GOP revives rule allowing $1 salaries for government employees

[Papageorgio]

Subsidies for Capitalists of wealth.

In what way, give me a specific example.

Any artificial Persons that receive funds from the government, to advance public policy decisions.

The right wing Only complains when real Persons get checks.

He asked for an example, dumbass.

Hes giving me exactly what I expected.
Proof that he is spewing a talking point without any clue what so ever what he is saying.
basically, proof that he is the typical uninformed liberal.

not at all; you are merely special pleading due to Your not having a valid argument. quibbling is not the same actually having another valid argument and rationale.

So all you do is quibble, you offer nothing valid, nothing rationale

 

[danielpalos]

In what way, give me a specific example.

Any artificial Persons that receive funds from the government, to advance public policy decisions.

The right wing Only complains when real Persons get checks.

He asked for an example, dumbass.

Hes giving me exactly what I expected.
Proof that he is spewing a talking point without any clue what so ever what he is saying.
basically, proof that he is the typical uninformed liberal.

not at all; you are merely special pleading due to Your not having a valid argument. quibbling is not the same actually having another valid argument and rationale.

So all you do is quibble, you offer nothing valid, nothing rationale

Any artificial Persons that receive funds from the government, to advance public policy decisions.

The right wing Only complains when real Persons get checks.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Good.... most of them aren't worth $.01 let alone $1.

How about a rule that rich guys have to live on their public servant salary while in public office?

Define "rich".

 

[danielpalos]

Good.... most of them aren't worth $.01 let alone $1.

How about a rule that rich guys have to live on their public servant salary while in public office?

Define "rich".

the one percent.

 

[Papageorgio]

I cited wikipedia. you have nothing but appeals to your authority. you have nothing but fallacy; whom do you think, i should believe.

Wikipedia? LOL!! Why not use Mother Earth News, just as reliable.

Robots now make fords.

Here's the other thing happening people don't realize is happening. Companies are subcontracting jobs to 3rd party companies.

In the past 35% workers were unions. In the future 35% will be temps.

This coming from a person that doesn't belong to a union and won't form one at his place of employment.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I work for a surprisingly liberal place. Even the president defends unions. We knock them too but he understands their importance. Do you?

I've worked for places I would have love to unionize. But they would just fire you and would the sheep sign up or be told their job will go to Texas? One place actually did cut half our staff then opened up a competitor in Texas we would compete against. Sad. Too many bad places to work.

Man you don't remember anything I post do you? If you want to unionize so be, I really don't care either way. Collective bargaining is fine unless you are a public employee. I agree with FDR Truman and Kennedy, public sector unions should not be allowed to have collective bargaining.

I'll give you that. But don't think that's going to help the middle class. Don't think that's going to help unemployment. I don't mind the idea of cutting the government in half but not overnight.

And I don't think teachers should make as much as they do.

But don't you dare try to say "but only the police get to have a union". Why them and not teachers? Because that would be going too far. If you are ok with unions for police you are a hypocrite.

I am okay with all unions, where did I claim otherwise?

 

[Papageorgio]

Any artificial Persons that receive funds from the government, to advance public policy decisions.

The right wing Only complains when real Persons get checks.

He asked for an example, dumbass.

Hes giving me exactly what I expected.
Proof that he is spewing a talking point without any clue what so ever what he is saying.
basically, proof that he is the typical uninformed liberal.

not at all; you are merely special pleading due to Your not having a valid argument. quibbling is not the same actually having another valid argument and rationale.

So all you do is quibble, you offer nothing valid, nothing rationale

Any artificial Persons that receive funds from the government, to advance public policy decisions.

The right wing Only complains when real Persons get checks.

More cliches without evidence, see another quibble. I don't mind if people get checks, that is their business not mine, quibbler.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Good.... most of them aren't worth $.01 let alone $1.

How about a rule that rich guys have to live on their public servant salary while in public office?

Define "rich".

the one percent.

Well, that certainly nails it down.

 

[danielpalos]

I cited wikipedia. you have nothing but appeals to your authority. you have nothing but fallacy; whom do you think, i should believe.

Wikipedia? LOL!! Why not use Mother Earth News, just as reliable.

Here's the other thing happening people don't realize is happening. Companies are subcontracting jobs to 3rd party companies.

In the past 35% workers were unions. In the future 35% will be temps.

This coming from a person that doesn't belong to a union and won't form one at his place of employment.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I work for a surprisingly liberal place. Even the president defends unions. We knock them too but he understands their importance. Do you?

I've worked for places I would have love to unionize. But they would just fire you and would the sheep sign up or be told their job will go to Texas? One place actually did cut half our staff then opened up a competitor in Texas we would compete against. Sad. Too many bad places to work.

Man you don't remember anything I post do you? If you want to unionize so be, I really don't care either way. Collective bargaining is fine unless you are a public employee. I agree with FDR Truman and Kennedy, public sector unions should not be allowed to have collective bargaining.

I'll give you that. But don't think that's going to help the middle class. Don't think that's going to help unemployment. I don't mind the idea of cutting the government in half but not overnight.

And I don't think teachers should make as much as they do.

But don't you dare try to say "but only the police get to have a union". Why them and not teachers? Because that would be going too far. If you are ok with unions for police you are a hypocrite.

I am okay with all unions, where did I claim otherwise?

you either have a good argument or you don't. diversion is a fallacy.

 

[danielpalos]

He asked for an example, dumbass.

Hes giving me exactly what I expected.
Proof that he is spewing a talking point without any clue what so ever what he is saying.
basically, proof that he is the typical uninformed liberal.

not at all; you are merely special pleading due to Your not having a valid argument. quibbling is not the same actually having another valid argument and rationale.

So all you do is quibble, you offer nothing valid, nothing rationale

Any artificial Persons that receive funds from the government, to advance public policy decisions.

The right wing Only complains when real Persons get checks.

More cliches without evidence, see another quibble. I don't mind if people get checks, that is their business not mine, quibbler.

this is why, no one takes the right wing seriously about economics.

Artificial persons get checks through corporate welfare, and real persons get checks from social welfare. The right, only has a problem when the poor get checks.

 

[danielpalos]

Good.... most of them aren't worth $.01 let alone $1.

How about a rule that rich guys have to live on their public servant salary while in public office?

Define "rich".

the one percent.

Well, that certainly nails it down.

wikipedia can be our reference.

 

[Papageorgio]

Good.... most of them aren't worth $.01 let alone $1.

How about a rule that rich guys have to live on their public servant salary while in public office?

Define "rich".

the one percent.

Well, that certainly nails it down.

Where do these nutters come from? Are they comedians?

 

[danielpalos]

nothing but fallacy. how fantastical of the right wing.

 

[Papageorgio]

I cited wikipedia. you have nothing but appeals to your authority. you have nothing but fallacy; whom do you think, i should believe.

Wikipedia? LOL!! Why not use Mother Earth News, just as reliable.

This coming from a person that doesn't belong to a union and won't form one at his place of employment.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I work for a surprisingly liberal place. Even the president defends unions. We knock them too but he understands their importance. Do you?

I've worked for places I would have love to unionize. But they would just fire you and would the sheep sign up or be told their job will go to Texas? One place actually did cut half our staff then opened up a competitor in Texas we would compete against. Sad. Too many bad places to work.

Man you don't remember anything I post do you? If you want to unionize so be, I really don't care either way. Collective bargaining is fine unless you are a public employee. I agree with FDR Truman and Kennedy, public sector unions should not be allowed to have collective bargaining.

I'll give you that. But don't think that's going to help the middle class. Don't think that's going to help unemployment. I don't mind the idea of cutting the government in half but not overnight.

And I don't think teachers should make as much as they do.

But don't you dare try to say "but only the police get to have a union". Why them and not teachers? Because that would be going too far. If you are ok with unions for police you are a hypocrite.

I am okay with all unions, where did I claim otherwise?

you either have a good argument or you don't. diversion is a fallacy.

I'm not diverting, like you are trying to do. I asked him to clarify a point he made about me.

 

[Papageorgio]

Hes giving me exactly what I expected.
Proof that he is spewing a talking point without any clue what so ever what he is saying.
basically, proof that he is the typical uninformed liberal.

not at all; you are merely special pleading due to Your not having a valid argument. quibbling is not the same actually having another valid argument and rationale.

So all you do is quibble, you offer nothing valid, nothing rationale

Any artificial Persons that receive funds from the government, to advance public policy decisions.

The right wing Only complains when real Persons get checks.

More cliches without evidence, see another quibble. I don't mind if people get checks, that is their business not mine, quibbler.

this is why, no one takes the right wing seriously about economics.

Artificial persons get checks through corporate welfare, and real persons get checks from social welfare. The right, only has a problem when the poor get checks.

This is why I don't take you seriously, you play cliches and say nothing over and over. Again, I have no issue with others getting checks. Why are you quibbling about me agreeing with you?

 

[Maryland Patriot]

Good.... most of them aren't worth $.01 let alone $1.

How about a rule that rich guys have to live on their public servant salary while in public office?

Define "rich".

the one percent.

Well, that certainly nails it down.

its like a talking point magic 8 ball, ask it a question then wait for the generic answer to appear.
The guy is either a total idiot or he is in maybe the 10th grade. Either way, he has no clue about anything he claims, is unable to back anything up that he says and basically has proven that he has no idea at all how money flows in this country.

 

[sealybobo]

Labor should have a choice of unemployment compensation, if they don't want to work and don't want to go on more expensive, means tested welfare.

I don't know where to go with that. It does appear that you support some type of social payment for those who flat out refuse to even make an attempt at finding employment. In other words we the productive should be burdened with the lazy and disinterested. Just because....

...we subscribe to the rule of law, Individual Liberty, and Capitalism. Why not ask for a tax preference for it.

I'm having trouble figuring out if you're a troll or totally brain dead. The second isn't as much of a long shot as some may think, because Socialists are just that outright stupid.

Are you against public schools and police? You socialist!

The Police are infrastructure. For something to be Socialist, it has to include Social control of a means of production.

I am against Public schools, though. Worthless, propaganda spewing, tax dollar black holes.

I have no kids and my brother sends his 2 kids to the most expensive private school in Michigan. I would love to see everyone with kids have to pay for their school.

 

[sealybobo]

Good.... most of them aren't worth $.01 let alone $1.

How about a rule that rich guys have to live on their public servant salary while in public office?

Define "rich".

the one percent.

Well, that certainly nails it down.

Where do these nutters come from? Are they comedians?

Soggy is a nut huh?

 

[sealybobo]

Good.... most of them aren't worth $.01 let alone $1.

How about a rule that rich guys have to live on their public servant salary while in public office?

Define "rich".

the one percent.

Well, that certainly nails it down.

its like a talking point magic 8 ball, ask it a question then wait for the generic answer to appear.
The guy is either a total idiot or he is in maybe the 10th grade. Either way, he has no clue about anything he claims, is unable to back anything up that he says and basically has proven that he has no idea at all how money flows in this country.

Just because he's not a right wing nut job like you doesn't mean he's stupid. I'm reading your back and forth and seems he's schooling your ass but you just don't get what he's saying because you are a right wing tool.

 

[Maryland Patriot]

How about a rule that rich guys have to live on their public servant salary while in public office?

Define "rich".

the one percent.

Well, that certainly nails it down.

its like a talking point magic 8 ball, ask it a question then wait for the generic answer to appear.
The guy is either a total idiot or he is in maybe the 10th grade. Either way, he has no clue about anything he claims, is unable to back anything up that he says and basically has proven that he has no idea at all how money flows in this country.

Just because he's not a right wing nut job like you doesn't mean he's stupid. I'm reading your back and forth and seems he's schooling your ass but you just don't get what he's saying because you are a right wing tool.

He has not schooled anyone? he has not been able to provide any proof that corporate welfare is a real thing.
until he does he will just have to stay on the total idiot list.

 

[Papageorgio]

How about a rule that rich guys have to live on their public servant salary while in public office?

Define "rich".

the one percent.

Well, that certainly nails it down.

Where do these nutters come from? Are they comedians?

Soggy is a nut huh?

NOLA is fine, Daniel is a nut. he has nothing to say and then says it over and over and thinks the more he posts his stupidity the better his argument is. At least you think.