congressman had done it. What they all have in common is that they're all Americans, CC.

Listen very closely because I dont like the "are you saying" game.

A Congressman words carry more weight than a Girl Country Group words. If that still confuses you I'm sorry

 

[ClosedCaption]

Curious...

what did you think when Harry Reid announced to the World that the Iraq War was lost while we still had men and women in harms way fighting the "lost war"?

Or will you ignore that question like every single person in the thread has so far.

I'll answer but Are you asking because what Dana Rohrabacher said is just like what Harry Reid said? Are you saying the two statements are comparable? Both being wrong?

I am asking you to answer the question. If you then wish to ask a question, I will answer it.

But my question is very simple...

what did YOU think when Harry Reid announced to the World that the Iraq War was lost while we still had men and women in harms way fighting the "lost war"?

If that was put on TV internationally that would be a problem. But just because Reid says something doesnt make it true also. Your turn.

Are you asking because what Dana Rohrabacher said is just like what Harry Reid said? Are you saying the two statements are comparable? Both being wrong?

 

[natstew]

The republicans are telling the whole world that the United states is weak. It is totally anti-American and treasonous. It's worse than Snowden's revelations. Playing politics with America's reputation, shows that the right wingers will do anything to make Obama look bad. If the voters of this country don't vote the republicans out of congress this year, they are as dumb as the GOP hopes they are.

You sorry piece of shit!!
You were singing a different song when the Democrats were aiding and abetting our enemies when George Bush was president!

Difference is, the Republicans are telling the truth, the Democrats were lying out their asses!!

your stupid hate filled spewings are not proof.

You are lying about it

(following is copied and pasted from post by Whithall)
"Is this a freaking joke or are lefties serious? The freaking anti-war nutcases lynched the president in effigy and democrats undermined the Military any way they could when Bush was president and he took it like a man. Now we have a whiny administration that lashes out at everyone else for their failures and the low information left laps it up like pablum."

 

[peach174]

Hey wing nut, when there's a red line under a word, that means you misspelled it. Right click on it and it will correct it.

And really, thinking that people are stupid enough to buy ridiculous propaganda is a Nazi strategy. Didn't work. Only stupid Nazi's bought it.

Something the Democrats do extremely well, Hitler would be very proud of the Socialist Democrats.
You who vote for Dems are the ones who buy into their ridiculous propaganda.
Perfect example - Cummings recent rant yesterday, and the left bought into it hook line and sinker.

Hitler and the Nazi's overthrew the Socialist Democrats, like the fascist republicans are trying to do now.

Has the Police become more fascist under this administration? YES

 

[natstew]

Politics used to stop at the waters edge but not now with this new "do anything" GOP.



They even go on Russian TV and tells everyone that Putin is being treated badly by those awful Americans.

You can blame that on those leftwing nut Dixie Chicks when they were bashing Bush. Nothing but politics and a stage to vent.

Dissenting a stupid fucking war started with lies, you portray as un-American. But when Obama refuses to start a nuclear war, you call that patriotic dissent.

Ah yes, those Clinton lies about Saddam having WMD's and a nuclear Program, yes I remember those Clinton lies.

 

[Meister]

I know which is why I'm wondering why the repubs are bringing up internet posters and girl singing groups.

Are you saying bashing our politicians overseas by a leftwing nut group isn't political?
It's every bit as political as if a gov, senator or congressman had done it. What they all have in common is that they're all Americans, CC.

Listen very closely because I dont like the "are you saying" game.

A Congressman words carry more weight than a Girl Country Group words. If that still confuses you I'm sorry

Okay, let's say you're right (you're not), but let's say you are. Why do administrations hire the Hollywood crowd and rock stars to promote their agenda. Because it really does carry more weight than a politician.

Now I hope that doesn't confuse you.

 

[peach174]

I'll answer but Are you asking because what Dana Rohrabacher said is just like what Harry Reid said? Are you saying the two statements are comparable? Both being wrong?

I am asking you to answer the question. If you then wish to ask a question, I will answer it.

But my question is very simple...

what did YOU think when Harry Reid announced to the World that the Iraq War was lost while we still had men and women in harms way fighting the "lost war"?

If that was put on TV internationally that would be a problem. But just because Reid says something doesnt make it true also. Your turn.

Are you asking because what Dana Rohrabacher said is just like what Harry Reid said? Are you saying the two statements are comparable? Both being wrong?

Anyone in the world that has internet can get live coverage on the House and Senate floors.

 

[peach174]

Are you saying bashing our politicians overseas by a leftwing nut group isn't political?
It's every bit as political as if a gov, senator or congressman had done it. What they all have in common is that they're all Americans, CC.

Listen very closely because I dont like the "are you saying" game.

A Congressman words carry more weight than a Girl Country Group words. If that still confuses you I'm sorry

Okay, let's say you're right (you're not), but let's say you are. Why do administrations hire the Hollywood crowd and rock stars to promote their agenda. Because it really does carry more weight than a politician.

Now I hope that doesn't confuse you.

The use of the Hollywood crowd is actually more common among Democrats who employ Hollywood stars to promote their liberal agenda.
Democrats have sold their voters into thinking who is more popular and cool, rather than who is best for the job.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Are you saying bashing our politicians overseas by a leftwing nut group isn't political?
It's every bit as political as if a gov, senator or congressman had done it. What they all have in common is that they're all Americans, CC.

Listen very closely because I dont like the "are you saying" game.

A Congressman words carry more weight than a Girl Country Group words. If that still confuses you I'm sorry

Okay, let's say you're right (you're not), but let's say you are. Why do administrations hire the Hollywood crowd and rock stars to promote their agenda. Because it really does carry more weight than a politician.

Now I hope that doesn't confuse you.

So I'm supposed to have a conversation with someone who says that a US Congressmans words carry the same weight as a girl group named The Dixie Chicks? Thats aiight...

 

[Esmeralda]

Whatever the right wing is saying, about Obama or otherwise, it is clear the last thing they care about is what is best for the country. They will say or do anything that benefits the GOP, however detrimental it is to the whole of the country. They display nothing but partisanship and a total lack of concern for what is best for the country as a whole.

 

[Jarhead]

I'll answer but Are you asking because what Dana Rohrabacher said is just like what Harry Reid said? Are you saying the two statements are comparable? Both being wrong?

I am asking you to answer the question. If you then wish to ask a question, I will answer it.

But my question is very simple...

what did YOU think when Harry Reid announced to the World that the Iraq War was lost while we still had men and women in harms way fighting the "lost war"?

If that was put on TV internationally that would be a problem. But just because Reid says something doesnt make it true also. Your turn.

Are you asking because what Dana Rohrabacher said is just like what Harry Reid said? Are you saying the two statements are comparable? Both being wrong?

LMAO....you didn't answer the question. You simply said he gave his opinion. Nowhere did you say you approved or disapproved. Kind of spineless of you.

But as promised...I will now answer yours......

OK....first things first...

In my opinion, Dana Rohrabacher is an ass. He offered his opinion to an international audience and whereas he may truly believe what he said, he by no means spoke for most of us Americans.

Second.....Dana Rohrabacher is not the Senate Majority leader so he ONLY speaks for his constituants, not for the house or Senate.

Third....When a "leader" (referring to Senate Majority Leader, Speaker, VP, Pres. or any Secretary) speaks, they are speaking for the house or department they represent..

SO when Harry Reid said the war was lost, it WAS to an international audience because he was speaking of an international event....and to MOST who are naïve to how things work, it appeared he was speaking on behalf of the Senate.

Fourth.....Reid saying the war was lost could have had a major affect on the morale of those in harms way. And if you have ever experienced military training, you would understand how delicate morale can be and how important it is to NEVER compromise it during wartime.

Now MY opinion per your request......

NO FEDERAL ELECTED OFFICIAL SHOULD EVER CRITICIZE the President of the United States, or the United States as a country as it pertains to foreign affairs aloud. They should put their dissent in a congressional record; perhaps a letter to the President or SoS; BUT KEEP IT FROM THE INTERNATIONAL AUDIENCE until the situation has come to an end.

Both men were wrong.

But Reid compromised the morale of our troops who were in harms way. If he knew anything about the military, he would never have done it.

Per my above opinion, Dana Rohrabacher was completely in the wrong and compromised our standing in the eyes of the international community.

And Romney? When he said what he said WHILE BENGHAZI WAS STILL IN PROGRESS....he lost much of my support.

Can you offer anything more that has some substance?

OPr will you simply do as you did...avoid offering your opinion?

 

[Jarhead]

Whatever the right wing is saying, about Obama or otherwise, it is clear the last thing they care about is what is best for the country. They will say or do anything that benefits the GOP, however detrimental it is to the whole of the country. They display nothing but partisanship and a total lack of concern for what is best for the country as a whole.

and you think that is a one way street?

The democrats didn't do that for the last several years of Bush' tenure?

 

[Esmeralda]

No they didn't, not the way the right wing does it.

 

[Meister]

Listen very closely because I dont like the "are you saying" game.

A Congressman words carry more weight than a Girl Country Group words. If that still confuses you I'm sorry

Okay, let's say you're right (you're not), but let's say you are. Why do administrations hire the Hollywood crowd and rock stars to promote their agenda. Because it really does carry more weight than a politician.

Now I hope that doesn't confuse you.

So I'm supposed to have a conversation with someone who says that a US Congressmans words carry the same weight as a girl group named The Dixie Chicks? Thats aiight...

If you were a politcian...maybe not, but that's not what we're talking about. We're talking about our dirty laundry going beyond the borders of our shores. So yes, a group named the Dixie Chicks do have as much if not more weight. They all know the Dixie Chicks, they may not know some politician. Fact being the Dixie Chicks had to come home and change their name.

 

[Meister]

No they didn't, not the way the right wing does it.

Oh brother

 

[Jarhead]

No they didn't, not the way the right wing does it.

Yes they did.

Exactly like the right wing is doing it.

You are just way too partisan to see it.

And that is OK. I don't frown on those that are partisan. I admire their allegiance to their ideology.

But it DOES cloud their thinking as it pertains to rationalizing the intentions and actions of their party and of the opposing party.

 

[hangover]

Whatever the right wing is saying, about Obama or otherwise, it is clear the last thing they care about is what is best for the country. They will say or do anything that benefits the GOP, however detrimental it is to the whole of the country. They display nothing but partisanship and a total lack of concern for what is best for the country as a whole.

and you think that is a one way street?

The democrats didn't do that for the last several years of Bush' tenure?

Pointing your finger at Obama and telling lies about him, is not a viable defense of Shrub's stupid war.

 

[peach174]

Whatever the right wing is saying, about Obama or otherwise, it is clear the last thing they care about is what is best for the country. They will say or do anything that benefits the GOP, however detrimental it is to the whole of the country. They display nothing but partisanship and a total lack of concern for what is best for the country as a whole.

Both Parties are doing that Esmeralda