Great Billboard

[bripat9643]

ROFL! They most certainly are.



During the Indian wars General Sherman gunned down plenty of Indians who had no guns.

You don't know your history very well, do you?

Because no one IS trying to take anyone's guns away. Try to stay in the Present, please.

Why do you leftist keep repeating this lie?

What was that whole parade of idiocy about banning AR's then?

Stop
Fucking
Lying
When it's so clear. There is no grey area at all.

Of course it did. Every time some lib refers to "common sense regulations," they are talking about making guns illegal.

 

[Intense]

Yes, I would take it as a warning for minorities in this country to watch out for the white, christian males who think they own the place.

Pfft...as if someone's personal gun collection would stand a chance against the Delaware national guard much less the US Army.

pfft those national guards men are ordinary people that believe in their constitutional rights,along with the US army,if you think they would in mass attach US citizens,you be wrong.

Leave that to the Canadians.

 

[candycorn]

Yes, I would take it as a warning for minorities in this country to watch out for the white, christian males who think they own the place.

Pfft...as if someone's personal gun collection would stand a chance against the Delaware national guard much less the US Army.

pfft those national guards men are ordinary people that believe in their constitutional rights,along with the US army,if you think they would in mass attach US citizens,you be wrong.

Yes...which makes the stockpiling of guns and ammo even more looney.

 

[thereisnospoon]

DAMN....using liberal ideal against them....awesome.......


what does this mean?
I think we all get that (Second Amendment) message. What I don't understand is how an organization can post something like that and not think about the ripple effect that it's gonna have through the community," she said.


What are liberals going to be so upset at the bilboards they're going to bash some indians?

what is the ripple effect?

I read it as a warning to everybody that what the government did to the Native Americans could happen to them. I see no anti-Indian propaganda at all.

Yes, I would take it as a warning for minorities in this country to watch out for the white, christian males who think they own the place.

Oh go fuck yourself.
Racist piece of shit.

 

[thereisnospoon]

But, it's got some Native Americans really teed off. Read more @ Native Americans incensed over pro-gun rights billboard in Colorado | Fox News

sadly it seems, that American Indians have taken notes and now act as a victim class.

take offense to anything and everything.

Until they open a casino. Then it's 'game on dude!'

 

[thereisnospoon]

So...they were undefeatable WITH guns?

Strawman!!!

No, but they sure as hell we easier to defeat once disarmed.

Not a strawman at all. It shows that this is not a "gun" issue at all. It's about the big bad European christian male pushing around the natives, a minority, because he CAN.

another racist comment.

 

[Antares]

Why Bod....you an angry black person?

Seems you have been in a coma for the last 2-3 months.

The obama admin actually did try to take away people arms.

Shortbus has been in a coma her/his entire life.

Where was this that people's guns were almost taken away?

 

[percysunshine]

Change a few words, and it could be about Obamacare.

Ever seen government provided healthcare on an indian reservation?

 

[Locke11_21]

bodecea drunkenly drawled:

Because no one IS trying to take anyone's guns away. Try to stay in the Present, please.

Really?

“Banning guns addresses a fundamental right of all Americans to feel safe.” ~Senator Diane Feinstein, 1993

“We’re going to hammer guns on the anvil of relentless legislative strategy! We’re going to beat guns into submission!”
~Senator Charles Schumer, 1993

“Except for lawful police and military purposes, the possession of weapons by individuals is not constitutionally protected.” ~ACLU policy statement #47, 1986


And that is just a few. But hey, nothing to worry about with quotes like that. I mean after all, those in the past who used similar quotes all head good intentions:


“This year will go down in history. For the first time, a civilised nation has full gun registration! Our streets will be safer, our police more efficient, and the world will follow our lead into the future!” Adolf Hitler


“Germans who wish to use firearms should join the SS or the SA — ordinary citizens don’t need guns, as their having guns doesn’t serve the state.” - Heinrich Himmler.

 

[Spoonman]

bodecea drunkenly drawled:

Because no one IS trying to take anyone's guns away. Try to stay in the Present, please.

Really?

“Banning guns addresses a fundamental right of all Americans to feel safe.” ~Senator Diane Feinstein, 1993

“We’re going to hammer guns on the anvil of relentless legislative strategy! We’re going to beat guns into submission!”
~Senator Charles Schumer, 1993

“Except for lawful police and military purposes, the possession of weapons by individuals is not constitutionally protected.” ~ACLU policy statement #47, 1986


And that is just a few. But hey, nothing to worry about with quotes like that. I mean after all, those in the past who used similar quotes all head good intentions:


“This year will go down in history. For the first time, a civilised nation has full gun registration! Our streets will be safer, our police more efficient, and the world will follow our lead into the future!” Adolf Hitler


“Germans who wish to use firearms should join the SS or the SA — ordinary citizens don’t need guns, as their having guns doesn’t serve the state.” - Heinrich Himmler.

i like how libs equate - not having the votes to take away gun rights to - we're not trying to take away your gun rights

 

[eflatminor]

Because no one IS trying to take anyone's guns away.

My guess, you're either lying, drunk or supremely ignorant.

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=mQJHzmB1JuE"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=mQJHzmB1JuE[/ame]

 

[Uncensored2008]

My guess, you're either lying, drunk or supremely ignorant.

With Shortbus, you can be assured that it's all three....

 

[peach174]

Because no one is trying to take anyone's guns away.

ROFL! They most certainly are.

All it does is illuminate the injustices the American troops inflicted on the Native Americans AT GUNPOINT - it's not like the Lakota were lining up voluntarily to give guns to the generals. Didn't you love the part where they chased down and killed those that were unarmed and fled? Disgusting what our government did to those people.

During the Indian wars General Sherman gunned down plenty of Indians who had no guns.

You don't know your history very well, do you?

Because no one IS trying to take anyone's guns away. Try to stay in the Present, please.

No one is trying to take guns away?
REALLY?
Then why are Democrats pushing bills to make guns and ammo unaffordable and too time consuming to purchase, maintain and insure them?

 

[Uncensored2008]

ROFL! They most certainly are.



During the Indian wars General Sherman gunned down plenty of Indians who had no guns.

You don't know your history very well, do you?

Because no one IS trying to take anyone's guns away. Try to stay in the Present, please.

No one is trying to take guns away?
REALLY?
Then why are Democrats pushing bills to make guns and ammo unaffordable and too time consuming to purchase, maintain and insure them?

Shortbus speak with forked tongue!

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

But, it's got some Native Americans really teed off. Read more @ Native Americans incensed over pro-gun rights billboard in Colorado | Fox News

The Native American genocide/impoundment wasn't about guns....it was about using perceived racial and religious superiority (Manifest Destiny) to bulldoze over the weaker peoples.

What exactly are you trying to say here? Because the point being made with the sign has absolutely nothing to do with what you just said.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

DAMN....using liberal ideal against them....awesome.......


what does this mean?
I think we all get that (Second Amendment) message. What I don't understand is how an organization can post something like that and not think about the ripple effect that it's gonna have through the community," she said.


What are liberals going to be so upset at the bilboards they're going to bash some indians?

what is the ripple effect?

I read it as a warning to everybody that what the government did to the Native Americans could happen to them. I see no anti-Indian propaganda at all.

Yes, I would take it as a warning for minorities in this country to watch out for the white, christian males who think they own the place.

More hatred of white males by a lesbian. What a surprise !!!

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

So...they were undefeatable WITH guns?

Strawman!!!

No, but they sure as hell we easier to defeat once disarmed.

Not a strawman at all. It shows that this is not a "gun" issue at all. It's about the big bad European christian male pushing around the natives, a minority, because he CAN.

Dont leave out the part where the indians joined forces with the US to eradicate tribes they didnt like.
Had they been smart enough to join forces it might have turned out different for them.