Dems effed around, and now they're gonna find out.

The Intelligencer...

View attachment 955001

Comment: The fix was in.

Oh the outrage. Judge Irene Cannon was appointed by Trump and she's been a good little foot soldier for him, hoping for that next SC opening. I don't think she's really SC material though.

Trump isn't threatening her on a daily basis, but then she's dragging her feet better than Trump could have ever hoped for. The Florida Appeals Court has slammed her Orders, so she stopped issuing them. Now she's setting it up so she can dismiss the case and the state can't appeal.

When Trump loses the election, she'll be recused.
 
MAGAs are furious over the outcome of trump's latest trial. They are incensed that Democrats used existing law and our courts to find Trump guilty of multiple felonies. This is just outrageous.
It really isn't. Trump did the shit he was accused of. And there's plenty of evidence to prove it.
 
Except what he did wasn’t illegal.

Falsifying business records is definitely illegal in NY. And if it was done with the intent to commit, aid or conceal another crime, its a felony.

There's plenty of evidence that Trump committed this felony 34 times.
 
Falsifying business records is definitely illegal in NY. And if it was done with the intent to commit, aid or conceal another crime, its a felony.

There's plenty of evidence that Trump committed this felony 34 times.
What's the other crime, Bubba? :p
 
1) You shouldn’t make nasty comments about someone else’s cognitive ability when you don’t even know the difference between “except” and “accept.”

2) Of course it’s not over. This was a clear violation of Trump’s constitutional rights and will be overturned. In doing so, the appeals court (or SCOTUS) will list all the ways in which the Democrats manipulated the law to hurt Trump’s presidential campaign - and then everyone who doesn’t already know will see the North Korean tactics the Left takes against its political rivals.

A man in middle-stage dementia, who has brought in 10 million illegals, ratcheted up energy costs (which impact everything else), enabled Iran to fund the Oct 7th massacre of Jews, is presiding over rampant violent crime, and cannot find his way off stage and wanders away in the middle of a meeting CANNOT WIN WITHOUT A LOT OF CHEATING.

1. That's a grammatical error, not a cognitive error, Miss Phi Beta Kappa.

2. Yes dear, it's over. Nobody's constitution rights were violated, except those of the American people whose right to know what kind of person they're voting for was usurped by the conspiracy to hide the truth.

You're parroting Trump's lies again Lisa. Biden is a whole lot saner than the candidate who thinks Milwaukee is a "terrible" city. That'll go over well at the National Convention.

Here's what they're saying about Joe Biden in the REAL World:



 
Falsifying business records is definitely illegal in NY.

EXPIRED.
And if it was done with the intent to commit, aid or conceal another crime, it’s a felony.

Name this “crime” the jury determined Trump intended to commit. We still don’t know.
There's plenty of evidence that Trump committed this felony 34 times.
Again, what “other crime,” the one that turned an expired misdemeanor into 34 felonies, did he commit?
 
What's the other crime, Bubba?
Still refusing to do the slightest research of your own, huh?

No worries, baby bird. I've got you! You open your little maw...and I'll do all that research you will never do for yourself.

The jury instructions included multiple options including FECA and NY 17-152
 
Still refusing to do the slightest research of your own, huh?

No worries, baby bird. I've got you! You open your little maw...and I'll do all that research you will never do for yourself.

The jury instructions included multiple options including FECA and NY 17-152
And which one of the “options” did the jury decide he intended to commit?

Was Trump informed that he was being charged for intending to commit one of these options? When was that?
 
FECA and NY 17-152

§ 17-152. Conspiracy to promote or prevent election. Any two or more persons who conspire to promote or prevent the election of any person to a public office by unlawful means and which conspiracy is acted upon by one or more of the parties thereto, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.


It's a misdemeanor. The statute of limitations had run out on it, and THERE IS NO OTHER CRIME, NITWIT.
 

It's a misdemeanor. The statute of limitations had run out on it, and THERE IS NO OTHER CRIME, NITWIT.
175.10 is a misdemeanor. However, it can be raised to a felony if the state can prove that the falsification of business records was done with the intent to commit, aid, or conceal another crime.

And the other crimes listed in the jury instructions included FECA and NY 17-152.

And the statute of limitations had run out according to who? Remember, Statutes were extended during COVID. And Judge Merchan had an entire hearing on this issue.

So.....you may want to look into a bit more.
 
And which one of the “options” did the jury decide he intended to commit?

Was Trump informed that he was being charged for intending to commit one of these options? When was that?


Doesn't matter which crime they decided he had the intent to commit. The standard that state had to meet was ANOTHER crime had been committed. With the jury's options including FECA and 17-152, along with a trio of standards for meeting 'unlawful means'.

And the jury unanimously concluded that the state had proved beyond a reasonable doubt the falsification of records had been committed with the intent to commit, aid or conceal another crime.
 
175.10 is a misdemeanor. However, it can be raised to a felony if the state can prove that the falsification of business records was done with the intent to commit, aid, or conceal another crime.

And the other crimes listed in the jury instructions included FECA and NY 17-152.

And the statute of limitations had run out according to who? Remember, Statutes were extended during COVID. And Judge Merchan had an entire hearing on this issue.

So.....you may want to look into a bit more.
For another thing, FuckTardo, the law was passed 6 years after the alleged crime was committed.

Look up Ex Post Facto sometime.
 
Doesn't matter which crime they decided he had the intent to commit. The standard that state had to meet was ANOTHER crime had been committed. With the jury's options including FECA and 17-152, along with a trio of standards for meeting 'unlawful means'.

And the jury unanimously concluded that the state had proved beyond a reasonable doubt the falsification of records had been committed with the intent to commit, aid or conceal another crime.
There has to be another crime though, and there isn't.

That Ex Post Facto thing is going to smash this thing to Smithereens I bet.

Here's a little reading for you:


The law was passed in 2021 yet the alleged offense occured in 2016. :rolleyes-41:

I hope these fuckers are disbarred and prosecuted. They should be.
 
Last edited:
;What's the other crime, Bubba? :p


1. There is the conspiracy to hide the women's stories until after the election, and to publish negative stories about Trump's opponents whether true or nor, to change the outcome of an election - election fraud ;
2. There are the campaign contributions made by Enquirer in paying for McDougall's story and the doorman's story, which were never reported by the campaign, and which David Pecker was given immunity on; and
3. Cohen's payments to Stormy Daniels which Cohen went to prison for, and for which Trump was an unindicted co[conspirator.

Jurors didn't have to be unanimous on which underlying crime applied, they just had to agree that one of them applied.

Greed got Trump in the end. Trying to claim it all as a business expense. Never throw your fixer under the bus. He knows where ALL the bodies are buried because he's the one who buried them.
 
There has to be another crime though, and there isn't.

Says you, citing you. And you have no idea what's going on.

Back in the jury instructions, the secondary crimes that the jury had to assess as part of the felony enhancements of 175.10 to determine if there was intent to commit, aid or conceal them......was FECA and NY 17-152. Along with a trio of standards for meeting 'unlawful means."

The jury unanimously found that Trump falsified business records. AND that he had falsified those records with the intent to commit, aid or conceal another crime, the standard necessary to upgrade 34 misdemeanors into 34 felonies.

Remember, Duke....I know more than you.
 
Doesn't matter which crime they decided he had the intent to commit. The standard that state had to meet was ANOTHER crime had been committed. With the jury's options including FECA and 17-152, along with a trio of standards for meeting 'unlawful means'.

And the jury unanimously concluded that the state had proved beyond a reasonable doubt the falsification of records had been committed with the intent to commit, aid or conceal another crime.
So the jury unanimously decided Trump did 1) this, 2) that, or 3) the other?

Sorry, this isn’t like ordering off a Chinese menu. You think someone can be charged with intending to rob a bank, or intending to shoot someone, or intending to hijack a car - and four jurors think the evidence proved it was the bank, another four think it was proved it was shooting, and the remaining four think it was the carjacking - and that counts as unanimous?!

GMAB.
 

Forum List

Back
Top