CrusaderFrank
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2009
- 147,612
- 70,847
- 2,330
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So you lied saying I to admitted something that I did not even address? You are a fool.
So you lied yet again, Yurt.
My point was that all parties do it.
I am glad you admitted that you lied.
^^^^ Yurt, you can't hide.
Please, please, please, let him keep hiding![]()
let's see....we have liberals claiming republicans are putting up fake sites....yet no liberal can actually give a link to the site.
see, in the other two threads about this same subject, there was a link to the actual site and it was clear as day it was not fake or fraudulent. in fact, after copying the information, a lliberal admitted it did not rise to fraud.
i believe this thread is bullshit and that is why no liberals will link to this supposed site.
Here is another link to an article explaining the problem:
Republicans set up decoy websites to divert donations from Democratic candidates
See, the problem is not whether or not you think it easy to understand, whether you think it is clearly stated as to what the site is saying, it is whether anyone finds the site misleading, whether they give money under false perceptions, and whether the site was designed with that specific goal in mind. I think the answer to that question is pretty obvious but I am not a legal expert. We have plenty of legal experts however to examine the issue and it is a dereliction of duty if they do not.
One of the reasons I feel so strongly about this matter is I have designed and built a website or two in my day. I realize how easy it is to think a user will know how to use a site only to see a very computer literate individual stare at the screen not knowing which items are links or just pictures. Colors, patterns, fonts, use of white space, placement of relevant information and extra information all need to be thoughtful considered. I really doubt these sites were built without any consideration to the presentation of information. If one person goes to site to see why it is fake they will instantly see the reasons it is. If they go to the site thinking they have gone to a legitimate site they will see what they are looking for, do what they came to do, and get back to whatever they were doing. If someone came to the site because they just heard something that really pissed them off but they are in the middle of something they will Google the candidate, go to the site of the candidate, give $50, and go back to what they were doing. If a website was specifically designed to pervert that process it is fraud and is a criminal offense.
let's see....we have liberals claiming republicans are putting up fake sites....yet no liberal can actually give a link to the site.
see, in the other two threads about this same subject, there was a link to the actual site and it was clear as day it was not fake or fraudulent. in fact, after copying the information, a lliberal admitted it did not rise to fraud.
i believe this thread is bullshit and that is why no liberals will link to this supposed site.
Here is another link to an article explaining the problem:
Republicans set up decoy websites to divert donations from Democratic candidates
See, the problem is not whether or not you think it easy to understand, whether you think it is clearly stated as to what the site is saying, it is whether anyone finds the site misleading, whether they give money under false perceptions, and whether the site was designed with that specific goal in mind. I think the answer to that question is pretty obvious but I am not a legal expert. We have plenty of legal experts however to examine the issue and it is a dereliction of duty if they do not.
Oh, how fucking rich. Complain about a fraudulent website that CLEARLY IN THE TITLE states it is for defeating the democrat candidate and then link to a report that purposefully edits out the statement in the title.
How rich, LOL.
One of the reasons I feel so strongly about this matter is I have designed and built a website or two in my day. I realize how easy it is to think a user will know how to use a site only to see a very computer literate individual stare at the screen not knowing which items are links or just pictures. Colors, patterns, fonts, use of white space, placement of relevant information and extra information all need to be thoughtful considered. I really doubt these sites were built without any consideration to the presentation of information. If one person goes to site to see why it is fake they will instantly see the reasons it is. If they go to the site thinking they have gone to a legitimate site they will see what they are looking for, do what they came to do, and get back to whatever they were doing. If someone came to the site because they just heard something that really pissed them off but they are in the middle of something they will Google the candidate, go to the site of the candidate, give $50, and go back to what they were doing. If a website was specifically designed to pervert that process it is fraud and is a criminal offense.
And it would be fraud if anything you just stated was true. Unfortunately, none of it is. In BOLD LETTERS in the title it states:
Make a Contribution Today to Help Defeat Alex Sink and candidates like her
The entire site is putting negative information out there about Sink. There is no possible way for anyone to not realze what the site is if they read a single sentence on the site itself. ZERO FUCKING FRAUD.
You have not utilized anything from the site itself specifically because of this. Either you are completely ignorant and unwilling to see the truth by going there yourself or you are outright lying about what is presented there. Either way YOU are being far more fraudulent than this site ever was.
![]()
^^^^ Yurt, you can't hide.
Please, please, please, let him keep hiding![]()
still no link
why am i not surprised a lefty and jakey have teamed up to provide no link
Here is another link to an article explaining the problem:
Republicans set up decoy websites to divert donations from Democratic candidates
See, the problem is not whether or not you think it easy to understand, whether you think it is clearly stated as to what the site is saying, it is whether anyone finds the site misleading, whether they give money under false perceptions, and whether the site was designed with that specific goal in mind. I think the answer to that question is pretty obvious but I am not a legal expert. We have plenty of legal experts however to examine the issue and it is a dereliction of duty if they do not.
Oh, how fucking rich. Complain about a fraudulent website that CLEARLY IN THE TITLE states it is for defeating the democrat candidate and then link to a report that purposefully edits out the statement in the title.
How rich, LOL.
One of the reasons I feel so strongly about this matter is I have designed and built a website or two in my day. I realize how easy it is to think a user will know how to use a site only to see a very computer literate individual stare at the screen not knowing which items are links or just pictures. Colors, patterns, fonts, use of white space, placement of relevant information and extra information all need to be thoughtful considered. I really doubt these sites were built without any consideration to the presentation of information. If one person goes to site to see why it is fake they will instantly see the reasons it is. If they go to the site thinking they have gone to a legitimate site they will see what they are looking for, do what they came to do, and get back to whatever they were doing. If someone came to the site because they just heard something that really pissed them off but they are in the middle of something they will Google the candidate, go to the site of the candidate, give $50, and go back to what they were doing. If a website was specifically designed to pervert that process it is fraud and is a criminal offense.
And it would be fraud if anything you just stated was true. Unfortunately, none of it is. In BOLD LETTERS in the title it states:
Make a Contribution Today to Help Defeat Alex Sink and candidates like her
The entire site is putting negative information out there about Sink. There is no possible way for anyone to not realze what the site is if they read a single sentence on the site itself. ZERO FUCKING FRAUD.
You have not utilized anything from the site itself specifically because of this. Either you are completely ignorant and unwilling to see the truth by going there yourself or you are outright lying about what is presented there. Either way YOU are being far more fraudulent than this site ever was.
![]()
That really puts a fine point of the Low Information nature of the typical Democrat Voter
Notice that all the con responses are in defense of the deception. None even try to have any dignity. They're proud of their parties sliminess. That should give everyone an idea of the kind of government they envision.
All your double talk doesn't change the fact that the cons are using slimy politics. When the liberals do it, then we'll rag on them. BTW, I'm a registered INDEPENDENT since 1996.Notice that all the con responses are in defense of the deception. None even try to have any dignity. They're proud of their parties sliminess. That should give everyone an idea of the kind of government they envision.
Proud?
For the record, I despise Republicans as much as I do Democrats.
However, just because you read a biased blog that coincides with your biased beliefs does not make the blog correct in what it states. It took about 1 second to notice that the donation box says "help defeat Alex Sink" and then about a second and a half to notice it was a Republican site. The idiot simply did not read what he was donating to. He is lucky to have received a refund.
Notice that all the con responses are in defense of the deception. None even try to have any dignity. They're proud of their parties sliminess. That should give everyone an idea of the kind of government they envision.
Notice that all the con responses are in defense of the deception. None even try to have any dignity. They're proud of their parties sliminess. That should give everyone an idea of the kind of government they envision.
There was no deception ..... just an idiot old man who didn't bother reading what was as clear as the nose on his face. Typical stupid democrat then goes on to blame the site and even dumber dems are fooled by reporting that knows you're too stupid to see the simple facts so you're led around like a bunch of dumbass jackasses.
how many threads are we going to have on this? it has been debunked so many times. are democrats this stupid?
Notice that all the con responses are in defense of the deception. None even try to have any dignity. They're proud of their parties sliminess. That should give everyone an idea of the kind of government they envision.
There was no deception ..... just an idiot old man who didn't bother reading what was as clear as the nose on his face. Typical stupid democrat then goes on to blame the site and even dumber dems are fooled by reporting that knows you're too stupid to see the simple facts so you're led around like a bunch of dumbass jackasses.
Read the OP, moron. The story was reported by FORBES, a con rag.
Notice that all the con responses are in defense of the deception. None even try to have any dignity. They're proud of their parties sliminess. That should give everyone an idea of the kind of government they envision.
There was no deception ..... just an idiot old man who didn't bother reading what was as clear as the nose on his face. Typical stupid democrat then goes on to blame the site and even dumber dems are fooled by reporting that knows you're too stupid to see the simple facts so you're led around like a bunch of dumbass jackasses.
Read the OP, moron. The story was reported by FORBES, a con rag.
There was no deception ..... just an idiot old man who didn't bother reading what was as clear as the nose on his face. Typical stupid democrat then goes on to blame the site and even dumber dems are fooled by reporting that knows you're too stupid to see the simple facts so you're led around like a bunch of dumbass jackasses.
Read the OP, moron. The story was reported by FORBES, a con rag.
So what, idiot? Try thinking for yourself....sobering up first would help.
I suppose one could argue that the web site address itself, is fraudulent. I suppose one could also argue that the large banner advertising the opposition, was more prominent than the large bold font explaining what you are paying for. If someone was on a lap top and had bad eye sight and the sun was reflecting on it... yeah he might make a mistake.
Yeah ok just from the web site address and that pic, I'd say it's arguable that this site is attempting to perpetrate a fraud.