Guns and Knives

[2aguy]

^^^^ Why is it that the gun crowd are such retards? 2aguy, Marion and now jknowgood and crixus. Not one rational thought among the whole gang.

Yes....only a left wing nut would say that people who back up their points with facts, truth and reality are not rational...while the only counter argument mudda and his buddies have is "We don't like guns.....so we want all of them banned....and we will pretend we only want to ban the bad guns, but we really want all the guns banned...."

See what I'm saying? Just nothing but nonsense out of your side's mouth all the time. I never said ban a;

Then let's get into the UK's rising gun violence and incidents of stabbings then.

I come from the US, we got guns 'round heanh. Boy.

And you have regular mass shootings. The most in the world. You must be so proud.

1% of all murders occur in mass shooting events so it really isn't that much of a problem

Ya, no problem. Tell that to the 600 people who were shot in Vegas. Don't worry, I'll add you to the numbskull list. No problem.

600 people weren't shot in Vegas...a lot were, but a lot were also injured as they ran away, trampling each other, and other injuries...

With 2 rifles, and all the ammo he wanted, shooting at a tightly packed group of 22,000 people, with 11 minutes of shooting...he murdered 58.

The rental truck...in 5 minutes....murdered 89 and actually injured over 450.

And 100 million were killed in WWII. That makes mass shootings no problem, right?

Well....yes.....considering the German government told their people that turning in their guns and registering their hunting weapons would make them safer, and then the socialists used those lists, and murdered the disarmed people......yeah, shows that allowing the government to have all the guns is really fucking stupid.....considering the rest of Europe disarmed their people and were easily conquered by the German socialists...and then mass murdered....

Except...for the Swiss......they kept their fully automatic miitary rifles, and had 435,000 armed civilians with those rifles...and did not get invaded by the Germans....and did not hand over their people for the gas chambers.....

You left wingers don't pay attention to history, and then create points based on this lack of knowledge...

 

[Mudda]

^^^^ Why is it that the gun crowd are such retards? 2aguy, Marion and now jknowgood and crixus. Not one rational thought among the whole gang.

Yes....only a left wing nut would say that people who back up their points with facts, truth and reality are not rational...while the only counter argument mudda and his buddies have is "We don't like guns.....so we want all of them banned....and we will pretend we only want to ban the bad guns, but we really want all the guns banned...."

See what I'm saying? Just nothing but nonsense out of your side's mouth all the time. I never said ban a;

And you have regular mass shootings. The most in the world. You must be so proud.

1% of all murders occur in mass shooting events so it really isn't that much of a problem

Ya, no problem. Tell that to the 600 people who were shot in Vegas. Don't worry, I'll add you to the numbskull list. No problem.

1% of all murder occurs in mass shooting events why is it that you think that 1% is more important than the 99% who get murdered outside of mass shootings?

I think ALL the killings are a problem (and are related). You don't think there's any problem. BIG difference.

I said murders committed in mass killings aren't a problem since it is only 1% of all murder.

The thing is people have always committed murder and people will always commit murder and quite frankly nothing you can do will ever stop people from committing murder.

Knowing the above statement is irrefutable as gravity I would rather err on the side of letting people protect themselves with the best tool available for self defense and that tool is a firearm.

Never said I wanted to ban all firearms. Please try to keep up.

 

[2aguy]

Yes....only a left wing nut would say that people who back up their points with facts, truth and reality are not rational...while the only counter argument mudda and his buddies have is "We don't like guns.....so we want all of them banned....and we will pretend we only want to ban the bad guns, but we really want all the guns banned...."

See what I'm saying? Just nothing but nonsense out of your side's mouth all the time. I never said ban a;

1% of all murders occur in mass shooting events so it really isn't that much of a problem

Ya, no problem. Tell that to the 600 people who were shot in Vegas. Don't worry, I'll add you to the numbskull list. No problem.

1% of all murder occurs in mass shooting events why is it that you think that 1% is more important than the 99% who get murdered outside of mass shootings?

I think ALL the killings are a problem (and are related). You don't think there's any problem. BIG difference.

I said murders committed in mass killings aren't a problem since it is only 1% of all murder.

The thing is people have always committed murder and people will always commit murder and quite frankly nothing you can do will ever stop people from committing murder.

Knowing the above statement is irrefutable as gravity I would rather err on the side of letting people protect themselves with the best tool available for self defense and that tool is a firearm.

Never said I wanted to ban all firearms. Please try to keep up.

You guys never do...till we see the legislation you want to pass and then Viola!!! There are bans on things you never said you wanted banned when you were saying you didn't want to ban guns.....

We know what you want, we know you will lie to get it done....

 

[Mudda]

^^^^ Why is it that the gun crowd are such retards? 2aguy, Marion and now jknowgood and crixus. Not one rational thought among the whole gang.

Yes....only a left wing nut would say that people who back up their points with facts, truth and reality are not rational...while the only counter argument mudda and his buddies have is "We don't like guns.....so we want all of them banned....and we will pretend we only want to ban the bad guns, but we really want all the guns banned...."

See what I'm saying? Just nothing but nonsense out of your side's mouth all the time. I never said ban a;

And you have regular mass shootings. The most in the world. You must be so proud.

1% of all murders occur in mass shooting events so it really isn't that much of a problem

Ya, no problem. Tell that to the 600 people who were shot in Vegas. Don't worry, I'll add you to the numbskull list. No problem.

600 people weren't shot in Vegas...a lot were, but a lot were also injured as they ran away, trampling each other, and other injuries...

With 2 rifles, and all the ammo he wanted, shooting at a tightly packed group of 22,000 people, with 11 minutes of shooting...he murdered 58.

The rental truck...in 5 minutes....murdered 89 and actually injured over 450.

And 100 million were killed in WWII. That makes mass shootings no problem, right?

Well....yes.....considering the German government told their people that turning in their guns and registering their hunting weapons would make them safer, and then the socialists used those lists, and murdered the disarmed people......yeah, shows that allowing the government to have all the guns is really fucking stupid.....considering the rest of Europe disarmed their people and were easily conquered by the German socialists...and then mass murdered....

Except...for the Swiss......they kept their fully automatic miitary rifles, and had 435,000 armed civilians with those rifles...and did not get invaded by the Germans....and did not hand over their people for the gas chambers.....

You left wingers don't pay attention to history, and then create points based on this lack of knowledge...

Must be why the US has so many guns deaths every year. Ya, it's me.

You know, I've given up hope that you'll ever say anything coherent. Problem is, a person like you is allowed to own guns.

 

[Mudda]

See what I'm saying? Just nothing but nonsense out of your side's mouth all the time. I never said ban a;
Ya, no problem. Tell that to the 600 people who were shot in Vegas. Don't worry, I'll add you to the numbskull list. No problem.

1% of all murder occurs in mass shooting events why is it that you think that 1% is more important than the 99% who get murdered outside of mass shootings?

I think ALL the killings are a problem (and are related). You don't think there's any problem. BIG difference.

I said murders committed in mass killings aren't a problem since it is only 1% of all murder.

The thing is people have always committed murder and people will always commit murder and quite frankly nothing you can do will ever stop people from committing murder.

Knowing the above statement is irrefutable as gravity I would rather err on the side of letting people protect themselves with the best tool available for self defense and that tool is a firearm.

Never said I wanted to ban all firearms. Please try to keep up.

You guys never do...till we see the legislation you want to pass and then Viola!!! There are bans on things you never said you wanted banned when you were saying you didn't want to ban guns.....

We know what you want, we know you will lie to get it done....

You're delusional and are allowed to own guns. That's one problem.

 

[2aguy]

Yes....only a left wing nut would say that people who back up their points with facts, truth and reality are not rational...while the only counter argument mudda and his buddies have is "We don't like guns.....so we want all of them banned....and we will pretend we only want to ban the bad guns, but we really want all the guns banned...."

See what I'm saying? Just nothing but nonsense out of your side's mouth all the time. I never said ban a;

1% of all murders occur in mass shooting events so it really isn't that much of a problem

Ya, no problem. Tell that to the 600 people who were shot in Vegas. Don't worry, I'll add you to the numbskull list. No problem.

1% of all murder occurs in mass shooting events why is it that you think that 1% is more important than the 99% who get murdered outside of mass shootings?

I think ALL the killings are a problem (and are related). You don't think there's any problem. BIG difference.

I said murders committed in mass killings aren't a problem since it is only 1% of all murder.

The thing is people have always committed murder and people will always commit murder and quite frankly nothing you can do will ever stop people from committing murder.

Knowing the above statement is irrefutable as gravity I would rather err on the side of letting people protect themselves with the best tool available for self defense and that tool is a firearm.

Never said I wanted to ban all firearms. Please try to keep up.

Here is just the latest example of you guys saying you don't want to ban guns....

You guys say...Hey, we need to ban the bump stock, but we don't want to ban all guns....

Then, we see the legislation and Viola!!!! The bump stock ban legislation, in a close reading would essentially ban all semi auto rifles and pistols in particular if you get any work on your trigger.......because if you fix a bad factory trigger you are technically making the gun shoot faster and blam.......banned.

So....we know your game......you lie....you lie to the uninformed so they will vote to support your bans.....

screw you.

 

[2aguy]

Yes....only a left wing nut would say that people who back up their points with facts, truth and reality are not rational...while the only counter argument mudda and his buddies have is "We don't like guns.....so we want all of them banned....and we will pretend we only want to ban the bad guns, but we really want all the guns banned...."

See what I'm saying? Just nothing but nonsense out of your side's mouth all the time. I never said ban a;

1% of all murders occur in mass shooting events so it really isn't that much of a problem

Ya, no problem. Tell that to the 600 people who were shot in Vegas. Don't worry, I'll add you to the numbskull list. No problem.

600 people weren't shot in Vegas...a lot were, but a lot were also injured as they ran away, trampling each other, and other injuries...

With 2 rifles, and all the ammo he wanted, shooting at a tightly packed group of 22,000 people, with 11 minutes of shooting...he murdered 58.

The rental truck...in 5 minutes....murdered 89 and actually injured over 450.

And 100 million were killed in WWII. That makes mass shootings no problem, right?

Well....yes.....considering the German government told their people that turning in their guns and registering their hunting weapons would make them safer, and then the socialists used those lists, and murdered the disarmed people......yeah, shows that allowing the government to have all the guns is really fucking stupid.....considering the rest of Europe disarmed their people and were easily conquered by the German socialists...and then mass murdered....

Except...for the Swiss......they kept their fully automatic miitary rifles, and had 435,000 armed civilians with those rifles...and did not get invaded by the Germans....and did not hand over their people for the gas chambers.....

You left wingers don't pay attention to history, and then create points based on this lack of knowledge...

Must be why the US has so many guns deaths every year. Ya, it's me.

You know, I've given up hope that you'll ever say anything coherent. Problem is, a person like you is allowed to own guns.

No....we have more gun deaths because we didn't go through the destruction that Europe went through because of the War, and because we don't have a class system the way Europe did.......that, and our criminal justice system refuses to lock up violent gun offenders....

That is why we have more gun murder.......

 

[2aguy]

Yes....only a left wing nut would say that people who back up their points with facts, truth and reality are not rational...while the only counter argument mudda and his buddies have is "We don't like guns.....so we want all of them banned....and we will pretend we only want to ban the bad guns, but we really want all the guns banned...."

See what I'm saying? Just nothing but nonsense out of your side's mouth all the time. I never said ban a;

1% of all murders occur in mass shooting events so it really isn't that much of a problem

Ya, no problem. Tell that to the 600 people who were shot in Vegas. Don't worry, I'll add you to the numbskull list. No problem.

1% of all murder occurs in mass shooting events why is it that you think that 1% is more important than the 99% who get murdered outside of mass shootings?

I think ALL the killings are a problem (and are related). You don't think there's any problem. BIG difference.

I said murders committed in mass killings aren't a problem since it is only 1% of all murder.

The thing is people have always committed murder and people will always commit murder and quite frankly nothing you can do will ever stop people from committing murder.

Knowing the above statement is irrefutable as gravity I would rather err on the side of letting people protect themselves with the best tool available for self defense and that tool is a firearm.

Never said I wanted to ban all firearms. Please try to keep up.

And the most, most recent lie about not wanting to ban guns....

you morons say...hey, those AR-15s are dangerous, we need to ban those...but don't worry, we don't want to ban all guns....

Then....

Democrats' New 'Assault Weapons' Bill Would Ban the GLOCK 17, More Semi-Auto Pistols - The Truth About Guns

The text of Senator Dianne Feinstein’s assault rifle ban bill is now available on her website and, contra Nick’s expectations, it isn’t simply a copy-and-paste re-run of the failed Clinton era assault rifle ban language. It’s worse. Much worse.

How bad is it? In the first four pages, it bans the popular GLOCK 17 9mm pistol, a gun that’s commonly used for shooting sports and personal self defense by hundreds of thousands of Americans.

That’s right, one of the most reliable, commonly-used pistols in the US, from one of the most popular firearms manufacturers in the world is now on the chopping block.

But it’s not just the G17. The Beretta 92, the CZ75, and the HK VP70 would also be forbidden. Heck, even the Luger P08 would be out.

Why? Because among the many things the bill prohibits — from the “CZ Scorpion Pistol” [sic], which it somehow defines as an “AK” to the jihad it wages against barrel shrouds that keep people from injuring themselves — the senior Senator from California wants to ban any “semiautomatic versions of an automatic firearm.” (See page 4 of the bill.)

That means that if a manufacturer ever made a fully-automatic version of a semi-automatic pistol (i.e. the GLOCK 18, a select fire version of the G17), the semi-auto gun would be verboten. Feinstein’s bill, if passed, would classify these guns as a “semiautomatic assault weapons” and, therefore, outlaw them.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

How many people would the shooter in Vegas have killed if he only had a knife?

Knife-wielding attackers kill 29 at China train station - CNN

 

[Old Rocks]

How many people would the shooter in Vegas have killed if he only had a knife?

The same amount, he would have used a bomb. He had explosives.

Feel free to GFY with a cactus at your earliest convenience.

Sorry, but this thread is about stabbings vs guns. Please try to keep up.

Then let's get into the UK's rising gun violence and incidents of stabbings then.

I come from the US, we got guns 'round heanh. Boy.

Why yes, so we do. And mass shootings at the rate of one a week. Silly little girl.

 

[Old Rocks]

See what I'm saying? Just nothing but nonsense out of your side's mouth all the time. I never said ban a;
Ya, no problem. Tell that to the 600 people who were shot in Vegas. Don't worry, I'll add you to the numbskull list. No problem.

1% of all murder occurs in mass shooting events why is it that you think that 1% is more important than the 99% who get murdered outside of mass shootings?

I think ALL the killings are a problem (and are related). You don't think there's any problem. BIG difference.

I said murders committed in mass killings aren't a problem since it is only 1% of all murder.

The thing is people have always committed murder and people will always commit murder and quite frankly nothing you can do will ever stop people from committing murder.

Knowing the above statement is irrefutable as gravity I would rather err on the side of letting people protect themselves with the best tool available for self defense and that tool is a firearm.

Never said I wanted to ban all firearms. Please try to keep up.

And the most, most recent lie about not wanting to ban guns....

you morons say...hey, those AR-15s are dangerous, we need to ban those...but don't worry, we don't want to ban all guns....

Then....

Democrats' New 'Assault Weapons' Bill Would Ban the GLOCK 17, More Semi-Auto Pistols - The Truth About Guns

The text of Senator Dianne Feinstein’s assault rifle ban bill is now available on her website and, contra Nick’s expectations, it isn’t simply a copy-and-paste re-run of the failed Clinton era assault rifle ban language. It’s worse. Much worse.

How bad is it? In the first four pages, it bans the popular GLOCK 17 9mm pistol, a gun that’s commonly used for shooting sports and personal self defense by hundreds of thousands of Americans.

That’s right, one of the most reliable, commonly-used pistols in the US, from one of the most popular firearms manufacturers in the world is now on the chopping block.

But it’s not just the G17. The Beretta 92, the CZ75, and the HK VP70 would also be forbidden. Heck, even the Luger P08 would be out.

Why? Because among the many things the bill prohibits — from the “CZ Scorpion Pistol” [sic], which it somehow defines as an “AK” to the jihad it wages against barrel shrouds that keep people from injuring themselves — the senior Senator from California wants to ban any “semiautomatic versions of an automatic firearm.” (See page 4 of the bill.)

That means that if a manufacturer ever made a fully-automatic version of a semi-automatic pistol (i.e. the GLOCK 18, a select fire version of the G17), the semi-auto gun would be verboten. Feinstein’s bill, if passed, would classify these guns as a “semiautomatic assault weapons” and, therefore, outlaw them.

Well, I suppose if you are too much of a little girl to handle a revolver, then you should not have a gun. LOL

 

[miketx]

How many people would the shooter in Vegas have killed if he only had a knife?

The same amount, he would have used a bomb. He had explosives.

Feel free to GFY with a cactus at your earliest convenience.

Sorry, but this thread is about stabbings vs guns. Please try to keep up.

Clown musings never stop. You don't have the ability to pour piss from a boot with directions on the heel.

 

[2aguy]

How many people would the shooter in Vegas have killed if he only had a knife?

The same amount, he would have used a bomb. He had explosives.

Feel free to GFY with a cactus at your earliest convenience.

Sorry, but this thread is about stabbings vs guns. Please try to keep up.

Then let's get into the UK's rising gun violence and incidents of stabbings then.

I come from the US, we got guns 'round heanh. Boy.

Why yes, so we do. And mass shootings at the rate of one a week. Silly little girl.

No...we don't have one a week, in 2016 we had a total of 6.....there are 52 weeks in a year.....

In those 2 attacks with 2 rifles 84 people were murdered.

In one attack, with a rental truck 89 people were murdered......

You have no point.

 

[Mudda]

How many people would the shooter in Vegas have killed if he only had a knife?

Knife-wielding attackers kill 29 at China train station - CNN

Several attackers. Please try again.

 

[Mudda]

How many people would the shooter in Vegas have killed if he only had a knife?

The same amount, he would have used a bomb. He had explosives.

Feel free to GFY with a cactus at your earliest convenience.

Sorry, but this thread is about stabbings vs guns. Please try to keep up.

Clown musings never stop. You don't have the ability to pour piss from a boot with directions on the heel.

Nothing coherent to add. Got it.

 

[Skull Pilot]

Yes....only a left wing nut would say that people who back up their points with facts, truth and reality are not rational...while the only counter argument mudda and his buddies have is "We don't like guns.....so we want all of them banned....and we will pretend we only want to ban the bad guns, but we really want all the guns banned...."

See what I'm saying? Just nothing but nonsense out of your side's mouth all the time. I never said ban a;

1% of all murders occur in mass shooting events so it really isn't that much of a problem

Ya, no problem. Tell that to the 600 people who were shot in Vegas. Don't worry, I'll add you to the numbskull list. No problem.

1% of all murder occurs in mass shooting events why is it that you think that 1% is more important than the 99% who get murdered outside of mass shootings?

I think ALL the killings are a problem (and are related). You don't think there's any problem. BIG difference.

I said murders committed in mass killings aren't a problem since it is only 1% of all murder.

The thing is people have always committed murder and people will always commit murder and quite frankly nothing you can do will ever stop people from committing murder.

Knowing the above statement is irrefutable as gravity I would rather err on the side of letting people protect themselves with the best tool available for self defense and that tool is a firearm.

Never said I wanted to ban all firearms. Please try to keep up.

No just those you think are "assault weapons"

But since you don't know shit about guns you don't know that what you call an assault weapon is a plain old everyday semiautomatic that has been around since the 1860's

So you people start with guns that look like military weapons but aren't then you;ll move to all semiautomatic rifles then move to ban certain caliber rifles etc etc

 

[Skull Pilot]

Yes....only a left wing nut would say that people who back up their points with facts, truth and reality are not rational...while the only counter argument mudda and his buddies have is "We don't like guns.....so we want all of them banned....and we will pretend we only want to ban the bad guns, but we really want all the guns banned...."

See what I'm saying? Just nothing but nonsense out of your side's mouth all the time. I never said ban a;

1% of all murders occur in mass shooting events so it really isn't that much of a problem

Ya, no problem. Tell that to the 600 people who were shot in Vegas. Don't worry, I'll add you to the numbskull list. No problem.

600 people weren't shot in Vegas...a lot were, but a lot were also injured as they ran away, trampling each other, and other injuries...

With 2 rifles, and all the ammo he wanted, shooting at a tightly packed group of 22,000 people, with 11 minutes of shooting...he murdered 58.

The rental truck...in 5 minutes....murdered 89 and actually injured over 450.

And 100 million were killed in WWII. That makes mass shootings no problem, right?

Well....yes.....considering the German government told their people that turning in their guns and registering their hunting weapons would make them safer, and then the socialists used those lists, and murdered the disarmed people......yeah, shows that allowing the government to have all the guns is really fucking stupid.....considering the rest of Europe disarmed their people and were easily conquered by the German socialists...and then mass murdered....

Except...for the Swiss......they kept their fully automatic miitary rifles, and had 435,000 armed civilians with those rifles...and did not get invaded by the Germans....and did not hand over their people for the gas chambers.....

You left wingers don't pay attention to history, and then create points based on this lack of knowledge...

Must be why the US has so many guns deaths every year. Ya, it's me.

You know, I've given up hope that you'll ever say anything coherent. Problem is, a person like you is allowed to own guns.

Most gun deaths are suicides and suicide is not a crime

 

[Skull Pilot]

1% of all murder occurs in mass shooting events why is it that you think that 1% is more important than the 99% who get murdered outside of mass shootings?

I think ALL the killings are a problem (and are related). You don't think there's any problem. BIG difference.

I said murders committed in mass killings aren't a problem since it is only 1% of all murder.

The thing is people have always committed murder and people will always commit murder and quite frankly nothing you can do will ever stop people from committing murder.

Knowing the above statement is irrefutable as gravity I would rather err on the side of letting people protect themselves with the best tool available for self defense and that tool is a firearm.

Never said I wanted to ban all firearms. Please try to keep up.

And the most, most recent lie about not wanting to ban guns....

you morons say...hey, those AR-15s are dangerous, we need to ban those...but don't worry, we don't want to ban all guns....

Then....

Democrats' New 'Assault Weapons' Bill Would Ban the GLOCK 17, More Semi-Auto Pistols - The Truth About Guns

The text of Senator Dianne Feinstein’s assault rifle ban bill is now available on her website and, contra Nick’s expectations, it isn’t simply a copy-and-paste re-run of the failed Clinton era assault rifle ban language. It’s worse. Much worse.

How bad is it? In the first four pages, it bans the popular GLOCK 17 9mm pistol, a gun that’s commonly used for shooting sports and personal self defense by hundreds of thousands of Americans.

That’s right, one of the most reliable, commonly-used pistols in the US, from one of the most popular firearms manufacturers in the world is now on the chopping block.

But it’s not just the G17. The Beretta 92, the CZ75, and the HK VP70 would also be forbidden. Heck, even the Luger P08 would be out.

Why? Because among the many things the bill prohibits — from the “CZ Scorpion Pistol” [sic], which it somehow defines as an “AK” to the jihad it wages against barrel shrouds that keep people from injuring themselves — the senior Senator from California wants to ban any “semiautomatic versions of an automatic firearm.” (See page 4 of the bill.)

That means that if a manufacturer ever made a fully-automatic version of a semi-automatic pistol (i.e. the GLOCK 18, a select fire version of the G17), the semi-auto gun would be verboten. Feinstein’s bill, if passed, would classify these guns as a “semiautomatic assault weapons” and, therefore, outlaw them.

Well, I suppose if you are too much of a little girl to handle a revolver, then you should not have a gun. LOL

I'll take my semiautomatic handgun over a revolver any day. There's a reason revolvers aren't used as much any more

 

[miketx]

How many people would the shooter in Vegas have killed if he only had a knife?

The same amount, he would have used a bomb. He had explosives.

Feel free to GFY with a cactus at your earliest convenience.

Sorry, but this thread is about stabbings vs guns. Please try to keep up.

Clown musings never stop. You don't have the ability to pour piss from a boot with directions on the heel.

Nothing coherent to add. Got it.

What should I add? Whatever i do add you the the other regressives will just lie and spin.

 

[skookerasbil]

How many people would the shooter in Vegas have killed if he only had a knife?

s0n.........do you know how many guns there are in the US?

Almost 350 million!!

Whoever wants to really go get a semiauto rifle can do it in a day or two........duh.......well assuming they have a little cash!