Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For another thing, FuckTardo, the law was passed 6 years after the alleged crime was committed.
Look up Ex Post Facto sometime.
Doesn't matter, smartass. Ex Post Facto.Says you, citing you. And you have no idea what's going on.
Back in the jury instructions, the secondary crimes that the jury had to assess as part of the felony enhancements of 175.10 to determine if there was intent to commit, aid or conceal them......was FECA and NY 17-152. Along with a trio of standards for meeting 'unlawful means."
The jury unanimously found that Trump falsified business records. AND that he had falsified those records with the intent to commit, aid or conceal another crime, the standard necessary to upgrade 34 misdemeanors into 34 felonies.
Remember, Duke....I know more than you.
You take a look at The Constitution.Again, take a look at how the statute of limitations of crime was extended by the Governor during COVID due to the courts being largely shut down.
Then take a look at Merchan's hearing on this issue where he found that due to the extension, the charges under 175.10 had not yet expired.
Your unwillingness to actually get into the rulings or jury instructions is severely hamstringing your argument.
So the jury unanimously decided Trump did 1) this, 2) that, or 3) the other?
Oh, the Chinese menu. So turley is doing your thinking for you.Sorry, this isn’t like ordering off a Chinese menu. You think someone can be charged with intending to rob a bank, or intending to shoot someone, or intending to hijack a car - a four jurors think the evidence proved it was the bank, another four think it was proved it was shooting, and the remaining four think it was the carjacking - and that counts as unanimous?!
GMAB.
2. Yes dear, it's over. Nobody's constitution rights were violated, except those of the American people whose right to know what kind of person they're voting for was usurped by the conspiracy to hide the truth.
You take a look at The Constitution.
I've read the jury instructions, there's no way they could return any verdict except guilty.
Doesn't matter, smartass. Ex Post Facto.
Yeah, you don't get it. What they did was patently illegal.The ability to toll out statutes of limitations in circumstances like COVID is already part of the governor's authority under NY law. He merely exercised that authority.
The issue of tolling statutes of limitations was already adjudicated by an appellant court in Brash v. Richards. And they found that the governor definitely had that authority.
What this then, cocksuck?And you've never read the jury instructions.
Says you, citing yourself as a legal authority. And you're nobody.Yeah, you don't get it. What they did was patently illegal.
What year was the law passed?
So the jury unanimously decided Trump did 1) this, 2) that, or 3) the other?
Sorry, this isn’t like ordering off a Chinese menu. You think someone can be charged with intending to rob a bank, or intending to shoot someone, or intending to hijack a car - and four jurors think the evidence proved it was the bank, another four think it was proved it was shooting, and the remaining four think it was the carjacking - and that counts as unanimous?!
GMAB.
Pecker's testimony absolutely buried Trump and Trump hasn't uttered a bad word about Pecker or turned the Cult lose on him either. Makes me wonder what Pecker has on Trump.
Except election fraud was never charged.It doesn't matter which of the crimes the jurors think apply, all three apply. Pecker, Cohen and Trump conspired together on the election fraud. Pecker got immunity, Cohen went to jail, Trump was an unindicted co-conspirator on Cohen's charges.
Cohen wouldn't have been involved in writing the check to Daniels if Pecker hadn't been warned by the Enquirer's lawyer that what he was doing was illegal and cut it out. Pecker had already paid out $150,000 and suspected he wasn't going to get it back. Unlike Trump, Pecker had auditors and a board of directors to answer to.
Pecker's testimony absolutely buried Trump and Trump hasn't uttered a bad word about Pecker or turned the Cult lose on him either. Makes me wonder what Pecker has on Trump.
Except election fraud was never charged.
All of it is for naught due to Ex Post Facto.Charges aren't required. Intent to commit, aid or conceal another crime is.
View attachment 962637
Which you'd know if you'd ever read the jury instructions. You're shoveling personal credibility like coal today.
All of it is for naught due to Ex Post Facto.
You can't criminalize something then charge anyone for doing it in the past.
The offenses can only be charged from the day forward of the law being passed.
Law was passed in 2021, alleged offense occurred in 2016. Should never have been brought.
