ShaklesOfBigGov
Restore the Republic
- Nov 19, 2010
- 5,077
- 749
Ah, yes. "I think it is a critical first step in making a health care system that works for all Americans."
Making it work for all Americans? Like the way the Federal Government currently handles medicare and medicaid? What about Social Security, I'm sure there has never been a problem with how the government manages that program? Can you name me one government run program that is more fiscally efficient than that of the private sector? I'd be intersted in hearing your view of how exactly does "government do a better job at making it work for All Americans", considering their financial track record and Federal budget issues.
It's odd--when the quote from my post trickled down into your response, the wording had changed. "I think it is a critical first step in making a health care system that works for all Americans" became "government do[es] a better job at making it work for All Americans."
I'm not sure how I explain a quote (which isn't mine, by the way) that doesn't say what you seem to think it says. That does seem be the theme of this thread, though. Many folks seem unable to distinguish between the kind of private multi-payer system reinforced by the ACA and single-payer models or "government-run" systems or whatever other terrors lurk in their imaginations.
So you can not provide ONE government program that is run more fiscally efficient than in the private sector. Yet you believe government is the answer to providing a Health Care system that works for All Americans. Interesting. Are you simply afraid to address the issue, so you resort to a little "cop-out" response? Simply give me an example of a government program to which Federal Government did a more financially efficient job?
Last edited: