Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
i already provided you with an example
Your example shows someone having one. You've done nothing to prove they needed one. I don't doubt they have been used many times for defense. My argument is that they weren't needed. Those store owners could have had 10 round magazines. Now your suppose to provide some documentation that they did in fact need hi cap magazines. If you can't do that you really have no argument.
they shot over 500 rounds that day to break up the crowds
---------
This year marked the 20th anniversary of the Los Angeles riots, sparked by the acquittal of four Los Angeles Police Department officers accused of beating now-deceased Rodney King. During the five days, mobs around Los Angeles looted stores, burnt 3,767 buildings, caused more than $1 billion in property damage, and led to the deaths of more than 50 people and left another 4,000 injured. A story that has been forgotten since then is that of the brave storeowners in Koreatown who fended off mobs with handguns, rifles and assault weapons.
On the second day of the riots, the police had abandoned much of Koreatown. Jay Rhee, a storeowner in the area, stated to The Los Angeles Times, we have lost faith in the police.
With the cops nowhere to be found, hundreds of people marauded through the streets towards Koreatown. The neighborhood suffered 45 percent of all the property damage and five fatalities of storeowners during the riots. Having had enough of waiting for police, Korean storeowners assembled into militias to protect themselves, their families, and businesses.
According to the Los Angeles Times, From the rooftops of their supermarkets, a group of Koreans armed with shotguns and automatic weapons peered onto the smoky streets . . . Koreans have turned their pastel-colored mini-malls into fortresses against looters tide.
Rhee claimed that the storeowners shot off 500 rounds into the sky and ground in order to break up the masses of people. The only weapons able to clear that much ammo in a very short time are assault weapons. Single shot pistols or rifles might not have been able to deter the crowd hell-bent on destroying the neighborhood.
When Assault Weapons Saved Koreatown | American Renaissance
B/c they are not supposed to be.
It's unconstitutional to keep such arm from us.
Your right to life doesn't trump mine.
If I'm attacked by a much bigger person or better fighter. What give you the right to say I get to be beaten to death b/c I can't carry an arm with me?
Nobody is saying that you can't own and use a gun to defend yourself.... but if your such a piss-poor shot that you need 30 super-high velocity, Monkey maiming rounds to defend yourself, you may want to consider Tae Kwon Do instead.
What utter bullshit
We know from history that liberals are never ever satisfied. So we stopped you now, so in the future you can't take away guns.
and AGAIN
It's ARMS, the RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS, not own a gun to defend myself or hunt with.
Nobody is saying that you can't own and use a gun to defend yourself.... but if your such a piss-poor shot that you need 30 super-high velocity, Monkey maiming rounds to defend yourself, you may want to consider Tae Kwon Do instead.
What utter bullshit
We know from history that liberals are never ever satisfied. So we stopped you now, so in the future you can't take away guns.
and AGAIN
It's ARMS, the RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS, not own a gun to defend myself or hunt with.
In the 1930's machine guns were banned. Since then the assault rifle ban came and went. Yes so much taking....
You are not competent to judge this.Yes I do know. There are no reports because a hi cap magazine is not necessary for self defense.boy you are dense. its about having equal footing with your attacker. you know why there are few reports of self defense where multiple shots are fired? because most people attacked are a statistic. they are dead. now had they had a gun with a 30 round mag, the attacker would be dead. why did so many die in sandy hook? they were all unarmed. thats usually the way it is.
What utter bullshit
We know from history that liberals are never ever satisfied. So we stopped you now, so in the future you can't take away guns.
and AGAIN
It's ARMS, the RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS, not own a gun to defend myself or hunt with.
In the 1930's machine guns were banned. Since then the assault rifle ban came and went. Yes so much taking....
they are not banned
you can legally own one
if you follow the law
Nobody is saying that you can't own and use a gun to defend yourself.... but if your such a piss-poor shot that you need 30 super-high velocity, Monkey maiming rounds to defend yourself, you may want to consider Tae Kwon Do instead.
What utter bullshit
We know from history that liberals are never ever satisfied. So we stopped you now, so in the future you can't take away guns.
and AGAIN
It's ARMS, the RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS, not own a gun to defend myself or hunt with.
banning a 30 round magazine
makes no difference to a mass shooter
the va tec shooter
had a 15 round magazine
and a ten round magazine
he killed 32 people
and wounded another 17
that makes at least 49 shots
so he apparently had all the time in the world
to swap his lower capacity magazines
Your example shows someone having one. You've done nothing to prove they needed one. I don't doubt they have been used many times for defense. My argument is that they weren't needed. Those store owners could have had 10 round magazines. Now your suppose to provide some documentation that they did in fact need hi cap magazines. If you can't do that you really have no argument.
they shot over 500 rounds that day to break up the crowds
---------
This year marked the 20th anniversary of the Los Angeles riots, sparked by the acquittal of four Los Angeles Police Department officers accused of beating now-deceased Rodney King. During the five days, mobs around Los Angeles looted stores, burnt 3,767 buildings, caused more than $1 billion in property damage, and led to the deaths of more than 50 people and left another 4,000 injured. A story that has been forgotten since then is that of the brave storeowners in Koreatown who fended off mobs with handguns, rifles and assault weapons.
On the second day of the riots, the police had abandoned much of Koreatown. Jay Rhee, a storeowner in the area, stated to The Los Angeles Times, we have lost faith in the police.
With the cops nowhere to be found, hundreds of people marauded through the streets towards Koreatown. The neighborhood suffered 45 percent of all the property damage and five fatalities of storeowners during the riots. Having had enough of waiting for police, Korean storeowners assembled into militias to protect themselves, their families, and businesses.
According to the Los Angeles Times, From the rooftops of their supermarkets, a group of Koreans armed with shotguns and automatic weapons peered onto the smoky streets . . . Koreans have turned their pastel-colored mini-malls into fortresses against looters tide.
Rhee claimed that the storeowners shot off 500 rounds into the sky and ground in order to break up the masses of people. The only weapons able to clear that much ammo in a very short time are assault weapons. Single shot pistols or rifles might not have been able to deter the crowd hell-bent on destroying the neighborhood.
When Assault Weapons Saved Koreatown | American Renaissance
Ok, 500 rounds over the course of a day by how many shop owners? I don't see how this could not have been done with 10 rd magazines especially since they can be changed in less than a second. The shots were in the sky or at the ground so I don't see a need for hi cap magazines.
they shot over 500 rounds that day to break up the crowds
---------
This year marked the 20th anniversary of the Los Angeles riots, sparked by the acquittal of four Los Angeles Police Department officers accused of beating now-deceased Rodney King. During the five days, mobs around Los Angeles looted stores, burnt 3,767 buildings, caused more than $1 billion in property damage, and led to the deaths of more than 50 people and left another 4,000 injured. A story that has been forgotten since then is that of the brave storeowners in Koreatown who fended off mobs with handguns, rifles and assault weapons.
On the second day of the riots, the police had abandoned much of Koreatown. Jay Rhee, a storeowner in the area, stated to The Los Angeles Times, we have lost faith in the police.
With the cops nowhere to be found, hundreds of people marauded through the streets towards Koreatown. The neighborhood suffered 45 percent of all the property damage and five fatalities of storeowners during the riots. Having had enough of waiting for police, Korean storeowners assembled into militias to protect themselves, their families, and businesses.
According to the Los Angeles Times, From the rooftops of their supermarkets, a group of Koreans armed with shotguns and automatic weapons peered onto the smoky streets . . . Koreans have turned their pastel-colored mini-malls into fortresses against looters tide.
Rhee claimed that the storeowners shot off 500 rounds into the sky and ground in order to break up the masses of people. The only weapons able to clear that much ammo in a very short time are assault weapons. Single shot pistols or rifles might not have been able to deter the crowd hell-bent on destroying the neighborhood.
When Assault Weapons Saved Koreatown | American Renaissance
Ok, 500 rounds over the course of a day by how many shop owners? I don't see how this could not have been done with 10 rd magazines especially since they can be changed in less than a second. The shots were in the sky or at the ground so I don't see a need for hi cap magazines.
the va tec shooter
had a 15 round and a 10 round magazine
he fired 170 shots
so there was surely some magazine swapping going on that day
your banon thirty 30 magazines
is nothing more then an arbitrary number that only
hinders the law abiding
want to slow down or end
mass shootings in the schools
end the gun free zone
What utter bullshit
We know from history that liberals are never ever satisfied. So we stopped you now, so in the future you can't take away guns.
and AGAIN
It's ARMS, the RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS, not own a gun to defend myself or hunt with.
banning a 30 round magazine
makes no difference to a mass shooter
the va tec shooter
had a 15 round magazine
and a ten round magazine
he killed 32 people
and wounded another 17
that makes at least 49 shots
so he apparently had all the time in the world
to swap his lower capacity magazines
Thank you for the support of them being used only for evil.
banning a 30 round magazine
makes no difference to a mass shooter
the va tec shooter
had a 15 round magazine
and a ten round magazine
he killed 32 people
and wounded another 17
that makes at least 49 shots
so he apparently had all the time in the world
to swap his lower capacity magazines
Thank you for the support of them being used only for evil.
wanna talk evil
the va tec shooter should have never been able to
legally buy his firearms
he was court ordered in 2005 to a psychiatric assessment
he was found to be mentally ill and in need of hospitalization
yet the back ground checks system was not notified
Thank you for the support of them being used only for evil.
wanna talk evil
the va tec shooter should have never been able to
legally buy his firearms
he was court ordered in 2005 to a psychiatric assessment
he was found to be mentally ill and in need of hospitalization
yet the back ground checks system was not notified
Yes I'm a strong supporter of strengthening the background check system. You must be also be, tell the NRA to stop fighting it.
wanna talk evil
the va tec shooter should have never been able to
legally buy his firearms
he was court ordered in 2005 to a psychiatric assessment
he was found to be mentally ill and in need of hospitalization
yet the back ground checks system was not notified
Yes I'm a strong supporter of strengthening the background check system. You must be also be, tell the NRA to stop fighting it.
the law is already on the books
try again
Yes I'm a strong supporter of strengthening the background check system. You must be also be, tell the NRA to stop fighting it.
the law is already on the books
try again
you just said it is evil that it failed. I said that we need to strengthen background checks so failures don't happen. What do I need to try again for? Your statement was pretty clear that you agree we need stronger background checks so evil doesn't fall through a loophole. I was just agreeing with you.
the law is already on the books
try again
you just said it is evil that it failed. I said that we need to strengthen background checks so failures don't happen. What do I need to try again for? Your statement was pretty clear that you agree we need stronger background checks so evil doesn't fall through a loophole. I was just agreeing with you.
then enforce the current laws
we already have background checks
i never said anything else
The law was instated to prevent mass shootings.
this is what we call a fail.
yes it prevented mass shootings, which catch headlines, but failed to make Aus any safer and actually made it more dangerous
you just said it is evil that it failed. I said that we need to strengthen background checks so failures don't happen. What do I need to try again for? Your statement was pretty clear that you agree we need stronger background checks so evil doesn't fall through a loophole. I was just agreeing with you.
then enforce the current laws
we already have background checks
i never said anything else
Ok, so you clearly stated that the current system failed. But I guess your saying in response to that we should do nothing? Ok, I fail to see how that will save any lives. You brought up a failure in the current system and then say lets do nothing about it?
then enforce the current laws
we already have background checks
i never said anything else
Ok, so you clearly stated that the current system failed. But I guess your saying in response to that we should do nothing? Ok, I fail to see how that will save any lives. You brought up a failure in the current system and then say lets do nothing about it?
You'll get that from pretty much everyone of these selfish gun nuts. It's the same thing over and over again, no ideas, just complaints and the same cliche arguments that don't mean anything.
"We already have gun laws"
"Criminals don't obey laws"
These are the things people say who can't use their brain to form an original thought.
At the end of the interview, it was noted that guns weren't the problem, people were.
I tend to agree.
*sigh*
Ok, so you clearly stated that the current system failed. But I guess your saying in response to that we should do nothing? Ok, I fail to see how that will save any lives. You brought up a failure in the current system and then say lets do nothing about it?
You'll get that from pretty much everyone of these selfish gun nuts. It's the same thing over and over again, no ideas, just complaints and the same cliche arguments that don't mean anything.
"We already have gun laws"
"Criminals don't obey laws"
These are the things people say who can't use their brain to form an original thought.
Most of the arguments are so bad you can't tell if they are pro or anti gun... It is sad how dishonest the debate is. There might be answers that should keep everyone happy and save lives, but we will never know.
You'll get that from pretty much everyone of these selfish gun nuts. It's the same thing over and over again, no ideas, just complaints and the same cliche arguments that don't mean anything.
"We already have gun laws"
"Criminals don't obey laws"
These are the things people say who can't use their brain to form an original thought.
Most of the arguments are so bad you can't tell if they are pro or anti gun... It is sad how dishonest the debate is. There might be answers that should keep everyone happy and save lives, but we will never know.
I've lost count how many times these idiots post links that disprove their own point. You have to remember that most of these people aren't very smart, have no real education and respond on pure emotion and repeat things they hear other people say that they think sounds good. But when you challenge them they don't have any logical followup because it wasn't their retarded idea to begin with.
This site is not for rational debate, it's for comedy purposes only. The sooner you come to grips with that, the more anguish you will save yourself from banging your head against the wall in an attempt to have a rational, adult conversation.
