Guess who just apologised

[HereWeGoAgain]

That's right Ginsberg!
Guess the old hag has lost her mind.
BUT! She helped Trump get another 100K votes. Thanks bitch!
Every vote helps.
These LIBs can't help themselves.
Emotional hemophiliacs.

For every he gained bc of her he will lose triple that tomorrow if he makes a stupid pick of a neocon RINO

I see it like this.
Now the common RINO will vote for Trump because of it.

Eh maybe but that kind always have held their nose and voted for Romney and McCain he is going to lose the independents and disenfranchised democrats he had bc of the shit pick

I dont think so. He's going to be the VP not the president.

Unless something happens to trump politicians that upset the apple cart end up dead so his vp pick is much bigger

Still better than the beast.

 

[Pogo]

Stupid move by Ginsburg to apologize.

Even stupider to have said it in the first place.

I disagree. Evil triumphs when good men (or women) do nothing.

She's a Supreme Court Justice they are prevented from voicing their personal opinions about POTUS contests. She broke the law, and she violated her Code of Ethics. Color me unsurprised that you have no problem with that violation.

Uh --- really.

What "law" would this be then?

 

[Pogo]

No link then? Typical.

I just clicked in to see if Rump apologised for the first time in his life. But no, the record stands.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg - Bing

I am not doing this to help the douche nozzle OP'er but she did apologize which is the correct course of action...

Why? Are we not all entitled to an opinion?

I wont waste my time responding other than to say you're dumb as a bag of hammers..

Of course you won't. Because you don't have an answer.

I call it "Thursday".

 

[Pogo]

She will have to recuse herself from any case involving Trump. If Trump is elected president, she will have to recuse herself from any case involving the United States. Her career is effectively over.

You let us know when the case comes before the Supreme Court on the question of "whether Donald Rump is a 'faker'", K?

That's the sort of thing they work with, right?

Jeez Louise, think it through for once.....

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

No link then? Typical.

I just clicked in to see if Rump apologised for the first time in his life. But no, the record stands.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg - Bing

I am not doing this to help the douche nozzle OP'er but she did apologize which is the correct course of action...

Why? Are we not all entitled to an opinion?

I wont waste my time responding other than to say you're dumb as a bag of hammers..

Of course you won't. Because you don't have an answer.

I call it "Thursday".

If you dont understand the importance of impartiality?
Yeah...you're dumb as a bag of hammers.

 

[westwall]

Stupid move by Ginsburg to apologize.

Even stupider to have said it in the first place.

I disagree. Evil triumphs when good men (or women) do nothing.

She's a Supreme Court Justice they are prevented from voicing their personal opinions about POTUS contests. She broke the law, and she violated her Code of Ethics. Color me unsurprised that you have no problem with that violation.

Uh --- really.

What "law" would this be then?

"Canon 2, which provides that “[a] judge shall perform the duties of judicial office impartially, competently and diligently.” It also could violate Rule 2.1 of Canon 2, which provides that the judicial duties of a judge take precedence over all the judge’s personal and extrajudicial activities."

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

She will have to recuse herself from any case involving Trump. If Trump is elected president, she will have to recuse herself from any case involving the United States. Her career is effectively over.

You let us know when the case comes before the Supreme Court on the question of "whether Donald Rump is a 'faker'", K?

That's the sort of thing they work with, right?

Jeez Louise, think it through for once.....

She shouldnt be able to rule on anything involving politics.
She's proven she's bias.

 

[Conservative65]

she proved she has an opinion on trump, nothing more

She proved she was biased when saying it and a liar by claiming she was sorry for doing so.

lol. biased? maybe you could claim bias if something about the election ended up in front of the court...

and nothing about expressing regret makes one a liar

Don't have to. By saying what she said, she already indicated where she stood. If you think, based on what she said, she would be anything but biased, you're an idiot. Would she be honorable enough to recuse herself since she has proven she wouldn't be able to be impartial?

It does when the only reason you do it isn't sincere.

Yep...if she has to rule on anything that involves politics in anyway she shouldnt be able to vote on it.
She just hamstrung herself and the court.

lol. that's a very broad brush. what makes you think none of the other justices dont hold opinions on the candidates?

I have no doubt other justices have opinions about he candidates. Difference is none of the others have said what Ginsburg said. If they do, my opinion would be the same.

 

[Preacher]

For every he gained bc of her he will lose triple that tomorrow if he makes a stupid pick of a neocon RINO

I see it like this.
Now the common RINO will vote for Trump because of it.

Eh maybe but that kind always have held their nose and voted for Romney and McCain he is going to lose the independents and disenfranchised democrats he had bc of the shit pick

I dont think so. He's going to be the VP not the president.

Unless something happens to trump politicians that upset the apple cart end up dead so his vp pick is much bigger

Still better than the beast.

If you play that game yea I don't

 

[Conservative65]

Stupid move by Ginsburg to apologize.

Even stupider to have said it in the first place.

I disagree. Evil triumphs when good men (or women) do nothing.

She's a Supreme Court Justice they are prevented from voicing their personal opinions about POTUS contests. She broke the law, and she violated her Code of Ethics. Color me unsurprised that you have no problem with that violation.

Uh --- really.

What "law" would this be then?

"Canon 2, which provides that “[a] judge shall perform the duties of judicial office impartially, competently and diligently.” It also could violate Rule 2.1 of Canon 2, which provides that the judicial duties of a judge take precedence over all the judge’s personal and extrajudicial activities."

Ginsburg has shown by her statements that she is not impartial and that her personal beliefs matter more than her duties to be impartial. Had she not said anything, most people with any sense knew how she would view things. However, when she made the statements, she opened a can that can't be resealed.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

I see it like this.
Now the common RINO will vote for Trump because of it.

Eh maybe but that kind always have held their nose and voted for Romney and McCain he is going to lose the independents and disenfranchised democrats he had bc of the shit pick

I dont think so. He's going to be the VP not the president.

Unless something happens to trump politicians that upset the apple cart end up dead so his vp pick is much bigger

Still better than the beast.

If you play that game yea I don't

Trump getting killed is kind of a stretch.
If it gets some RINOs to vote Trump it's worth the risk.

 

[Pogo]

No link then? Typical.

I just clicked in to see if Rump apologised for the first time in his life. But no, the record stands.

Why should Trump apologize?

Good question. Many answers.
I put out the challenge long ago on this board for anyone to show any time, anywhere, in any circumstance, that Rump has ever apologized, admitted to a mistake, taken any kind of responsibility for any kind of fuckup, to anyone ever in history. I could find no such evidence myself and was betting no one else could either. I won that bet.

But as far as specifics, that was never qualified. But the list would be long ---- women in general.... Mexicans in general..... Native Americans in general...... the Polish workers he exploited to build his edifice complex...... the Scottish landowner he disparaged because the landowner wouldn't sell out and he doesn't understand the concept of "not selling out".........the Chicago Cubs.... The guy he got fired for predicting that Rump's casino would fail (which it did) ..... all those people ripped off in the Rump University fraud.... the USFL he took down the drain ...... couple off the top of my head.

 

[Pogo]

Even stupider to have said it in the first place.

I disagree. Evil triumphs when good men (or women) do nothing.

She's a Supreme Court Justice they are prevented from voicing their personal opinions about POTUS contests. She broke the law, and she violated her Code of Ethics. Color me unsurprised that you have no problem with that violation.

Uh --- really.

What "law" would this be then?

"Canon 2, which provides that “[a] judge shall perform the duties of judicial office impartially, competently and diligently.” It also could violate Rule 2.1 of Canon 2, which provides that the judicial duties of a judge take precedence over all the judge’s personal and extrajudicial activities."

Ginsburg has shown by her statements that she is not impartial and that her personal beliefs matter more than her duties to be impartial. Had she not said anything, most people with any sense knew how she would view things. However, when she made the statements, she opened a can that can't be resealed.

What case are we talking about?

 

[Pogo]

No she wasn't.

The fact that she DID apologize refutes your assertion.

No it doesn't. Who forced her to apologize?

Her career and the ass chewing she was getting.

Oh so no one. No one made her apologize. She just decided to.

Sure thing bunky. No Supreme does anything they don't want to. Unless they are forced. She got a memo from above telling her to apologize and shut her trap. The fact that you are incapable of adding 2+2 is your particular bias and pathology. The reality is she was forced to do so or she wouldn't have said a word after making her comment.

"a message 'from above'" huh?

Who's "above" the Supremes? Berry Gordy?

 

[westwall]

The fact that she DID apologize refutes your assertion.

No it doesn't. Who forced her to apologize?

Her career and the ass chewing she was getting.

Oh so no one. No one made her apologize. She just decided to.

Sure thing bunky. No Supreme does anything they don't want to. Unless they are forced. She got a memo from above telling her to apologize and shut her trap. The fact that you are incapable of adding 2+2 is your particular bias and pathology. The reality is she was forced to do so or she wouldn't have said a word after making her comment.

"a message 'from above'" huh?

Who's "above" the Supremes? Berry Gordy?

I don't know. But she wouldn't have apologized without it. You know it, I know it. You're just a biased hack who bloviates and somehow thinks you are special. You're not. Neither is she. Which is why she was FORCED to apologize.

 

[Harry Dresden]

The fact that she DID apologize refutes your assertion.

No it doesn't. Who forced her to apologize?

Her career and the ass chewing she was getting.

her career? she has a lifetime appointment to the highest court in the land. there is nobody above her to give her an ass chewing

everybody in our govt has someone who can give them an ass chewing......

so who supposedly gave it to a supreme court justice?

in her case Roberts.....he is not just the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court he is also the head of the United States federal court system....he is the chief administrative officer for the federal courts and as head of the Judicial Conference of the US im sure he can tell her plenty should he want to........

 

[Pogo]

That's right Ginsberg!
Guess the old hag has lost her mind.
BUT! She helped Trump get another 100K votes. Thanks bitch!
Every vote helps.
These LIBs can't help themselves.
Emotional hemophiliacs.

She's an 83 year old Jewish grandmother. Done well to keep quiet this long. I'm kind of sorry she apologized. Why do so many people LOVE Trump for being politically incorrect, but an 83 year old woman tries it and BLAM. Hang her.

you forgot to mention she is a supreme court justice.....there lies the difference....

Because she is a Supreme Court Justice she can't have a personal opinion?

Sure she can...if she keeps em to herself.

She can also voice them in a private conversation. What she is not allowed to do is voice them publicly.

Yuh huh.

Link?

 

[Pogo]

No it doesn't. Who forced her to apologize?

Her career and the ass chewing she was getting.

Oh so no one. No one made her apologize. She just decided to.

Sure thing bunky. No Supreme does anything they don't want to. Unless they are forced. She got a memo from above telling her to apologize and shut her trap. The fact that you are incapable of adding 2+2 is your particular bias and pathology. The reality is she was forced to do so or she wouldn't have said a word after making her comment.

"a message 'from above'" huh?

Who's "above" the Supremes? Berry Gordy?

I don't know. But she wouldn't have apologized without it. You know it, I know it. You're just a biased hack who bloviates and somehow thinks you are special. You're not. Neither is she. Which is why she was FORCED to apologize.

So you have no answer.

That's one level, but the fact that you don't see how it makes your claim empty is a whole 'nother one.

 

[Conservative65]

I disagree. Evil triumphs when good men (or women) do nothing.

She's a Supreme Court Justice they are prevented from voicing their personal opinions about POTUS contests. She broke the law, and she violated her Code of Ethics. Color me unsurprised that you have no problem with that violation.

Uh --- really.

What "law" would this be then?

"Canon 2, which provides that “[a] judge shall perform the duties of judicial office impartially, competently and diligently.” It also could violate Rule 2.1 of Canon 2, which provides that the judicial duties of a judge take precedence over all the judge’s personal and extrajudicial activities."

Ginsburg has shown by her statements that she is not impartial and that her personal beliefs matter more than her duties to be impartial. Had she not said anything, most people with any sense knew how she would view things. However, when she made the statements, she opened a can that can't be resealed.

What case are we talking about?

Future cases. Judges do it all the time when past situations put them in a place of conflict of interest. Ginsburg set herself up now for the need to recuse herself should such a situation occur.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

She's an 83 year old Jewish grandmother. Done well to keep quiet this long. I'm kind of sorry she apologized. Why do so many people LOVE Trump for being politically incorrect, but an 83 year old woman tries it and BLAM. Hang her.

you forgot to mention she is a supreme court justice.....there lies the difference....

Because she is a Supreme Court Justice she can't have a personal opinion?

Sure she can...if she keeps em to herself.

She can also voice them in a private conversation. What she is not allowed to do is voice them publicly.

Yuh huh.

Link?

You're funny when you refuse to admit you're wrong.