JoeB131
Diamond Member
[
Did you even read the grand jury report? That's a rhetorical question, of course, because it's evident that you did not. On the whole, your arguments are nonsensical. Instead of blaming the fact that Gosnell could operate because of pro-choicers not wanting to cause, as the Grand Jury report noted, an "undue burden to women" seeking to obtain an abortion (see: PPvC), you blame the fact that Gosnell could operate for years on the fact that abortions aren't free. Sorry, but that's extremely idiotic
I'm going to save your posts as proof that pro-choicers, in general, don't just want abortions to be legal; they want them to be free and paid for by someone else.
Oh, I absolutely want them to be paid for by someone else.
If those families can't afford the abortions, they can't afford the kids. So it's a pay me now or pay me later situation. I'd rather pay for one $300 first trimester abortion than 18 years of dependency followed by a person who is probably going to end up in prison for most of his life.
If only someone had aborted Charlie Manson before he was born.
On the politically motivated Grand Jury report- keeping in mind, the Judge threw out half the charges before it even GOT to a jury- the fact is, all the restrictive laws in PA didn't stop Gosnell from operating. They helped him. Because he became the choice of last resort.