Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
End Crime? No.
Reduce it? Well, the UK, Australia, Germany, Japan, France, Italy have all proven it does.
One form of crime went down but others went up when you disarmed the people.
You have more of a chance being a victim those country's than you do in the United States.
No, you don't. Their crime rates are vastly lower than ours in all of them.
So now you think you can prevent all accidental death too?
More kids drown in swimming pools than get shot. Maybe you should start there.
go get the numbers
End Crime? No.
Reduce it? Well, the UK, Australia, Germany, Japan, France, Italy have all proven it does.
One form of crime went down but others went up when you disarmed the people.
You have more of a chance being a victim those country's than you do in the United States.
No, you don't. Their crime rates are vastly lower than ours in all of them.
One form of crime went down but others went up when you disarmed the people.
You have more of a chance being a victim those country's than you do in the United States.
No, you don't. Their crime rates are vastly lower than ours in all of them.
Sorry but I just proved you wrong
NoNo, you don't. Their crime rates are vastly lower than ours in all of them.
Sorry but I just proved you wrong
and I just proved you wrong about the drownings
SoSorry but I just proved you wrong
and I just proved you wrong about the drownings
One form of crime went down but others went up when you disarmed the people.
You have more of a chance being a victim those country's than you do in the United States.
No, you don't. Their crime rates are vastly lower than ours in all of them.
No you don't? Assaults and being a victim went up when gun confiscation took place.
Big Reb... you shouldn't try to play the race card, you kind of suck at it.
Fact is, a gun in the house is 43 times more likely to kill a member of the household, and the FBI recorded that there were only 201 cases of "justifiable homicide" committed with guns in 2010.
FBI ? Expanded Homicide Data Table 15
The notion you need a gun to protect yourself is laughable. But the gun industry knows a sucker when they see one.
Like I said, let the INNOCENT victims of gun violence collect damages from the gun industry and their big investors, then we'll see how keen they are on "the second Amendment".... bet they'll be for "well-regulated militias" really quickly.
Dumb ass you have no facts, why do you keep repeating the same myth?
And yes stupid the first gun control laws were used against blacks.
Here's a disarmed black man was visited by the klan
No, that's a man murdered by the Klan. they'd have still murdered him even if had a gun.
Probably would have triggered worse reprisals if he had shot one or two of them.
But please address my point. If guns are so crucial for self defense, how come only 201 of the 11,000 gun muders we have every year actually involves a citizen shooting a criminal in self-defense? This is what the FBI says, not what I say, and their data has been pretty consistant on this.
out of 300,000,000 guns, only 201 were used by "good guys" to kill "bad guys".
Asshole you're an idiot, the first gun control laws were used against blacks, and you say I'm playing the race card? No I'm playing the truth card.
No reputable historian would endorse that interpretation...
Reality- for most of AMerican history, few people owned guns, few people needed them. Guns didn't become a problem until industrialization and mass production, and a gun industry ready to sell to any crazy person who could bring up a bunch of crumpled $100.00 bills.
So when the rest of the world got rid of private guns and found they were far better off, we Americans doubled down on stupid.
Terrorists killed 3000 people on 9/11, we went to war. We changed the way we live.
Guns have killed 270,000 people since 9/11, and we've made the guns laws weaker.
Absolutely insane.
Asshole you're an idiot, the first gun control laws were used against blacks, and you say I'm playing the race card? No I'm playing the truth card.
No reputable historian would endorse that interpretation...
Reality- for most of AMerican history, few people owned guns, few people needed them. Guns didn't become a problem until industrialization and mass production, and a gun industry ready to sell to any crazy person who could bring up a bunch of crumpled $100.00 bills.
So when the rest of the world got rid of private guns and found they were far better off, we Americans doubled down on stupid.
Terrorists killed 3000 people on 9/11, we went to war. We changed the way we live.
Guns have killed 270,000 people since 9/11, and we've made the guns laws weaker.
Absolutely insane.
Soand I just proved you wrong about the drownings
so its OK for you to be wrong huh?
No, you don't. Their crime rates are vastly lower than ours in all of them.
Sorry but I just proved you wrong
and I just proved you wrong about the drownings
Dumb ass you have no facts, why do you keep repeating the same myth?
And yes stupid the first gun control laws were used against blacks.
Here's a disarmed black man was visited by the klan
No, that's a man murdered by the Klan. they'd have still murdered him even if had a gun.
Probably would have triggered worse reprisals if he had shot one or two of them.
But please address my point. If guns are so crucial for self defense, how come only 201 of the 11,000 gun muders we have every year actually involves a citizen shooting a criminal in self-defense? This is what the FBI says, not what I say, and their data has been pretty consistant on this.
out of 300,000,000 guns, only 201 were used by "good guys" to kill "bad guys".
Are we to assume that you would prefer 201 more VICTIMS?
