GOP led Benghazi report refutes conspiracy theories

[Redfish]

Bottom line-------------obama, rice, and clinton lied about the benghazi attack being caused by the video.

That is the fact of the matter.

no amount of left wing spinning and lying can change that FACT.

so you didn't read the report? Thanks for the clarification

please quote from the report where it says that the attack was caused by the video.

 

[kaz]

Republican-led report debunks Benghazi accusations - CNN.com

I know you're not the sharpest spoon in the drawer, but most of us thought it was incompetence by the White House, not a plot so this doesn't contradict us. Also, the big issue was the White House blocking investigating the truth, and this report doesn't dispel that, they did.

 

[Lakhota]

R.I.P. Benghazi Conspiracy Theories

Benghazi is dead.

 

[Camp]

Bottom line-------------obama, rice, and clinton lied about the benghazi attack being caused by the video.

That is the fact of the matter.

no amount of left wing spinning and lying can change that FACT.

You have to include Abu Khallala, the mastermind organizer of the attack that was captured and is in US custody on that list of names. He claims he used the video to organize the protest that gave the attack cover. But he might be part of your conspiracy.

 

[paperview]

You know what was one of the sickest parts of that whole incident?


How about another memory spark of that day, and night....of Sept 11, 2012 --

When candidate Romney, chomping at the bit to make political hay over a video the whole world was chattering about, our embassy issued a PR about, the Grand Mafti issued a Fatwa a few days earlier over, and those nutcakes were storming our walls --

-- Candidate Romney While the attack was still going on in Benghazi went and issued a press release --
then he mugged for the camera the next day with a shit-eating grin on his face, with fires still burning, dead bodies not even cold -- to attack the president again.

Blaming it on Obama, and tracing it to the video, in absolutely the most cravenly political ****-the-facts-I-have-an-election-to-win statement in the history of the incident.

Look -- the GOP candidate was actually SMILING as he walked away, as the fires were still burning --

That's a memory spark I'll bet a lot of RW'ers want to forget. A truly despicable act.

Sick Fuck.

 

[NYcarbineer]

The report is the cake; the RWnut denialism is the icing.

 

[Redfish]

Bottom line-------------obama, rice, and clinton lied about the benghazi attack being caused by the video.

That is the fact of the matter.

no amount of left wing spinning and lying can change that FACT.

You have to include Abu Khallala, the mastermind organizer of the attack that was captured and is in US custody on that list of names. He claims he used the video to organize the protest that gave the attack cover. But he might be part of your conspiracy.

link?

 

[Nyvin]

Bottom line-------------obama, rice, and clinton lied about the benghazi attack being caused by the video.

That is the fact of the matter.

no amount of left wing spinning and lying can change that FACT.

Actually the part about the comments of it being caused by a video is in the Report.

The report says the comments were a case of misinformation from within the CIA, and that Rice's comments came two days before the CIA finalized all their data on the attack.

It was a case of confusion, not deliberate deception.

 

[Redfish]

The report is the cake; the RWnut denialism is the icing.

"what difference, at this point, does it make". They lied about it, four americans died because the country failed to protect them in a very dangerous place.

spin and celebrate all you want, the truth will always be the there.

 

[Redfish]

Bottom line-------------obama, rice, and clinton lied about the benghazi attack being caused by the video.

That is the fact of the matter.

no amount of left wing spinning and lying can change that FACT.

Actually the part about the comments of it being caused by a video is in the Report.

The report says the comments were a case of misinformation from within the CIA, and that Rice's comments came two days before the CIA finalized all their data on the attack.

It was a case of confusion, not deliberate deception.

we all understand that that is the current spin being put on it. We get it.

But if thats the case, then there was gross incompetence in the state dept under HRC.

 

[Nyvin]

The report is the cake; the RWnut denialism is the icing.

"what difference, at this point, does it make". They lied about it, four americans died because the country failed to protect them in a very dangerous place.

spin and celebrate all you want, the truth will always be the there.

You realize the four of them would still be dead even if they called it a terrorist attack right?

 

[NYcarbineer]

The report is the cake; the RWnut denialism is the icing.

"what difference, at this point, does it make". They lied about it, four americans died because the country failed to protect them in a very dangerous place.

spin and celebrate all you want, the truth will always be the there.

Who do you think sane Americans are going to believe?

1. A committee report out of the Republican held Congress, or,

2. A bunch of deranged Obama haters on the internet?

 

[Nyvin]

Bottom line-------------obama, rice, and clinton lied about the benghazi attack being caused by the video.

That is the fact of the matter.

no amount of left wing spinning and lying can change that FACT.

Actually the part about the comments of it being caused by a video is in the Report.

The report says the comments were a case of misinformation from within the CIA, and that Rice's comments came two days before the CIA finalized all their data on the attack.

It was a case of confusion, not deliberate deception.

we all understand that that is the current spin being put on it. We get it.

But if thats the case, then there was gross incompetence in the state dept under HRC.

The CIA is not under the state department, they report to the director of national intelligence.

 

[Redfish]

The report is the cake; the RWnut denialism is the icing.

"what difference, at this point, does it make". They lied about it, four americans died because the country failed to protect them in a very dangerous place.

spin and celebrate all you want, the truth will always be the there.

You realize the four of them would still be dead even if they called it a terrorist attack right?

probably, but thats not the issue. lying for political gain is the issue here.

 

[NYcarbineer]

The report is the cake; the RWnut denialism is the icing.

"what difference, at this point, does it make". They lied about it, four americans died because the country failed to protect them in a very dangerous place.

spin and celebrate all you want, the truth will always be the there.

You realize the four of them would still be dead even if they called it a terrorist attack right?

That's a moot point because the report pointed out that the president did in fact call it an act of terror the day after it happened.

 

[Redfish]

The report is the cake; the RWnut denialism is the icing.

"what difference, at this point, does it make". They lied about it, four americans died because the country failed to protect them in a very dangerous place.

spin and celebrate all you want, the truth will always be the there.

Who do you think sane Americans are going to believe?

1. A committee report out of the Republican held Congress, or,

2. A bunch of deranged Obama haters on the internet?

still waiting for you to post that language from the report saying it was caused by the video as obama, rice, and clinton claimed.

 

[Redfish]

The report is the cake; the RWnut denialism is the icing.

"what difference, at this point, does it make". They lied about it, four americans died because the country failed to protect them in a very dangerous place.

spin and celebrate all you want, the truth will always be the there.

You realize the four of them would still be dead even if they called it a terrorist attack right?

That's a moot point because the report pointed out that the president did in fact call it an act of terror the day after it happened.

"an act or terror caused by a video" to be precise as to what he said.

 

[Redfish]

Bottom line-------------obama, rice, and clinton lied about the benghazi attack being caused by the video.

That is the fact of the matter.

no amount of left wing spinning and lying can change that FACT.

Actually the part about the comments of it being caused by a video is in the Report.

The report says the comments were a case of misinformation from within the CIA, and that Rice's comments came two days before the CIA finalized all their data on the attack.

It was a case of confusion, not deliberate deception.

we all understand that that is the current spin being put on it. We get it.

But if thats the case, then there was gross incompetence in the state dept under HRC.

The CIA is not under the state department, they report to the director of national intelligence.

embassy protection is the responsibility of the state dept.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

The report is the cake; the RWnut denialism is the icing.

"what difference, at this point, does it make". They lied about it, four americans died because the country failed to protect them in a very dangerous place.

spin and celebrate all you want, the truth will always be the there.

You realize the four of them would still be dead even if they called it a terrorist attack right?

Yes but would obama still be president since he was pushing to remove Gaddafi and the other we are winning bullshit?

 

[NYcarbineer]

The report is the cake; the RWnut denialism is the icing.

"what difference, at this point, does it make". They lied about it, four americans died because the country failed to protect them in a very dangerous place.

spin and celebrate all you want, the truth will always be the there.

You realize the four of them would still be dead even if they called it a terrorist attack right?

probably, but thats not the issue. lying for political gain is the issue here.

You mean the lies that contradicted this finding in the report?